Abstract
Direct and accurate radiocarbon dating of lipid residues preserved in ceramics is a recently established method that allows direct dating of specific food products and their inception in human subsistence strategies. The method targets individual fatty acids originating from animal fats such as ruminant dairy, ruminant adipose, non-ruminant adipose and aquatic fats. Horse lipid residues found in Central Asian pottery vessels are also directly dateable using this new method. Here we present the identification of equine lipid residues preserved in two pottery assemblages from the Neolithic and Eneolithic in Kazakhstan and their direct 14C dating. The site of Botai, previously radiocarbon-dated to the 4th millennium BC, was used as a reference to evaluate the dates obtained directly on horse lipids. The direct dating of equine products extracted from Botai potsherds are shown to be compatible with previous 14C dates at the site. The site of Bestamak, lacking previous14C measurements, had been relatively dated to the Neolithic based on pottery typologies. The direct dating of equine residues made it possible to anchor the pottery assemblage of Bestamak in the 6th millennium BC confirming their Neolithic attribution. These findings demonstrate the potential for dating horse products through a compound-specific approach, while highlighting challenges in 14C dating individual fatty acids from lipid extracts in which their abundances differ substantially.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The exploitation of horses for their primary products was common in Central Asia during Prehistory. These were intensively processed in pottery vessels from the Botai and Tersek Eneolithic cultures, but their importance in the subsistence economy decreased from the early Bronze Age with the rise in exploitation of ruminant products (Outram et al. 2011, 2012). Horse lipid residues in ancient vessels, like other animal fats, are dominated by palmitic (C16:0) and stearic (C18:0) fatty acids (FAs) derived from the degradation of triacylglycerols (Evershed et al. 1995). However, the relative abundance of the C16:0 compared to the C18:0 FAs from fresh horse fat is higher than in any other animal species. For example, fresh modern equine product fats from Kazakhstan have an average C16:0/ C18:0 ratio for meat and milk of 7.5 ± 2.9 s.d., respectively, compared to 2.1 ± 0.9 s.d. in other animal fats (ruminants, porcine, fish), permitting discrimination of lipids of equine origin when fresh (Stear 2008; Outram et al. 2009). However, this criterion cannot be used to distinguish archaeological horse fats from other fat sources due to fatty acid distributions being altered during burial (De Jong et al. 1961; Dudd et al. 1998; Mills and White 2012; Whelton et al. 2021). Significantly, determinations of δ13C values of the C16:0 and C18:0 FAs offer the possibility to discriminate horse lipids from ruminant, porcine or aquatic products. Additionally, δ2H analyses of individual FAs enable discrimination of equine meat from equine milk (Outram et al. 2009). The latter is possible as hydrogen isotopic composition is sensitive to seasonal variations in precipitation. Mare’s milk is only exploited seasonally during the spring and summer (driest seasons of the year) with its lipids biosynthesised in the season of milk let-down, whereas meat and adipose fats undergo long-term biosynthesis and remodelling throughout the year resulting in an integrated annual signal for the animal’s FA pool. This allowed for the first-time identification of mare’s milk in pottery vessels, at Botai in the 4th millennium BC (Outram et al. 2009). Alongside evidence for horse harnessing from ‘bit wear’ damage and the presence of corral structures, this provided the earliest evidence for horse domestication (Outram et al. 2009; Gaunitz et al. 2018). Despite this compelling evidence, the question of early horse domestication at Botai is still debated (Outram et al. 2021; Taylor and Barrón-Ortiz 2021).
The direct radiocarbon dating of specific commodities permits determination of the time of their introduction in human diet and verification of their antiquity in a particular context/region while removing any taphonomic uncertainty that may exist when radiocarbon dating associated materials. Thus their direct dating is extremely important to anchor the timeframe of exploitation of specific commodities. The most common materials targeted in such an application are charred seeds, bone collagen of animals exploited for their meat, or visible food residues present on the surface of pottery (but the source(s) of their constituent C are rarely identified prior to dating (Teetaert et al. 2017; Bayliss and Marshall 2019). A new method for reliably radiocarbon dating pottery vessels from the absorbed food residues preserved within the ceramic fabric has now been validated (Casanova et al. 2020). The approach is based on the compound-specific radiocarbon analysis (CSRA) of the two most abundant FAs (C16:0 and C18:0) characteristic of degraded animal fats preserved within the vessel walls. This dating method is useful in fixing timeframes at sites where traditionally 14C dated materials do not survive, dating directly typologically characteristic pottery, verifying the antiquity of lipids within sherds and, of interest here, directly dating the use of specific food products (Casanova et al. 2020).
This new method has been rigorously validated using modern references, lipids from bog butter specimens and pottery assemblages from well-dated sites (Casanova et al. 2018, 2020c), and then applied to various archaeological questions and sources of lipids. The CSRA method has been used on lipids of terrestrial origin, such as porcine and ruminant products, with a particular focus on the direct dating of ruminant dairy residues. Dairy residues were directly 14C-dated to time their inception in human food procurement, for instance, in Central Europe, the Balkans, and North Africa (Casanova et al. 2020a, c; In press; Stojanovski et al. 2020), or to verify their antiquity in a particular archaeological context (Dunne et al. 2019; Fewlass et al. 2020). Biases in 14C dates (reservoir effects) of lipids with a marine origin as well as their mixing with terrestrial resources have also been explored, and means of correction for the marine reservoir effects established (Casanova et al. 2020; Casanova 2022). All these studies demonstrate that the fatty acids from various food sources, recovered in pottery vessels, can be dated accurately, providing the C16:0 and C18:0 FAs survive in sufficient amounts. This suggests FAs from other sources, such as equine, are within the scope of this dating method.
Identification of horse lipid residues from food processing in pottery vessels from the Kazakh steppe (Outram et al. 2011; Outram 2012) provides a unique opportunity to apply the new CSRA method to the dating of FAs of equine origin. In this paper we focus on ceramics from the Botai settlement, for which previously measured 14C dates are available, to serve as a test for the dating of FAs of equine origin from a well-dated site, and the site of Bestamak (Stear 2008), lacking absolute chronology. Hence, we present here the first example of lipid residue analyses of pottery with the identification of horse products followed by their direct 14C dating.
Materials and methods
Botai
Botai (67.645786 E, 53.303942 N) is an Eneolithic site of the 4th millennium BC in Northern Kazakhstan, which gave its name to a culture recognised for intensive horse exploitation and early forms of domestication. The settlement comprises ca. 300 pit house dwellings (Levine and Kislenko 1999). Faunal assemblages are abundant (300,000 bones), dominated by horse remains (99.9%) with some wild animal remains including aurochs, bison, antelope and marmot. This site presents several lines of evidence for the husbandry of horses (Olsen 2006; Outram et al. 2011; Outram and Bogaard 2019). For this study, pottery vessels of Eneolithic typologies at the Botai settlement (n= 89) previously analysed for their lipid residues (Outram et al. 2011) were considered for 14C dating.
For Botai, a total of 25 radiocarbon dates on horse bone collagen, human collagen and botanical remains are available in the literature, which estimates the Eneolithic phase to ca. 3600–3100 BC (Levine and Kislenko 1997; Levine 1999; Outram et al. 2009; De Barros Damgaard et al. 2018; Gaunitz et al. 2018; Mortuzaite Matuzeviciute et al. 2019). The earliest published dates, however, exhibit rather large uncertainties (Levine and Kislenko 1999; Levine 1997) compared to more recent ones. Stratigraphical sequences have not been highlighted, thus, the relative relationship between dated materials is not well-established. Only the 14C dates on botanical remains from a particular house have been modelled using Bayesian statistics (Motuzaite Matuzeviciute et al. 2019).
Bestamak
Bestamak (64.724468 E, 51.575646 N) is a multi-period complex of sites in the Turgai Plateau comprising a settlement and cemetery. It has phases dating from the Neolithic through to the Iron Age. The Bronze Age cemetery has been 14C-dated and studied in relation to the diet of the human population (Ventresca Miller et al. 2014; Ventresca 2018). Horse bones from the Eneolithic, Middle Bronze Age and Iron Age phases have been 14C dated as part of an ancient DNA study (Librado et al. 2021). The phase with typologically dated Neolithic material culture, however, lacks absolute dating. This multiple phase site has yielded ceramics of the Neolithic, Eneolithic (Tersek culture) and Bronze Age phases. For this study, pottery vessels of the Makhandzhar Neolithic culture at the Bestamak settlement (n = 38) were selected for lipid residue analyses and 14C dating.
Protocol for lipid residue analyses
Lipid residue analyses in pottery were performed following established procedures (Evershed et al. 1990; Charters et al. 1993). In brief, ~ 2 g of each potsherd surface was cleaned then ground to a fine powder before being transferred to a glass vial along with 20 μL of internal standard (n-tetratriacontane). Lipids were extracted by sonication in a chloroform/methanol solution (10 mL; 2:1 v/v, 2 × 20 min), then centrifuged (2500 rpm, 10 min). The supernatant comprising the total lipid extract (TLE) was filtered through a silica column (1 g) to remove any particulate matter.
An aliquot of the TLE was treated with N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) containing 1% trimethylchlorosilane (40 μL; 70 °C, 1 h) with excess removed under N2 stream, and was dissolved in n-hexane prior to high temperature gas chromatography (HTGC) and HTGC/mass spectrometry (MS) analyses (Supplementary information (SI) 1; Stear 2008).
A second aliquot of the TLE was hydrolysed using a methanolic sodium hydroxide solution (5% v/v, 70 °C, 1 h) with regular mixing. The neutral fraction was extracted with n-hexane (3 × 3 mL). The remaining solution was acidified to pH 3 (HCl 1 M) and the free fatty acids were extracted with chloroform (3 × 3 mL) and excess solvent removed under nitrogen. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) derivatives of FAs were prepared with BF3-methanol (14% w/v, 100 μL, 70 °C, 1 h). Double distilled water was added (1 mL), the FAMEs extracted with chloroform (3 × 2 mL) and the solvent removed under nitrogen. FAMEs were re-dissolved in n-hexane before analysis by GC and GC-combustion-isotope ratio mass spectrometer (GC-C-IRMS; SI 1; Stear 2008). GC-C-IRMS analyses were performed to measure δ13C values on individual C16:0 and C18:0 FAs (SI 1; Stear 2008; Outram et al. 2011).
Protocol for radiocarbon dating and calibration
The CSRA method was performed using an acidified solution of methanol to extract lipids preserved in pottery (Casanova et al. 2020c), a method about five times more efficient than the solvent extraction used to pre-screen for lipid preservation in this study (Correa-Ascencio and Evershed 2014). For 14C dating, potsherds with lipid concentrations over 100 µg of lipid per g of sherd were selected (usually > 500 µg·g−1 using the acidified methanol solution) and c. 5 g were sampled to maximise the chances of obtaining enough carbon (c. 200 µg of C per fatty acid). The radiocarbon determinations were thus performed on separate TLEs than those used for lipid residue analysis.
Lipids were extracted and methylated using an acidified methanol solution (H2SO4/MeOH, 4% v/v, 3 × 8 mL, 1 h, 70 °C). The extracts were centrifuged (10 min, 2500 rpm), and the supernatants combined in a culture tube. Lipids were extracted by liquid–liquid extraction with n-hexane (4 × 5 mL) then transferred to small vials and blown down to dryness. A procedural blank was performed with every batch to monitor (by GC analysis) potential contamination arising from the lipid extraction step. The FAMEs (re-dissolved in sufficient hexane to achieve a concentration of ~ 5 μg·μL−1 for the C18:0 FA) were isolated 40 times in individual solventless traps using a preparative capillary gas chromatography (pcGC) instrument (Casanova et al. 2020b, c). This step allows removal of exogenous contaminants from the burial environment or the chemical pre-treatment (excluding contaminants that would co-elute with the FAMEs). Pseudo-processing standards, i.e. n-hexane injections to mimic the trapping of the FAMEs, then addition of IAEA-C7 oxalic acid standard or phthalic anhydride blank (Casanova et al. 2020b, c), were also prepared alongside each batch of samples to monitor for potential contamination from the pcGC isolation.
Isolated lipids (on glass wool) were transferred to an Al capsule for combustion in an elemental analyser (VarioCube) linked to an automatic graphitisation equipment (AGE3, Ionplus) prior to being measured on the BRIS-MICADAS instrument (Knowles et al. 2019). The graphitised lipids were measured in several batches based on their C mass. Size-matched standards (Oxalic Acid II, IAEA-C7) and blanks (phthalic anhydride), including the pseudo-processing standards, were analysed alongside each batch of FAMEs isolated from pottery vessels for normalisation and background corrections (Casanova et al. 2020b; Knowles et al. 2019).
The 14C measurements on FAMEs were corrected for the derivative carbon using a simple mass balance approach as fractionation during the methylation of FAs has been shown to be negligible (Stott et al. 2003; Casanova et al. 2020b); Casanova 2019). As described in Casanova et al. (2020c), the two FAs dated (C16:0 and C18:0) are from the same source, and their statistical equivalence (at the 5% level) provides an internal quality control measure for the potsherds dated. If this quality control test was passed, the C16:0 and C18:0 FA 14C measurements were combined as described in Casanova et al. (2020c) before calibration.
The radiocarbon dates were calibrated against the northern hemisphere atmospheric calibration curve Intcal20 (Reimer et al. 2020) in OxCal v4.4 (Bronk Ramsey 2009). Due to the lack of stratigraphy at the site, existing 14C dates from Botai were modelled in a single phase, and charcoal samples treated as termini post quem (TPQ) dates to mitigate for potential old wood effects.
Results and discussion
In this section, we present the 14C measurements obtained from the site of Botai and Bestamak (Table 1) and how they fit the local chronologies, the required methodological considerations for CSRA of equine lipid dating, and the significance of the dates for Eurasian Steppe archaeological studies.
Botai
Lipid residues analyses from this pottery assemblage have been reported in an earlier publication (Outram et al. 2011) and are briefly described here (SI TableS1). A total of 82% (n = 73) of the TLEs showed lipids were present in appreciable concentrations (> 5 µg·g−1) with an average lipid concentration of 391 µg·g−1and maximum of 3.7 mg·g−1. All the TLEs are dominated by C16:0 and C18:0 FAs. The C16:0 and C18:0 ratios for 27% of the TLEs (n = 18) are above 4, strongly suggesting an equine origin but as discussed before this criterion by itself is not a reliable species indicator (Fig. 1a). A total of 14% (or n = 12) of the sherds contained the C31, C33, C35 long-chain ketones characteristic of the heating of vessels content to high temperature (Evershed et al. 1995). Most δ13C16:0 and δ13C18:0 values are characteristic of equine fats products (n = 45 or 84%) which is consistent with the dominance of horse remains in the faunal assemblage (Fig. 1b). A total of n = 5 sherds display δ13C values characteristic of ruminant adipose fats which could originate from wild aurochs or antelopes, although we should note that two of these residues have δ13C values that are close that those expected for equine fats, and thus could also be of equine origin.
For radiocarbon dating, we selected potsherds with residues clearly identified as equine products (n = 7) based on their δ13C values. It should be noted the relative abundance of the C16:0 FA for these extracts is between 3 and 5 times higher than the C18:0 FA. Thus, the mass of C in the cathodes after the graphitisation differed greatly for the two FAs extracted from the same potsherds. These required measurement in separate analytical sequences on the AMS, with sized-matched standards for the specific targets. The concentrations of the samples isolated on the pcGC were adjusted to ensure that ~ 200 µg of the least abundant FA was isolated. In some cases, this would result in over 1 mg of the C16:0 FA being isolated. Because sample sizes are limited to 1 mg during graphitisation, this would affect the apparent blank contribution from the pcGC isolation and sample combustion procedures. To avoid this, the C16:0 FA from some lipid extracts (based on their relative concentrations) was only collected from only ten pcGC runs, while the C18:0 FA was isolated from 40 runs. After the first ten injections, the trap containing the isolated C16:0 FA was removed and replaced with a new one and the remaining 30 injections required to isolate a sufficient amount of the C18:0 FA were performed. This is the first time we have used such an approach due to the difference in the relative abundances of the C16:0 and C18:0 FAs. In previous dating programs involving ruminant fats, lipid extracts with similar abundances of the two FAs were considered the best candidates for dating (e.g. Casanova et al. 2018; 2020a, c; Casanova 2022; In press) (Fig.2).
δ13C18:0 values plotted against the δ13C16:0 values for animal fats from potsherds from the sites of a Botai and bBestamak. Ellipses correspond to modern references values from Kazakhstan (Outram et al. 2011). Horse adipose and dairy fats ellipses completely overlap meaning these two products cannot be discriminated using δ13C16:0 and δ13C18:0 values. Animal fats selected for 14C dating as part of this study are displayed using open circles and labelled with their sample names
Four of the equine adipose fats exhibited statistically consistent ages between the C16:0 and C18:0 FAs radiocarbon dates (Table 1) which were combined as described in Casanova et al. (2020c) to give 4465 ± 22 BP (BOT26, BRAMS-3044), 4485 ± 23 BP (BOT3, BRAMS-3045), 4674 ± 22 BP (BOT24, BRAMS-3046) and 4471 ± 23 BP (BOT18, BRAMS-3047). Lipids in potsherd BOT26 were dated twice as the first14C measurements clearly showed contamination of the C16:0 target by fossil carbon (likely from graphite ferrule degradation in the pcGC), which exhibited older ages by 2000 14C years. This was resolved in the repeated analysis, and only the latter measurement was used in this study. The TLEs which exhibited the highest C16:0/C18:0 FA ratios unfortunately failed the internal quality control test on the statistical consistency of the C16:0 and C18:0 FA 14C measurements. A second isolation was only possible for BOT70 but we could only obtain a date on the C16:0 FA due to the lower abundance of C18:0 FA. Furthermore, the C18:0 FA only yielded 100 µg of C on the first isolation and this is below the tested limit of reliability (200 µg) for precise and accurate 14C measurements on single compound using graphite targets (Casanova et al. 2020c). The two C16:0 FA ages of potsherd BOT70 are statistically consistent (T’ = 0.0, T’ (0.05) = 3.8, ν = 1) and give a combined age of 4634 ± 21 BP. This supports the conclusion that the age determined for the C18:0 FA from the first extraction was erroneous and likely contaminated during the isolation procedure.
The dated potsherds fell into two clear age ranges (Fig. 3). BRAMS-3046 (BOT24) and combined measurements for BOT70 are statistically consistent (T’ = 1.7, T’ (0.05) = 3.8, ν = 1) and calibrate between the mid-36th and mid-34th century BC (Fig. 3). BRAMS-3044 (BOT26), BRAMS-3045 (BOT3) and BRAMS-3047 (BOT18) are statistically identical (T’ = 0.4, T’ (0.05) = 9.1, ν = 2) and calibrate between the mid-34th and late 31st century BC (Fig. 3).
We compiled the 25 radiocarbon dates on horse bone collagen, human collagen and botanical remains already published (SI Table S2) to create a single-phase model in OxCal as reference (Levine and Kislenko (Levine and Kislenko 1997; Levine 1999; Outram et al. 2009; de Barros Damgaard et al. 2018; Gaunitz et al. 2018; Motuzaite Matuzeviciute et al. 2019). Charcoal dates were treated as TPQs dates, which is common practice to mitigate for any samples with a potential old wood effect. Two of the dates (IGAN-4234 and IGAN-449) had poor agreements in the sequence and were treated as outliers. The revised model has a good agreement ([A = 108]) and suggests the Botai sequence started in3660–3423 cal BC (95% probability) probably in 3568–3469 cal BC (68% probability) and ended in 2887–2673 cal BC (95% probability) probably in 2873–2783 cal BC (68% probability; SI Figure S1).
The dates on pottery were then added to this model. All the dates demonstrated a good agreement ([A = 109]; Fig. 4). The new model including the additional pottery FA dates suggests the Botai sequence started in 3627–3451 cal BC (95% probability) probably in 3550–3480 cal BC (68% probability) and ended in 2889–2723 cal BC (95% probability) probably in 2875–2806 cal BC (68% probability; Fig. 3). The pottery dates on horse products fit well with the pre-existing dates, and do not significantly change the estimated intervals for the start and end of the Botai sequence, supporting their compatibility and accuracy.
Probability distribution of CSRA dates from lipid residues diagnostic of horse products in pottery (BRAMS laboratory code) and published 14C dates for Botai. Each distribution represents the relative probability that an event occurs at a particular time. For each of the dates, two distributions have been plotted: one in outline, which is the result of simple radiocarbon calibration, and a solid one, based on the chronological model used. Distributions other than those relating to particular samples correspond to aspects of the model. The distribution followed by ‘?’ has been excluded from the model. The large square brackets down the left-hand side of the figure, along with the OxCal keywords, define the overall model exactly
Bestamak
Pottery from the Neolithic typologies at Bestamak (n = 38) was analysed for their lipid residues (SI Table S3). A total of 63% of the TLEs from Bestamak pottery showed lipids in appreciable concentrations (> 5 µg·g−1) with an average lipid concentration of 52.7 µg·g−1. All of the TLEs presenting residues (except six containing appreciable plasticiser contamination) are dominated by the C16:0 and C18:0 FAs (Fig. 1). The relative ratios of C16:0/C18:0 FAs are between 2 and 8, suggesting the processing of equine products in some potsherds. Most of δ13C16:0 and δ13C18:0 values measured (n= 11/13 or 85%) are consistent with those from modern equine products from Kazakhstan (Outram et al. 2011). One TLE (PS489) exhibited δ13C values consistent with either equine fats or ruminant adipose fats. Another TLE (PS484) displayed relatively enriched δ13C16:0 and δ13C18:0 values compared to any of the reference values of animal fats recorded from the region; however, its Δ13C (= δ13C18:0 − δ13C16:0) value of 0.3‰ suggests an equine origin.
Only three sherds were considered to be datable from their lipid concentrations (> 100 µg·g−1) and sherd sizes (at least 5 g available for sampling). One sherd was dated to 6092 ± 22 BP (PS484, BRAMS-3052; Table 1). The other two only provided ages on the C16:0 FA due to the low abundance of the C18:0 FA in the TLEs, preventing the collection of enough C for 14C dating; therefore, the internal quality control criterion is not available for these dates (Table 1). The C16:0 FA in the residues date to 6216 ± 27 BP (PS460, BRAMS-3050) and 6272 ± 27 BP (PS466, BRAMS-3051). Again, these 14C dates highlight the challenges faced when working with highly different abundances of the two fatty acids. These two dates are statistically identical (T’ = 2.2, T’ (0.05) = 3.8, ν = 1) providing confidence in their accurate dating. They are nonetheless significantly older than BRAMS-3052 suggesting a rather longer period of occupation at Bestamak.
The calibrated dates on horse products range between the 54th and 49th century BC (Fig. 4). The radiocarbon dates obtained here are consistent with the relative dating of pottery based on their typologies. Three radiocarbon dates on collagen and ceramics are available for the Makhandzhar ceramic phase, but are from other sites than Bestamak (Shevnina and Logvin 2020). The pre-existing dates (KI-13751 = 5910 ± 70 BP, SPb-1670 = 5662 ± 120 BP and SPb-1671 = 5966 ± 120 BP) present a wider uncertainty and display younger calibrated ages than the dates obtained in this study (Shevnina and Logvin 2020). These new dates on lipids preserved in Makhandzhar ceramics suggest this culture was already established in the late 6th millennium BC, and had older ancestry than the 14C dates from other settlements with this pottery typology suggest. Direct dating of lipid residues within potsherds provided a unique opportunity to date the Neolithic layer with Makhandzhar ceramics of the site of Bestamak. The 14C dates suggest a settlement persisted over several centuries at Bestamak. A more extensive dating program would be required to further refine this site chronology (Fig. 5).
Methodological considerations
From a technical point of view, direct compound-specific 14C dating of archaeological horse fat residues highlighted a number of challenges in the application of the approach. The differing abundances of C16:0 and C18:0 FAs in equine residues inevitably yielded significantly different amounts of C for each of the two FAs. This was particularly problematic for the potsherds with the largest difference in relative abundances of the two FAs, especially for sherds with relatively low lipid concentrations (< 100 µg of lipids per gram of sherd). Generally, it was not problematic to isolate the most abundant C16:0 FA in sufficient quantities > 1 mg of C to generate a full size target for AMS measurement; however, difficulties were commonly encountered in obtaining 200 µg of C from the C18:0 FA required for accurate and precise CSRA dating (Casanova et al. 2020c). In order to avoid this, especially to ensure no more than 1 mg of C for each FA was collected, the number of trapping runs was reduced to 10 for the C16:0 FA while 40 runs were performed for the C18:0 FA. We were also careful to use size-matched standards and appropriate blank corrections for the two FAs extracted from the same potsherd extract. Although not all potsherds could be successfully dated using this approach, for Botai, very good agreement was obtained for the 14C ages for the C16:0 and C18:0 FAs, which were entirely compatible with previously published dates for the settlement, supporting the accuracy achievable using the approach. The internal control achievable by comparing the dates for the C16:0 and C18:0 FAs shows again its usefulness for verifying the accuracy of dates using this approach. The 14C dating success rate for this investigation was 62% (n= 5 out of 8, excluding potsherds dated by one target only), which contrasts with the 80–100% success rate achieved in previous studies (Casanova et al. 2020c; Stojanovski et al. 2020). This highlights that tackling samples with uneven abundance of C16:0 and C18:0 fatty acids in the extracts remains challenging. Since completing the work described here, we have successfully dated additional potsherds displaying similarly unequal abundances of FAs in pottery from the Altai (Makarewicz et al., in prep) and Niger (Manning et al., in prep) using appropriate size-matched standards and blank corrections. These studies add further confidence in the modified approach we used for CSRA in cases of uneven abundances of C16:0 and C18:0 FAs from the same potsherds.
Significance of the radiocarbon dates on equine products in the Eurasian Steppe context
Returning to the focus of the work described here for the Eurasian Steppe, particular attention has been given to reconstructing dietary practices at Eneolithic and Bronze Age settlements by analysing food residues in potsherds (Outram et al. 2011; Outram 2012) but much less attention has been given to the Neolithic peoples who first used ceramics in the region. Therefore, exploitation of equine products in central Asia are less well documented for the earlier periods.
The new radiocarbon dates on Botai sherds proved entirely compatible with the pre-existing dates from the 4th millennium BC. Based on the dominance of horse remains at this site, and the wide processing of equine products in pottery vessels, horses have been shown to be an essential part of the economy. Direct CSRA dating of equine products from pottery vessels at Botai confirmed their Eneolithic antiquity. This is particularly significant as Botai is the only site where evidence of mare’s milk processing in pottery vessels has been reported (Outram et al. 2011). The new CSRA dates provide therefore further confidence in the ancestry of equine adipose and milk products exploitation in the 4th millennium BC. The site of Botai remains the site with the earliest domestic horse lineage evidence; however, it is not the ancestor of modern domestic breeds (DOM2) whose lineage can be traced back into the 3rd millennium BC and spread widely in the 2nd millennium BC replacing other lineages (Librado et al. 2021).
The new dates for Bestamak potsherds confirm the Neolithic origin of the Makhandzhar ceramics from the 6th millennium BC. This constitutes some of the oldest pottery yet analysed for their lipid residues in Central Asia. Animal bone assemblages associated with the Neolithic phases at Bestamak are very limited making the dating and dietary information that can be obtained from lipid residue analyses particularly useful. The lipids preserved in pottery vessels clearly indicate significant consumption of horse products at the site from the 6th millennium BC. A question remains as to whether these products would have come from wild horse hunting or even earlier husbanded horses. A way to answer this would be to determine δ2H values on the FAs identified as equine product and identify if some of them have δ2H values characteristic of mare’s milk fats.
Future analyses of a larger set of well-contextualised Neolithic sherds with δ13C and δ2H determinations would be required to demonstrate if equine milking, thus equine domestication, had earlier origins than Botai. Such a programme of research would also help reconstruct the sequence of subsistence practices that led from mixed hunting and gathering in the earlier Holocene to the extremely horse-specialised economies of the Eneolithic period in Kazakhstan.
Conclusions
This is the first time CSRA measurements have been performed on archaeological FAs of equine origin. Working with very different abundances of FAs from the same potsherds required some methodological adjustments for appropriate corrections of 14C measurements. Our study nonetheless showed that equine residues are, like lipid residues from ruminant products, datable by CSRA of individual FAs. The new CSRA dates particularly resolved the absolute chronology of Bestamak ceramics which were previously only relatively constrained based on ceramic typology. Our new dates on individual FAs of equine origin from ceramics from the Eurasian steppe are entirely compatible with the Botai chronology in the 4th millennium BC, and the Neolithic period at Bestamak in the 6th millennium BC.
References
Bayliss A, Marshall P (2019) Confessions of a serial polygamist: the reality of radiocarbon reproducibility in archaeological samples. Radiocarbon 61:1143–1158. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2019.55
Bronk Ramsey C (2009) Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51:337–360. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200033865
Casanova E (2019) Compound-specific radiocarbon dating of lipid residues preserved in archaeological pottery vessels (Doctoral thesis). University of Bristol
Casanova E, Knowles TD, Williams C, Crump MP, Evershed RP (2018) Practical considerations in high-precision compound-specific radiocarbon analyses: eliminating the effects of solvent and sample cross-contamination on accuracy and precision. Anal Chem 90:11025–11032. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02713
Casanova E, Arbogast R-M, Denaire A, Jeunesse C, Lefranc P, Evershed RP (2020a) Spatial and temporal disparities in human subsistence in the Neolithic Rhineland gateway. J Archaeol Sci 122:105215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105215
Casanova E, Knowles TD, Ford C, Cramp LJ, Sharples N, Evershed RP (2020b) Compound-specific radiocarbon, stable carbon isotope and biomarker analysis of mixed marine/terrestrial lipids preserved in archaeological pottery vessels. Radiocarbon 62:1679–1697. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2020.11
Casanova E, Knowles TDJ, Bayliss A, Dunne J, Barański MZ, Denaire A, Lefranc P, di Lernia S, Roffet-Salque M, Smyth J, Barclay A, Gillard T, Claßen E, Coles B, Ilett M, Jeunesse C, Krueger M, Marciniak A, Minnitt S, Rotunno R, van de Velde P, van Wijk I, Cotton J, Daykin A, Evershed RP (2020c) Accurate compound-specific 14C dating of archaeological pottery vessels. Nature 580:506–510. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2178-z
Casanova E, Knowles TDJ, Bayliss A, Roffet-Salque M, Heyd VM, Pyzel J, Claßen E, Domboroczki L, Ilett M, Lefranc P, Jeunesse C, Marciniak A, van Wijk I, Evershed RP, In press. Dating the emergence of dairying by the first farmers of Central Europe using 14C analysis of fatty acids preserved in pottery vessels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Casanova E, Knowles TDJ, Bayliss A, Walton-Doyle C, Barclay A, Evershed RP, (2022) Compound-specific radiocarbon dating of lipid residues in pottery vessels: a new approach for detecting the exploitation of marine resources. Journal of Archaeological Science 137:105528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2021.105528
Charters S, Evershed RP, Goad LJ, Leyden A, Blinkhorn PW, Denham V (1993) Quantification and distribution of lipid in archaeological ceramics: implications for sampling potsherds for organic residue analysis and the classification of vessel use. Archaeometry 35(2):211–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.1993.tb01036.x
Correa-Ascencio M, Evershed R (2014) High throughput screening of organic residues in archaeological potsherds using direct acidified methanol extraction. Anal Methods 6:1330–1340. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3AY41678J
de Barros Damgaard P, Martiniano R, Kamm J, Moreno-Mayar JV, Kroonen G, Peyrot M, Barjamovic G, Rasmussen S, Zacho C, Baimukhanov N, Zaibert V, Merz V, Biddanda A, Merz I, Loman V, Evdokimov V, Usmanova E, Hemphill B, Seguin-Orlando A, Yediay FE, Ullah I, Sjögren K-G, Iversen KH, Choin J, de la Fuente C, Ilardo M, Schroeder H, Moiseyev V, Gromov A, Polyakov A, Omura S, Senyurt SY, Ahmad H, McKenzie C, Margaryan A, Hameed A, Samad A, Gul N, Khokhar MH, Goriunova OI, Bazaliiskii VI, Novembre J, Weber AW, Orlando L, Allentoft ME, Nielsen R, Kristiansen K, Sikora M, Outram AK, Durbin R, Willerslev E (2018) The first horse herders and the impact of early Bronze Age steppe expansions into Asia. Science 360:eaar7711. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar7711
De Jong IDD, Dauvillier MM, Roman W (1961) On the formation of adipocere from fats. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 27:337–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02538464
Dudd SN, Regert M, Evershed RP (1998) Assessing microbial lipid contributions during laboratory degradations of fats and oils and pure triacylglycerols absorbed in ceramic potsherds. Org Geochem 29:1345–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(98)00093-X
Dunne J, Grillo KM, Casanova E, Whelton HL, Evershed RP (2019) Pastoralist foodways recorded in organic residues from pottery vessels of modern communities in Samburu, Kenya. J Archaeol Method Theory 26:619–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-018-9384-0
Evershed RP, Heron C, Goad LG. (1990) Analysis of organic residues of archaeological origin by high-temperature gas chromatography and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The Analyst 115(10): 1339–1342. https://doi.org/10.1039/AN9901501339
Evershed RP, Stott AW, Raven A, Dudd SN, Charters S, Leyden A (1995) Formation of long-chain ketones in ancient pottery vessels by pyrolysis of acyl lipids. Tetrahedron Lett 36:8875–8878. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-4039(95)01844-8
Evershed RP, Dudd SN, Copley MS, Berstan R, Stott AW, Mottram H, Buckley SA, Crossman Z. (2002) Chemistry of archaeological animal fats. Accounts of Chemical Research 35(8):660–668. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar000200f
Fewlass H, Mitchell PJ, Casanova E, Cramp LJ (2020) Chemical evidence of dairying by hunter-gatherers in highland Lesotho in the late first millennium ad. Nat Hum Behav 4:791–799. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0859-0
Gaunitz C, Fages A, Hanghøj K, Albrechtsen A, Khan N, Schubert M, Seguin-Orlando A, Owens IJ, Felkel S, Bignon-Lau O, de Barros Damgaard P, Mittnik A, Mohaseb AF, Davoudi H, Alquraishi S, Alfarhan AH, Al-Rasheid KAS, Crubézy E, Benecke N, Olsen S, Brown D, Anthony D, Massy K, Pitulko V, Kasparov A, Brem G, Hofreiter M, Mukhtarova G, Baimukhanov N, Lõugas L, Onar V, Stockhammer PW, Krause J, Boldgiv B, Undrakhbold S, Erdenebaatar D, Lepetz S, Mashkour M, Ludwig A, Wallner B, Merz V, Merz I, Zaibert V, Willerslev E, Librado P, Outram AK, Orlando L (2018) Ancient genomes revisit the ancestry of domestic and Przewalski’s horses. Science 360:111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao3297
Knowles TD, Monaghan PS, Evershed RP (2019) Radiocarbon sample preparation procedures and the first status report from the Bristol Radiocarbon AMS (BRAMS) facility. Radiocarbon 61:1541–1550. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2019.28
Levine MA (1999) Botai and the origins of horse domestication. J Anthropol Archaeol 18:29–78
Levine M, Kislenko AM (1997) New Eneolithic and Early Bronze Age radiocarbon dates for North Kazakhstan and South Siberia. Camb Archaeol J 7:297–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300001992
Librado P, Khan N, Fages A, Kusliy MA, Suchan T, Tonasso-Calvière L, Schiavinato S, Alioglu D, Fromentier A, Perdereau A, (2021). The origins and spread of domestic horses from the Western Eurasian steppes. Nature 598(7882):634-640. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04018-9
Mills J, White R (2012) Organic chemistry of museum objects. Routledge
MotuzaiteMatuzeviciute G, Lightfoot E, Liu X, Jacob J, Outram AK, Zaibert VF, Zakharov S, Jones MK (2019) Archaeobotanical investigations at the earliest horse herder site of Botai in Kazakhstan. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 11:6243–6258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-019-00924-2
Olsen S, (2006) Early horse domestication: weighing the evidence., in: Horses and humans: the evolution of human-equine relationships. Archaeopress, Oxford, 81–113
Outram AK, Bogaard A (2019) Subsistence and society in prehistory: new directions in Economic Archaeology. Cambridge University Press
Outram AK, Stear NA, Bendrey R, Olsen S, Kasparov A, Zaibert V, Thorpe N, Evershed RP (2009) The earliest horse harnessing and milking. Science 323:1332. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168594
Outram AK, Bendrey R, Evershed RP, Orlando L, Zaibert VF, (2021) Rebuttal of Taylor and Barrón-Ortiz 2021 rethinking the evidence for early horse domestication at Botai. Zenodo
Outram AK, Stear NA, Kasparov A, Usmanova E, Varfolomeev V, Evershed RP (2011) Horses for the dead: funerary foodways in Bronze Age Kazakhstan. Antiquity 85:116–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00067478
Outram AK, Kasparov A, Stear NA, Varfolomeev V, Usmanova E, Evershed RP (2012) Patterns of pastoralism in later Bronze Age Kazakhstan: new evidence from faunal and lipid residue analyses. J Archaeol Sci 39:2424–2435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.02.009
Reimer PJ, Austin WE, Bard E, Bayliss A, Blackwell PG, Ramsey CB, Butzin M, Cheng H, Edwards RL, Friedrich M (2020) The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 62:725–757. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2020.41
Shevnina I, Logvin A (2020) Exploration of the Turgai depression by the Neolithic population (in Russian). In Joints of no Return. Migration and Cultural Stream in Prehistory, I.V., Manzura, V.B. Pankowski (Eds), Bucharest, Stratum plus. 2, p57–69
Stear NA, (2008) Changing patterns of animal exploitation in the Prehistoric Eurasian steppe: an integrated molecular, stable isotopic and archaeological approach (Doctoral thesis). University of Bristol
Stojanovski D, Živaljević I, Dimitrijević V, Dunne J, Evershed RP, Balasse M, Dowle A, Hendy J, McGrath K, Fischer R (2020) Living off the land: terrestrial-based diet and dairying in the farming communities of the Neolithic Balkans. PLoS ONE 15:e0237608. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237608
Stott AW, Berstan R, Evershed RP, Bronk-Ramsey C, Hedges REM, Humm MJ. (2003) Direct dating of archaeological pottery by compound-specific C analysis of preserved lipids. Analytical Chemistry 75(19):5037–5045. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac020743y
Taylor WTT, Barrón-Ortiz CI (2021) Rethinking the evidence for early horse domestication at Botai. Sci Rep 11:7440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86832-9
Teetaert D, Boudin M, Saverwyns S, Crombé P (2017) Food and soot: organic residues on outer pottery surfaces. Radiocarbon 59:1609–1621. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2017.25
Ventresca Miller A, Usmanova E, Logvin V, Kalieva S, Shevnina I, Logvin A, Kolbina A, Suslov A, Privat K, Haas K, Rosenmeier M (2014) Subsistence and social change in central Eurasia: stable isotope analysis of populations spanning the Bronze Age transition. J Archaeol Sci 42:525–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.11.012
Ventresca Miller A, Winter-Schuh C, Usmanova E, Logvin A, Shevnina I, Makarewicz C (2018) Pastoralist mobility in bronze age landscapes of northern Kazakhstan: 87Sr/86Sr and δ18O analyses of human dentition from Bestamak and Lisakovsk. Environ Archaeol 23:352–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/14614103.2017.1390031
Whelton HL, Hammann S, Cramp LJE, Dunne J, Roffet-Salque M, Evershed RP (2021) A call for caution in the analysis of lipids and other small biomolecules from archaeological contexts. J Archaeol Sci 132:105397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2021.105397
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the European Research Council for funding a Proof of Concept Grant to RPE (LipDatH2020 ERC-2018-PoC/812917) financing a postdoctoral contract to EC. NERC are thanked for partial funding of the National Environmental Isotope Facility (NEIF; NE/V003917/1). The authors wish to thank the NERC (NE/V003917/1), the European Research Council (FP7-IDEAS-ERC/340923) and the University of Bristol for funding GC-MS and GC-C-IRMS capabilities used for this work. We thank the BRAMS facility established with funding by NERC, BBSRC and the University of Bristol. The Royal Society is thanked for funding a fellowship to MRS (DHF\R1\180064 and RGF\EA\181067).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EC and RPE designed the study. EC, NS and TK performed the laboratory work and data analysis. MRS advised on material selection and data analysis. AKO secured access of pottery materials and led the original project on horse domestication. VZ, AL, IS and AKO directed sites excavations. EC, AKO and RPE wrote the paper. All authors read, commented and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Viktor Zaibert is deceased.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Casanova, E., Knowles, T.D.J., Outram, A.K. et al. Direct 14C dating of equine products preserved in archaeological pottery vessels from Botai and Bestamak, Kazakhstan. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 14, 175 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-022-01630-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-022-01630-2