Skip to main content
Log in

Fast direct sampling for multiple-point stochastic simulation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple-point statistics simulation has recently attracted significant attention for the simulation of complex geological structures. In this paper, a fast direct sampling (FDS) algorithm is presented based on a fast gradient descent pattern matching strategy. The match is directly extracted from the training image (TI) and so the method does not require intensive preprocessing and database storage. The initial node of the search path is selected randomly but the following nodes are selected in a principled manner so that the path is conducted to the right match. Each node is selected based on the matching accuracy and the behavior of the TI in the previous node. A simple initialization strategy is presented in this paper which significantly accelerates the matching process at the expense of a very naïve preprocessing stage. The proposed simulation algorithm has several outstanding advantages: it needs no (or very limited) preprocessing, does not need any database storage, searches for the match directly in the TI, is not limited to fixed size patterns (the pattern size can be easily changed during simulation), is capable of handling both continuous and categorical data, is capable of handling multivariate data, and finally and more importantly, is a fast method while maintaining high standards for the matching quality. Experiments on different TIs reveal that the simulation results of FDS and DS are comparable in terms of pattern reproduction and connectivity while FDS is far faster than DS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitokhuehi I, Durlofsky LJ (2005) Optimizing the performance of smart wells in complex reservoirs using continuously updated geological models. J Petrol Sci Eng 48(3–4):254–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arpat BG, Caers J (2007) Stochastic simulation with patterns. Math Geol 39(202):177–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caers J, Strebelle S, Payrazyan K (2003) Stochastic integration of seismic data and geologic scenarios: a West Africa submarine channel saga. Lead Edge 22(3):192–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chugunova T, Hu L (2008) Multiple–point simulations constrained by continuous auxiliary data. Math Geosci 40(2):133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyen L, Caers J (2006) Quantifying geological uncertainty for flow and transport modeling in multimodal heterogeneous formations. Adv Water Resour 29(6):912–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gloaguen E, Dimitrakopoulos R (2009) Two-dimensional conditional simulations based on the wavelet decomposition of training images. Math Geosci 41(6):679–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2008) Digital image processing, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Guardiano F, Srivastava M (1993) Multivariate geostatistics: beyond bivariate moments. In: Geostatistics—Troia. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 133–144

  • Hoffman BT, Caers J (2007) History matching by jointly perturbing local facies proportions and their spatial distribution: application to a North Sea reservoir. J Petrol Sci Eng 57(3–4):257–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honarkhah M, Caers J (2010) Stochastic simulation of patterns using distance-based pattern modeling. Math Geosci 42:487–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu L, Chugunova T (2008) Multiple–point geostatistics for modeling subsurface heterogeneity: a comprehensive review. Water Resour Res 44:W11413. doi:10.1029/2008WR006993

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans M, Dassargues A (2009) Application of multiple–point geostatistics on modeling groundwater flow and transport in a crossbedded aquifer (Belgium). Hydrogeol J 17:1901–1911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks E (1990) The application of Monte Carlo methods to the analysis of spatially correlated data. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University

  • Journel AG (1983) Non-parametric estimation of spatial distributions. Math Geol 15(3):445–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjønsberg H, Kolbjørnsen O (2008) Markov mesh simulations with data conditioning through indicator kriging. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Geostatistics Congress, Santiago, Chile

  • Larriestra C, Gomez H (2009a) Multiple-point simulation applied to uncertainty analysis of reservoirs related to high sinuosity fluvial systems: Mina el Carmen formation, San Jorge gulf basin, Argentina. IAMG Annual Meeting, Stanford University, USA

  • Larriestra C, Gomez H (2009b) Uncertainty Analysis of Reservoirs from Meandering Fluvial Systems using Multiple Point Stochastic Simulation. Mina El Carmen Formation, San Jorge Gulf Basin, Argentina. AAPG Annual Meeting, Río de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Liu Y, Harding A, Abriel W, Strebelle S (2004) Multiple–point simulation integrating wells, three–dimensional seismic data, and geology. AAPG Bull 88(7):905–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyster S, Deutsch CV (2008) MPS simulation in a Gibbs sampler algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Geostatistics Congress, Santiago, Chile

  • Mariethoz G, Renard P, Straubhaar J (2010) The direct sampling method to perform multiple-points geostatistical simulations. Water Resour Res. doi:10.1029/2008WR007621

  • Remy N, Boucher A, Wu J (2009) Applied geostatistics with SGeMS: a user’s guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Renard P (2007) Stochastic hydrogeology: what professionals really need? Ground Water 45(5):531–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strebelle S (2002) Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple point statistics. Math Geol 34(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strebelle S, Payrazyan K, Caers J (2003) Modeling of a deepwater turbidite reservoir conditional to seismic data using principal component analysis and multiple–point geostatistics. SPE J 8(3):227–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szeliski R (2010) Computer vision: algorithms and applications. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahmasebi P, Hezarkhani A, Sahimi M (2012) Multiple-point geostatistical modeling based on the cross correlation functions. Comput Geosci 16(3):779–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjelmeland H (1996) Stochastic models in reservoir characterization and Markov random fields for compact objects. Doctoral dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim

  • Tjelmeland H, Eidsvik J (2004) Directional Metropolis–Hastings updates for posteriors with non linear likelihood. In: Leuangthong O, Deutsch CV (eds) Geostatistics. Springer, Banff, pp 95–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Umazano M, Larriestra C, Bellosi E (2009) Multiple-point simulation of channelized and unconfined fluvial deposits: an exploratory model for Cretaceous oil-bearing sandstones of central Patagonia. 9th International Conference on Fluvial Sedimentology San Miguel de Tucuman—Tucuman, Argentina

  • Wu J, Zhang T, Journel AG (2008) A fast FILTERSIM simulation with score-based distance. Math Geosci 47:773–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T, Switzer P, Journel AG (2006) Filter-based classification of training image patterns for spatial simulation. Math Geol 38:63–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karim Faez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdollahifard, M.J., Faez, K. Fast direct sampling for multiple-point stochastic simulation. Arab J Geosci 7, 1927–1939 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-0850-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-0850-4

Keywords

Navigation