Skip to main content
Log in

Modular neural networks prediction model based A2/O process control system

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Anaerobic/Anoxic/Oxic (A2/O) process is a traditionally well-established biological wastewater treatment process (WWTP). In order to control a biological process in a laboratory environment, engineers typically adopt a methodology that relies mostly on their prior knowledge of transient and steady-state behaviors of micro-organisms. Based on this prior knowledge, our A2/O process is designed to keep proper reaction time in check as well as the state defining conditions of micro-organisms. However, converse to our expectation, unforeseen experimental changes in our biological samples could cause the entire experimental process to deviate from its original course of progress. Practically, to mitigate these unexpected changes, modular neural networks (MNNs) prediction model for dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration is proposed. The MNNs consists of numerous neural network models. Each neural network model is only concerned with a single cluster. Therefore, when suitable neural network models can be selected for each condition, stable and advanced treatment performance is expected. DO concentration is an observable and controllable factor in a reactor. On the whole it affects the biological reactions and water quality. DO set-point is decided by prediction model and its control remains as an essential feature of WWTP. The predicted DO concentration is used to control the air blower, thus enabling scheduling for a stable NH4-N concentration in the effluent wastewater. The proposed model has time-series static neural networks with multiple inputs and one output. The inputs — the air blower speed and DO concentration — are time-dependent variables. The output is the DO concentration in the immediate following time step. Our prediction results are compared with those of other prediction methodologies; proposed prediction model shows that it can achieve better accuracy for the DO concentration estimate than by other models. Therefore, the proposed system can be applied to a time-delayed compensation system to meet the target DO set-point tracking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Comeau, Y., Hall, K. J., Hancock, R. E. W., and Oldham, W. K., “Biochemical model for enhanced biological phosphorus removal,” Water Research, Vol. 20, No. 12, pp. 1511–1521, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mino, T., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., and Heijnen, J. J., “Microbiology and biochemistry of the enhanced biological phosphate removal process,” Water Research, Vol. 32, No. 11, pp. 3193–3207, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, W., Wang, S., Peng, Y., Zhang, S., and Yin, F., “Enhanced biological nutrients removal in modified step-feed anaerobic/anoxic/oxic process,” Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 840–848, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F. L., and Stensel, H. D., “Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, 4th ed.,” McGraw-Hill, 2003.

  5. Dellana, S. A. and West, D., “Predictive modeling for wastewater applications: Linear and nonlinear approaches,” Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 96–106, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jain, A. and Kumar, A., “An evaluation of artificial neural network technique for the determination of infiltration model parameters,” Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 272–282, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mjalli, F. S., Al-Asheh, S., and Alfadala, H. E., “Use of artificial neural network black-box modeling for the prediction of wastewater treatment plants performance,” Journal of Environment Management, Vol. 83, No. 3, pp. 329–338, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alvisi, S. and Franchini, M., “Fuzzy neural networks for water level and discharge forecasting with uncertainty,” Environmental Modelling & Software, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 523–537, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong, W. K., Xia, M., and Chu, W. C., “Adaptive neural network model for time-series forecasting,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 207, No. 2, pp. 807–816, 2010.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, G. P., “Time series forecasting using a hybrid ARIMA and neural network model,” Neurocomputing, Vol. 50, pp. 159–175, 2003.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Faruk, D. O., “A hybrid neural network and ARIMA model for water quality time series prediction,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 586–594, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, G., Patuwo, B. E., and Hu, M. Y., “Forecasting with artificial neural networks: The state of the art,” International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 35–62, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pan, Y.-R., Shih, Y.-T., Horng, R.-H., and Lee, A.-C., “Advanced Parameter Identification for a Linear-Motor-Driven Motion System Using Disturbance Observer,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 35–47, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolkenhauer, O., “Data Engineering: Fuzzy Mathematics in Systems Theory and Data Analysis,” John Wiley & Sons, 2001.

  15. Taskaya-Temizel, T. and Casey, M. C., “A comparative study of autoregressive neural network hybrids,” Neural Networks, Vol. 18, No. 5–6, pp. 781–789, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu, C. L., Cahu, K. W., and Fan, C., “Prediction of rainfall time series using modular artificial neural networks coupled with data-preprocessing techniques,” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 389, No. 1–2, pp. 146–167, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carcenac, M., “A modular neural network for super-resolution of human faces,” Applied Intelligence, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 168–186, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mendivil, S. G., Castillo, O., and Melin, P., “Optimization of artificial neural network architectures for time series prediction using parallel genetic algorithms,” Soft Computing for Hybrid Intelligent Systems, Vol. 154, pp. 387–399, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kourakos, G. and Mantoglou, A., “Pumping optimization of coastal aquifers based on evolutionary algorithms and surrogate modular neural network models,” Advances in Water Resources, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 507–521, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, P., Xu, L., Zhou, S.-M., Fan, Z., Li, Y., and Feng, S., “A novel Bayesian learning method for information aggregation in modular neural networks,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 1071–1074, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tseng, H. C. and Almogahed, B., “Modular neural networks with applications to pattern profiling problems,” Neurocomputing, Vol. 72, No. 10–12, pp. 2093–2100, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao, Z.-Q., “A novel modular neural network for imbalanced classification problems,” Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 783–788, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mendoza, O., Melin, P., and Licea, G., “A hybrid approach for image recognition combining type-2 fuzzy logic, modular neural networks and the Sugeno integral,” Information Sciences, Vol. 179, No. 13, pp. 2078–2101, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmad, U., Gavrilov, A. V., Lee, S., and Lee, Y.-K., “A modular classification model for received signal strength based location systems,” Neurocomputing, Vol. 71, No. 13, pp. 2657–2669, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramirez-Agundis, A., Gadea-Girones, R., and Colom-Palero, R., “A hardware design of a massive-parallel, modular NN-based vector quantizer for real-time video coding,” Microprocessors and Microsystems, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 33–44, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bhende, C. N., Mishra, S., and Panigrahi, B. K., “Detection and classification of power quality disturbances using S-transform and modular neural network,” Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 122–128, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Macleod, C., Maxwell, G., and Muthuraman, S., “Incremental growth in modular neural networks,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 22, No. 4–5, pp. 660–666, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt, A., “A modular neural network architecture with additional generalization abilities for high dimensional input vectors,” M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Computing, Manchester Metropolitan University, 1996.

  29. Relvas, C., Ramos, A., Completo, A., and Simoes, J. A., “Accuracy Control of Complex Surfaces in Reverse Engineering,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 1035–1042, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kwak, Y.-K., Kim, S.-H., and Ahn, J.-H., “Improvement of Positioning Accuracy of Magnetostrictive Actuator by Means of Built-in Air Cooling and Temperature Control,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 829–834, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sungshin Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baek, G., Cheon, SP., Kim, S. et al. Modular neural networks prediction model based A2/O process control system. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 13, 905–913 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-012-0118-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-012-0118-z

Keywords

Navigation