Abstract
Not so many books describe and model the effective budgeting and benchmarking of clinical engineering departments. The publications by Frize (Med Biol Eng Comput 28:153–9, 1990), (Med Biol Eng Comput 28:160–5, 1990) are insightful but they are now somewhat outdated. Therefore, an up-to-date systematic approach, based on real data is most useful. Benchmarking was described by Wang (J Clin Eng 33:24–37, 2008) in 2008 but now 10 years after, we obtain a clearer picture of how to perform this in current reality.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Frize M. Results of an international survey of clinical engineering departments, part I: role, functional involvement and recognition. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1990a;28:153–9.
Frize M. Results of an international survey of clinical engineering departments, part II: budgets, staffing, resources and financial strategies. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1990b;28:160–5.
Wang B, et al. Clinical engineering benchmarking: an analysis of American acute care hospitals. J Clin Eng. 2008;33:24–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
The author of the book gave his Informed consent that his name as the original author would be named explicitly.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Available at Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1724163345/ref=sr_1_4?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1539531808&sr=1-4&keywords=binseng+wangand
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nyssen, M. Book review: « Clinical engineering financial management and benchmarking » subtitle: «Essential tools to manage finances and remain competitive for clinical engineering / health technology professionals » by Binseng Wang. Health Technol. 9, 195–196 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-019-00331-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-019-00331-6