Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of liquid carbon dioxide phase change fracturing technology on gas drainage

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coal mine researchers have been studying the subject of improving the effect of gas drainage to control gas accident. This paper focuses on a new permeability-improvement technology, liquid carbon dioxide phase change fracturing technology. This technology can be classified as physical blasting by using the phase energy of liquid carbon dioxide in the drilling underground coal mine. According to the results of field tests, by applying the liquid carbon dioxide phase change fracturing technology, the radius of the damaged area in the coal body around the drilling reached 5 m. Also, compared with the original coal body, the permeability of the damaged area increased approximately six times. In addition, based on the permeability of the damaged area, the influence of the liquid carbon dioxide phase change fracturing technology on the gas drainage radius was analyzed by numerical calculation. It can be observed from the numerical results that the effect of gas drainage was improved greatly by the liquid carbon dioxide phase change fracturing operation. Research results of this paper can contribute to safe and efficient mining of coal mines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon (1995) Cardox system brings benefits in the mining of large coal. Coal International 243(1):27–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Barati R, Hutchins RD, Friedel T, Ayoub JA, Dessinges M, England KW (2009) Fracture impact of yield stress and fracture-face damage on production with a three-phase 2d model. SPE Prod Oper 24(2):336–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barati R, Liang JL (2014) A review of fracturing fluid systems used for hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells. J Appl Polym Sci 131(16)

  • Burton TG, Rifai HS, Hildenbrand ZL, Carlton DD, Fontenot BE, Schug KA (2016) Elucidating hydraulic fracturing impacts on ground water quality using a regional geospatial statistical modeling approach. Sci Total Environ 545:114–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai F, Liu Z (2011) Intensified extracting gas and rapidly diminishing outburst risk using deep-hole presplitting blast technology before opening coal seam in shaft influenced by fault. Procedia Eng 26:449–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng YP, Wang L, Zhang XL (2011) Environmental impact of coal mine methane emissions and responding strategies in China. Int J Greenh Gas Control 5:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HD, Cheng YP, Zhou HX, Li W (2013) Damage and permeability development in coal during unloading. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46:1377–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HD, Cheng YP, Ren T, Zhou HX, Liu QQ (2014) Permeability distribution characteristics of protected coal seams during unloading of the coal body. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 71:105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory K, Mohan AM (2015) Current perspective on produced water management challenges during hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas recovery. Environ Chem 12(3):261–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo D, Pei H, Song J, Qin F, Liu X (2008) Study on splitting mechanism of coalbed deep-hole cumulative blasting to improve permeability. J China Coal Soc 33:1381–1385

    Google Scholar 

  • King GE (2012) Hydraulic fracturing 101: what every representative, environmentalist, regulator, reporter, investor, university researcher, neighbor and engineer should know about estimating frac risk and improving Frac performance in unconventional gas and oil wells. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers, The Woodlands, Texas. February, In, pp 6–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Lin B, Zhai C (2014) The effect of pulse frequency on the fracture extension during hydraulic fracturing. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 21:296–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Liu Z, Gao K, Ma X, Li Z, Guo L (2014) Experimental study and application of directional focused energy blasting in deep boreholes. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 33:2490–2496

    Google Scholar 

  • Long SC (2014) Direct and indirect challenges for water quality from the hydraulic fracturing industry. J Am Water Works Assoc 106(11):53–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Coal Mine Safety Supervision Bureau (2009) Provisions of the prevention of coal and gas outburst, Beijing

  • Rogers JD, Burke TL, Osborn SG, Ryan JN (2015) A framework for identifying organic compounds of concern in hydraulic fracturing fluids based on their mobility and persistence in groundwater. Environ Sci Technol Lett 2(6):158–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutqvist J, Tsang CF (2002) A study of caprock hydro-mechanical changes associated with CO2-injection into a brine formation. Environ Geol 42:296–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP (1998) Non-explosive applications of the PCF concept for underground excavation. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology 13:305–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringfellow WT, Domen JK, Camarillo MK, Sandelin WL, Borglin S (2014) Physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of compounds used in hydraulic fracturing. J Hazard Mater 275:37–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringfellow WT, Camarillo MK, Domen JK, Sandelin WL, Varadharajan C, Jordan PD, Reagan MT, Cooley H, Heberger MG, Birkholzer JT (2017) Identifying chemicals of concern in hydraulic fracturing fluids used for oil production. Environ Pollut 220:413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vengosh A, Jackson RB, Warner N, Darrah TH, Kondash A (2014) A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 48(15):8334–8348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidanovic N, Ognjanovic S, Ilincic N, Ilic N, Tokalic R (2011) Application of unconventional methods of underground premises construction in coal mines. Technics Technol Educ Manag-ttem 6(4):861–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang HF, Cheng YP, Wang W, Xu R (2014) Research on comprehensive CBM extraction technology and its applications in China’s coal mines. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 20:200–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan F, Lin B, Zhu C, Shen C, Zou Q, Guo C, Liu T (2015) A novel ECBM extraction technology based on the integration of hydraulic slotting and hydraulic fracturing. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 22:571–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang T, Tham L, Tang C, Liang Z, Tsui Y (2004) Influence of heterogeneity of mechanical properties on hydraulic fracturing in permeable rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 37:251–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai C, Li M, Sun C, Zhang J, Yang W, Li Q (2012) Guiding-controlling technology of coal seam hydraulic fracturing fractures extension. Int J Min Sci Technol 22:831–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou C, Lin B, Li F, Zhao S, Liu F (2011) The research of quaternity of drilling-blasting-fracturing-extracting technology and application of outburst. Procedia Eng 26:449–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou HX, Yang QL, Cheng YP, Ge CG, Chen JX (2014) Methane drainage and utilization in coal mines with strong coal and gas outburst dangers: a case study in Luling mine, China. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 20:357–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou SN, Kong JZ (1965) Gas flow theory and its applications in coal seam. J China Coal Soc 2:24–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu W, Wei C, Li S, Wei J, Zhang M (2013) Numerical modeling on destress blasting in coal seam for enhancing gas drainage. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 59:179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Research Project of Henan Province (172102310640), the State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Gas Geology and Gas Control of Henan Province (WS2017B13, Henan Polytechnic University), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M561989), the Ph.D. Foundation of Henan Polytechnic University (B2014-001), the Support Program on Science and Technology Innovation of University in Henan Province (17IRTSTHN030), the Key Scientific Research Projects of Colleges of Henan Province (16A440005), and the National Foundation for the Youth of China (No. 51504084).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhao-feng Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Hd., Wang, Zf., Qi, Ll. et al. Effect of liquid carbon dioxide phase change fracturing technology on gas drainage. Arab J Geosci 10, 314 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3103-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3103-0

Keywords

Navigation