Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Enhancing permeability prediction in tight and deep carbonate formations: new insights from pore description and electrical property using gene expression programming

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The estimation of permeability in carbonate formations remains one of the main challenges in reservoir engineering. Existing literature predominantly utilizes total porosity as the sole input for characterizing permeability. However, the recognition of other influential parameters and their corresponding correlations is deemed important for enhancing accuracy, particularly in heterogeneous tight and deep carbonate formations. Despite progress, a universal, accurate, and straightforward approach for achieving this goal is still lacking. In this study, the advanced heuristic algorithm known as gene expression programming (GEP) is employed to estimate absolute permeability. An all-inclusive database that includes permeability, formation resistivity factor, total porosity, moldic porosity, interparticle porosity, and non-fabric-selective dissolution (connected) porosity is compiled from existing literature. Initially, a sensitivity analysis is conducted to identify the key variables affecting permeability. Notably, the formation resistivity factor emerges as the most relevant variable on permeability prediction. Subsequently, the reliability of the database is assessed using Williams’ plot to detect outliers. After excluding the outlier data and considering the detected influential variable on permeability, multiple realizations of GEP modeling strategies are constructed. As a result, four GEP-derived symbolic equations are proposed. Statistical measures and graphical analyses demonstrate that GEP Model-IV provides the most accurate estimations, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.09, a determination coefficient (R2) of 0.72, and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.33. Furthermore, the accuracy of the proposed GEP Model-IV is verified by Williams’ plot, covering approximately 97.32% of the databank. Finally, it is recognized that considering pore description parameters enhances the accuracy of permeability estimation, particularly in studies characterizing carbonate reservoirs, especially when dealing with tight and deep formations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akam SA, Maher TF, Schell-Murdey C, Arnott S (2010) Flow quality indicator (FQI): an innovative approach to permeability prediction. Paper presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition. Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. https://doi.org/10.2118/132361-MS

  • Alkroosh I, Nikraz H (2011) Correlation of pile axial capacity and CPT data using gene expression programming. Geotech Geol Eng 29(5):725–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asquith G (1997) The importance of determining pore type from petrophysical logs in the evaluation of a Permian Wolfcamp Reentry Northern Midland Basin. The Log Analyst 38(03):37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Babadagli T, Al-Salmi S (2004) A review of permeability-prediction methods for carbonate reservoirs using well-log data. SPE Res Eval & Eng 7(02):75–88. https://doi.org/10.2118/87824-PA

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Babadagli T, Al-Salmi S (2002) Improvement of permeability prediction for carbonate reservoirs using well log data. Paper presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition. Melbourne, Australia. https://doi.org/10.2118/77889-MS

  • Basbug B, Karpyn ZT (2007) Estimation of permeability from porosity, specific surface area, and irreducible water saturation using an artificial neural network. Paper presented at the Latin American & Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference. Buenos Aires, Argentina. https://doi.org/10.2118/107909-MS

  • Borai A (1987) A new correlation for the cementation factor in low-porosity carbonates. SPE Form Eval 2(04):495–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carman PC (1997) Fluid flow through granular beds. Chem Eng Res Des 75:S32–S48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilingar GV (1964) Relationship between porosity, permeability, and grain-size distribution of sands and sandstones. Dev Sedimentol 1:71–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilingarian GV, Chang J, Bagrintseva KI (1990) Empirical expression of permeability in terms of porosity, specific surface area, and residual water saturation of carbonate rocks. J Petrol Sci Eng 4(4):317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilingarian GV, Torabzadeh J, Rieke HH, Metghalchi M, Mazzullo S (1992) Interrelationships among surface area, permeability, porosity, pore size, and residual water saturation. Dev Petrol Sci 30:379–397

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chok NS (2010) Pearson’s versus Spearman’s and Kendall’s correlation coefficients for continuous data. University of Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Coats GR, Denoo S (1981) The producibility answer product. Tech Rev 29:55–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer NL (1985) A representation for the adaptive generation of simple sequential programs. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Genetic Algorithms and Their Applications. Psychology Press, pp 183–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandekar A (2015) Critical evaluation of empirical gas condensate correlations. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 27:298–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira C (2006) Gene expression programming: mathematical modeling by an artificial intelligence. Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira C (2001) Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. arXiv preprint cs/0102027

  • Focke J, Munn D (1987) Cementation exponents in Middle Eastern carbonate reservoirs. SPE Form Eval 2(02):155–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gholinezhad S, Masihi M (2012) A physical-based model of permeability/porosity relationship for the rock data of Iran southern carbonate reservoirs. Iran J Oil Gas Sci Technol 1(1):25–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Holland JH (1988) Genetic algorithms and machine learning. Mach Learn 3(2):95–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodall CR (1993) 13 Computation using the QR decomposition. In Handbook of Statistics 9:467–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7161(05)80137-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudarzi B (2019) Numerical Sensitivity Analysis and Simulation of Petrophysical Characteristics of Porous Media Domains, Master’s thesis. University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramatica P (2007) Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external. QSAR & combinatorial science 26:694–701. https://doi.org/10.1002/qsar.200610151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmati-Sarapardeh A, Ameli F, Dabir B, Ahmadi M, Mohammadi AH (2016) On the evaluation of asphaltene precipitation titration data: modeling and data assessment. Fluid Phase Equilib 415:88–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick D, Kennedy WD (1995) Formation resistivity factor and permeability relationships in rocks characterized by secondary solution porosity. Paper presented at the SPWLA 36th Annual Logging Symposium, Paris, France, SPWLA-1995-QQQ

  • Herrick DC, Kennedy WD (1994) Electrical efficiency; a pore geometric theory for interpreting the electrical properties of reservoir rocks. Geophysics 59(6):918–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, p 32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong T, Jeong K, Koo C (2018) An optimized gene expression programming model for forecasting the national CO2 emissions in 2030 using the metaheuristic algorithms. Appl Energy 228:808–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keehm Y (2003) Computational rock physics: transport properties in porous media and applications. Stanford University

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolah-kaj P, Kord S, Soleymanzadeh A (2022) Application of electrical rock typing for quantification of pore network geometry and cementation factor assessment. J Petrol Sci Eng 208:109426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koza JR, Koza JR (1992) Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection. MIT press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozeny J (1927) Ueber kapillare Leitung des Wassers im Boden. Sitzungsber Akad 136:271–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahdaviara M, Rostami A, Shahbazi K (2021) Smart learning strategy for predicting viscoelastic surfactant (VES) viscosity in oil well matrix acidizing process using a rigorous mathematical approach. SN Appl Sci 3(10):815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahdavi-Ara M, Rostami A, Shahbazi K, Shokrollahi A, Ghazanfari MH (2022) Estimating aqueous nanofluids viscosity via GEP modeling: Correlation development and data assessment. Iran J Chem Chem Eng 41(1):266–283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohaghegh S, Arefi R, Ameri S, Rose D (1995) Design and development of an artificial neural network for estimation of formation permeability. SPE Comp Appl 7(06):151–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen J, Engstrom F, Lind I (1998) The relation among porosity, permeability, and specific surface of chalk from the Gorm field, Danish North Sea. SPE Reservoir Eval Eng 1(03):245–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mostaghimi P, Blunt MJ, Bijeljic B (2013) Computations of absolute permeability on micro-CT images. Math Geosci 45(1):103–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najafi-Silab R, Soleymanzadeh A, Kolah-Kaj P, Kord S (2023) Electrical rock typing using Gaussian mixture model to determine cementation factor. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 13(5):1329–1344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ragland DA (2002) Trends in cementation exponents (m) for carbonate pore systems. Petrophysics, 43(05):SPWLA-2002-v43n5a4

  • Rostami A, Baghban A, Mohammadi AH, Hemmati-Sarapardeh A, Habibzadeh S (2019) Rigorous prognostication of permeability of heterogeneous carbonate oil reservoirs: Smart modeling and correlation development. Fuel 236:110–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rostami A, Kordavani A, Parchekhari S, Hemmati-Sarapardeh A, Helalizadeh A (2022) New insights into permeability determination by coupling Stoneley wave propagation and conventional petrophysical logs in carbonate oil reservoirs. Sci Rep 12(1):11618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw PJ, Leroy AM (1987) Robust regression and outlier detection. Wiley Online Library

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saar MO, Manga M (1999) Permeability-porosity relationship in vesicular basalts. Geophys Res Lett 26(1):111–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sander R, Pan Z, Connell LD (2017) Laboratory measurement of low permeability unconventional gas reservoir rocks: a review of experimental methods. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 37:248–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sayahi T, Tatar A, Rostami A, Anbaz MA, Shahbazi K (2021) Determining solubility of CO2 in aqueous brine systems via hybrid smart strategies. Int J Comput Appl Technol 65(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soleymanzadeh A, Jamialahmadi M, Helalizadeh A, Soulgani BS (2018) A new technique for electrical rock typing and estimation of cementation factor in carbonate rocks. J Petrol Sci Eng 166:381–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soleymanzadeh A, KolahKaj P, Kord S, Monjezi M (2021) A new technique for determining water saturation based on conventional logs using dynamic electrical rock typing. J Petrol Sci Eng 196:107803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soleymanzadeh A, Helalizadeh A, Jamialahmadi M, Soulgani BS (2021a) Development of a new model for prediction of cementation factor in tight gas sandstones based on electrical rock typing. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 94:104128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soleymanzadeh A, Helalizadeh A, Jamialahmadi M, Soulgani BS (2021b) Investigation of analogy between thermal and electrical properties of some reservoir rocks. Bull Eng Geol Env 80(1):507–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun W, Wong T-F (2018) Prediction of permeability and formation factor of sandstone with hybrid lattice Boltzmann/finite element simulation on microtomographic images. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 106:269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timur A (1968) An investigation of permeability, porosity, & residual water saturation relationships for sandstone reservoirs. The Log Analyst 9(04):SPWLA-1968-vIXn4a2

  • Watfa M, Nurmi R (1987) Calculation of saturation, secondary porosity and producibility in complex Middle East carbonate reservoirs. Paper presented at the SPWLA 28th Annual Logging Symposium, London, England, SPWLA-1987-CC

  • Zhong J, Feng L, Ong Y (2017) Gene Expression Programming: A Survey [Review Article]. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 12(3):54–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong J, Hu X, Zhang J, Gu M (2005) Comparison of performance between different selection strategies on simple genetic algorithms. International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation and International Conference on Intelligent Agents. Web Technologies and Internet Commerce (CIMCA-IAWTIC’06), Vienna, pp 1115–1121. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIMCA.2005.1631619

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Petroleum Engineering, Petroleum University of Technology (PUT), Ahwaz, Iran

    Alireza Rostami, Abbas Helalizadeh, Mehdi Bahari Moghaddam & Aboozar Soleymanzadeh

Authors
  1. Alireza Rostami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abbas Helalizadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mehdi Bahari Moghaddam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aboozar Soleymanzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alireza Rostami, Abbas Helalizadeh or Mehdi Bahari Moghaddam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Santanu Banerjee

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rostami, A., Helalizadeh, A., Moghaddam, M.B. et al. Enhancing permeability prediction in tight and deep carbonate formations: new insights from pore description and electrical property using gene expression programming. Arab J Geosci 17, 178 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-024-11971-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-024-11971-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation