Skip to main content
Log in

Dermal tubercles and bucklers of gigantic stingrays (Dasyatidae) from the Pleistocene of South Carolina and the stratigraphic origin of “Ceratoptera unios” Leidy, 1877

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
PalZ Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rays (Batoidea) possess some of the absolutely largest dermal elements of any cartilaginous fish. One of the largest known batoid dermal elements is an isolated fossil tubercle originally interpreted as a manta ray caudal stinger and named Ceratoptera unios Leidy, 1877 from an unknown locality near Charleston, South Carolina. Though recently considered to be a stingray (Dasyatidae), the lack of stratigraphic provenience for the specimen has hampered attempts to identify it. A new collection of gigantic dermal tubercles and bucklers from the Lower Pleistocene Waccamaw Formation of South Carolina includes mid-dorsal tubercles similar in morphology to “Ceratoptera unios” and dermal bucklers similar in morphology to those of the extant roughtail stingray Bathytoshia centroura (Mitchill, 1815). Mid-dorsal tubercles and bucklers suggest gigantic stingrays in excess of 3 m disc width. These new specimens suggest that C. unios may have originated from upper Pliocene or Pleistocene deposits, and possible synonymy with Bathytoshia centroura, pending careful study of extant dasyatid dermal elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Modified from Boessenecker et al. (2018: fig. 1) and reproduced from Leidy (1877; pl. 34: 1–2)

Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All specimens studied herein are curated within established natural history museums.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Albright, L.B., A.E. Sanders, R.E. Weems, D.J. Cicimurri, and J.L. Knight. 2019. Cenozoic vertebrate biostratigraphy of South Carolina, U.S.A., and additions to the fauna. Bulletin of the Florida Museum 57: 77–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albright, L.B., A.E. Sanders, and J.H. Geisler. 2018. An unexpectedly derived odontocete from the Ashley Formation (upper Rupelian) of South Carolina, U.S.A. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 38: e1482555.

  • Başusta, N., and J.A. Sulikowski. 2012. The oldest estimated age for roughtail stingray [Dasyatis centroura (Mitchill, 1815)] from the Mediterranean Sea. Applied Ichthyology 28: 641–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, H.B., and W.C. Schroeder. 1953. Fishes of the Western North Atlantic, part two: Sawfishes, Guitarfishes, Skates and Rays. Memoir of the Sears Foundation for Marine Research 1 (2): 1–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boessenecker, R.W., and S.J. Boessenecker. 2019. Paleontology of the “Ashley Phosphate Beds” of Charleston: Insights from Northbridge Park, Charleston, South Carolina. Geological Society of America Field Guide 53: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boessenecker, S.J., R.W. Boessenecker, and J.H. Geisler. 2018. Youngest record of the extinct walrus Ontocetus emmonsi from the early Pleistocene of South Carolina and a review of North Atlantic walrus biochronology. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 63 (2): 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bor, T., T. Reinecke, and S. Verschueren. 2012. Miocene Chondrichthyes from Winterswik-Miste, The Netherlands. Palaeontos 21: 1–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collareta, A., M. Merella, S. Casati, and A. Di Cencio. 2020. Did titanic stingrays wander the Pliocene Mediterranean Sea? Some notes on a giant-sized myliobatoid stinger from the Piacenzian of Italy. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 298: 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compagno, L.J.V. 1973. Interrelationships of living elasmobranchs. In Interrelationships of fishes, eds. P.H. Greenwood, R.S. Miles, and C. Patterson, 15–61. New York, N.Y.: Academic Press.

  • Deynat, P.P. 1998. Le revetement cutané des raies (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii, Batoidea). II. Morphologie et arrangement des tubercules cutanés. Annales des Sciences naturelles 3–4: 155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, T.H. 1880. On the application of the laws of evolution to the arrangement of the Vertebrata and more particularly of the Mammalia. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1880: 649–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, D.S. 1888. Description of two new species of fishes from South America. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 39: 387–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, D.S., and C.H. Gilbert. 1879. Notes on the fishes of Beaufort Harbor, North Carolina. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 1: 365–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Last, P.R., G.J.P. Naylor, and B.M. Manjaji-Matsumoto. 2016. A revised classification of the family Dasyatidae (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) based on new morphological and molecular insights. Zootaxa 4139: 345–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leidy, J. 1876. Remarks on fossils of the Ashley Phosphate Beds. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 28: 86–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leidy, J. 1877. Description of vertebrate remains, chiefly from the phosphate beds of South Carolina. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 8(2): 209–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchill, S.L. 1815. The fishes of New York described and arranged. Transactions of the Literary and Philosophical Society of New York 1: 355–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdy, R.W., V.P. Schneider, S.P. Applegate, J.H. McLellan, R.L. Meyer, and B.H. Slaughter. 2001. The Neogene sharks, rays, and bony fishes from Lee Creek Mine, Aurora, North Carolina. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 90: 71–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reif, W.E. 1979. Morphogenesis and histology of large scales of batoids (Elasmobranchii). Paläontologische Zeitschrift 53: 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, A.E. 2002. Additions to the Pleistocene mammal faunas of South Carolina, North Carolina, and Georgia. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 92: 1–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, F.J., J. Purifoy, G. Safrit, and C. Lewis. 2010. Status of roughtail stingray, Dasyatis centroura, off North Carolina. Journal of the North Carolina Academy of Science 126: 64–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silas, E.G., and G.S.D. Selvaraj. 1985. On the occurrence of the rough-tail sting-ray Dasyatis centroura (Mitchill) in Indian waters. Indian Journal of Fisheries 32: 248–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, G.P. 1933. Studies in ichthyology. No. 7. Records of the South Australian Museum 19: 60–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study would not have been possible without the generosity of Sam Davis, Ashby Gale and Jordan Taylor, Ivan Tomkins, and Bricky Way, who kindly donated the specimens reported herein. We would like to thank James Austin for field access and Sarah Boessenecker, Mark Bunce, Ashby Gale, and Jordan Taylor for field assistance at Austin Sand Pit #2. This study benefited from discussions on South Carolina stratigraphy and paleontology with Ashby Gale and Rob Weems. Thanks to J. Peragine (Charleston Museum) and Sarah Boessenecker (CCNHM), who facilitated study of specimens under their care. This study benefited greatly from constructive reviews by J. Carrillo-Briceño and A. Collareta and comments from the editors.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert W. Boessenecker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Jürgen Kriwet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boessenecker, R.W., Gibson, M.L. Dermal tubercles and bucklers of gigantic stingrays (Dasyatidae) from the Pleistocene of South Carolina and the stratigraphic origin of “Ceratoptera unios” Leidy, 1877. PalZ 96, 267–273 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-021-00592-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-021-00592-5

Keywords

Navigation