Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Volume, gravitational potential energy reduction, and regional centroid position change in the wake of landslides triggered by the 14 April 2010 Yushu earthquake of China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, earthquake-triggered landslides have attracted much attention in the scientific community as a main form of seismic ground response. However, little work has been performed concerning the volume and gravitational potential energy reduction of earthquake-triggered landslides and their severe effect on landscape change. This paper presents a quantitative study on the volume, gravitational potential energy reduction, and change in landscape related to landslides triggered by the 14 April 2010 Yushu earthquake. At least 2,036 landslides were triggered by the earthquake. A total landslide scar area of 1.194 km2 was delineated from the visual interpretation of aerial photographs and satellite images and was supported by selected field checking. In this paper, we focus on possible answers to the following five questions: (1) What is the total volume of the 2,036 landslides triggered by the earthquake, and what is the average landslide erosion thickness in the earthquake-stricken area? (2) What are the elevations of all landslide materials in relation to pre- and post-landsliding? (3) How much was the gravitational potential energy reduced due to the sliding of these landslide materials? (4) What is the average elevation change caused by these landslides in the study area? (5) What is the vertical change of the regional centroid position above sea level, as induced by these landslides? It is concluded that the total volume of the 2,036 landslides is 2.9399 × 106 m3. The landslide erosion thickness throughout the study area is 2.02 mm. The materials of these landslides moved from an elevation of 4,145.243 to 4,104.697 m, resulting in a decreased distance of 40.546 m. The gravitational potential energy reduction related to the landslides triggered by the earthquake was 2.9213 × 1012 J. The average regional elevation of the study area is 4,427.160 m, a value consistent with the assumption that the accumulated materials were remained in situ. This value changes from 4,427.160 to 4,427.158 m with all landslide materials moved out of the study area, resulting in a reduction in elevation of 2 mm. Based on the assumption that all landslide materials moved out of the study area, the elevations of the centroid of the study area’s crust changed from 2,222.45967 to 2,222.45867 m, which means the centroid value decreased by 1 mm. This value is 0.001 mm when assuming that the materials were remained in situ, which is almost negligible, compared with the situation of “all landslide materials moved out of the study area.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bozzano F, Lenti L, Martino S, Paciello A, Mugnozza GS (2011) Evidences of landslide earthquake triggering due to self-excitation process. Int J Earth Sci 100(4):861–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaytor JD, ten Brink US, Solow AR, Andrews BD (2009) Size distribution of submarine landslides along the U.S. Atlantic margin. Mar Geol 264(1–2):16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chigira M, Wang WN, Furuya T, Kamai T (2003) Geological causes and geomorphological precursors of the Tsaoling landslide triggered by the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan. Eng Geol 68(3–4):259–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chigira M, Yagi H (2006) Geological and geomorphological characteristics of landslides triggered by the 2004 Mid Niigta prefecture earthquake in Japan. Eng Geol 82(4):202–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosta GB, Imposimato S, Roddeman D, Chiesa S, Moia F (2005) Small fast-moving flow-like landslides in volcanic deposits: the 2001 Las Colinas Landslide (El Salvador). Eng Geol 79(3–4):185–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadson SJ, Hovius N, Chen H, Dade WB, Hsieh ML, Willett SD, Hu JC, Horng MJ, Chen MC, Stark CP, Lague D, Lin JC (2003) Links between erosion, runoff variability and seismicity in the Taiwan orogen. Nature 426(6967):648–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadson SJ, Hovius N, Chen H, Dade WB, Lin JC, Hsu ML, Lin CW, Horng MJ, Chen TC, Milliman J, Stark CP (2004) Earthquake-triggered increase in sediment delivery from an active mountain belt. Geology 32(8):733–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadson SJ, Hovius N, Pegg S, Dade WB, Horng M J, Chen H (2005) Hyperpycnal river flows from an active mountain belt. J Geophys Res 110: F04016

  • Dai FC, Xu C, Yao X, Xu L, Tu XB, Gong QM (2011) Spatial distribution of landslides triggered by the 2008 Ms 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake, China. J Asia Earth Sci 40(4):883–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devkota KC, Regmi AD, Pourghasemi HR, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Ryu IC, Dhital MR, Althuwaynee OF (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling-Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya. Nat Hazard 65:135–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T (2011) Landslide risk assessment based on GIS multi-criteria evaluation: a case study in Bostan-Abad County, Iran. Journal of Earth Science and Engineering 1:66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T (2013) GIS-multicriteria decision analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping: comparing three methods for the Urmia Lake basin, Iran. Nat Hazard 65(3):2105–2128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T, Nazmfar H (2012) GIS-based ordered weighted averaging and Dempster–Shafer methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Urmia Lake Basin Iran. Int J Digit Earth. doi:10.1080/17538947.2012.749950

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuoka H, Wang GH, Sassa K, Wang FW, Matsumoto T (2004) Earthquake-induced rapid long-traveling flow phenomenon: May 2003 Tsukidate landslide in Japan. Landslides 1(2):151–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Rodriguez MJ, Malpica J, Benito AB, Díaz M (2008) Susceptibility assessment of earthquake-triggered landslides in El Salvador using logistic regression. Geomorphology 95(3–4):172–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorum T, Fan XM, van Westen CJ, Huang RQ, Xu Q, Tang C, Wang GH (2011) Distribution pattern of earthquake-induced landslides triggered by the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Geomorphology 133(3–4):152–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie RH, Evans SG (2004) Analysis of landslide frequencies and characteristics in a natural system, coastal British Columbia. Earth Surf Process Landf 29(11):1321–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Galli M, Reichenbach P, Rossi M (2008) Distribution of landslides in the Upper Tiber River basin, central Italy. Geomorphology 96(1–2):105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Rossi M, Valigi D (2009) Landslide volumes and landslide mobilization rates in Umbria, central Italy. Earth Planet Sci Lett 279(3–4):222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haflidason H, Lien R, Sejrup HP, Forsberg CF, Bryn P (2005) The dating and morphometry of the Storrega Slide. Mar Pet Geol 22(1–2):187–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Havenith HB, Strom A, Jongmans D, Abdrakhmatov A, Delvaux D, Tréfois P (2003a) Seismic triggering of landslides, part A: field evidence from the Northern Tien Shan. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 3(1–2):135–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havenith HB, Strom A, Calvetti F, Jongmans D (2003b) Seismic triggering of landslides. Part B: simulation of dynamic failure processes. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 3(6):663–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiroshi Y, Takanari Y, Masahiro A (2007) GIS analysis on geomorphological features and soil mechanical implication of landslides caused by 2004 Niigata Chuetsu earthquake. J Jpn Landslide Soci 43(5):294–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovius N, Meunier P, Lin CW, Hongey C, Chen YG, Dadson S, Horng MJ, Lines M (2011) Prolonged seismically induced erosion and the mass balance of a large earthquake. Earth Planet Sci Lett 304(3–4):347–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imaizumi F, Sidle RC (2007) Linkage of sediment supply and transport processes in Miyagawa Dam catchment, Japan. J Geophysical Res 112: F03012

  • Imaizumi F, Sidle RC, Kamei R (2008) Effects of forest harvesting on the occurrence of landslides and debris flows in steep terrain of central Japan. Earth Surf Process Landf 33(6):827–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes JN (1983) Lichenometric dating of debris-flow deposits in the Scottish Highlands. Earth Surf Process Landf 8(6):579–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jibson RW, Keefer DK (1989) Statistical analysis of factors affecting landslide distribution in the new Madrid seismic zone, Tennessee and Kentucky. Eng Geol 27(1–4):509–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp U, Growley BJ, Khattak GA, Owen LA (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for the 2005 Kashmir earthquake region. Geomorphology 101(4):631–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefer DK (1994) The importance of earthquake-induced landslides to long-term slope erosion and slope-failure hazards in seismically active regions. Geomorphology 10(1–4):265–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefer DK (1999) Earthquake-induced landslides and their effects on alluvial fans. J Sediment Res 69(1):84–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefer DK (2000) Statistical analysis of an earthquake-induced landslide distribution—the 1989 Loma Prieta, California event. Eng Geol 58(3–4):231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelarestaghi A, Ahmadi H (2009) Landslide susceptibility analysis with a bivariate approach and GIS in Northern Iran. Arab J Geosci 2(1):95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konagai K, Johansson J, Mayorca P, Uzuoka R, Yamamoto T, Miyajima M, Pulido N, Sassa K, Fukuoka H, Duran F (2004) Las Colinas landslide: rapid and long-traveling soil flow caused by the January 13, 2001, El Salvador earthquake. Geol Soc Am 375:39–53, special paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Korup O (2005) Distribution of landslides in southwest New Zealand. Landslides 2(1):43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen MC, Torres-Sánchez AJ (1998) The frequency and distribution of recent landslides in three montane tropical regions of Puerto Rico. Geomorphology 24(4):309–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen IJ, Montgomery DR, Korup O (2010) Landslide erosion controlled by hillslope material. Nat Geosci 3(4):247–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JF, Wei CY, Huang CC (2004) The study of Hungtsaiping landslide using digital aerial photogrametric technique. In: Proceeding of International Symposium on Landslide and Debris Flow Hazard Assessment, 7th∼8th Oct 2004

  • Lee CT, Huang CC, Lee JF, Pan KL, Lin ML, Dong JJ (2008) Statistical approach to earthquake-induced landslide susceptibility. Eng Geol 100(1–2):43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin Y, Rood K, Schwab JW, Church M (2002) Sediment transfer by shallow landsliding in the Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia. Can J Earth Sci 39(2):189–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meunier P, Hovius N, Haines AJ (2007) Regional patterns of earthquake-triggered landslides and their relation to ground motion. Geophys Res Lett 34: L20408

  • Mohammady M, Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Golestan Province Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster–Shafer, and weights-of-evidence models. J Asia Earth Sci 61:221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouimet WB (2010) Landslides associated with the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan earthquake: implications for the erosion and tectonic evolution of the Longmen Shan. Tectonophysics 491(1–4):244–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan J, Li H, Xu Z, Li N, Wu F, Guo R, Zhang W (2010) Surface rupture characteristics and rupture mechanics of the Yushu earthquake (Ms7.1), 14/04/2010. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2010, abstract #T54B-08

  • Pareek N, Sharma ML, Arora MK (2010) Impact of seismic factors on landslide susceptibility zonation: a case study in part of Indian Himalayas. Landslides 7(2):191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker RN, Densmore AL, Rosser NJ, de Michele M, Li Y, Huang RQ, Whadcoat S, Petley DN (2011) Mass wasting triggered by 2008 Wenchuan earthquake is greater than orogenic growth. Nat Geosci 4(7):449–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce AJ, O’Loughlin CL (1985) Landsliding during a M 7.7 earthquake: influence of geology and topography. Geol 13(12):855–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Mohammadi M, Moradi HR (2012) Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-012-0532-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Goli Jirandeh A, Pradhan B, Xu C, Gokceoglu C (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS. J Earth Syst Sci 122(2):349–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Youssef AM (2010) Manifestation of remote sensing data and GIS on landslide hazard analysis using spatial-based statistical models. Arab J Geosci 3(3):319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regmi AD, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Pourghasemi HR, Khumamoto T, Akgun A (2013) Application of frequency ratio, statistical index and weights-of-evidence models, and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping in Central Nepal Himalaya. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-012-0807-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice RM, Corbett ES, Bailey RG (1969) Soil slips related to vegetation, topography, and soil in Southern California. Water Resour Res 5(3):647–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice RM, Foggin GT III (1971) Effects of high intensity storms on soil slippage on mountainous watersheds in Southern California. Water Resour Res 7(6):1485–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassa K, Wang GH, Fukuoka H, Wang FW, Ochiai T, Sugiyama M, Sekiguchi T (2004) Landslide risk evaluation and hazard zoning for rapid and long-travel landslides in urban development areas. Landslides 1(3):221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato HP, Sekiguchi T, Kojiroi R, Suzuki Y, Iida M (2005) Overlaying landslides distribution on the earthquake source, geological and topographical data: the Mid Niigata prefecture earthquake in 2004, Japan. Landslides 2(2):143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato HP, Hasegawa H, Fujiwara S, Tobita M, Koarai M, Une H, Iwahashi J (2007) Interpretation of landslide distribution triggered by the 2005 Northern Pakistan earthquake using SPOT 5 imagery. Landslides 4(2):113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonett DS (1967) Landslide distribution and earthquakes in the Bewani and Torricelli Mountains, New Guinea. In: Jennings JA, Mabbutt JA (eds) Landform Studies from Australia and New Guinea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 64–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Sujatha ER, Rajamanickam V, Kumaravel P, Saranathan E (2013) Landslide susceptibility analysis using probabilistic likelihood ratio model—a geospatial-based study. Arab J Geosci 6(2):429–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Brink US, Geist EL, Andrews BD (2006) Size distribution of submarine landslides and its implication to tsunami hazard in Puerto Rico. Geophys Res Lett 33, L11307

  • Tibaldi A, Ferrari L, Pasquare G (1995) Landslides triggered by earthquakes and their relations with faults and mountain slope geometry: an example from Ecuador. Geomorphology 11(3):215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Geological Survey (2010) Magnitude 6.9 - southern Qinghai, China, 2010 April 13 23:49:38 UTC. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqinthenews/2010/us2010vacp/

  • Whitehouse IE (1983) Distribution of large rock avalanche deposits in the Central Southern Alps, New Zealand. N Z J Geol Geophys 26(3):271–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse IE, Griffiths GA (1983) Frequency and hazard of large rock avalanches in the central Southern Alps, New Zealand. Geology 11(6):331–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Xu XW (2012) Comment on “Spatial distribution analysis of landslides triggered by 2008.5.12 Wenchuan Earthquake, China” by Shengwen Qi, Qiang Xu, Hengxing Lan, Bing Zhang, Jianyou Liu [Eng Geol 116 (2010) 95-108]. Eng Geol 133-134: 40-42

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Xu XW (2013) Controlling parameter analyses and hazard mapping for earthquake triggered-landslides: an example from a square region in Beichuan County, Sichuan Province, China. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-012-0646-y

  • Xu C, Dai FC, Chen J, Tu XB, Xu L, Li WC, Tian W, Cao YB, Yao X (2009) Identification and analysis of secondary geological hazards triggered by a magnitude 8.0 Wenchuan Earthquake. J Remote Sens 13(4):745–762 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Dai FC, Yao X (2010a) Wenchuan earthquake-induced landslides: an overview. Geol Rev 56(6):860–874 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X W, Yu G H, Sun X Z (2010b) Yushu earthquake slip: implication of great earthquake migration along boundary fault system of Bayan Har block, Tibetan Plateau. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2010, abstract #T22A-04

  • Xu C, Dai FC, Xu XW, Lee YH (2012a) GIS-based support vector machine modeling of earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility in the Jianjiang River watershed, China. Geomorphology 145–146:70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Xu XW, Dai FC, Saraf AK (2012b) Comparison of different models for susceptibility mapping of earthquake triggered landslides related with the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. Comput Geosci 46:317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Xu XW, Dai FC, Xiao JZ, Tan XB, Yuan RM (2012c) Landslide hazard mapping using GIS and weight of evidence model in Qingshui river watershed of 2008 Wenchuan earthquake struck region. J Earth Sci 23(1):97–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Xu XW, Yu GH (2012d) Study on the characteristics, mechanism, and spatial distribution of Yushu earthquake triggered landslides. Seismol Geol 34(1):47–62 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Xu XW, Yao X, Dai FC (2013a) Three (nearly) complete inventories of landslides triggered by the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan Mw 7.9 earthquake of China and their spatial distribution statistical analysis. Landslides. doi:10.1007/s10346-013-0404-6

  • Xu C, Xu XW, Yao Q, Wang YY (2013b) GIS-based bivariate statistical modelling for earthquake-triggered landslides susceptibility mapping related to the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, China. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 46(2):221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Xu XW, Yu GH (2013c) Landslides triggered by slipping-fault-generated earthquake on a plateau: an example of the 14 April 2010, Ms 7.1, Yushu, China earthquake. Landslides. doi:10.1007/s10346-012-0340-x

  • Yin YP, Zhang YS, Ma YS, Hu DG, Zhang ZC (2010) Research on major characteristics of geohazards induced by the Yushu Ms 7.1 earthquake. J Eng Geol 18(3):289–296 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zare M, Pourghasemi HR, Vafakhah M, Pradhan B (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Vaz watershed (Iran) using an artificial neural network model: a comparison between multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and radial basic function (RBF) algorithms. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-012-0610-x

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the National Science Foundation of China (grant No. 41202235 and 91214201).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chong Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, C., Xu, X., Pourghasemi, H.R. et al. Volume, gravitational potential energy reduction, and regional centroid position change in the wake of landslides triggered by the 14 April 2010 Yushu earthquake of China. Arab J Geosci 7, 2129–2138 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-1020-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-1020-4

Keywords

Navigation