Skip to main content
Log in

Do product returns hurt relational outcomes? some evidence from online retailing

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Electronic Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Customer product returns are a key challenge for online retailers. Previous research primarily focused on causes of returns and possible interventions to reduce customers’ product returns and concomitant costs for online retailers. However, little is known about the effect of product returns on key relational outcomes. Drawing on relationship marketing theory, we test a model that relates product returns to three relationship marketing outcomes—customer satisfaction, trust, and positive word-of-mouth. A field study based on online panel data from customers of eight large online retailers demonstrates that product returns negatively affect customer satisfaction with the retailer, customer trust, and word-of-mouth. The findings extend previous research by revealing that product returns can detrimentally affect relationships with customers. Implications for e-commerce research and management are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahearne, M., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Gruen, T. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of customer-company identification: expending the role of relationship marketing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 574–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. W. (1998). Customer satisfaction and word of mouth. Journal of Service Research, 1(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babin, B. J., & Darden, W. R. (1996). Good and bad shopping vibes: spending and patronage satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 35(3), 201–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L. L. (1983). Relationship marketing. In L. L. Berry, G. L. Shostack, & G. Upah (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on services marketing (pp. 25–28). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blut, M., Beatty, S. E., Evanschitzky, H., & Brock, C. (2014). The impact of service characteristics on the switching costs–customer loyalty link. Journal of Retailing, 90(2), 275–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, A. B., & Maxham III, J. G. (2012). Return shipping policies of online retailers: normative assumptions and the long-term consequences of fee and free returns. Journal of Marketing, 76(5), 110–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brohan, M. (2013). Reducing the rate of returns, Internet Retailer. Retrieved September 24, 2015, from http://www.internetretailer.com/2013/05/29/reducing-rate-returns.

  • Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: a typology, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2), 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttle, F. A. (1998). Word of mouth: understanding and managing referral marketing. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6(3), 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, S.-C., Cheng, Y.-H., Chang, C.-J., & Yang, S.-H. (2012). The effect of service failure types and service recovery on customer satisfaction: a mental accounting perspective. The Service Industries Journal, 32(2), 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, H., & Salam, A. F. (2014). Does service convenience matter? An empirical assessment of service quality, service convenience and exchange relationship in electronic mediated environment. Electronic Markets, 24(4), 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, R. L. (1984). Modeling choices among alternative responses to dissatisfaction. In T. C. Kinnear (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 11, pp. 496–499). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Matos, C. A., & Rossi, C. A. V. (2008). Word-of-mouth communications in marketing: a meta-analytic review of the antecedents and moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(4), 578–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Buyer-seller developing relationships. American Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49(8), 709–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192–3198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallino, S., & Moreno, A. (2014). Integration of online and offline channels in retail: the impact of sharing reliable inventory availability information. Management Science, 60(6), 1434–1451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, G., Mitchell, R., Getz, D., Crouch, G., & Ong, B. (2008). Sensation seeking and the prediction of attitudes and behaviours of wine tourists. Tourism Management, 29(5), 950–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, H., & Liu, D. (2014). Relationship of trustworthiness and relational benefit in electronic catalog markets. Electronic Markets, 24(1), 7–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. Omega, 28(6), 725–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D. (2002). Reflections on the dimensions of trust and trustworthiness among online consumers. SIGMIS Database, 33(3), 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gneezy, A. (2016). Field experimentation in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, in press, doi:10.1509/jmr.16.0225.

  • Griffis, S. E., Rao, S., Goldsby, T. J., & Niranjan, T. T. (2012a). The customer consequences of returns in online retailing: an empirical analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 30(4), 282–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffis, S. E., Rao, S., Goldsby, T. J., Voorhees, C. M., & Deepak, I. (2012b). Linking order fulfillment performance to referrals in online retailing: an empirical analysis. Journal of Business Logistics, 33(4), 279–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (1990). Service management and marketing: managing the moments of truth in service competition. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummerus, J., Liljander, V., Weman, E., & Pihlström, M. (2012). Customer engagement in a Facebook brand community. Management Research Review, 35(9), 857–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, A., Johnson, M. D., & Roos, I. (2005). The effects of customer satisfaction, relationship commitment dimensions, and triggers on customer retention. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 210–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwinner, K. P., Gremler, D. D., & Bitner, M. J. (1998). Relational benefits in services industries: the customer’s perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(2), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. C. (2008). Fraudulent return proclivity: an empirical analysis. Journal of Retailing, 84(4), 461–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., & Gremler, D. D. (2002). Understanding relationship marketing outcomes: an integration of relational benefits and relationship quality. Journal of Service Research, 4(3), 230–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, M. K., Ho, C. K., & Wan, L. C. (2011). Prior relationships and consumer responses to service failures: a cross-cultural study. Journal of International Marketing, 19(1), 59–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibi research (2013). Retourenmanagement im online-Handel – Das Beste daraus machen. Ibi Research. Retrieved September 24, 2015, from: http://www.ibi.de/files/Retourenmanagement-im-Online-Handel_-_Das-Beste-daraus-machen.pdf.

  • Kim, D., & Benbasat, I. (2006). The effects of trust-assuring arguments on consumer trust in internet stores: application of Toulmin’s model of argumentation. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 286–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Raghav Rao, H. (2009a). Trust and satisfaction, two stepping stones for successful e-commerce relationships: a longitudinal exploration. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. T., Kim, W. G., & Kim, H.-B. (2009b). The effects of perceived justice on recovery satisfaction, trust, word-of-mouth, and revisit intention in upscale hotels. Tourism Management, 30(1), 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koufteros, X., Droge, C., Heim, G., Massad, N., & Vickery, S. K. (2014). Encounter satisfaction in E-tailing: are the relationships of order fulfillment service quality with its antecedents and consequences moderated by historical satisfaction? Decision Sciences, 45(1), 5–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, M., Yang, Z., McDougall, G. H. G., & Bergeron, J. (2005). Internet versus bricks-and-mortar retailers: an investigation into intangibility and its consequences. Journal of Retailing, 81(4), 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, C., Palvia, P., & Lin, H. N. (2010). Stage antecedents of consumer online buying behavior. Electronic Markets, 20(1), 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, K., Sia, C., Lee, M., & Benbasat, I. (2006). Do I trust you online, and if so, will I buy? An empirical study of two trust-building strategies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 233–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maity, D., & Arnold, T. J. (2013). Search: an expense or an experience? Exploring the influence of search on product return intentions. Psychology and Marketing, 30(7), 576–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006). Accounting for common method variance in IS research: reanalysis of past studies using a marker-variable technique. Management Science, 52(12), 1865–1883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, R. B., Osborne, P., Morgan, R. E., & Kutwaroo, G. (2001). Market orientation and firm value. Journal of Marketing Management, 17(5–6), 521–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnema, A., Bijmolt, T. H., Gensler, S., & Wiesel, T. (2016). To Keep or Not to Keep: Effects of Online Customer Reviews on Product Returns. Journal of Retailing, from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002243591630001X.

  • Mollenkopf, D., Rabinovich, E., Laseter, T. M., & Boyer, K. K. (2007). Managing internet product returns: a focus on effective service operations. Decision Sciences, 38(2), 215–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, K., & Halinen, A. (2000). Relationship marketing theory: its roots and direction. Journal of Marketing Management, 16(1–3), 29–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research: the dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 314–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, K. (2013). Zitiert! Robert Gentz und Rubin Ritter verraten die offizielle Retourenquote von zalando. Deutsche-Startups. Retrieved September 24, 2015, from http://www.deutsche-startups.de/2013/01/18/zitiert-retourenquote-zalando/.

  • Neal, M. (2011). Beyond trust: Psychological considerations for recommender systems. In: H. R. Arabnia, L. Deligiannidis, A. M. G. Solo & A. Bahrami (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2011 EEE International Conference on e-Learning, e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and e-Government (pp. 365–369). Las Vegas: EEE'11.

  • Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Parvatiyar, A., & Sheth, J. N. (2000). The domain and conceptual foundations of relationship marketing. In J. N. Sheth & A. Parvatiyar (Eds.), Handbook of relationship marketing (pp. 3–38). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pei, Z., Paswan, A., & Yan, R. (2014). E-tailer’s return policy, consumer′ s perception of return policy fairness and purchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(3), 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, J. A., & Anderson, E. T. (2015). Leveraging product returns to maximize customer equity. In B. V. Kumar & D. Shah (Eds.), Handbook of research on customer equity in marketing (pp. 160–177). Cheltenham: Elgar Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, J. A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Are product returns a necessary evil? Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 73(3), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pick, D., & Eisend, M. (2014). Buyers’ perceived switching costs and switching: a meta-analytic assessment of their antecedents. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42(2), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, T. L., & Jack, E. P. (2013). The influence of cognitive dissonance on retail product returns. Psychology & Marketing, 30(8), 724–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, A. (2016). UK retailers count the cost of returns, Financial Times, Retrieved September 2, 2016, from: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/52d26de8-c0e6-11e5-846f-79b0e3d20eaf.html#axzz4CVRhobWZ. (accessed

  • Ramanathan, R. (2011). An empirical analysis on the influence of risk on relationships between handling of product returns and customer loyalty in E-commerce. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(2), 255–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, S., Griffis, S. E., & Goldsby, T. J. (2011). Failure to deliver? Linking online order fulfillment glitches with future purchase behavior. Journal of Operations Management, 29(7–8), 692–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romaniuk, J., & Sharp, B. (2004). Conceptualizing and measuring brand salience. Marketing Theory, 4(4), 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabiote, E. F., & Román, S. (2009). The influence of social regard on the customer–service firm relationship: the moderating role of length of relationship. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(4), 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, D., Kumar, V., Qu, Y., & Chen, S. (2012). Unprofitable cross-buying: evidence from consumer and business markets. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 78–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statista (2014). Welches sind die drei häufigsten Gründe für Retouren in Ihrem Online-Shop? Statista. Retrieved September 24, 2015, from: http://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/4423/umfrage/gruende-fuer-retouren-in-online-shops/.

  • The Economist (2013). Return to Santa – Ecommerce firms have a hard core of costly, impossible-to-please customers. Retrieved September 24, 2015, from: http://www.economist.com/news/business/21591874-e-commerce-firms-have-hard-core-costly-impossible-please-customers-return-santa.

  • Tsai, H. T., & Huang, H. C. (2007). Determinants of e-repurchase intentions: an integrative model of quadruple retention drivers. Information & Management, 44(3), 231–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vaerenbergh, Y., Orsingher, C., Vermeir, I., & Lariviere, B. (2014). A meta-analysis of rela-tionships linking service failure attributions to customer outcomes. Journal of Service Research, 17(4), 381–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, G., Hennig-Thurau, T., Sassenberg, K., & Bornemann, D. (2010). Does relationship quality matter in e-services? A comparison of online and offline retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 17(2), 130–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, G., Gouthier, M., Gremler, D. D., & Brach, S. (2012). What the eye does not see, the mind cannot reject: can call center location explain differences in customer evaluations? International Business Review, 21(5), 957–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, G., Bartikowski, B., & Beatty, S. E. (2014). Impact of customer-based corporate reputation on non-monetary and monetary outcomes: the roles of commitment and service context risk. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 166–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, G., Albrecht, A. K., Kunz, W., & Hofacker, C. F. (2016). Relationship between online retailers’ reputation and product returns. British Journal of Management, 27(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Beatty, S. E., & Liu, J. (2012). Employees’ decision making in the face of customers’ fuzzy return requests. Journal of Marketing, 76(6), 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wangenheim, F. V., & Bayón, T. (2007). The chain from customer satisfaction via word-of-mouth referrals to new customer acquisition. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(2), 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weun, S., Beatty, S. E., & Jones, M. A. (2004). The impact of service failure severity on service recovery evaluations and post-recovery relationships. Journal of Services Marketing, 18(2), 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weverbergh, R. (2013). The best kept secret in e-commerce is out. Here’s Zalando’s official return rate. Retrieved September 24, 2015, from: http://www.whiteboardmag.com/the-best-kept-secret-in-e-commerce-is-out-heres-zalandos-official-return-rate/.

  • Wood, S. L. (2001). Remote purchase environments: the influence of return policy leniency on two-stage decision processes. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Fang, Y., Wei, K., Ramsey, E., McCole, P., & Chen, H. (2011). Repurchase intention in B2C e-commerce—a relationship quality perspective. Information & Management, 48(6), 192–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, W. & Hinz, O. (2015). Determining profit-optimizing return policies – a two-step approach on data from taobao.com. Electronic Markets (Online Version of Record published before inclusion in an issue).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianfranco Walsh.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Hans-Dieter Zimmermann

Appendix

Appendix

Measures

Construct and item

Adapted from

Customer satisfactiona

Tsai & Huang (2007)

 I am satisfied with the services this online retailer provides.

Customer trusta

Walsh et al. (2016)

 This is an online retailer that you can trust.

Customer positive word-of-moutha

Koufteros et al. (2014)

 I would say positive things about this online retailer to other people.

Customer monthly spending

Galloway et al. (2008)

 How much, on average, do you spend per month at this online retailer?

  1 = up to 20 Euro

  2 = 21 to 40 Euro

  3 = 41 to 60 Euro

  4 = 61 to 80 Euro

  5 = 81 to 100 Euro

  6 = more than 100 Euro

  1. aThe items were rated on a seven-point scale ranging from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (7)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walsh, G., Brylla, D. Do product returns hurt relational outcomes? some evidence from online retailing. Electron Markets 27, 329–339 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-016-0240-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-016-0240-3

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation