Skip to main content
Log in

Action Control of Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation with fecal immunochemical test (FIT)

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Most of the individuals concerned by colorectal cancer screening recognize the importance of screening participation. However, the screening rates for this cancer remain low in most countries, including France. Based on the action control framework, the present study aimed to (i) explore the distribution of intentions-behavior profiles toward colorectal cancer screening and (ii) to determine to what extent the profiles could be differentiated on theory of planned behavior (TPB) (i.e., attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control [PBC]) and self-regulation variables (i.e., action planning, coping planning).

Method

A total of 149 participants from the general French population (M = 60 years, SD = 7.04) completed a questionnaire measuring TPB and self-regulation variables. Subsequent screening behavior was determined from medical records. Participants were notably categorized as non-intenders, unsuccessful intenders, or successful intenders. Data were analyzed using discriminant function analysis and analyses of covariance.

Results

Main findings revealed that 71% of the intenders were unsuccessful intenders. TPB and self-regulation variables were significantly correlated with the discriminant function (rs ≥ .40). Successful and unsuccessful intenders reported significantly higher levels of subjective norms, PBC, and coping planning than non-intenders (ps < .01). Successful intenders reported a significantly higher level of coping planning than unsuccessful intenders (p < .01).

Conclusions

Further research appears necessary to empirically test to what extent interventions targeting subjective norms, PBC, and coping planning could enhance the proportion of successful intenders toward colorectal cancer screening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. INCa. Les cancers en France en 2018 - L’essentiel des faits et chiffres [Cancers in France in 2018- Essential facts and numbers]. 2019.

  3. Sarma EA, Silver MI, Kobrin SC, Marcus PM, Ferrer RA. Cancer screening: health impact, prevalence, correlates, and interventions. Psychol Health. 2019;34(9):1036–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bridou M, Aguerre C, Gimenes G, Kubiszewski V, Le Gall A, Potard C, et al. Psychological barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening: a French qualitative study. Health Psychol Res 2013;1(2).

  5. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rhodes RE, de Bruijn GJ. What predicts intention-behavior discordance? A review of the action control framework. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2013;41(4):201–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rhodes RE, Yao CA. Models accounting for intention-behavior discordance in the physical activity domain: a user’s guide, content overview, and review of current evidence. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12.

  8. Sheeran P, Webb TL. The intention–behavior gap. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2016;10(9):503–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rogers RW. A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J Psychol. 1975;91(1):93–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Orbell S, Sheeran P. “ Inclined abstainers ”: a problem for predicting health-related behaviour. Br J Soc Psychol. 1998;37(Pt 2):151–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Power E, Van Jaarsveld CHM, McCaffery K, Miles A, Atkin W, Wardle J. Understanding intentions and action in colorectal cancer screening. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35(3):285–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. de Bruijn GJ, Wiedemann A, Rhodes RE. An investigation into the relevance of action planning, theory of planned behaviour concepts, and automaticity for fruit intake action control. Br J Health Psychol. 2014;19(3):652–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sniehotta F, Schwarzer R, Scholz U, Schüz B. Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: Theory and assessment. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2005;35(4):565–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwarzer R. Coping planning as an intervention component: a commentary. Psychol Health. 2016;31(7):903–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Walsh JC. Increasing screening uptake for a cervical smear test: predictors of attendance and the use of action plans in prior non-attenders. Ir J Psychol. 2005;26(1–2):65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rhodes RE. Evolving understanding of physical activity behavior: a multi-process action control approach. In: Elliot AJ, éditeur. Advances in motivation science. Elsevier; 2017

  17. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 6th ed. Boston: Allyn Bacon; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Godin G, Shephard RJ, Colantonio A. The cognitive profile of those who intend to exercise but do not. Public Health Rep. 1986;101(5):521–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. McHugh ML. The Chi-square test of independence. Biochem Medica. 2012;23(2):143–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Santé Publique France. Taux de participation au programme de dépistage organisé du cancer colorectal 2017–2018 [Participation rates in the organized colorectal cancer screening program 2017–2018] [Internet]. [Cited 2020 March 11]. Available from: https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr/maladies-et-traumatismes/cancers/cancer-du-colon-rectum/articles/taux-de-participation-au-programme-de-depistage-organise-du-cancer-colorectal-2017-20182

  22. Pellat A, Deyra J, Coriat R, Chaussade S. Results of the national organised colorectal cancer screening program with FIT in Paris. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):4162.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Roncancio AM, Ward KK, Sanchez IA, Cano MA, Byrd TL, Vernon SW, et al. Using the theory of planned behavior to understand cervical cancer screening among Latinas. Health Educ Behav. 2015;42(5):621–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Milne S, Orbell S, Sheeran P. Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation: protection motivation theory and implementation intentions. Br J Health Psychol. 2002;7(Pt 2):163–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rhodes RE, Grant S, de Bruijn GJ. Planning and implementation intention interventions. In: Hagger M, Cameron L, Hamilton K, Hankonen N, Lintunen T, editors. The Handbook of Behavior Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020. p. 572–85.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Neter E, Stein N, Barnett-Griness O, Rennert G, Hagoel L. From the bench to public health: Population-level implementation intentions in colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(3):273–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gonzalez Salas Duhne P, Horan AJ, Ross C, Webb TL, Hardy GE. Assessing and promoting the use of implementation intentions in clinical practice. Soc Sci Med. 2020;265:113490.

  28. Sniehotta FF, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. Bridging the intention–behaviour gap: planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychol Health. 2005;20(2):143–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. de Vries H, Eggers SM, Bolman C. The role of action planning and plan enactment for smoking cessation. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):393.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Conner PM, Godin G. Temporal stability of behavioural intention as a moderator of intention–health behaviour relationships. Psychol Health. 2007;22(8):875–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a TpB Questionnaire : Conceptual and Methodological Considerations. Retrieved July 26, 2019, from http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf

  32. Sniehotta, F. F., Schwarzer, R., Scholz, U., & Schüz, B. (2005). Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: Theory and assessment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(4), 565–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.258

  33. Le Bonniec A. (2018). Les déterminants psychosociaux de la participation au dépistage du cancer colorectal : enjeux de l’arrivée du nouveau test immunologique [Psychosocial determinants of participation in colorectal cancer screening: implications of the arrival of the new immunological test]. Doctoral thesis (not published). University Paul Valery, Montpellier, France.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the Dépistages 34 staff for their help with recruitment, and particularly to M. Galindo, Pr. Daures, and Dr. Cherifcheikh. Finally, we sincerely thank all the participants involved in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the French National Cancer Institute (doctoral fellowship « Human and social sciences, Epidemiology, Public health and cancer»), the Integrated Site in Cancer Research of Montpellier (Grant « Inca-DGOS-INSERM 6045»), and the French League Against Cancer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alice Le Bonniec.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Descriptive statistics of the sample

 

Participants (N)

Percentage (%)

Age

M = 60.3 (SD = 7.04)

Sex

  

  Men

72

45.9

  Women

85

54.1

Occupational category

  

  Farmer

1

0.6

  Craftsman, shopkeeper, business owner

5

3.2

  Executive officer

23

14.6

  Intermediate profession

9

5.7

  Liberal profession

7

4.5

  Employee

25

15.9

  Worker

3

1.9

  Retiree

67

42.7

  Unemployed

13

8.3

  Other

2

1.3

Working in the field of health

  

  Yes

17

10.8

  No

133

84.7

Having a General Practitioner

  

  Yes

153

97.5

  No

2

1.3

Having a health care professional’s recommendation for screening

  

  Yes

64

40.8

  No

89

56.7

Personal history of cancer (all types)

  

  Yes

26

16.6

  No

130

82.8

Family history of cancer (all types)

  

  Yes

87

55.4

  No

66

42

Family history of colorectal cancer or colorectal adenoma

  

  Yes

29

18.5

  No

123

78.3

Knowing individual(s) suffering from cancer

  

  Yes

124

79

  No

32

20.4

Knowing individual(s) suffering from colorectal cancer

  

  Yes

49

31.2

  No

107

68.2

Previous participation in colorectal cancer screening

  

  Yes

86

54.8

  No

68

43.3

Frequency of screening by faecal occult blood test

  

  Never

67

42.7

  Every 5 years/1 or 2 time in total

31

19.7

  Every 2 or 3 years

45

28.7

  Every year

2

1.3

Other screening tests achieved

  

  Yes

79

50.3

  No

74

47.1

Other type of screening tests achieved

  

  Mammography

69

43.9

  Prostate cancer

7

4.5

  Pap-smear

40

25.5

Appendix 2

Items of the questionnaire measuring variables of the theory of planned behavior and self-regulation variables

Variables

Items

Intentions

I intend to perform a screening test for colorectal cancer in the next few months

I wish to perform a screening test for colorectal cancer in the next few months

Attitudes

If I do a screening test for colorectal cancer, it will allow to detect a potential health problem as soon as possible

It is possible to recover from colorectal cancer if it is detected early thanks to the screening test

I think that the new immunological test for colorectal cancer is reliable

I don’t like thinking about the colorectal cancer screening test (R)

I think that performing a colorectal cancer screening test is something unpleasant (R)

I feel disgusted to have to take a sample of my stool myself to do the screening test (R)

I dread the results of my colorectal cancer screening test (R)

Norms

I often heard about colorectal cancer in the media and it encourages me to get screened

I feel that most people of my age do regularly a screening test for colorectal cancer

I think the majority of my relatives over the age of fifty are regularly testing for colorectal cancer

My general practitioner has already recommended me to participate in screening for colorectal cancer

If the screening center in my area sends me an invitation letter to get screened for colorectal cancer, then I have to do it

Behavioral perceived control

I think the new immunological test for colorectal cancer is easy to perform

I feel able to perform alone the screening test for colorectal cancer properly

In my daily life, I feel able to visit my general practitioner to collect the colorectal cancer screening kit even if it takes time

In my daily life, I think I can take the time necessary to perform a colorectal cancer screening test

Coping planning

For my next screening, I know how to get organized if I am out of time

For my next screening, I know how to motivate myself if I don’t want to do it anymore

For my next screening, I know how to react if my emotions block me at the time of performing the test

Action planning

I have already planned when I will get the screening kit for colorectal cancer from my general practitioner for my next screening

I have already planned when I will perform my next screening for colorectal cancer

  1. This is a translation of the questionnaire submitted in French to the participants. The items of this questionnaire are based on existing guidelines (Ajzen, 2006 [31]; Sniehotta, 2005 [32]) and two qualitative studies presented in the doctoral thesis of Alice Le Bonniec (2018) [33]
  2. R reverse item

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Le Bonniec, A., Gourlan, M., Préau, M. et al. Action Control of Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation with fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Int.J. Behav. Med. 29, 122–130 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-09976-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-09976-y

Keywords

Navigation