Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Application of land properties in estimation of wheat production by FAO and gene expression programming (GEP) models

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to compare the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) framework as a common model and gene expression programming (GEP) model for predicting the irrigated wheat production by using land properties in Khajeh area, Iran. First, 80 representative soil profiles were described in wheat fields. Then, the soil samples were collected from each horizon, and soil properties were determined in the laboratory for obtaining the model input data. After that, wheat production models were developed by FAO and GEP models. Sensitivity analysis indicated that total N, available P, slope, coarse fragment, electrical conductivity, pH, and organic matter are important soil properties for wheat production. Based on the results, the value of predicted wheat production by GEP model (981–5382) is closer to the actual production (1000–5600) compared to the FAO models (1284–6123). The geometric mean error ratio (GMER), root mean square error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R2) between predicted and actual production for FAO and GEP models were calculated 1.24, 18.6, and 0.84 and 0.83, 15.4, and 0.91, respectively. The overall agreement was recognized between wheat predicted production by using FAO and GEP and actual production by composite operator. This agreement was 71.5 and 82.2% for FAO and GEP models, respectively. Therefore, gene expression programming model was introduced as an effective model for predicting the wheat production. This more accuracy was obtained due to good choosing and lack of interaction among land properties as input variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data which support the findings of this study will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Abdipour M, Younessi-Hmazekhanlu M, Ramazani SHR (2019) Artificial neural networks and multiple linear regression as potential methods for modeling seed yield of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Ind Crops Prod 127:185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.10.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison LE, Moodie CD (1965) Carbonates. In: Norman AG (ed) Methods of soil analysis: chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 1379–1396

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayoubi S, Sahrawat KL (2011) Comparing multivariate regression and artificial neural network to predict barley production from soil characteristics in northern Iran. Arch Agron Soil Sci 57(5):549–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650341003631400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béné C, Barange M, Subasinghe R, Pinstrup-Andersen P, Merino G, Hemre GI, Williams M (2015) Feeding 9 billion by 2050–putting fish back on the menu. Food Secur 7(2):261–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0427-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyoucos GJ (1962) Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. J Agron 54(5):464–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower CA, Reitemeier RF, Fireman M (1952) Exchangeable cation analysis of saline and alkali soils. Soil Sci 73(4):251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Nitrogen-Total. In: Page AL (ed) Methods of soil analysis: chemical and microbiological properties. Unaided states American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 595–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Briak H, Kebede F (2021) Wheat (Triticum aestivum) adaptability evaluation in a semi-arid region of Central Morocco using APSIM model. Sci Rep 11(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02668-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng S, Chen F, Dong X, Gao G, Wu X (2021) Short-term load forecasting by using improved GEP and abnormal load recognition. ACM Trans Internet Technol 21(4):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diacono M, Castrignanò A, Troccoli A, De Benedetto D, Basso B, Rubino P (2012) Spatial and temporal variability of wheat grain yield and quality in a Mediterranean environment: a multivariate geostatistical approach. Field Crops Res 131:49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elaalem M, Comber A, Fisher P (2011) A comparison of fuzzy AHP and ideal point methods for evaluating land suitability. Trans GIS 15(3):329–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2011.01260.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everest T, Sungur A, Özcan H (2020) Determination of agricultural land suitability with a multiple-criteria decision-making method in Northwestern Turkey. Int J Environ Sci Technol 18:1073–1088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02869-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1976) A framework for Land Evaluation. Soils Bulletin, 32. Rome.

  • FAO (1978) Report on the agro-ecological zones project. World Soil Resources Report, 48. Rome.

  • FAO (2006) Guidelines for soil description. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome.

  • Ferreira C (2001) Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. Complex Syst 13(2):87–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu Z, Jiang J, Gao Y, Krienke B, Wang M, Zhong K, Cao Q, Tian Y, Zhu Y, Cao W, Liu X (2020) Wheat growth monitoring and yield estimation based on multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle. Remote Sens 12(3):508. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomiero T, Pimentel D, Paoletti MG (2011) Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices: conventional vs. organic agriculture. Crit Rev Plant Sci 30(1–2):95–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.554355

  • Hamam KA, Negim O (2014) Evaluation of wheat genotypes and some soil properties under saline water irrigation. Ann Agric Sci 59(2):165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2014.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafarzadeh AA, Pal M, Servati M, FazeliFard MH, Ghorbani MA (2016) Comparative analysis of support vector machine and artificial neural network models for soil cation exchange capacity prediction. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13(1):87–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0856-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang P,  Thelen KD (2004) Effect of soil and topographic properties on crop yield in a North‐Central corn–soybean cropping system. Agronomy Journal, 96(1), pp.252-258.

  • Jones GV, Duff AA, Hall A, Myers JW (2010) Spatial analysis of climate in wine grape growing regions in the western United States. Am J Enol Vitic 61(3):313–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaboli SHA, Fallahpour A, Selvaraj J, Rahim NA (2017) Long-term electrical energy consumption formulating and forecasting via optimized gene expression programming. Energy 126:144–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaki S, Wang L (2019) Crop yield prediction using deep neural networks. Front Plant Sci 10:621. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khiddir SM (1986) A statistical approach in the use of parametric systems applied to the FAO framework for land evaluation. Dissertation, Trent Ghent University.

  • Koza JR (1992) Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural. MIT press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

    Google Scholar 

  • Law M, Collins A (2015) Getting to know ArcGIS. ESRI press, Redlands, p 768

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Page Y, Vasconcelos M, Palminha A, Melo IQ, Pereira JMC (2017) An operational approach to high resolution agro-ecological zoning in West-Africa. PLoS One 12(9):e0183737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemieux-Charles L McGuire WL (2006) What do we know about health care team effectiveness? A review of the literature. Medical care research and review, 63(3), pp.263-300.

  • Litke L, Gaile Z, Ruža A (2018) Effect of nitrogen fertilization on winter wheat yield and yield quality. Agron Res 16(2):500–509. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.18.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Goering CE, Tian L (2001) A neural network for setting target corn yields. Trans ASABE 44(3):705–713. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.6097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P (2015) The future of food and agriculture: trends and challenges. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

  • Maass J, Vose JM, Swank WT, Martínez-Yrízar A (1995) Seasonal changes of leaf area index (LAI) in a tropical deciduous forest in west Mexico. For Ecol Manag 74(1–3):171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)03485-F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean EO (1983) Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Page AL (ed) Methods of soil analysis: chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 199–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabati J, Nezami A, Neamatollahi E, Akbari M (2020) GIS-based agro-ecological zoning for crop suitability using fuzzy inference system in semi-arid regions. Ecol Indic 117:106646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RE (1982) Carbonate and gypsum. In: Page AL (ed) Methods of soil analysis: chemical and microbiological properties. Unaided states American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp v181-197

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH (ed) Methods of soil analysis: Chemical methods. John Wiley and Sons, pp 961–1010.

  • Newhall F, Berdanier CR (1996) Calculation of soil moisture regimes from the climatic record. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 46, National Soil Survey Center, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lincoln, NE.

  • Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS and Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture Government Print Office, Washington, United states.

  • Padarian J, Minasny B, McBratney A (2012) Using genetic programming to transform from Australian to USDA/FAO soil particle-size classification system. Soil Res 50(6):443–446. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR12139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla FLM, Maas SJ, González-Dugo MP, Mansilla F, Rajan N, Gavilán P, Domínguez J (2012) Monitoring regional wheat yield in Southern Spain using the GRAMI model and satellite imagery. Field Crops Res 130:145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.02.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontius RG Jr, Cheuk ML (2006) A generalized cross-tabulation matrix to compare soft classified maps at multiple resolutions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20: 1–30

  • Ren J, Chen Z, Zhou Q, Tang H (2008) Regional yield estimation for winter wheat with MODIS-NDVI data in Shandong, China. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 10(4), pp.403-413.

  • Rhoades JD (1996) Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH (ed) Methods of soil analysis: Chemical methods. John Wiley and Sons, pp 417–435.

  • Safa M, Samarasinghe S, Nejat M (2015) Prediction of wheat production using artificial neural networks and investigating indirect factors affecting it: case study in Canterbury province. New Zealand J Agric Sci Technol 17(4):791–803

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha S, Saha B, Murm S, Pati S, Roy PD (2014) Grain yield and phosphorus uptake by wheat as influenced by long-term phosphorus fertilization. Afr J Agric Res 9(6):607–612. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2013.7525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez J, Curt MD, Fernández J (2017) Approach to the potential production of giant reed in surplus saline lands of Spain. Glob Change Biol 9(1):105–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeneberger PJ, Wysocki DA Benham EC (2012) Field book for describing and sampling soils. Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE.

  • Shahbazi F, Jafarzadeh AA, Shahbazi M (2009) Agro-ecological field vulnerability evaluation and climate change impacts in Souma area (Iran), using MicroLEIS DSS. Biologia 64(3):555–559. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-009-0104-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sys C, Van Ranst E, Debaveye J (1991) Land evaluation: Part I. Principles in land evaluation and crop production calculations, Part II. Methods in land evaluation. General Administration for Development Cooperation, Brussels, Belgium.

  • Sys C, Van Ranst E, Debaveye J, Beernaert F (1993) Land evaluation: crop requirements. Part III. Central Administration for Development Cooperation, Brussels, Belgium.

  • TaghizadehMehrjardi R (2016) Digital mapping of cation exchange capacity using genetic programming and soil depth functions in Baneh region. Iran Arch Agron Soil Sci 62(1):109–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2015.1038253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori F, Mohammadi Torkashvand A, Ahmadi A, Esfandiari M (2021) Prediction of Saffron Yield Based on Soil Properties Using Artificial Neural Networks as a Way to Identify Susceptible Lands of Saffron. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2021.1879128

  • Tenpe AR, Patel A (2020) Utilization of support vector models and gene expression programming for soil strength modeling. Arab J Sci Eng 45(5):4301–4319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04441-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toscano P, Ranieri R, Matese A, Vaccari FP, Gioli B, Zaldei A, Silvestri M, Ronchi C, La Cava P, Porter JR, Miglietta F (2012) Durum wheat modeling: The Delphi system, 11 years of observations in Italy. Eur J Agron 43:108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2012.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uysal F (2020) Prediction of collapse potential of soils using gene expression programming and parametric study. Arab J Geosci 13(19):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06050-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Klompenburg T, Kassahun A, Catal C (2020) Crop yield prediction using machine learning: a systematic literature review. Comput Electron Agric 177:105709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whetton RL, Zhao Y, Nawar S, Mouazen AM (2021) Modelling the influence of soil properties on crop yields using a non-linear NFIR model and laboratory data. Soil Syst 5(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems5010012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Deng S, Zhang Z (2020) New spectral model for estimating leaf area index based on gene expression programming. Comput Electr 83:106604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yassin MA, Alazba AA, Mattar MA (2016) A new predictive model for furrow irrigation infiltration using gene expression programming. Comput Electron Agric 122:168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.01.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Li C, Koopialipoor M, JahedArmaghani D, Thai Pham B (2021) Development of a new methodology for estimating the amount of PPV in surface mines based on prediction and probabilistic models (GEP-MC). Int J Min Reclam Environ 35(1):48–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2020.1734151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorn CR, Shamseldin AY (2015) Peak flood estimation using gene expression programming. J Hydrol 531:1122–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors contributed to the study conception and design and read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moslem Servati.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Haroun Chenchouni

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bariklo, A., Alamdari, P., Moravej, K. et al. Application of land properties in estimation of wheat production by FAO and gene expression programming (GEP) models. Arab J Geosci 15, 590 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09868-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09868-9

Keywords

Navigation