Skip to main content
Log in

The University in periods of technological change: a historically grounded perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The University has a remarkably enduring history that is due in no small part to its ability to adapt itself whenever intellectual, political, or technological change has occurred. Today’s technology revolution, however, presents the University with one of the greatest adaptation challenges it has ever faced in its lengthy history, and the Institution will either adjust to this new reality or will risk losing its status as a premier educational institution. Instructional technology can play a critical role in helping the University meet these new challenges, but how should instructional technology be effectively leveraged to do so? Key recommendations are presented and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this article, the term “University” is a reference to the structural concept of a University, whereas the term “university” refers to specific or non-specific incarnations of the Institution in specific locales.

  2. The term “non-traditional students” is typically used to describe working adult learners.

References

  • Amirault, R. J., & Branson, R. K. (2006). Educators and expertise: A brief history of theories and models. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 69–86). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashburn, E. (2008). Doing remedial education right can mean more money, college official says. Retrieved November 3, 2008 from http://chronicle.com/news/article/4070/doing-remedial-education-right-can-mean-more-money-college-official-says.

  • Baldwin, J. W. (1997). The scholastic culture of the middle ages, 1000–1300. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.

  • Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., Slowinski, M., Vye, N., & Mosborg, S. (2008). The learning sciences, technology and designs for educational systems: Some thoughts about change. In J. Visser & M. Visser-Valfrey (Eds.), Learners in a changing learning landscape. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casner-Lotto, J., & Barrington, L. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Employers’ perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st century workforce (No. BED-06-Workforce). New York: The Conference Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitnis, S. (1999). The transformation of an imperial colony into an advanced nation: India in comparative perspective. In P. G. Altbach & P. M. Peterson (Eds.), Higher education in the 21st century: Global challenge and national response. Annapolis Junction, MD: Institute of International Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Education Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission on the Future of Higher Education. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compayré, G. (1893). Abelard and the origin and early history of universities. London: William Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreni, J. J. (1972). The formation of Laon’s cathedral library in the ninth century. In Carolingian learning, masters and manuscripts. Aldershot: Variorum.

  • Cowan, R. (2005). Universities and the knowledge economy. Paper presented at the Advancing Knowledge and the Knowledge Economy Conference, from http://advancingknowledge.com/drafts/Cowan-Cowan_Universities.pdf.

  • Cubberley, E. P. (1922). A brief history of education: A history of the practice and progress and organization of education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (2000). The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers, Rutgers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durant, W. (1950). The age of faith. New York: MJF Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furruolo, S. (1985). The origins of the University: The schools of Paris and their critics, 1100–1215. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, D., & Wagner, W. (2006). Cost and consequences of remedial course enrollment in Ohio public higher education: Six-year outcomes for Fall 1998 Cohort. Paper presented at the Association of Institutional Research Forum.

  • Gunderson, S., Jones, R., & Scanland, K. (2004). The jobs revolution: Changing how America works. Washington, DC: Copywriters Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskins, C. H. (1927). The renaissance of the twelfth century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskins, C. H. (1957). The rise of universities. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2007). NETS for students. Retrieved October 18, 2008 from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ForStudents/2007Standards/NETS_for_Students_2007_Standards.pdf.

  • Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Education Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagemann, E. C. (2000). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leff, G. (1992). The trivium and the three philosophies. In W. Rüegg (Ed.), A history of the universities of Europe (Vol. I). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsdaine, A. A. (1964). Educational technology, programmed learning, and instructional science. In E. R. Hilgard (Ed.), Theories of learning and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Méhaut, P. (2004). Knowledge economy, learning society and lifelong learning: A review of the French literature [Electronic Version]. Retrieved October 18, 2008 from http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/haljournl/halshs-00085893_5Fv1.htm.

  • Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEERA). (2007). Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from the first student cohort. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2001). The condition of education 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2003a). National assessment of adult literacy. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2003b). Remedial education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in fall 2000 (No. NCES 2004010). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2008). Projections of education statistics to 2017. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Open CourseWare Consortium. (2008). About us. Retrieved October 18, 2008 from http://www.ocwconsortium.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=15&Itemid=29.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1996). The knowledge economy. Retrieved October 15, 2008 from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/51/8/1913021.pdf.

  • Perkins, D. (1993). Teaching for understanding. American Educator: The Professional Journal of the American Federation of Teachers, 17(3), 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radding, C. M., & Clark, W. W. (1992). Medieval architecture, medieval learning. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roblyer, M. D. (2006). Integrating educational technology into teaching (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royce, J. (1966). Is there a science of education? In M. L. Borrowman (Ed.), Teacher education in America. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saettler, P. (1968). A history of instructional technology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO). (2003). Issue priorities and trends in state higher education. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ThinkEquity. (2002). Emerging trends in post secondary education—The view to 2012. from http://www.usdla.org/html/aboutUs/researchInfo.htm.

  • Van Merriënboer, J. J., Clark, R. E., & DeCroock, M. B. M. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model. Education Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 39–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verger, J. (1992). Teachers. In W. Rüegg (Ed.), A history of the University in Europe (Vol. 1, Universities in the Middle Ages). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2003). Lifelong learning in the global knowledge economy: Challenges for developing countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2007). Knowledge economies: Advanced strategies for development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ray J. Amirault.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amirault, R.J., Visser, Y.L. The University in periods of technological change: a historically grounded perspective. J Comput High Educ 21, 62–79 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-009-9016-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-009-9016-5

Keywords

Navigation