Abstract
The objectives of our study were to examine the (1) trends and patterns of caesarean deliveries in India and; (2) differentials in catestrophic household expenditure on caesarean deliveries. The paper used data from 71st round of the National Sample Survey, India. The analysis included 14,310 women, hospitalised for delivery during the last 365 days preceding the survey. The proportion of caesarean sections among institutional deliveries in India was 2.5% in 1992–1993, which increased to 23.9% in 2014. In private facilities, 47.8% deliveries were conducted through caesarean section, while in public facilities, this proportion was 8%. OOPE per delivery was US$157 which was 64.9% of the total cost of maternal health care. OOPE varied by type of delivery; US$283 for caesarean and US$77 for non-caesarean delivery. About 60% of households incurred the expenditure on caesarean section exceeding 40% of their capacity to pay. The incidence of catastrophic delivery expenditure declined with increased education and per-capita expenditure. Caesarean delivery in private facilities and a hospital stay of more than 48 h increased the chances of catastrophic expenditure. Interventions and regulations are necessary for both public and private sector to check unwarranted caesarean deliveries and hospital stays to reduce catastrophic expenditure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balabanova, D., & McKee, M. (2002). Understanding informal payments for health care: The example of Bulgaria. Health Policy,62(3), 243–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-8510(02)00035-0.
Bangal, V. B., Giri, P. A., & Chandaliya, R. M. (2012). Caesarean section—Why is it performed so often? IOSR Journal of Pharmacy,2(3), 534–536.
Betrán, A. P., Ye, J., Moller, A., Zhang, J., Gülmezoglu, A. M., & Torloni, (2016). The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: Global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS ONE,11(2), e0148343. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343.
Bonu, S., Bhushan, I., & Peters, D. H. (2007). Incidence, intensity and correlates of catastrophic out-of-pocket health payments in India. ERD Working Paper Series No. 102. Manila: Asian Development Bank. Retrieved November 26, 2017, from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/28364/wp102.pdf.
Bonu, S., Bhushan, I., Rani, M., & Anderson, I. (2009). Incidence and correlates of ‘catastrophic’ maternal health care expenditure in India. Health Policy and Planning,24, 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czp032.
Borghi, J., Sabina, N., Blum, L. S., Hoque, M. E., & Ronsmans, C. (2006). Household costs of healthcare during pregnancy, delivery, and the postpartum period: a case study from Matlab, Bangladesh. Journal of Health Population and Nutrition,24, 446–455.
Declercq, E., Young, R., Cabral, H., & Ecker, J. (2011). Is a rising caesarean delivery rate inevitable? Trends in industrialized countries, 1987 to 2007. Birth,38(2), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00459.x.
Fox-Rushby, J. A., & Foord, F. (1996). Costs, effects and cost effectiveness analysis of a mobile maternal health care service in West Kiang. The Gambia. Health Policy, 35, 123–143.
Hou, X., Rakhshani, N. S., & Iunes, R. (2014). Factors associated with high Cesarean deliveries in China and Brazil - A Call for reducing elective surgeries in moving towards Universal Health Coverage. Journal of Hospital Administration, 3(5), 67–78.
India Infoline News Service. (2018). Economic survey 2013–14: Annual average exchange rate goes up. Retrieved April 10, 2018, from http://www.indiainfoline.com/article/news-top-story/economic-survey-2013-14-annual-average-exchange-rate-goes-up-114072200367_1.html.
Issac, A., Chatterjee, S., Srivastava, A., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2016). Out of pocket expenditure to deliver at public health facilities in India: A cross sectional analysis. Reproductive Health,13(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0221-1.
Khan, J. A. M., Ahmed, S., & Evans, T. G. (2017). Catastrophic healthcare expenditure and poverty related to out-of-pocket payments for healthcare in Bangladesh—An estimation of financial risk protection of universal health coverage. Health Policy and Planning,32(8), 1102–1111. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx048.
Khan, A., & Zaman, S. (2010). Costs of vaginal delivery and caesarean section at a tertiary level public hospital in Islamabad, Pakistan. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth,10, 2.
Koblinsky, M., Mathews, Z., Hussein, J., Mavalankar, D., Mridha, M. K., Achadi, E., et al. (2006). Going to scale with professional skilled care. Lancet, 368(9544), 1377–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69382-3.
Leone, T., Padmadas, S. S., & Matthews, Z. (2008). Community factors affecting rising caesarean section rates in developing countries: An analysis of six countries. Social Science and Medicine,67, 1236–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.032.
Li, Y., Wu, Q., Xu, L., Legge, D., Hao, Y., Gao, L., et al. (2012). Factors affecting catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment from medical expenses in China: Policy implications of universal health insurance. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 90, 664–671. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.12.102178.
Modugu, H. R., Kumar, M., Kumar, A., & Christopher, M. (2012). State and socio-demographic group variation in out-of-pocket expenditure, borrowings and Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) programme use for deliveries in India. BMC Public Health,12, 1048. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-1048.
Mohanty, S. K., & Kastor, A. (2017). Out-of-pocket expenditure and catastrophic health spending on maternal care in public and private health centres in India: A comparative study of pre and post national health mission period. Health Economics Review,7, 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-017-0167-1.
Mohanty, S. K., & Srivastava, A. (2012). Out-of-pocket expenditure on institutional delivery in India. Health Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czs057.
National Health Systems Resource Centre. (2017). National Health Accounts Estimates for India (2014–15). New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
NSSO (2016). Health in India; NSS 71st Round, January–June 2014. National Sample Survey Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India. Retrieved 26 November 2017. http://mospi.nic.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/nss_rep574.pdf.
Naznin, E., Hoque, M. E., & Mamun, A. A. (2014). Household out of pocket expenditure of caesarean section delivery in bangladesh: A critical review of the published literature. Science Journal of Public Health,2(3), 200–204. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20140203.20.
O’Donnell, O., van Doorslaer, E., Rannan-Eliya, R. P., Somanathan, A., Adhikari, S. R., Akkazieva, B., et al. (2008). Who pays for health care in Asia? Journal of Health Economics,27, 460–475.
Perkins, M., Brazier, E., Themmen, E., Bassane, B., Diallo, D., Mutunga, A., et al. (2009). Out-of-pocket costs for facility-based maternity care in three African countries. Health Policy and Planning, 24, 289–300.
Quinn, Z. (2017). Why cesarean surgeries are on the rise in India and how to avoid an “unnecesarean”. Accessed November 26, 2017 from http://birthindia.org/2017/04/25/why-cesarean-surgeries-are-on-the-rise-in-india-and-how-to-avoid-an-unnecesarean/.
Radha, K. G., Prameela, D., Manjula, R. V., & Chandrasekharan, P. A. (2015). Study on rising trends of caesarean section (C-section): A bio-sociological effect. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences,14(8), 10–13.
Sahu, K. S., & Bharati, B. (2017). Out-of-pocket health expenditure and sources of financing for delivery, postpartum, and neonatal health in urban slums of Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. Indian Journal of Public Health,61, 67–73.
Saoji, A., Nayse, J., Deoke, A., & Mitra, A. (2016). Maternal risk factors of caesarean delivery in a tertiary care hospital in Central India: A case control study. People’s Journal of Scientific Research,9(2), 18–23.
Sharma, S. (2017). Caesarean vs natural birth: Why are expectant moms increasingly coming under the scalpel? Retrieved April 10, 2018, from https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/caesarean-vs-natural-birth-why-are-expectantmoms-increasingly-coming-under-the-scalpel/story-mdRSyl8rJeGakI1DgIYmDJ.html.
Shrime, M. G., Dare, A. J., Alkire, B. C., O’Neill, K., & Meara, J. G. (2015). Catastrophic expenditure to pay for surgery worldwide: A modelling study. Lancet Global Health,3(S2), S38–S44.
Sidney, K., Tolhurst, R., Jehan, K., Diwan, V., & De Costa, A. (2016). ‘The money is important but all women anyway go to hospital for childbirth nowadays’—A qualitative exploration of why women participate in a conditional cash transfer program to promote institutional deliveries in Madhya Pradesh, India. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth,16, 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0834-y.
WHO. (2005). World health report 2005: Make every mother and child count. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
WHO. (2015). WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved November 26, 2017, from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/161442/1/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf.
WHO, UNICEF, World Bank Group and the United Nation Population Division. (2015). Trends in maternal mortality: 1995 to 2015. WHO/RHR/15.23. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
Funding
No funding was required for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Govil, D., Mohanty, S.K. & Narzary, P.K. Catastrophic household expenditure on caesarean deliveries in India. J Pop Research 37, 139–159 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-019-09236-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-019-09236-7