Abstract
Similar to other online courses, massive open online courses (MOOCs) often rely on learner–learner interaction as a mechanism to promote learning. However, little is known at present about learner–learner interaction in these nascent informal learning environments. While some studies have explored MOOC participant perceptions of learner–learner interactions, research is still lacking regarding the content and level of such interactions. Using the interaction analysis model (IAM) as a theoretical framework and social network analysis methods, the present study investigates the nature and level of learner–learner interaction within a popular Chemistry MOOC from Coursera. Findings suggest that learner–learner interaction: was limited to lower phases of the IAM framework (e.g., sharing and comparing information); changed (decreased) over time; and was heavily dependent on a few highly-engaged learners. Potential implications for the design of future MOOCs are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
06 April 2017
An erratum to this article has been published.
References
Adams, C., Yin, Y., Madriz, L. F. V., & Mullen, C. S. (2014). A phenomenology of learning large: the tutorial sphere of xMOOC video lectures. Distance Education, 35(2), 202–216.
Alario-Hoyos, C., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Delgado Kloos, C., Parada, G., et al. (2016). Who are the top contributors in a MOOC? Relating participants’ performance and contributions. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 32(3), 232–243.
Barak, M., Watted, A., & Haick, H. (2016). Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: Examining aspects of language and social engagement. Computers & Education, 94, 49–60.
Barba, P. G., Kennedy, G. E., & Ainley, M. D. (2016). The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC Motivation and participation in MOOCs. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 32(3), 218–231.
Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 9(4), 403–436.
Blanco, Á.F., García-Peñalvo, F.J., & Sein-Echaluce, M. (2013). A methodology proposal for developing adaptive cMOOC. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 553–558). New York, NY: ACM.
Brandes, U., & Erlebach, T. (2005). Network analysis: Methodological foundations. Springer.
Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 13–25.
Brinton, C. G., Chiang, M., Jain, S., Lam, H., Liu, Z., & Wong, F. M. F. (2014). Learning about social learning in MOOCs: From statistical analysis to generative model. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(4), 346–359.
Brooks, C. D., & Jeong, A. C. (2006). Effects of pre-structuring discussion threads on group interaction and group performance in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Distance Education, 27(3), 371–390.
Chai, C. S., & Tan, S. C. (2009). Professional development of teachers for computer-supported collaborative learning: A knowledge-building approach. Teacher Knowledge Records, 111(5), 1296–1327.
Chen, Y.-H., & Chen, P.-J. (2015/8). MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains. Computers & Education, 86, 55–70.
Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. J. (2013). The MOOC phenomenon: Who takes massive open online courses and why? Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers2.cfm?abstract_id=2350964.
Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012(3). Retrieved from http://jime.open.ac.uk/article/view/2012-18/sirjohn.ca/.
Dennen, V. (2005). From message posting to learning dialogues: Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion. Distance Education, 26(1), 127–148.
Dillahunt, T. R., Wang, B. Z., & Teasley, S. (2014). Democratizing higher education: Exploring MOOC use among those who cannot afford a formal education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 1–20.
Dowell, N.M., Skrypnyk, O., Joksimović, S., Graesser, A.C., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Hennis, T.A., de Vries, P., & Kovanović, V. (2015). Modeling learners’ social centrality and performance through language and discourse. In Submitted to the 8th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2015).
Draper, D. C. (2015). Collaborative instructional strategies to enhance knowledge convergence. The American Journal of Distance Education, 29(2), 109–125.
Fritz, J. (2011/3). Classroom walls that talk: Using online course activity data of successful students to raise self-awareness of underperforming peers. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 89–97
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148.
Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC research initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 1.
Gillani, N., & Eynon, R. (2014). Communication patterns in massively open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 18–26.
Goggins, S. P., Galyen, K. D., Petakovic, E., & Laffey, J. M. (2016). Connecting performance to social structure and pedagogy as a pathway to scaling learning analytics in MOOCs: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 32(3), 244–266.
Goodyear, P., Jones, C., & Thompson, K. (2014). Computer-supported collaborative learning: Instructional approaches, group processes and educational designs. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 439–453). New York: Springer.
Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001.
Hone, K. S., & El Said, G. R. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers & Education, 98, 157–168.
Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265.
Jiang, S., Fitzhugh, S.M., & Warschauer, M. (2014). Social positioning and performance in MOOCs. In Workshop on Graph-Based Educational Data Mining (p. 14).
Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2008). Cooperation and the use of technology. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. van Merrienboer, & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 659–670). New York: Routledge.
Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1651.
Juwah, C. (2006). Interactions in online education: Implications for theory and practice. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Kim, M. C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education, 56(2), 403–417.
Koller, D., Ng, A., Do, C., & Chen, Z. (2013). Retention and intention in massive open online courses: In depth. Educause Review, 48(3), 62–63.
Kop, R., & Fournier, H. (2011). New dimensions to self-directed learning in an open networked learning environment. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 7(2), 1–18.
Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A.E., Schroder, K.E.E., & Belland, B.R. (2014/1). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50
Laffey, J., Amelung, C., & Goggins, S. (2009). A context awareness system for online learning: Design based research. International Journal on E-Learning, 8(3), 313–330.
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202–227.
Lu, J., Lajoie, S. P., & Wiseman, J. (2010). Scaffolding problem-based learning with CSCL tools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(3), 283–298.
Lucas, M., Gunawardena, C., & Moreira, A. (2014/1). Assessing social construction of knowledge online: A critique of the interaction analysis model. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 574–582
Lucas, M., & Moreira, A. (2010). Knowledge construction with social web tools. In M. D. Lytras et al. (Eds.), 1st International conference on reforming education and quality of teaching, CCIS 73 (pp. 278–284). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13166-0_4078-284.
Mackness, J., & Bell, F. (2015). Rhizo14: A rhizomatic learning cMOOC in sunlight and in shade. Open Praxis, 7(1), 25–38.
Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015/1). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77–83.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7.
Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., & Harland, J. (2012). Evaluating the quality of interaction in asynchronous discussion forums in fully online courses. Distance Education, 33(1), 5–30.
Oh, S., & Jonassen, D. H. (2007). Scaffolding online argumentation during problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 23(2), 95–110.
Padilla-Rodriguez, B. C., & Armellini, A. (2015). Expanding the interaction equivalency theorem. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2085
Phan, T., McNeil, S. G., & Robin, B. R. (2016). Students’ patterns of engagement and course performance in a massive open online course. Computers & Education, 95, 36–44.
Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., Kirschner, P. A., Erkens, G., & Jaspers, J. (2010). Group awareness of social and cognitive performance in a CSCL environment: Effects of a peer feedback and reflection tool. Computers in Human Behavior, In Press. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.024.
Pursel, B. K., Zhang, L., Jablokow, K. W., Choi, G. W., & Velegol, D. (2016). Understanding MOOC students: motivations and behaviours indicative of MOOC completion. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 32(3), 202–217.
Rabbany, R., Elatia, S., Takaffoli, M., & Zaïane, O. R. (2014). Collaborative learning of students in online discussion forums: A social network analysis perspective. In A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.), Educational data mining (pp. 441–466). New York: Springer International Publishing.
Reeves, T. D., & Pedulla, J. J. (2011). Predictors of teacher satisfaction with online professional development: Evidence from the USA’s e-Learning for Educators initiative. Professional Development in Education, 37(4), 591–611.
Sher, A. (2009). Assessing the relationship of student–instructor and student–student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in web-based online learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 102–120.
Sinha, T. (2014). Supporting MOOC instruction with social network analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1401.5175.
Spector, J. M. (2014). Remarks on MOOCS and mini-MOOCS. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(3), 385–392.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 2006, 409–426.
Stich, A. E., & Reeves, T. D. (2017/1). Massive open online courses and underserved students in the United States. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 58–71.
Sullins, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2014). The relationship between cognitive disequilibrium, emotions and individual differences on student question generation. International Journal of Learning Technology, 9(3), 221–247.
Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115–136.
van Aalst, J. (2013). Assessment in collaborative learning. In C. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. Chan, & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 280–296). London: Routledge.
Veletsianos, G., Collier, A., & Schneider, E. (2015). Digging deeper into learners’ experiences in MOOCs: Participation in social networks outside of MOOCs, notetaking and contexts surrounding content consumption. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 570–587.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development (M. LopezMorillas, Trans.). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79–91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Waite, M., Mackness, J., Roberts, G., & Lovegrove, E. (2013). Liminal participants and skilled orienteers: Learner participation in a MOOC for new lecturers. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 200–215.
Wang, Y., & Baker, R. (2015). Content or platform: Why do students complete MOOCs? Journal of Online Learning and Teaching/MERLOT, 11(1), 17.
Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 416–426.
Yap, K. C., & Chia, K. P. (2010). Knowledge construction and misconstruction: A case study approach in asynchronous discussion using Knowledge Construction—Message Map (KCMM) and Knowledge Construction—Message Graph (KCMG). Computers & Education, 55(4), 1589–1613.
Zheng, S., Rossen, M.B., Shih, P.C. & Carroll, J.M. (2015). Understanding student motivation, behaviors, and perceptions in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1882–1895.
Zhenghao, C., Alcorn, B., Christensen, G., Eriksson, N., Koller, D., & Emanuel, E. J. (2015). Who’s benefiting from MOOCs and why? Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/09/whos-benefiting-from-moocs-and-why.
Zimmerman, T. D. (2012). Exploring learner to content interaction as a success factor in online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 152–165.
Funding
This study was not completed as a result of funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
This study does not have any conflict of interests.
Additional information
The original version of this article was revised. The article title was incorrectly presented as: The nature and level of learner–learner in a chemistry massive open online course (MOOC) and has been corrected as: The nature and level of learner–learner interaction in a chemistry massive open online course (MOOC).
An erratum to this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9144-2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tawfik, A.A., Reeves, T.D., Stich, A.E. et al. The nature and level of learner–learner interaction in a chemistry massive open online course (MOOC). J Comput High Educ 29, 411–431 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9135-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9135-3