Abstract
The Ontario Hydro Method (OHM) recommended by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was used to determine mercury speciation in the combustion flue gas across wet FGD systems. Four coal-fired units with wet FGD systems were chosen to evaluate mercury speciation and mercury removal efficiencies through these wet FGD systems. Chlorine content in coal had been suggested as a main factor that affects mercury speciation in flue gas. It is shown that the higher the chlorine concentration in coal is, the higher the percentage of oxidized mercury (Hg2+) is removed in wet FGD systems, which can increase overall mercury removal efficiencies through wet FGD systems. The selective catalyst reduction (SCR) system has a function of oxidizing elemental mercury (Hg0) to oxidized mercury. A higher percentage of oxidized mercury in the total vapor mercury at the FGD inlet is observed when SCR is in service. Therefore, higher overall mercury removal efficiencies through wet FGD are attained. Because of different wet FGD operating conditions, there are different mercury removal efficiencies in different units. Elemental mercury reemission took place when a fraction of oxidized mercury absorbed in the slurry is reduced to elemental mercury, and Hg0 is reemitted from stack, which results in decreases in mercury removal efficiencies through wet FGD systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agarwal H, Stenge H G, Wu S, Fan Z, 2006. Effects of H2O, SO2, and NO on homogeneous Hg oxidation by Cl2. Energy & Fuels, 20(3): 1 068–1 075.
Cao Y, Chen B, Wu J, Cui H, John S, Chen C K, Paul C, Pan W P, 2007. Study of mercury oxidation by a selective catalytic reduction catalyst in a pilot-scale slipstream reactor at a utility boiler burning bituminous coal. Energy & Fuels, 21(1): 145–156.
Cao Y, Duan Y F, Kellie S, Li L C, Xu W B, Riley J T, Pan W P, 2005. Impact of coal chlorine on mercury speciation and emission from a 100 MW utility boiler with cold-side electrostatic precipitators and low-nox burners. Energy & Fuels, 19(3): 842–854.
Cao, Y, Gao, Z Y, Zhu, J S, Wang Q H, Huang Y J, Chiu C, Parker, B, Chu P, Pan W P, 2008. Impacts of halogen additions on mercury oxidation, in a slip-stream selective catalyst reduction (scr), reactor when burning sub-bituminous coal. Environment Science & Technology, 42(1): 256–261.
Diaz-Somoano M, Unterberger S, Hein Klaus R G, 2007. Mercury emission control in coal-fired plants: The role of wet scrubbers. Fuel Processing Technology, 88: 259–263.
Kellie S, Cao Y, Duan, Y F, Li LC, Chu P, Mehta A, Carty R, Riley J T, Pan W P, 2005. Factors affecting mercury speciation in a 100-MW coal-fired boiler with low-NOx burners. Energy & Fuels, 19(3): 800–806.
Pavlish J H, Sondreal E A, Mann M D, Olson E S, Galbreath K C, Laudal D L, Benson S A, 2003. Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants. Fuel Processing Technology, 82(2/3): 89–165.
Renninger S A, Farthing G A, Ghorishi S B, Teets C, Neureuter J A, 2004. Effect of SCR catalyst, ammonia injection and sodium Hydrosulfide on speciation and removal of mercury within a forced-oxidized limestone scrubber. In: Combined power plant air pollution control mega symposium, Washington DC: Department of Energy, BR-1754: 1–10.
Romero C E, Li Y, Bilirgen H, Sarunac N, Levy E K, 2006. Modification of boiler operating conditions for mercury emissions reductions in coal-fired utility boilers. Fuel, 85(2): 204–212.
Yang H M, Pan W P, 2007. Transformation of mercury speciation through the SCR system in power plants. Journal of Environmental Science, 19(2): 181–184.
Zhou J S, Luo Z Y, Hu C, Cen K F, 2007. Factors impating gaseous mercury speciation in post-combustion. Energy & Fuels, 21(2): 491–495.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, Cl., Cao, Y., Dong, Zb. et al. Mercury speciation and removal across full-scale wet FGD systems at coal-fired power plants. J Coal Sci Eng China 16, 82–87 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12404-010-0116-7
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12404-010-0116-7