Skip to main content
Log in

Risk estimation of soil slope stability problems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For successful design of any real-life engineering structures, it is important to quantify the risk of failure. Most of the geotechnical engineers find it suitable to define risk mathematically in terms of well-known metric called probability of failure. The inherent spatial variability of the soil strength parameters also makes the design of soil slopes suitable for stochastic interpretations. In the present study, probabilistic slope stability analysis has been performed for both, cohesive soil as well as cohesive frictional, i.e., \(c-\phi\) soil. The estimation of the factor of safety of the soil slope has been carried out using ordinary method of slices. Probabilistic analysis has been carried out using the single random variable approach with the assumption that the cohesion and angle of internal friction of soils follow lognormal distribution. The variation in soil shear strength is taken into account with the help of statistical parameter known as coefficient of variation. The effect of the coefficient of variation, the spatial correlation length, and local averaging on the probability of failure and the factor of safety has been investigated. This phenomenon indicates a gradual variation of probability of failure with respect to the factor of safety at higher coefficient of variation values. The presented analyses can be used to determine the factor of safety of a soil slope for which the slope should be designed with a predefined probability of failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aladejare AE, Wang Y (2018) Influence of rock property correlation on reliability analysis of rock slope stability: from property characterization to reliability analysis. Geosci Front 9(6):1639–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asteris PG, Mamou A, Hajihassani M, Hasanipanah M, Koopialipoor M, Le T-T, Kardani N, Armaghani DJ (2021) Soft computing based closed form equations correlating L and N-type Schmidt hammer rebound numbers of rocks. Transp Geotech 100588

  • Baker R, Garber M (1978) Theoretical analysis of the stability of slopes. Geotechnique 28(4):395–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop AW (1955) The use of the slip circle in the stability analysis of slopes. Geotechnique 5(1):7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celestino TB, Duncan JM (1981) Simplified search for non-circular slip surface. Proceedings, 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, International Society for Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm, AA Balkema, Rotterdam, Holland 3, 391–394

  • Chen L, Zhang W, Gao X, Wang L, Li Z, Böhlke T, Perego U (2020) Design charts for reliability assessment of rock bedding slopes stability against bi-planar sliding: SRLEM and BPNN approaches. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 1–16

  • Chen Z-Y, Shao C-M (1988) Evaluation of minimum factor of safety in slope stability analysis. Can Geotech J 25(4):735–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng YM (2003) Location of critical failure surface and some further studies on slope stability analysis. Comput Geotech 30(3):255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng YM, Li L, Chi SC (2007) Performance studies on six heuristic global optimization methods in the location of critical slip surface. Comput Geotech 34(6):462–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorigo M (1992) Optimization, learning and natural algorithms. Ph. D. Thesis, Politecnico Di Milano.

  • Drucker DC, Prager W (1952) Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design. Q Appl Mathe 10(2):157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellenius W (1936) Calculation of stability of earth dam. Transactions. 2nd Congress Large Dams, Washington, DC, 1936, 4, 445–462

  • Fenton GA, Griffiths DV (2008) Risk assessment in geotechnical engineering (Vol. 461). John Wiley & Sons. New York

  • Fredlund DG, Krahn J (1977) Comparison of slope stability methods of analysis. Can Geotech J 14(3):429–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Zhu D, Zhang F, Lei GH, Qin H (2014) Stability analysis of three-dimensional slopes under water drawdown conditions. Can Geotech J 51(11):1355–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geem ZW, Kim JH, Loganathan GV (2001) A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation 76(2):60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths DV, Fenton GA (2000) Influence of soil strength spatial variability on the stability of an undrained clay slope by finite elements. In Slope stability 2000 (pp. 184–193)

  • Griffiths DV, Fenton GA (2004) Probabilistic slope stability analysis by finite elements. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(5):507–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths DV, Huang J, Fenton GA (2009) On the reliability of earth slopes in three dimensions. Proc R Soc A: Mathe Phys Eng Sci 465(2110):3145–3164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths DV, Lane PA (1999) Slope stability analysis by finite elements. Geotechnique 49(3):387–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths DV, Yu X (2015) Another look at the stability of slopes with linearly increasing undrained strength. Géotechnique 65(10):824–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holand JH (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems 1975. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalal FE, Xu Y, Iqbal M, Javed MF, Jamhiri B (2021) Predictive modeling of swell-strength of expansive soils using artificial intelligence approaches: ANN, ANFIS and GEP. J Environ Manag 289:112420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janbu N (1973) Slope stability computations–Embankment–Dam Engineering, Casagrande Volume. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 47–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Javankhoshdel S, Bathurst RJ (2016) Influence of cross correlation between soil parameters on probability of failure of simple cohesive and c-ϕ slopes. Can Geotech J 53(5):839–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaloop MR, Bardhan A, Kardani N, Samui P, Hu JW, Ramzy A (2021) Novel application of adaptive swarm intelligence techniques coupled with adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system in predicting photovoltaic power. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 148:111315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardani N, Bardhan A, Roy B, Samui P, Nazem M, Armaghani DJ, Zhou A (2021) A novel improved Harris Hawks optimization algorithm coupled with ELM for predicting permeability of tight carbonates. Eng Comput 1–24

  • Kardani N, Zhou A, Shen S-L, Nazem M (2021) Estimating unconfined compressive strength of unsaturated cemented soils using alternative evolutionary approaches. Transp Geotech 29:100591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of ICNN'95-international conference on neural networks (Vol. 4, pp. 1942-1948). IEEE

  • Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598):671–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KS, Geem ZW (2005) A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: harmony search theory and practice. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(36–38):3902–3933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuo M, Kuroda K (1974) Probabilistic approach to design of embankments. Soils Found 14(2):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern NRU, Price VE (1965) The analysis of the stability of general slip surfaces. Geotechnique 15(1):79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen VU (1985) Determination of critical slope failure surfaces. J Geotech Eng 111(2):238–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyelowe KC, Iqbal M, Jalal FE, Onyia ME, Onuoha IC (2021) Application of 3-algorithm ANN programming to predict the strength performance of hydrated-lime activated rice husk ash treated soil. Multiscale Multidiscip Model Exp Des 1–16

  • Phoon K-K, Kulhawy FH (1999) Characterization of geotechnical variability. Can Geotech J 36(4):612–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarma SK (1973) Stability analysis of embankments and slopes. Geotechnique 23(3):423–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skempton AW (1948) ‘The φ 0 Analysis of Stability and Its Theoretical Basis. Proceedings 72–77

  • Spencer E (1967) A method of analysis of the stability of embankments assuming parallel inter-slice forces. Geotechnique 17(1):11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanmarcke E (1983) Random fields. Random Fields 372

  • Wai FAH, Chen WAIFAH (1975) Limit analysis and soil plasticity.

  • Wang L, Wu C, Gu X, Liu H, Mei G, Zhang W (2020) Probabilistic stability analysis of earth dam slope under transient seepage using multivariate adaptive regression splines. Bull Eng Geol Environ 79(6):2763–2775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Wu C, Tang L, Zhang W, Lacasse S, Liu H, Gao L (2020) Efficient reliability analysis of earth dam slope stability using extreme gradient boosting method. Acta Geotech 15(11):3135–3150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman RV (1984) Evaluating calculated risk in geotechnical engineering. J GeotechEng 110(2):143–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu W (2015) Slope Stability Assessment Based on Limit Analysis. In Geotechnical Safety and Risk V (pp. 263–268). IOS Press

  • Zhang W, Li H, Li Y, Liu H, Chen Y, Ding X (2021) Application of deep learning algorithms in geotechnical engineering: a short critical review. Artif Intell Rev 1–41

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pijush Samui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Zeynal Abiddin Erguler

APPENDIX

APPENDIX

The probability of failure pf against slope failure has been defined as the probability that the Fs value is less than 1. The derivation of the expression of pf for different cases is shown below:

Cohesive Soil

For cohesive soil slope, the factor of safety Fs against failure is earlier mentioned in Eq. 11 and is given by

$$F_{s} = \frac{{c_{u} L_{a} R}}{Wd}.$$
(A1)

From Eq. A1, pf is derived as follows:

$$\begin{array}{*{20}c} {p_{f} = P\left[ {F_{s} < 1} \right]} \\ { = P\left[ {\frac{{c_{u} L_{a} R}}{Wd} < 1} \right].} \\ \end{array}$$

Taking logarithm on both sides, we get

$$\begin{gathered} = P\left[ {\ln \left( {c_{u} L_{a} R} \right) - \ln \left( {Wd} \right) < 0} \right] \hfill \\ = P\left[ {ln\left( {c_{u} L_{a} R} \right) < \ln \left( {Wd} \right)} \right]. \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$

Subtracting \(\mu_{{ln\left( {c_{u} L_{a} R} \right)}}\) and dividing by \(\sigma_{{ln\left( {c_{u} L_{a} R} \right)}}\) on both sides, we get

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} { = P\left[ {\frac{{ln\left( {c_{u} L_{a} R} \right) - \mu_{{ln\left( {c_{u} L_{a} R} \right)}} }}{{\sigma_{{ln\left( {c_{u} L_{a} R} \right)}} }} < \frac{{\ln \left( {Wd} \right) - \mu_{{ln\left( {c_{u} L_{a} R} \right)}} }}{{\sigma_{{ln\left( {c_{u} L_{a} R} \right)}} }}} \right]} \hfill \\ { = P\left[ {Z < \frac{{\ln \left( {Wd} \right) - \mu_{{ln\left( {c_{u} L_{a} R} \right)}} }}{{\sigma_{{ln\left( {c_{u} L_{a} R} \right)}} }}} \right].} \hfill \\ \end{array}$$
(A2)

Cohesive Frictional Soil

In case of cohesive frictional, i.e., cϕ soil, different cases are considered in which soil properties such as cohesion and angle of internal friction are treated as lognormally distributed random variables. The respective expressions for factor of safety Fs against failure and the associated probability of failure are as described below.

For cohesion

In this case, the cohesion parameter is assigned lognormal distribution. The factor of safety Fs against failure is earlier mentioned in Eq. 14 and is given by

$$F_{s} = \frac{{\sum {cl} }}{{\sum {w\sin \alpha } - \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } }}.$$
(A3)

Further, the probability of failure pf expression from A3 is derived as follows

$$\begin{array}{*{20}c} {p_{f} = P\left[ {F_{s} < 1} \right]} \\ { = P\left[ {\frac{{\sum {cl} }}{{\sum {w\sin \alpha - \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } } }} < 1} \right]} \\ { = P\left[ {\ln (\sum {cl} ) - \ln \left( {\sum {w\sin \alpha - \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } } } \right) < 0} \right]} \\ { = P\left[ {\ln (\sum {cl} ) < \ln \left( {\sum {w\sin \alpha - \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } } } \right)} \right].} \\ \end{array}$$

Subtracting \(\mu_{{\ln (\sum {cl} )}}\) and dividing by \(\sigma_{{\ln (\sum {cl} )}}\), we get

$$\begin{gathered} = P\left[ {\frac{{\ln (\sum {cl} ) - \mu_{{\ln (\sum {cl} )}} }}{{\sigma_{{\ln (\sum {cl} )}} }} < \frac{{\ln \left( {\sum {w\sin \alpha - \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } } } \right) - \mu_{{\ln (\sum {cl} )}} }}{{\sigma_{{\ln (\sum {cl} )}} }}} \right] \hfill \\ = P\left[ {Z < \frac{{\ln \left( {\sum {w\sin \alpha - \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } } } \right) - \mu_{{\ln (\sum {cl} )}} }}{{\sigma_{{\ln (\sum {cl} )}} }}} \right]. \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$
(A4)

For angle of internal friction

In this case, the angle of internal friction is assigned lognormal distribution. The factor of safety Fs against failure is earlier mentioned in Eq. 15 and is given by

$$F_{s} = \frac{{\sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } }}{{\sum {w\sin \alpha } - \sum {cl} }}.$$
(A5)

Further, the probability of failure pf expression from A5 is derived as follows

$$\begin{gathered} p_{f} = P\left[ {F_{s} < 1} \right] \hfill \\ = P\left[ {\frac{{\sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } }}{{\sum {w\sin \alpha - \sum {cl} } }} < 1} \right] \hfill \\ = P\left[ {\ln (\sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } ) - \ln \left( {\sum {w\sin \alpha - \sum {cl} } } \right) < 0} \right] \hfill \\ = P\left[ {\ln (\sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } ) < \ln \left( {\sum {w\sin \alpha - \sum {cl} } } \right)} \right]. \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$

Subtracting \(\mu_{{\ln ((\sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } ))}}\) and dividing by \(\sigma_{{\ln (\sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } )}}\), we get

$$\begin{gathered} = P\left[ {\frac{{\ln (\sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } ) - \mu_{{\ln ((\sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } ))}} }}{{\sigma_{{\ln (\sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } )}} }} < \frac{{\ln \left( {\sum {w\sin \alpha - \sum {cl} } } \right) - \mu_{{\ln (\sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } )}} }}{{\sigma_{{\ln (\sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } )}} }}} \right] \hfill \\ = P\left[ {Z < \frac{{\ln \left( {\sum {w\sin \alpha - \sum {cl} } } \right) - \mu_{{\ln (\sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } )}} }}{{\sigma_{{\ln (\sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } )}} }}} \right]. \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$
(A6)

For both cohesion and angle of internal friction

In this case, both cohesion and angle of internal friction are assigned lognormal distribution. The factor of safety Fs against failure pf is earlier mentioned in Eq. 16 and is given by

$$F_{s} = \frac{{\sum {cl} + \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } }}{{\sum {w\sin \alpha } }}.$$
(A7)

Further, the probability of failure pf expression from A7 is derived as follows

$$\begin{gathered} p_{f} = P\left[ {F_{s} < 1} \right] \hfill \\ = P\left[ {\frac{{\sum {cl} + \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } }}{{\sum {w\sin \alpha } }} < 1} \right] \hfill \\ = P\left[ {\ln (\sum {cl} + \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } ) - \ln \left( {\sum {w\sin \alpha } } \right) < 0} \right] \hfill \\ = P\left[ {\ln (\sum {cl} + \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } ) < \ln \left( {\sum {w\sin \alpha } } \right)} \right]. \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$

Subtracting \(\mu_{{\ln (\sum {cl} + \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } )}}\) and dividing by \(\sigma_{{\ln (\sum {cl} + \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } )}}\), we get

$$\begin{gathered} = P\left[ {\frac{{\ln (\sum {cl} + \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } ) - \mu_{{\ln (\sum {cl} + \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } )}} }}{{\sigma_{{\ln (\sum {cl} + \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } )}} }} < \frac{{\ln \left( {\sum {w\sin \alpha } } \right) - \mu_{{\ln (\sum {cl} + \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } )}} }}{{\sigma_{{\ln (\sum {cl} + \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } )}} }}} \right] \hfill \\ = P\left[ {Z < \frac{{\ln \left( {\sum {w\sin \alpha } } \right) - \mu_{{\ln (\sum {cl} + \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } )}} }}{{\sigma_{{\ln (\sum {cl} + \sum {w\cos \alpha \tan \phi } )}} }}} \right] = P\left[ {Z < \frac{{\ln \left( {\sum {w\sin \alpha } } \right) - \mu_{{\ln (F_{R} )}} }}{{\sigma_{{\ln (F_{R} )}} }}} \right]. \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$
(A8)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, G., Burman, A., Bardhan, A. et al. Risk estimation of soil slope stability problems. Arab J Geosci 15, 204 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09528-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09528-y

Keywords

Navigation