Abstract
Transcription initiation is a major control point for the precise regulation of gene expression. Our knowledge of this process has been mainly derived from protein-centric studies wherein cis-regulatory DNA sequences play a passive role, mainly in arranging the protein machinery to coalesce at the transcription start sites of genes in a spatial and temporal-specific manner. However, this is a highly dynamic process in which molecular motors such as RNA polymerase II (RNAPII), helicases, and other transcription factors, alter the level of mechanical force in DNA, rather than simply a set of static DNA–protein interactions. The double helix is a fiber that responds to flexural and torsional stress, which if accumulated, can affect promoter output as well as change DNA and chromatin structure. The relationship between DNA mechanics and the control of early transcription initiation events has been under-investigated. Genomic techniques to display topological stress and conformational variation in DNA across the mammalian genome provide an exciting new insight on the role of DNA mechanics in the early stages of the transcription cycle. Without understanding how torsional and flexural stresses are generated, transmitted, and dissipated, no model of transcription will be complete and accurate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bancaud A, Conde e Silva N, Barbi M et al (2006) Structural plasticity of single chromatin fibers revealed by torsional manipulation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 13:444–450. http://www.nature.com/nsmb/journal/v13/n5/suppinfo/nsmb1087_S1.html
Baranello L, Kouzine F, Levens D (2013) DNA topoisomerases beyond the standard role. Transcription 4:232–237
Baranello L, Wojtowicz D, Cui K, Devaiah B (2016) RNA polymerase II regulates topoisomerase 1 activity to favor efficient transcription. Cell 165:357–371. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.036
Bates AD, Maxwell A (2005) DNA topology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Benham CJ (1993) Sites of predicted stress-induced DNA duplex destabilization occur preferentially at regulatory loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:2999–3003
Benjamin LR, Chung HJ, Sanford S, Kouzine F, Liu J, Levens D (2008) Hierarchical mechanisms build the DNA-binding specificity of FUSE binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:18296–18301. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803279105
Bermudez I, Garcia-Martinez J, Perez-Ortin JE, Roca J (2010) A method for genome-wide analysis of DNA helical tension by means of psoralen-DNA photobinding. Nucleic Acids Res 38:e182. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq687
Bi C, Benham CJ (2004) WebSIDD: server for predicting stress-induced duplex destabilized (SIDD) sites in superhelical DNA. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 20:1477–1479. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth304
Bowen C, Stuart A, Ju JH et al (2007) NKX3.1 homeodomain protein binds to topoisomerase I and enhances its activity. Cancer Res 67:455–464. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-1591
Brooks TA, Hurley LH (2009) The role of supercoiling in transcriptional control of MYC and its importance in molecular therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer 9:849–861
Champoux JJ (2001) DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism. Annu Rev Biochem 70:369–413. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.369
Chong S, Chen C, Ge H, Xie XS (2014) Mechanism of transcriptional bursting in bacteria. Cell 158:314–326. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.038
Chou FC, Lipfert J, Das R (2014) Blind predictions of DNA and RNA tweezers experiments with force and torque. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003756. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003756
Cook PR, Gove F (1992) Transcription by an immobilized RNA polymerase from bacteriophage T7 and the topology of transcription. Nucleic Acids Res 20:3591–3598
Cozzarelli NR, Wang JC (eds) (1990). DNA topology and its biological effects. In: Cold Spring Harbor Monograph Series, vol 20. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Springer Harbor
Dekker J, Heard E (2015) Structural and functional diversity of topologically associating domains. FEBS Lett 589:2877–2884. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2015.08.044
Dekker J, Misteli T (2015) Long-range chromatin interactions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7:a019356. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a019356
Devaiah BN, Lewis BA, Cherman N et al (2012) BRD4 is an atypical kinase that phosphorylates serine2 of the RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:6927–6932. doi:10.1073/pnas.1120422109
Dixon JR, Selvaraj S, Yue F et al (2012) Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485:376–380. doi:10.1038/nature11082
Droge P, Nordheim A (1991) Transcription-induced conformational change in a topologically closed DNA domain. Nucleic Acids Res 19:2941–2946
Gligoris T, Lowe J (2016) Structural insights into ring formation of cohesin and related Smc complexes. Trends Cell Biol. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2016.04.002
Gobert C, Skladanowski A, Larsen AK (1999) The interaction between p53 and DNA topoisomerase I is regulated differently in cells with wild-type and mutant p53. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:10355–10360
Guo Y, Xu Q, Canzio D et al (2015) CRISPR inversion of CTCF sites alters genome topology and enhancer/promoter function. Cell 162:900–910. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.038
He L, Liu J, Collins I, Sanford S, O’Connell B, Benham CJ, Levens D (2000) Loss of FBP function arrests cellular proliferation and extinguishes c-myc expression. EMBO J 19:1034–1044. doi:10.1093/emboj/19.5.1034
Ivanchenko M, Hassan A, van Holde K, Zlatanova J (1996) H1 binding unwinds DNA. evidence from topological assays. J Biol Chem 271:32580–32585
Ji X, Dadon DB, Powell BE et al (2016) 3D chromosome regulatory landscape of human pluripotent cells. Cell Stem Cell 18:262–275. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2015.11.007
Ju BG, Lunyak VV, Perissi V, Garcia-Bassets I, Rose DW, Glass CK, Rosenfeld MG (2006) A topoisomerase IIbeta-mediated dsDNA break required for regulated transcription. Science 312:1798–1802. doi:10.1126/science.1127196
Kahn JD, Yun E, Crothers DM (1994) Detection of localized DNA flexibility. Nature 368:163–166. doi:10.1038/368163a0
Katainen R, Dave K, Pitkänen E et al (2015) CTCF/cohesin-binding sites are frequently mutated in cancer. Nat Genet 47:818–821. doi:10.1038/ng.3335
Kouzine F, Liu J, Sanford S, Chung HJ, Levens D (2004) The dynamic response of upstream DNA to transcription-generated torsional stress. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11:1092–1100. doi:10.1038/nsmb848
Kouzine F, Sanford S, Elisha-Feil Z, Levens D (2008) The functional response of upstream DNA to dynamic supercoiling in vivo. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15:146–154. doi:10.1038/nsmb.1372
Kouzine F, Gupta A, Baranello L et al (2013) Transcription-dependent dynamic supercoiling is a short-range genomic force. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:396–403. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2517
Kramer PR, Fragoso G, Pennie W, Htun H, Hager GL, Sinden RR (1999) Transcriptional state of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter can affect topological domain size in vivo. J Biol Chem 274:28590–28597
Lavelle C, Victor JM, Zlatanova J (2010) Chromatin fiber dynamics under tension and torsion. Int J Mol Sci 11:1557–1579. doi:10.3390/ijms11041557
Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L et al (2009) Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science (New York, NY) 326:289–293. doi:10.1126/science.1181369
Liu LF, Wang JC (1987) Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:7024–7027
Liu J, Kouzine F, Nie Z et al (2006) The FUSE/FBP/FIR/TFIIH system is a molecular machine programming a pulse of c-myc expression. EMBO J 25:2119–2130. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601101
Lu M, Guo Q, Kallenbach NR, Sheardy RD (1992) Conformational properties of B-Z junctions in DNA. Biochemistry 31:4712–4719
Luger K, Mader AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ (1997) Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 389:251–260. doi:10.1038/38444
Ma J, Wang M (2014) Interplay between DNA supercoiling and transcription elongation. Transcription 5:e28636. doi:10.4161/trns.28636
Ma J, Bai L, Wang MD (2013) Transcription under torsion. Science 340:1580–1583. doi:10.1126/science.1235441
Madabhushi R, Gao F, Pfenning AR et al (2015) Activity-induced DNA breaks govern the expression of neuronal early-response genes. Cell 161:1592–1605. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.032
Maoileidigh DO, Tadigotla VR, Nudler E, Ruckenstein AE (2011) A unified model of transcription elongation: what have we learned from single-molecule experiments? Biophys J 100:1157–1166. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2010.12.3734
Matsumoto K, Hirose S (2004) Visualization of unconstrained negative supercoils of DNA on polytene chromosomes of Drosophila. J Cell Sci 117:3797–3805. doi:10.1242/jcs.01225
Medalion S, Rabin Y (2016) Effect of sequence-dependent rigidity on plectoneme localization in dsDNA. J Chem Phys 144(13):135101. doi: 10.1063/1.4945010
Naughton C, Avlonitis N, Corless S et al (2013) Transcription forms and remodels supercoiling domains unfolding large-scale chromatin structures. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:387–395. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2509
Nelson P (1999) Transport of torsional stress in DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:14342–14347. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.25.14342
Nitiss JL (2009) DNA topoisomerase II and its growing repertoire of biological functions. Nat Rev Cancer 9:327–337. doi:10.1038/nrc2608
Papantonis A, Cook PR (2013) Transcription factories: genome organization and gene regulation. Chem Rev 113:8683–8705. doi:10.1021/cr300513p
Podtelezhnikov AA, Cozzarelli NR, Vologodskii AV (1999) Equilibrium distributions of topological states in circular DNA: interplay of supercoiling and knotting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:12974–12979. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.23.12974
Pope BD, Ryba T, Dileep V et al (2014) Topologically associating domains are stable units of replication-timing regulation. Nature 515:402–405. doi:10.1038/nature13986
Puc J, Kozbial P, Li W et al (2015) Ligand-dependent enhancer activation regulated by topoisomerase-I activity. Cell 160:367–380. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.023
Rao SS et al (2014) A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159:1665–1680. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021
Rao SS, Huntley MH, Durand NC et al (2015) Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:E6456–E6465. doi:10.1073/pnas.1518552112
Roca J (2011) The torsional state of DNA within the chromosome. Chromosoma 120:323–334. doi:10.1007/s00412-011-0324-y
Rybenkov VV, Ullsperger C, Vologodskii AV, Cozzarelli NR (1997) Simplification of DNA topology below equilibrium values by type II topoisomerases. Science (New York, NY) 277:690–693. doi:10.1126/science.277.5326.690
Sekine S, Murayama Y, Svetlov V, Nudler E, Yokoyama S (2015) The ratcheted and ratchetable structural states of RNA polymerase underlie multiple transcriptional functions. Mol Cell 57:408–421. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.014
Sheflin LG, Spaulding SW (1989) High mobility group protein 1 preferentially conserves torsion in negatively supercoiled DNA. Biochemistry 28:5658–5664. doi:10.1021/bi00439a048
Sinden RR (1994). DNA structure and function. Academic Press, New York
Sinden RR, Carlson JO, Pettijohn DE (1980) Torsional tension in the DNA double helix measured with trimethylpsoralen in living E. coli cells: analogous measurements in insect and human cells. Cell 21:773–783
Smith EM, Lajoie BR, Jain G, Dekker J (2016) Invariant TAD boundaries constrain cell-type-specific looping interactions between promoters and distal elements around the CFTR locus. Am J Hum Genet 98:185–201. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.12.002
Sofueva S, Yaffe E, Chan WC et al (2013) Cohesin-mediated interactions organize chromosomal domain architecture. EMBO J 32:3119–3129. doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.237
Song LN, Bowen C, Gelmann EP (2013) Structural and functional interactions of the prostate cancer suppressor protein NKX3.1 with topoisomerase I. Biochem J 453:125–136. doi:10.1042/bj20130012
Strick T, Allemand J, Croquette V, Bensimon D (2000) Twisting and stretching single DNA molecules. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 74:115–140
Tang Z, Luo OJ, Li X et al (2015) CTCF-mediated human 3D genome architecture reveals chromatin topology for transcription. Cell 163:1611–1627. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.024
Teves SS, Henikoff S (2014) Transcription-generated torsional stress destabilizes nucleosomes. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21:88–94. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2723
Thomas TJ, Bloomfield VA (1983) Chain flexibility and hydrodynamics of the B and Z forms of poly(dG-dC).poly(dG-dC). Nucleic Acids Res 11:1919–1930
Valton AL, Dekker J (2016) TAD disruption as oncogenic driver. Curr Opin Genet Dev 36:34–40. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2016.03.008
van Loenhout MT, de Grunt MV, Dekker C (2012) Dynamics of DNA supercoils. Science 338:94–97. doi:10.1126/science.1225810
Vinograd J, Lebowitz J (1966) Physical and topological properties of circular DNA. J Gen Physiol 49:103–125
Vologodskii A (2009) Theoretical models of DNA topology simplification by type IIA DNA topoisomerases. Nucleic Acids Res 37:3125–3133. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp250
Wada H, Netz RR (2009) Plectoneme creation reduces the rotational friction of a polymer. Epl 87. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/87/38001
Watson JD, Crick FH (1953a) Genetical implications of the structure of deoxyribonucleic acid. Nature 171:964–967
Watson JD, Crick FH (1953b) Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171:737–738
Wu HY, Shyy SH, Wang JC, Liu LF (1988) Transcription generates positively and negatively supercoiled domains in the template. Cell 53:433–440
Xiao T, Wallace J, Felsenfeld G (2011) Specific sites in the C terminus of CTCF interact with the SA2 subunit of the cohesin complex and are required for cohesin-dependent insulation activity. Mol Cell Biol 31:2174–2183. doi:10.1128/mcb.05093-11
Yan J, Magnasco MO, Marko JF (1999) A kinetic proofreading mechanism for disentanglement of DNA by topoisomerases. Nature 401:932–935
Yu H, Droge P (2014) Replication-induced supercoiling: a neglected DNA transaction regulator? Trends Biochem Sci 39:219–220. doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2014.02.009
Yuwen H, Hsia CC, Nakashima Y, Evangelista A, Tabor E (1997) Binding of wild-type p53 by topoisomerase II and overexpression of topoisomerase II in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 234:194–197. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1997.6539
Zhabinskaya D, Benham CJ (2012) Theoretical analysis of competing conformational transitions in superhelical DNA. PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002484. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002484
Zhabinskaya D, Benham CJ (2013) Competitive superhelical transitions involving cruciform extrusion. Nucleic Acids Res 41:9610–9621. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt733
Zuin J, Dixon JR, van der Reijden M et al (2014) Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:996–1001. doi:10.1073/pnas.1317788111
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
David Levens declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Laura Baranello declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Fedor Kouzine declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is a contribution to Special Issue “DNA Supercoiling” but has already been published in BREV, September 2016, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 259–268, DOI 10.1007/s12551-016-0216-8.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levens, D., Baranello, L. & Kouzine, F. Controlling gene expression by DNA mechanics: emerging insights and challenges. Biophys Rev 8 (Suppl 1), 23–32 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-016-0243-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-016-0243-5