Abstract
Traffic surveillance of mountain roads accords problems of high risk, low efficiency, and high cost; thus, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are introduced for traffic surveillance, working in conjunction with a delivery van. UAVs are assigned to monitor the high-risk road segments, while the low-risk segments are monitored by the delivery van. UAVs take off from and return to the delivery van to improve the speed and flexibility of the traffic surveillance, with reduced risk. First, a real-time and coordinated UAV path-planning problem is presented, in which the number of monitored targets is dynamic and the delivery van is moving. Then, a multi-objective optimization model is proposed to minimize both the coordination value of UAV flight distance and the number of UAVs used. Next, a penalty-based boundary intersection optimization algorithm is proposed, which adopts the decomposition strategy and Pareto technique to acquire the optimized paths in real-time. In addition, a case study is implemented to compare the proposed algorithm with two commonly used algorithms and the results indicate that the proposed algorithm performs better with respect to solution quality and calculation time. Moreover, the cost versus performance of the UAV traffic surveillance was analyzed. This demonstrates that it is effective to use the proposed approach to conduct real-time and coordinated UAV path planning. Finally, the limitations and prospects of UAV traffic surveillance are presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
X. Liu, J. Ma, D. Chen, and L. Zhang, “Real-time unmanned aerial vehicle cruise route optimization for road segment surveillance using decomposition algorithm,” Robotica, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1007–1022, June 2021.
L. Inzerillo, G. Mino, and R. Roberts, “Image-based 3D reconstruction using traditional and UAV datasets for analysis of road pavement distress,” Automation in Construction, vol. 96, pp. 457–469, December 2018.
C. Hu, Z. Meng, G. Qu, H. S. Shin, and A. Tsourdos, “Distributed cooperative path planning for tracking ground moving target by multiple fixed-wing UAVs via DMPC-GVD in urban environment,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 823–836, February, 2021.
B. Lei, N. Wang, and P. Xu, “New crack detection method for bridge inspection using UAV incorporating image processing,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1–13, September 2018.
J. M. D’Souza, V. V. Velpula, and K. R. Guruprasad, “Effectiveness of a camera as a UAV mounted search sensor for target detection: An experimental investigation,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 2557–2568, June 2021.
Q. Yan, Z. Peng, and Y. Chang, “Unmanned aerial vehicle cruise route optimization model for sparse road network,” Proc. of Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, pp. 632–648, 2011.
X. Liu, Z. Guan, Y. Song, and D. Chen, “An optimization model of UAV route planning for road segment surveillance,” Journal of Central South University, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 2501–2510, June 2014.
R. R. Pitre, X. Li, and R. Delbalzo, “UAV route planning for joint search and track missions — An information-value approach,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 2551–2565, July 2012.
Y. Fu, M. Ding, C. Zhou, and H. Hu, “Route planning for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) on the sea using hybrid differential evolution and quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Systems, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1451–1465, November 2013.
P. Yao, Z. Xie, and P. Ren, “Optimal UAV route planning for coverage search of stationary target in river,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 822–829, March 2019.
E. Dasdemir, M. Koksalan, and D. T. Ozturk, “A flexible reference point-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm: An application to the UAV route planning problem,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 114, pp. 21–35, February 2020.
M. Radmanesh, M. Kumar, and A. Nemati, “Dynamic optimal UAV trajectory planning in the national airspace system via mixed integer linear programming,” Proc. of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G-Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 230, no. 9, pp. 1668–1682, July 2016.
B. S. Chung and J. Lee, “Optimization for drone and drone-truck combined operations: A review of the state of the art and future directions,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 123, pp. 1–26, November 2020.
H. M. P. C. Jayaweera and S. Hanoun, “A dynamic artificial potential field (D-APF) UAV path planning technique for following ground moving targets,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 192760–192776, October 2020.
S. Ragi and E. K. P. Chong, “UAV path planning in a dynamic environment via partially observable Markov decision process,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 2397–2412, October 2013.
X. Yu, C. Li, and J. Zhou, “A constrained differential evolution algorithm to solve UAV path planning in disaster scenarios,” Knowledge-based Systems, vol. 204, pp. 1–18, September 2020.
D. Zhang and H. Duan, “Social-class pigeon-inspired optimization and time stamp segmentation for multi-UAV cooperative path planning,” Neurocomputing, vol. 313, pp. 229–246, November 2018.
C. Yan, X. Xiang, and C. Wang, “Towards real-time path planning through deep reinforcement learning for a UAV in dynamic environments,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 297–309, May 2020.
R. Wang and G. Zeng, “An efficient service recommendation using differential evolutionary contract net for migrating workflows,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 1151–1157, March 2010.
F. Zhao, B. Liu, and H. Chen, “A multi-greedy spectrum auction algorithm for cognitive small cell networks,” International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1–14, June 2017.
Z. Wang, Q. Zhang, and A. Zhou, “Adaptive replacement strategies for MOEA/D,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 474–486, February 2016.
H. Chen, C. Hsueh, and M. Chang, “The real-time time-dependent vehicle routing problem,” Transportation Research Part E, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 383–408, September 2006.
K. Deb, S. Agrawal, and A. Pratap, “A fastand elitistmulti-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–197, April 2002.
R. Madiouni, S. Bouallegue, J. Haggege, and P. Siarry, “Robust RST control design based on multi-objective particle swarm optimization approach,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1607–1617, December 2016.
N. Guo, B. Qian, R. Hu, H. Jin, and F. Xiang, “A hybrid ant colony optimization algorithm for multi-compartment vehicle routing problem,” Complexity, vol. 2020, pp. 34–51, October 2020.
Q. Zhang and H. Li, “MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 712–731, December 2007.
A. Messac, A. Ismail-Yahaya, and C. A. Mattson, “The normalized normal constraint method for generating the Pareto frontier,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 86–98, July 2003.
I. Das and J. Dennis, “Normal-boundary intersection: A new method for generating Pareto optimal points in multicriteria optimization problems,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 631–657, August 1998.
X. Liu, Z. Peng, and L. Zhang, “Real-time UAV rerouting for traffic monitoring with decomposition based multiobjective optimization,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 491–501, May 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51408417) and the Science and Technology Plan Project of Tianjin, China (No. 19JCQNJC03400, XC202028, KYQD202107, 2021KJ018).
Xiaofeng Liu received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from the Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China, in 2004 and 2007, respectively, and a Ph.D. degree in traffic information engineering and control from the Tongji University, Shanghai, China, in 2013. He currently works in the School of Automotive and Transportation, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, China. His current research interest lies in the area of transportation applications using unmanned aerial vehicles.
Zhong-Ren Peng received his B.S. degree from the Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China, in 1983, an M.S. degree from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, in 1986, and a Ph.D. degree from the Portland State University, Oregon, USA, in 1994. He currently works at the Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Florida, USA. His current research interest lies in the area of air quality analysis using unmanned aerial vehicles and urban transportation planning.
Li-Ye Zhang received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from the Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, China, in 2002 and 2005, respectively, and a Ph.D. degree in traffic information engineering and control from the Tongji University, Shanghai, China, in 2014. He occupied the traffic safety post-doctoral research work from 2014 to 2016 in the National University of Singapore. He currently works at the Institute of High-Performance Computing, Singapore. His current research interest lies in the area of transportation optimization.
Qiang Chen received his Ph.D. degree from Jilin University, Changchun, China, in 2017. He currently works in the School of Automotive and Transportation, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, China. His currently research interests include road traffic accident scene investigation, intelligent transportation safety, and deep learning.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, X., Peng, ZR., Zhang, LY. et al. Real-time and Coordinated UAV Path Planning for Road Traffic Surveillance: A Penalty-based Boundary Intersection Approach. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 20, 2655–2668 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-020-0565-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-020-0565-8