Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Groundwater potential recharge estimation in bare soil using three soil moisture accounting models: field evaluation for a semi-arid foothill region

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Performances of conventional and improved soil moisture balance as well as locally calibrated empirical models were evaluated in simulating potential recharge (R) and soil moisture content for a semi-arid foothill region. Models comparison with observed values using lysimeter data during [(2011–2012), (2012–2013)] reveal poor performance of conventional soil moisture balance model, underestimating annual R values. Improved soil moisture balance model provided acceptable estimation of annual R for 2011–2012 by considering the wetting of the near surface soil storage. However, it produced the worst simulation for daily soil moisture content once rainy season was over. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the precision degree of initial soil moisture deficit value would strongly influence estimation of R by improved soil moisture balance model, which can be viewed as a limiting factor. Additionally, locally calibrated model produced the best estimation of annual R and daily soil moisture content, which is suggested for the study region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration—guidelines for computing crop water requirements—FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome, 300 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison GB (1988) A review of some of the physical, chemical and isotopic techniques available for estimating groundwater recharge. In: Simmers I (ed) Estimation of natural groundwater recharge. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, p 49–72

  • Allison GB, Gee GW, Tyler SW (1994) Vadose-zone techniques for estimating groundwater recharge in arid and semiarid regions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58(1):6–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banimahd SA, Khalili D, Kamgar-Haghighi AA, Zand-Parsa S (2014) Evaluation of groundwater potential recharge models considering estimated bare soil evaporation, in a semi-arid foothill region. Hydrol Sci J 61(1):162–172. doi:10.1080/02626667.2014.959957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black TA, Gardner WR, Thurtell GW (1969) The prediction of evaporation, drainage, and soil water storage for a bare soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 33(5):655–660

  • Bredenkamp DB, Botha LJ, Van Tonder GJ, Van Rensburg HJ, (1995) Manual on quantitative estimation of groundwater recharge and aquifer storativity: based on practical hydro-logical methods. Water Res Comm

  • Cantón Y, Villagarcía L, José Moro M, Serrano-Ortíz P, Were A, Javier Alcala F, Kowalski AS, Solé-Benet A, Lázaro R, Domingo D (2010) Temporal dynamics of soil water balance components in a karst range in southeastern Spain: estimation of potential recharge. Hydrol Sci J 55(5):737–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman TG, Malone RW (2002) Comparison of models for estimation of groundwater recharge, using data from a deep weighing lysimeter. Math Comput Simul 59(1):3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosbie RS, Jolly ID, Leaney FW, Petheram C (2010) Can the dataset of field based recharge estimates in Australia be used to predict recharge in data-poor areas? Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 7:5647–5684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Silva CS, Rushton KR (2007) Groundwater recharge estimation using improved soil moisture balance methodology for a tropical climate with distinct dry seasons. Hydrol Sci J 52(5):1051–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Martonne E (1942) Nouvelle carte mondiale de l’indice d’aridité. Ann Géog 51:242–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilers VHM, Carter RC, Rushton KR (2007) A single layer soil water balance model for estimating deep drainage (potential recharge): an application to cropped land in semi-arid North-east Nigeria. Geoderma 140(1):119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Hillel D (1988) Groundwater recharge in arid regions: review and critique of estimation methods. Hydrol Process 2(3):255–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gontia NK, Patil PY (2012) Assessment of groundwater recharge through rainfall and water harvesting structures in Jamka microwatershed using remote sensing and GIS. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 40(4):639–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickx J, Walker G (1997) Recharge from precipitation. Recharge of phreatic aquifers in (semi-) arid areas 19–98

  • Hillel D (1998) Environmental soil physics. Academic Press, London, 771 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson PD, Porter JD, Wilson DR (1991) A test of computer simulation model ARC-WHEAT1 on wheat crops grown in New Zealand. Field Crop Res 27:337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendy E, Gérard-Marchant P, Walter MT, Zhang Y, Liu C, Steenhuis TS (2003) A soil-water-balance approach to quantify groundwater recharge from irrigated cropland in the North China Plain. Hydrol Process 17(10):2011–2031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner DN, Issar AS, Simmers I (1990) Groundwater recharge. A guide to understanding and estimating natural recharge. International contributions to hydrogeology. Verlag Heinz Heise, p 345

  • Marei A, Khayat S, Weise S, Ghannam S, Sbaih M, Geyer S (2010) Estimating groundwater recharge using the chloride mass-balance method in the West Bank, Palestine. Hydrol Sci J 55(5):780–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavelic P, Smakhtin V, Favreau G, Villholth KG (2012) Water-balance approach for assessing potential for smallholder groundwater irrigation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Water SA 38(3):399–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragab R, Finch J, Harding R (1997) Estimation of groundwater recharge to chalk and sandstone aquifers using simple soil models. J Hydrol 190(1):19–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton KR, Eilers VHM, Carter RC (2006) Improved soil moisture balance methodology for recharge estimation. J Hydrol 318:379–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon BR, Cook PG (2002) Theme issue on groundwater recharge. Hydrogeol J 10(1):3–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmers I (1997) Recharge of phreatic aquifers in (semi-) arid areas (IAH International Contributions to Hydrogeology 19). Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DB (1996) Estimation of infiltration and recharge for environmental site assessment. API Publ 4643:143

  • Touhami I, Andreu JM et al (2013) Comparative performance of soil water balance models in computing semiarid aquifer recharge. Hydrol Sci J 59(1):193–203. doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.802094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Dochartaigh BO, Macdonald D (2010) A literature review of recharge estimation and groundwater resource assessment in Africa. Internal report IR/10/051. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, 31 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Westenbroek SM, Kelson VA, Dripps WR, Hunt RJ, Bradbury KR (2010) SWB—a modified Thornthwaite-Mather soil-water-balance code for estimating groundwater recharge. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, Ground Resources Program.

  • Willmott CJ (1981) On the validation of models. Phys Geogr 2:184–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Zand-Parsa S, Majnooni-Herris A, Sepaskhah AR, Nazemosadat MJ (2011) Modification of angstrom model for estimation of global solar radiation in an intermountain region of southern Iran. Energy Environ 22(7):911–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davar Khalili.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Banimahd, S.A., Khalili, D., Zand-Parsa, S. et al. Groundwater potential recharge estimation in bare soil using three soil moisture accounting models: field evaluation for a semi-arid foothill region. Arab J Geosci 10, 223 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3018-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3018-9

Keywords

Navigation