Skip to main content
Log in

Component matching of a series hybrid electric bus using nonlinear programming

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventional developed component matching methods for a series type hybrid electric vehicle have a high computational burden or component alternation researches have considered only a few parts without the weight variation of each component. To address such problems, this study presents a novel component matching method with nonlinear programming (NLP) for a series hybrid electric bus. The fuel consumption minimization problem is discretized in time and multistarting points are used with the variations of each component. The proposed matching method suggests to use novel initial standards for component matching such that both the computational efficiency and accuracy could be achieved simultaneously. As a result, the most fuel efficient component combination among 8 components could be found, where the results were verified with those of dynamic programming (DP).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a :

vehicle acceleration

A :

frontal area

B eff :

battery efficiency

c d :

air drag coefficient

DP:

dynamic programming

fc total :

total fuel consumption

g :

gravitational acceleration

g e :

gear ratio between the engine and the generator

I b :

battery current

m :

gross weight

NLP:

nonlinear programming

OOP:

optimal operating point

P e :

engine output power

P f :

engine fuel power

P g :

generator output power

P m :

mechanical power in the traction motor

P r :

required electric power in the traction motor

Q :

total battery capacity

r g :

reduction gear ratio

R i :

total battery internal resistance

r t :

tire radius

SOC :

state of charge

t r :

tractive resistance

v s :

vehicle speed

V bus :

bus voltage

V o :

open circuit voltage

w e :

engine output speed

w e,max :

maximum engine speed

w g :

generator speed

w m :

traction motor speed

ΔSOC :

variation of SOC

η e :

combustion efficiency

η g :

efficiency of the reduction gear

η g :

efficiency of the generator

η m :

efficiency of the motor

θ :

slope angle

μ :

rolling resistance coefficient

ρ :

air density

τ e :

engine output torque

τ e,max :

maximum engine torque

τ g :

generator torque

τ m :

mechanical torque of the traction motor

References

  1. Lee, D., Kim, N., Jeong, J., Park, Y., and Cha, S., “Component Sizing and Engine Optimal Operation Line Analysis for a Plug-In Hybrid Electric Transit Bus,” International Journal of Automotive Technology, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 459–469, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chau, K. and Wong, Y., “Overview of Power Management in Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 43, No. 15, pp. 1953–1968, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Madanipour, V., Montazeri-Gh, M., and Mahmoodi-k, M., “Optimization of the Component Sizing for a Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Using a Genetic Algorithm,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, Vol. 230, No. 5, pp. 692–708, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ao, G.-Q., Qiang, J.-X., Zhong, H., Yang, L., and Zhuo, B., “Exploring the Fuel Economy Potential of ISG Hybrid Electric Vehicles through Dynamic Programming,” International Journal of Automotive Technology, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 781–790, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pourabdollah, M., Silvas, E., Murgovski, N., Steinbuch, M., and Egardt, B., “Optimal Sizing of a Series PHEV: Comparison between Convex Optimization and Particle Swarm Optimization,” IFACPapersOnLine, Vol. 48, No. 15, pp. 16–22, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bayindir, K. Ç., Gözüküçük, M. A., and Teke, A., “A Comprehensive Overview of Hybrid Electric Vehicle: Powertrain Configurations, Powertrain Control Techniques and Electronic Control Units,” Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 1305–1313, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Salmasi, F. R., “Control Strategies for Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Evolution, Classification, Comparison, and Future Trends,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 56, No. 5, pp. 2393–2404, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gao, J., Zhu, G. G., Strangas, E. G., and Sun, F., “Equivalent Fuel Consumption Optimal Control of a Series Hybrid Electric Vehicle,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, Vol. 223, No. 8, pp. 1003–1018, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johri, R. and Filipi, Z., “Low-Cost Pathway to Ultra Efficient City Car: Series Hydraulic Hybrid System with Optimized Supervisory Control,” SAE International Journal of Engines, Vol. 2, No. 2009-24-0065, pp. 505–520, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Johri, R. and Filipi, Z., “Self-Learning Neural Controller for Hybrid Power Management Using Neuro-Dynamic Programming,” SAE Technical Paper, No. 2011-24-0081, Presented at ICE2011 Conference, 2011.

  11. Johri, R., Salvi, A., and Filipi, Z., “Optimal Energy Management for a Hybrid Vehicle Using Neuro-Dynamic Programming to Consider Transient Engine Operation,” Proc. of ASME 2011 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference and Bath/ASME Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control, Paper No. DSCC2011-6138, pp. 279–286 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jeong, J., Lee, D., Kim, N., Zheng, C., Park, Y.-I., and Cha, S. W., “Development of PMP-Based Power Management Strategy for a Parallel Hybrid Electric Bus,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 345–353, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Paganelli, G., Delprat, S., Guerra, T.-M., Rimaux, J., and Santin, J.-J., “Equivalent Consumption Minimization Strategy for Parallel Hybrid Powertrains,” Proc. of IEEE 55th Vehicular Technology Conference, pp. 2076–2081 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pérez, L. V. and Pilotta, E. A., “Optimal Power Split in a Hybrid Electric Vehicle Using Direct Transcription of an Optimal Control Problem,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, Vol. 79, No. 6, pp. 1959–1970, 2009.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Pourabdollah, M., Murgovski, N., Grauers, A., and Egardt, B., “Optimal Sizing of a Parallel Phev Powertrain,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 62, No. 6, pp. 2469–2480, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu, X., Johannesson, L., Murgovski, N., and Egardt, B., “Longevity-Conscious Dimensioning and Power Management of the Hybrid Energy Storage System in a Fuel Cell Hybrid Electric Bus,” Applied Energy, Vol. 137, pp. 913–924, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pisu, P. and Rizzoni, G., “A Comparative Study of Supervisory Control Strategies for Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 506–518, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Luján, J. M., Guardiola, C., Pla, B., and Reig, A., “Cost of Ownership-Efficient Hybrid Electric Vehicle Powertrain Sizing for Multi-Scenario Driving Cycles,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, Vol. 230, No. 3, pp. 382–394, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sundstrom, O., Guzzella, L., and Soltic, P., “Torque-Assist Hybrid Electric Powertrain Sizing: From Optimal Control towards a Sizing Law,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 837–849, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liao, Y. G. and Quail, A. M., “Component Sizing of Traction Motor in Hybrid Powertrains,” Proc. of Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), pp. 1–6 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thibault, L., Grondin, O., Querel, C., and Corde, G., “Energy Management Strategy and Optimal Hybridization Level for a Diesel HEV,” SAE International Journal of Alternative Powertrains, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 260–271, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guzzella, L. and Sciarretta, A., “Vehicle Propulsion Systems,” Springer, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, X., Wu, Y., and Duan, J., “Optimal Sizing of a Series Hybrid Electric Vehicle Using a Hybrid Genetic Algorithm,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, pp. 1125–1129 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Desai, C., Berthold, F., and Williamson, S.S., “Optimal Drivetrain Component Sizing for a Plug-In Hybrid Electric Transit Bus Using Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm,” Proc. of Electric Power and Energy Conference (EPEC), pp. 1–5 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jeong, J., Lee, D., Shin, C., Jeong, D., Min, K., Cha, S. W., and Park, Y.-I., “Comparison of the Fuel Economy of Series and Parallel Hybrid Bus System Using Dynamic Programming,” Transactions of the Korean Society of Automotive Engineers, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 92–98, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jeong, J.-R., Lee, D.-H., Shin, C.-W., Lim, W.-S., Park, Y.-I., and Cha, S.-W., “Analysis of Correlation of Fuel Efficiency and Cost Depending on Component Size of Heavy-Duty Parallel Hybrid System,” Transactions of the Korean Society of Automotive Engineers, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 73–82, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kim, M., Jung, D., Kang, H., and Min, K., “Series-Type Hybrid Electric Bus Fuel Economy Increase with Optimal Component Sizing and Real-Time Control Strategy,” Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers B, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 307–312, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zou, Y., Li, D.-G., and Hu, X.-S., “Optimal Sizing and Control Strategy Design for Heavy Hybrid Electric Truck,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2012, Article ID: 404073, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wu, X., Cao, B., Wen, J., and Wang, Z., “Application of Particle Swarm Optimization for Component Sizes in Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” Proc. of IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 2874–2878 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nüesch, T., Ott, T., Ebbesen, S., and Guzzella, L., “Cost and Fuel-Optimal Selection of HEV Topologies Using Particle Swarm Optimization and Dynamic Programming,” Proc. of American Control Conference (ACC), pp. 1302–1307 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Williamson, S. S., Wirasingha, S. G., and Emadi, A., “Comparative Investigation of Series and Parallel Hybrid Electric Drive Trains for Heavy-Duty Transit Bus Applications,” Proc. of Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, pp. 1–10 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wirasingha, S. G., Schofield, N., and Emadi, A., “Feasibility Analysis of Converting a Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) Transit Bus to a Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle,” Proc. of Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, pp. 1–7 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nüesch, T., Elbert, P., Flankl, M., Onder, C., and Guzzella, L., “Convex Optimization for the Energy Management of Hybrid Electric Vehicles Considering Engine Start and Gearshift Costs,” Energies, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 834–856, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Verdonck, N., Chasse, A., Pognant-Gros, P., and Sciarretta, A., “Automated Model Generation for Hybrid Vehicles Optimization and Control,” Oil & Gas Science and Technology-Revue de l’Institut Français du Pétrole, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 115–132, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gao, J., Sun, F., He, H., Zhu, G. G., and Strangas, E. G., “A Comparative Study of Supervisory Control Strategies for a Series Hybrid Electric Vehicle,” Proc. of Power and Energy Engineering Conference, pp. 1–7 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Barsali, S., Miulli, C., and Possenti, A., “A Control Strategy to Minimize Fuel Consumption of Series Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 187–195, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Xiong, W., Zhang, Y., and Yin, C., “Optimal Energy Management for a Series-Parallel Hybrid Electric Bus,” Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 50, No. 7, pp. 1730–1738, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim, M., Jung, D., and Min, K., “Hybrid Thermostat Strategy for Enhancing Fuel Economy of Series Hybrid Intracity Bus,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 63, No. 8, pp. 3569–3579, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhu, Q., Wang, Q., and Chen, Q., “Component Sizing For Compound Hybrid Excavators,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, Vol. 230, No. 7, pp. 969–982, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Enang, W., Bannister, C., Brace, C., and Vagg, C., “Modelling and Heuristic Control of a Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicle,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, Vol. 229, No. 11, pp. 1494–1513, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pérez, L. and García, G., “State Constrained Optimal Control Applied to Supervisory Control in HEVs,” Oil & Gas Science and Technology-Revue de l’Institut Français du Pétrole, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 191–201, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dosthosseini, R., Kouzani, A., and Sheikholeslam, F., “Direct Method for Optimal Power Management in Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” International Journal of Automotive Technology, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 943–950, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sundström, O., Guzzella, L., and Soltic, P., “Optimal Hybridization in Two Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicles Using Dynamic Programming,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 4642–4647, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang, C. and Vahidi, A., “Route Preview in Energy Management of Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 546–553, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Koot, M., Kessels, J. T., de Jager, B., Heemels, W., Van den Bosch, P., and Steinbuch, M., “Energy Management Strategies for Vehicular Electric Power Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 771–782, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hargraves, C. R. and Paris, S. W., “Direct Trajectory Optimization Using Nonlinear Programming and Collocation,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 338–342, 1987.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Von Stryk, D. M. O., “Numerical Solution of Optimal Control Problems by Direct Collocation,” in: Optimal Control, Bulirsch, R., Miele, A., Stoer, J., Well, K., (Eds.), Springer, pp. 129–143, 1993.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. Von Stryk, O. and Bulirsch, R., “Direct and Indirect Methods for Trajectory Optimization,” Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 357–373, 1992.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Betts, J. T., “Practical Methods for Optimal Control and Estimation Using Nonlinear Programming,” SIAM, 2010.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Gill, P. E., Murray, W., and Saunders, M. A., “User’s Guide for SNOPT Version 7: Software for Large-Scale Nonlinear Programming,” http://web.stanford.edu/group/SOL/guides/sndoc7.pdf (Accessed 2 MAR 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kessels, J. T., Koot, M., de Jager, B., van den Bosch, P. P., Aneke, N., and Kok, D. B., “Energy Management for the Electric Powernet in Vehicles with a Conventional Drivetrain,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 494–505, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Xuan, D., Kim, J., and Kim, Y., “Optimal Operation Strategy Development for Fuel Cell Hybrid Vehicle,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 183–192, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Betts, J. T., “A Direct Approach to Solving Optimal Control Problems,” Computing in Science & Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 73–75, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kleimaier, A. and Schroder, D., “Optimization Strategy for Design and Control of a Hybrid Vehicle,” Proc. of 6th International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, pp. 459–464 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bäuml, B., Wimbö ck, T., and Hirzinger, G., “Kinematically Optimal Catching a Flying Ball with a Hand-Arm-System,” Proc. of IEEE/ RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2592–2599 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Yan, F., Wang, J., and Huang, K., “Hybrid Electric Vehicle Model Predictive Control Torque-Split Strategy Incorporating Engine Transient Characteristics,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 61, No. 6, pp. 2458–2467, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kermani, S., Delprat, S., Guerra, T.-M., Trigui, R., and Jeanneret, B., “Predictive Energy Management for Hybrid Vehicle,” Control Engineering Practice, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 408–420, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Guemri, M., Caux, S., Ngueveu, S. U., and Messine, F., “Heuristics and Lower Bound for Energy Management in Hybrid-Electric Vehicles,” Proceedings of MOSIM’12, 2012. https://hal.archivesouvertes. fr/hal-00728563 (Accessed 2 MAR 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Guemri, M., Caux, S., and Ngueveu, S. U., “Using Quasi-Newton Method for Energy Management in Electrical Multi Source Systems,” Proc. of 11th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), pp. 194–199 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kim, M., Jung, D., and Min, K., “Hybrid Thermostat Strategy for Enhancing Fuel Economy of Series Hybrid Intracity Bus,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 63, No. 8, pp. 3569–3579, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. He, H., Xiong, R., Guo, H., and Li, S., “Comparison Study on the Battery Models Used for the Energy Management of Batteries in Electric Vehicles,” Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 64, No. pp. 113–121, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Murgovski, N., Johannesson, L., Sjöberg, J., and Egardt, B., “Component Sizing of a Plug-In Hybrid Electric Powertrain via Convex Optimization,” Mechatronics, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 106–120, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Tate, E. D. and Boyd, S. P., “Finding Ultimate Limits of Performance for Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” SAE Technical Paper, No. 2000-01-3099, 2000.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minjae Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, M. Component matching of a series hybrid electric bus using nonlinear programming. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 18, 1043–1056 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-017-0123-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-017-0123-3

Keywords

Navigation