Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics and outcome of impacted button batteries among young children less than 7 years of age in China: a retrospective analysis of 116 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Ingestion of button batteries occurs in about ten persons per one million persons each year, with most of them children, and one in every 1000 battery ingestions leads to serious injuries. This study aimed to describe the clinical features and outcome of ingestion or inhalation of button batteries in children spanning a decade from January, 2006 to December, 2016 at a tertiary care hospital.

Methods

We reviewed the clinical records of children who sought treatment for inhaled or ingested button batteries at our hospital during the study period. Data on gender, age, time from ingestion to treatment, site of impaction, imaging findings, and outcomes were retrieved and analyzed.

Results

We identified 116 pediatric cases of ingestion or inhalation of button batteries. Their mean age was 26 months. The time from ingestion or inhalation of button batteries to treatment was 0.5 hours to 2 weeks. Ninety-seven (83.6%) button batteries were located in the nasal cavity, 13 (11.2%) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract including 6 in the esophagus, and 7 in the stomach and lower GI tract, and 6 (5.2%) in the auditory tract. Twenty-one (21.6%) children with nasal button batteries had preoperative septal perforations and one (1.0%) had postoperative septal perforation. One child with esophageal button battery developed esophageal stricture and one died of sudden cardiac arrest perioperatively. One child had auditory damages in the right tympanic membrane and ossicles.

Conclusions

Inhalation or ingestion may occur in the nasal cavities, the esophagus and GI tract and the auditory tract. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are required for a satisfactory outcome and ingested or inhaled button batteries require different treatment protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Litovitz T, Whitaker N, Clark L. Preventing battery ingestions: an analysis of 8648 cases. Pediatrics. 2010;125:1178–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cowan SA, Jacobsen P. Ingestion of button batteries. Epidemiology, clinical signs and therapeutic recommendations. Ugeskr Laeger. 2002;164:1204–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Litovitz T, Schmitz BF. Ingestion of cylindrical and button batteries: an analysis of 2382 cases. Pediatrics. 1992;89:747–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Centers for Disease control and Prevention. Injuries from batteries among children aged < 13 years—United States, 1995–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61:661–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buttazzoni E, Gregori D, Paoli B, Soriani N, Baldas S, Rodriguez H, et al. Symptoms associated with button batteries injuries in children: an epidemiological review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79:2200–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liao W, Wen G, Zhang X. Button battery intake as foreign body in Chinese children: review of case reports and the literature. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015;31:412–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Leinwand K, Brumbaugh DE, Kramer RE. Button battery ingestion in children: a paradigm for management of severe pediatric foreign body ingestions. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2016;26:99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ettyreddy AR, Georg MW, Chi DH, Gaines BA, Simons JP. Button battery injuries in the pediatric aerodigestive tract. Ear Nose Throat J. 2015;94:486–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Suita S, Ohgami H, Yakabe S, Nagasaki A. The fate of swallowed button batteries in children. Z Kinderchir. 1990;45:212–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Scholes MA, Jensen EL. Presentation and management of nasal foreign bodies at a tertiary children’s hospital in an American metro area. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;88:190–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Loh WS, Leong JL, Tan HK. Hazardous foreign bodies: complications and management of button batteries in nose. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003;112:379–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guidera AK, Stegehuis HR. Button batteries: the worst case scenario in nasal foreign bodies. N Z Med J. 2010;123:68–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brumbaugh DE, Colson SB, Sandoval JA, Karrer FM, Bealer JF, Litovitz T, et al. Management of button battery-induced hemorrhage in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011;52:585–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Anfang RR, Jatana KR, Linn RL, Rhoades K, Fry J, Jacobs IN. pH-neutralizing esophageal irrigations as a novel mitigation strategy for button battery injury. Laryngoscope. Laryngoscope. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharpe SJ, Rochette LM, Smith GA. Pediatric battery-related emergency department visits in the United States, 1990–2009. Pediatrics. 2012;129:1111–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TH and WQL equally contributed to the conception and design of the research; ZFX contributed to the design of the research; JL contributed to the acquisition and analysis of the data; KCR and EMX contributed to the interpretation of the data; and TH and WQL drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript, agreed to be fully accountable for ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the work, and read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Qing Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee of Wuhan Children’s Hospital.

Conflict of interest

No financial or nonfinancial benefits have been received or will be received from any party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

12519_2018_188_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Supplementary Fig. 1 Electron nasopharyngoscope shows brown black scar in the nasal septum at one week post foreign body removal (A and B) and septal perforation at one month post foreign body removal (C) (TIFF 8023 kb)

12519_2018_188_MOESM2_ESM.tif

Supplementary Fig. 2 Chest x-ray shows extensive bilateral lung solidification with pneumothorax in a 14-month old boy (TIFF 3207 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, T., Li, WQ., Xia, ZF. et al. Characteristics and outcome of impacted button batteries among young children less than 7 years of age in China: a retrospective analysis of 116 cases. World J Pediatr 14, 570–575 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-018-0188-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-018-0188-9

Keywords

Navigation