Skip to main content
Log in

Modified SLD model for coalbed methane adsorption under reservoir conditions

  • ICCESEN 2017
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the process of coalbed methane (CBM) mining, with the decreasing of reservoir pressure, stress sensitivity and matrix desorption shrinkage, which could be called self-regulating effect comprehensively, possess great effect on the gas adsorption due to the changing of pore volume. Therefore, it is necessary to modify the simplified local density (SLD) model to investigate the gas adsorption under reservoir conditions for an accurate prediction of CBM production. For the utilization of SLD adsorption model, assume the pores as slit pore. When pressure is lower than critical desorption pressure and keeps falling, the deformations of specific surface area (SSA) and pore width could be studied by the chosen Shi and Durucan (S&D) model. Furthermore, based on the variation relationship and the modification of SLD model, a new adsorption predicting model could be derived with the consideration of stress sensitivity, and matrix desorption shrinkage. In the absence of stress sensitivity and matrix desorption shrinkage, the calculated consequence is relatively smaller than the actual field adsorption data. What’s more, the sensitivity analyses of Poisson’s ratio, pore volume compressibility and critical desorption pressure are conducted with the application of this new model. At the same reservoir pressure, Poisson’s ratio possesses negative relationship with modified adsorption, while pore volume compressibility and critical desorption pressure both possess positive influence on modified adsorption. The main reason is that Poisson’s ratio affects matrix desorption shrinkage negatively, while pore volume compressibility and critical desorption pressure affect matrix desorption shrinkage positively. In spite of the opposite effect of stress sensitivity and matrix desorption shrinkage on pore deformation, matrix desorption shrinkage exhibits a dominant role in self-regulating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 51774298, No. 51974330, and No. 51574256)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaojun Wu or Zhengfu Ning.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Geo-Resources-Earth-Environmental Sciences

Appendix

Appendix

Due to the positive relationship of relative matrix deformation and the surface energy variation, there is a relational equation

$$ \varepsilon =\frac{\rho_{\mathrm{c}} A\varDelta \gamma}{E} $$
(12)

where ε is the relative strain deformation and Δγ is the surface energy variation, J/m2.

Based on Gibbs equation (Bangham 1937), the surface energy variation is given by

$$ \varDelta \gamma ={\int}_0^p\Gamma RTd\ln p $$
(13)

where Γ is the surface concentration of adsorbed gas, mol/m2, which could be expressed as

$$ \Gamma =\frac{V}{V_0S} $$
(14)

where V is the gas adsorption at pressure p, m3/t, which could be expressed by Langmuir adsorption equation.

$$ V=\frac{V_{\mathrm{L}} bp}{1+ bp} $$
(15)

Combine Eq. (12) to (16); then the strain deformation caused by desorption

$$ \varDelta \varepsilon =\varepsilon (p)-\varepsilon \left({p}_{\mathrm{c}}\right)=\frac{V_{\mathrm{L}}{\rho}_c RT}{EV_0}\left[\ln \left(1+ bp\right)-\ln \left(1+{bp}_{\mathrm{c}}\right)\right] $$
(16)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, X., Ning, Z., Han, G. et al. Modified SLD model for coalbed methane adsorption under reservoir conditions. Arab J Geosci 12, 562 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4763-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4763-8

Keywords

Navigation