Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative measurement of ink-blanket adhesion for contact transfer printing inks

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In contact transfer printing, perfect ink transfer is determined by the difference of the surface energies between before and after a transfer step. To characterize the difference, one may record the adhesion force by separating the ink film from a substrate by an external force. Ink-blanket adhesion is one of the key properties to determine the printability because it affects all steps of the contact transfer printing. Only a certain range of ink-blanket adhesion properties can get a perfect transfer. Using a lab-made high-precision force measuring device, we developed a method to measure the adhesion force during detaching an ink film from a blanket. Ink-blanket adhesion can be evaluated quantitatively either as adhesion strength or adhesion energy from the measured adhesion force. Using the proposed method, we assessed the adhesion properties of commercial Ag nanoparticle ink varying the film thickness and the solid contents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

F p :

Maximum adhesion force

A c :

Transferred area of ink film

W a :

Work of adhesion

S a :

Adhesion strength

E a :

Adhesion energy

Std. dev.:

Standard deviation

References

  1. Jo, J., Yu, J. S., Lee, T. M., and Kim, D. S., “Fabrication of Printed Organic Thin-Film Transistors using Roll Printing,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 48, No. 4S, pp. 04C181, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yu, J. S., Kim, I., Kim, J. S., Jo, J., Larsen-Olsen, T. T., et al., “Silver Front Electrode Grids for Ito-Free all Printed Polymer Solar Cells with Embedded and Raised Topographies, Prepared by Thermal Imprint, Flexographic and Inkjet Roll-to-Roll Processes,” Nanoscale, Vol. 4, No. 19, pp. 6032–6040, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, T. M., Han, H. S., Kim, B., Kwak, S. W., Noh, J. H., and Kim, I., “Roll Offset Printing Process based on Interface Separation for Fine and Smooth Patterning,” Thin Solid Films, Vol. 548, pp. 566–571, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xia, Y. and Whitesides, G. M., “Extending Microcontact Printing as a Microlithographic Technique,” Langmuir, Vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 2059–2067, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, Y. G., Nam, S. H., Kim, N. K., Kook, Y. H., Kim, J., et al., “A Study of RollPrinting Technology for TFT-LCD Fabrication,” Journal of the Society for Information Display, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 301–307, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanaka, M., Mabuchi, Y., Hayashi, T., and Hara, M., “Subtractive Offset Printing for Fabrication of Sub Micrometer Scale Electrodes with Gold Nanoparticles,” Microelectronic Engineering, Vol. 95, pp. 14–20, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nam, K. S., Yoon, S. M, Lee, S.-H., Kim, D. S., and Kim, C. H., “Effect of Properties of Conductive Ink on Printability of Electrode Patterning by Gravure Printing Method” J. Korean. Soc. Precis. Eng., Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 573–577, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hrehorova, E., Pekarovicova, A., and Fleming, P. D., “Gravure Printability of Conducting Polymer Inks,” Proc. of NIP & Digital Fabrication Conference, Vol. 2006, No. 3, pp. 107–110, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Choi, N., Wee, H., Nam, S., Lavelle, J., and Hatalis, M., “A Modified Offset Roll Printing for Thin Film Transistor Applications,” Microelectronic Engineering, Vol. 91, pp. 93–97, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hwang, J. H., Mendoza, K., Jang, K., Kim, N., and Hwang, S., “Optimization of Reverse Offset Roll to Plate (RO-R2P) Through Contact Angle,” Journal of Control and Systems Engineer Dec, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 67–72, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chibowski, E., Hołysz, L., Kip, G., Van Silfhout, A., and Busscher, H., “Surface Free Energy Components of Glass from Ellipsometry and Zeta Potential Measurements,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 132, No. 1, pp. 54–61, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dataphysics Instruments GmbH, “Solid Surface Energy Data (SFE) for Common Polymers,” http://www.surface-tension.de/solid-surfaceenergy.htm (Accessed 4 DEC 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang, D., Feng, X., Qu, B., Wang, Y., and Fang, D., “Rate-Dependent Interaction between Thin Films and Interfaces during Micro/Nanoscale Transfer Printing,” Soft Matter, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 418–423, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dupont, S. R., Voroshazi, E., Heremans, P., and Dauskardt, R. H., “Adhesion Properties of Inverted Polymer Solarcells: Processing and Film Structure Parameters,” Organic Electronics, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 1262–1270, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Man Choi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, AR., Kim, I., Kim, KY. et al. Quantitative measurement of ink-blanket adhesion for contact transfer printing inks. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 16, 151–156 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-015-0019-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-015-0019-z

Keywords

Navigation