Abstract
The intersectional risks of children in United States immigrant communities include environmental exposures. Pesticide exposures and their biological outcomes are not well characterized in this population group. We assessed pesticide exposure and related these exposures to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in Latinx children from rural, farmworker families (FW; N = 30) and from urban, non-farmworker families (NFW; N = 15) living in North Carolina. DSBs were quantified in hair follicular cells by immunostaining of 53BP1, and exposure to 72 pesticides and pesticide degradation products were determined using silicone wristbands. Cholinesterase activity was measured in blood samples. DSB frequencies were higher in FW compared to NFW children. Seasonal effects were detected in the FW group, with highest DNA damage levels in April–June and lowest levels in October–November. Acetylcholinesterase depression had the same seasonality and correlated with follicular DNA damage. Organophosphate pesticides were more frequently detected in FW than in NFW children. Participants with organophosphate detections had increased follicular DNA damage compared to participants without organophosphate detection. Follicular DNA damage did not correlate with organochlorine or pyrethroid detections and was not associated with the total number of pesticides detected in the wristbands. These results point to rural disparities in pesticide exposures and their outcomes in children from vulnerable immigrant communities. They suggest that among the different classes of pesticides, organophosphates have the strongest genotoxic effects. Assessing pesticide exposures and their consequences at the individual level is key to environmental surveillance programs. To this end, the minimally invasive combined approach used here is particularly well suited for children.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Children in agricultural immigrant communities in the United States (US) are at risk for repeated exposures to environmental pollutants. These include pesticides used in fields close to their homes and carried indoors on clothing, and residential pesticides used in housing (Quandt et al. 2004, 2020; Arcury et al. 2007; Tamaro et al. 2018; Hernandez et al. 2019). Children living in urban communities are also exposed to a large number of pesticides, reflecting the ubiquitous presence of currently used and persistent legacy pesticides (e.g., Iglesias-Gonzalez et al. 2020, 2022; Arcury et al. 2021). The emerging picture is that, despite general trends related to location and parental activities, individual exposomes of children are extensive and unique.
Pesticide exposure in children is of particular concern. Their high surface area to volume ratio and immature metabolism lead to higher pesticide doses than in adults (Neri et al. 2006). Pesticides have been shown to alter neurocognitive development in children (Bouchard et al. 2011; Engel et al. 2011, 2016; Rauh et al. 2011, 2012; Bahrami et al. 2022; Dobbins et al. 2022). Epidemiological studies focused on children have also identified associations between chronic exposure to pesticides and pediatric cancers (brain tumors and leukemia) (Ma et al. 2002; Van Maele-Fabry et al. 2013; Cha et al. 2014; Chen et al. 2015; Chevrier and Beranger 2018). Environmental exposures during developmental windows of susceptibility such as early adolescence may also affect health outcomes later in life. Yet, the modes of pesticide toxicities at low, chronic doses are poorly understood (Grandjean and Landrigan 2006). Establishing causality between pesticide exposures and long-term health outcomes, such as cancers and neurological disorders, is challenging due to the long latencies of these diseases. In addition, complex mixtures and doses of pesticides are difficult to reproduce with cell or animal models. Functional biomarkers in exposed subjects provide rapid approaches to predict the impact of environmental exposures on health. Among these markers, DNA damage is a pathological characteristic of cancers and other chronic diseases (Fishel et al. 2007; Kulkarni and Wilson 2008; Ciccia and Elledge 2010; Shiwaku and Okazawa 2015).
Previous studies have assessed DNA damage as a function of pesticide exposures in children and generally found positive correlations. A frequent limitation of these studies is that a single pesticide, or a class of pesticides was monitored and correlated to DNA damage levels. These include organochlorine pesticides (Anguiano-Vega et al. 2020), dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT) and its metabolites (Perez-Maldonado et al. 2006), organophosphate pesticides (How et al. 2014; Sutris et al. 2016), and atrazine (Ruiz-Guzman et al. 2017). The detection of a particular type of pesticide is likely to be associated with exposures to other pesticides that may cause or modulate the measured genotoxic outcome, making it difficult to establish causal relationships.
Noninvasive biosampling is important for studies with children. We developed a sensitive and minimally invasive assay to quantify DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in plucked hair follicles (Vidi et al. 2017). We focus on DSBs because these lesions are highly deleterious. When incorrectly repaired, DSBs can cause major genomic rearrangements or mutations that contribute to tumorigenesis (Ciccia and Elledge 2010). Hair follicles contain epithelial cells, which is relevant since most solid tumors are of epithelial origin. Hair follicles also contain stem cells (Gho et al. 2004; Cotsarelis 2006) that give rise to proliferating cells in anaphase hairs (Camidge et al. 2005). Dysfunctional stem cells have been proposed to be at the origin of multiple malignancies. Proliferation occurs in epithelial tissues to replace damaged cells and in response to physiological needs (e.g., the expansion of the mammary gland for lactation). DNA replication in proliferating cells can lead to the conversion of unrepaired single-stranded breaks and oxidative DNA damage into DSBs. From this perspective, hair follicles are interesting compared to other common biosampling sources, such as blood and exfoliated buccal cells, which have few proliferating cells. The hair papilla, at the tip of the follicle, is irrigated by blood capillaries. Hence, follicular cells sense systemic chemicals, as evidenced by hair loss following chemotherapy. Hair follicular cells have actually been used to measure DNA damage induction by anticancer drugs (Fong et al. 2009; Redon et al. 2010) and to monitor DNA breaks induced by ionizing radiation (Tepe Cam and Seyhan 2013; Kudlova et al. 2021). Paired with pesticide biomonitoring, quantification of DSBs in hair follicles may be used to assess genotoxic effects of pesticide exposures in children (Vidi et al. 2017). Here we report the implementation of this concept with Latinx children from the PACE5 (Preventing Agricultural Chemical Exposure 5) cohort.
Materials and Methods
Participant Recruitment
All participants were enrolled in the PACE5 study, a community-based participatory research project conducted in partnership between the North Carolina Farmworkers Project (Benson, NC; https://ncfwp.org/) and Wake Forest University School of Medicine (WFUSM). PACE5 is a longitudinal study on the health and cognitive effects of pesticide exposure for Latinx children in rural farmworker (FW) families and in urban non-farmworker (NFW) families. Study protocols and procedures were approved by the WFUSM Institutional Review Board. Written parental permission and child assent were obtained for each participant. Inclusion criteria and participant recruitment are described in Arcury et al. (2021). Exclusion criteria for participation in the PACE5 study included (1) having life-threatening illness such as cancer, (2) prior history of neurological conditions, and (3) physical condition or development disorder preventing the participant from completing neurobehavioral tests or MRIs used in the larger main study. The FW participants were from counties surrounding the town of Benson (NC). The NFW participants were from Winston-Salem (NC). This ancillary study was proposed to 83 PACE5 participants. Participants were seen at the last visit of PACE5 for this ancillary study on follicular DNA damage, between April and November 2021. A $20 incentive was provided for participation to the hair follicle study. Characteristics of the participants are described in the Results section.
Collection of Hair Follicles
Samples of 5–10 hairs were plucked from the scalp of the participants using flat tweezers. Long hairs were cut to keep only 1–2 cm of shaft from the follicle. Hair follicles were fixed immediately after collection with 4% formaldehyde (Sigma) for 20 min, then kept in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) supplemented with 50 mM glycine and 0.02% sodium azide at 4 °C until analysis. We validated sample storage up to 4 months using a set of hair follicles from a healthy donor (Suppl. Fig. S1).
Immunostaining and Imaging of Hair Follicles
This procedure was performed as described previously (Vidi et al. 2017) with minor modifications. Briefly, the hairs (fixed immediately after collection) were inspected for presence of the follicle and transferred in a 12-well tissue culture plate containing PBS. The follicles were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100, then washed with PBS. 10% goat serum in immunofluorescence buffer (IF; 130 mM NaCl, 13.2 mM Na2HPO4, 3.5 mM NaH2PO4, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 0.05% NaN3, 0.2% Triton X-100, and 0.05% Tween 20) was used for blocking and for dilution of antibodies. Incubations with primary antibodies (overnight at 4 °C) and secondary antibodies (1 h at ambient temperature) were followed by washes in IF, and staining with 4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) and with fluorescently labeled (AlexaFluor-488) phalloidin. Stained follicles were mounted with coverslips using ProLong Gold Antifade (Invitrogen). Antibodies were against 53BP1 (Abcam, cat# Ab36823, 5 µg/ml), MDC1 (Abcam, cat# Ab50003, 2.3 µg/ml), and γH2AX (Millipore, clone JBW301, 2 µg/ml). Secondary antibodies conjugated with Alexa Fluor dyes AF568 or AF647 (ThermoFisher) were used at 1:500 dilutions. Optical sections of the follicles were taken with a Zeiss LSM880 confocal microscope, using a 40 × water immersion objective (NA = 1.1). Similar regions and tissue depths were imaged for each participant.
Measure of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Follicular Cells
Foci of 53BP1 in nuclei of follicular cells were quantified by visual scoring by an investigator blind to the experimental groups and pesticide exposure data. 53BP1 is a DNA double-strand break repair factor that forms distinct microscopic foci at DSBs (Schultz et al. 2000; Bekker-Jensen et al. 2005). We showed previously that the number of 53BP1 foci increases in cells from irradiated hair follicles, and that this increase is radiation dose-dependent (Vidi et al. 2017). 53BP1 foci generally overlapped with foci formed by MDC1 (Mediator of DNA damage checkpoint protein 1), another DSB repair factor (Suppl. Fig. S2A). Concordance of 53BP1 foci enumeration between independent scorers was high (Suppl. Fig. S2B), which validated the quantification of this marker. We obtained follicular DNA damage data for 45 participants (30 FW and 15 NFW). The absence of cellularized follicles was the principal reason for missing DNA damage data for some of the participants, as some hair shafts broke off when pulling the hairs. Between one and seven hairs were analyzed for each participant (median = 3). Values were summarized by averaging the numbers of 53BP1 foci per nucleus, combining each cell in each hair of a participant. The number of nuclei assessed ranged from 40 to 585 (median = 184).
Deployment of Passive Pesticide Samplers
Silicon wristbands (24hourwristbands) were used to monitor pesticide exposure, as reported previously (Anderson et al. 2014; Donald et al. 2016; Arcury et al. 2021). Briefly, the wristbands were rinsed in deionized water before their deployment to remove particulates (Anderson et al. 2017). The wristbands were then conditioned for three hours in a vacuum oven (300 °C, 0.12 Torr) with periodic nitrogen sweeps, and packaged individually in Teflon bags. The participants were instructed (in the presence of their parents) to wear the wristband for seven consecutive days. The wristbands were actually worn for 6–17 days (median = 8 and 7 days in the FW and NFW groups, respectively). An empty Teflon bag was given to the parents to store the wristband at the end of the sampling period, until laboratory analyses.
Laboratory Analyses of the Passive Samplers
The wristbands were first rinsed with Milli-Q water and isopropanol to remove particulate matter. Tetrachloro-meta-xylene, decachlorobiphenyl, and PCB100 were used as extraction surrogates. The wristbands were extracted with ethyl acetate, twice 50 ml which were combined and reduced to 1 ml. When analytical interferences had to be removed, solid-phase extraction was performed with acetonitrile on a C18 silica column (Kile et al. 2016). The solvent was exchanged to isooctane prior to injection. All solvents (from Fisher Scientific) were Optima-grade or equivalent. Analytical grade standards (from Accustandard) had purities of 95% or higher. We used an analytical method previously developed and validated for the analysis of pesticides in wristband samplers (Kile et al. 2016; Vidi et al. 2017). The internal standard (4,4′-dibromooctafluorobipheny) was added, and the extracts were analyzed using an Agilent 6890N gas chromatograph with dual micro-electron detectors. For most analytes, a DB-17MS column was used for identification and quantitation whereas a DB-5MS column was used for confirmation. Pesticides with concentrations above the level of detection (LOD) were considered to be present in the samples.
Pesticide Exposure Measures from Passive Samplers
Measures of pesticide exposure are the presence/absence of 72 pesticides and pesticide degradation products. These were selected based on previous toxicology and exposure studies (Anderson et al. 2017; Harley et al. 2019). The pesticides and pesticide degradation products are from 15 classes (organochlorine, pyrethroid, organophosphate, phenylpyrazole, neonicatinoid, chloroneb, dicarboximide, pentachloronitrobenzene, thiadiazole, dinitroaniline, aniline, triazine, benzenedicarboxylic acid, oxadiazole, and thiocarbamate) and are listed in Table 2.
Blood Collection to Assess Cholinesterase Activity
Blood samples were collected from a finger stick into capillary tubes. The participant’s skin was cleaned with an alcohol wipe before collection. The amount collected was 2 to 3 drops of blood, with a drop equivalent to 50 μl. Samples were frozen at – 20 °C.
Laboratory Analysis of Cholinesterase Activity
Total cholinesterase, acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase activities were assayed using a modified version of Johnson and Russell’s radiometric method with differential inhibition conditions (Johnson and Russell 1975), as described (Quandt et al. 2010, 2015). Whole blood was diluted with 50 mM neutral potassium phosphate buffer (1:30) immediately after thawing. All measurements were done in duplicates. Diluted whole blood (20 µl) was added to scintillation vials, with either a specific acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (60 µl of BW284C51; 1.5 μM final concentration; (Mirajkar and Pope 2008)) or with the same volume of buffer. This concentration of BW284C51 completely inhibited acetylcholinesterase activity in our assay conditions. The substrate ([3H]acetylcholine iodide, 20 µl; 1 mM final concentration) was added to each vial. After 10 min incubation at 37 °C, the reactions were stopped by addition of acidic stopping mixture (100 μl; pH 2.5), and 5 ml of organic scintillation cocktail was added. The vials were mixed vigorously and counted the following day to allow equilibration of the aqueous and organic phases. Before analyzing participant samples, total hydrolysis of the substrate (Ymax) was determined from a time course assay using a one phase association model (Graphpad Prism 6). Cholinesterase activity in participant samples was then expressed relative to Ymax. Total cholinesterase activity is defined as the activity in the samples without BW284C51. Butyrylcholinesterase activity is defined as the amount of activity in the presence of BW284C51. Acetylcholinesterase activity is defined as the difference in activity between those two conditions.
Assessment of Sun Exposure
At the time of hair collection, a questionnaire was administered to the parent/guardian to evaluate UV exposure, a potential confounder for DNA damage in hair follicles. The questionnaire assessed how many times the child played outside in the sun in the last week (none; 1–2 times; 3–4 times; ≥ 5 times) and how often hats were worn for sun protection (all of the time, some of the time, or never).
Measure of Participant BMI
Participant weight (kg) and height (cm) were measured in duplicates and averaged. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight divided by squared height. WHO BMI tables for children (ages 5–19) were used to assign participants to weight categories. BMI measures were taken at the study baseline visit (between March 2018 and May 2019). For a subset of the participants, longitudinal BMI measurements were available and are displayed in Suppl. Fig. S3A, indicating overall stable trajectories with expected increases with age. The fold change in BMI was not different for children from the FW and NFW groups (Suppl. Fig. S3B).
In Vitro Measurements of DNA Damage
Non-neoplastic HMT-3522 S1 breast epithelial cells were propagated between passages 54 and 60 in H14 medium, as described (Vidi et al. 2013). The cells were transduced to express a fluorescent DSB sensor, namely mCherry fused to the minimal DSB foci-forming region of 53BP1 (mCh-53BP1ct; residues 1220–1711). The cells were treated with chlorpyrifos (CPF) for 24 h. The concentration of CPF (1 µg/ml) was based on previous analyses from the CHAMACOS study, which identified up to 1.7 µg/ml of plasma CPF (Huen et al. 2012). In independent experiments, hair follicles plucked from an adult volunteer were treated with CPF diluted in DMEM medium (0.1 and 1 µg/ml), then immunostained for 53BP1 and H2AX. The mCh-53BP1ct signals and immunostained DSB foci were quantified by visual scoring.
Other Characteristics
Other participant characteristics considered in the analysis are location group (farmworker, non-farmworker), gender (girl, boy), and age (in years). The season in which the hairs were collected is defined as April-June, July–September, and October–November.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were done using Graphpad Prism 9 and Stata. Normality of data distribution was tested with the D’Agostino & Pearson omnibus test. If the data did not pass the normality test (at alpha = 0.05), nonparametric approaches were used. The t test (or Mann–Whitney test) was used for comparisons between two conditions. ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test (or Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test) was used for datasets with more than two levels. All statistical tests were two-sided. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant. Unless indicated otherwise in the figure legends, datapoints in graphs represent values for individual study participants and summary values are mean ± SD.
Results
Characteristics of the Participants
Eighty-three active PACE5 participants were contacted for this study and 70 (84%) agreed to participate. Acceptance rates were comparable for children from farmworker and from non-farmworker families (82% and 86%, respectively). Follicular DNA damage data was obtained from 45 participants (30 FW; 15 NFW). All data shown in this report concern these 45 participants. Loss of participants was either due to collection of insufficient number of hair follicles with cells at their tips (N = 12), or to technical issues with the immunostaining protocol (N = 13). All participants with available follicular DNA damage data were between 10 and 12 years old, with average ages of 10.7 and 11.1 in the FW and NFW groups, respectively. The proportion of girls/boys was 40/60% in the FW and 47/53% in the NFW group. The body mass index of the FW and NFW children was similar (18.9 ± 2.9 and 19.7 ± 3.5; P = 0.58, unpaired t test). The characteristics of the participants are summarized in Table 1.
DNA Breaks by Participant Location and Time of Collection
53BP1 damage foci were quantified from confocal images taken at the tips of the hair follicles (Fig. 1A–B). FW children had significantly more DSB foci than NFW children (Fig. 1C). Hair collection for the FW children took place between April and November 2021, enabling us to assess seasonal effects. As shown in Fig. 1D, the highest levels of DNA damage were measured in April-June, whereas the lowest levels were measured in October–November. Most (87%) collections from NFW children were done in July and August 2021. We could, therefore, not assess seasonality in the NFW group. We compared DSB levels in the two groups over a similar summertime period (July–September) and again found higher levels of DNA damage in children from farmworker families (Fig. 1E), indicating that the difference between the two groups was not caused by seasonal effects.
The majority of both FW and NFW children played outside in the sun at least three times during the week preceding hair collection. The FW children played outside more often than the NFW children, but the difference was not significant (Fig. 2A). Except for two participants in the FW group, no one wore a hat for outside play (Fig. 2B). Average follicular DSB counts were not different between sun exposure categories (Fig. 2C). UV damage from the sun is therefore unlikely to have affected DSB levels in hair follicles in this study.
Boys had more DSB foci than girls, but the difference was not significant (0.26 ± 0.17 vs. 0.18 ± 0.09; P = 0.34; Mann–Whitney). We also examined whether BMI was associated with DSB levels. Although DNA damage was not statistically different between BMI categories (Suppl. Fig. S3C), DSB levels were higher in obese children compared to the normal weight and overweight groups.
Pesticide Exposures Detected with Personal Sampling Devices
Pesticides were detected in 43 participants (96%), with 5.3 ± 2.8 (0–11) detections on average. The number of pesticides detected in FW and NFW children was similar (median = 6 in both groups), but the type of exposures was different, with more organochlorine pesticides detections in NFW compared to FW participants, and more organophosphate pesticide detections in the FW than in the NFW group. Differences in exposure to organophosphates between FW and NFW children were stark, with 63% of children in farmworker families exposed to at least one organophosphate pesticide compared to 27% for children in non-farmworker families. Chlorpyrifos was the most frequently detected organophosphate (in 21 participants). Ethion was detected in two non-farmworker participants, whereas dimethoate was detected in one farmworker participant. The number of pyrethroid pesticide detections was similar in both groups. Detections are summarized in Fig. 3 and listed in Table 2.
Follicular DNA Damage in Relation to Pesticide Exposures
Overall, there was no correlation between the number of pesticide detections and DSB levels estimated by 53BP1 damage foci counts (Fig. 4A). The number of follicular DSBs were also very similar in participants with and without detection of organochlorine or pyrethroid pesticides. Participants for whom organophosphate pesticides were detected had 30% higher DSB levels compared to those without organophosphate detection (0.26 ± 0.16 vs. 0.20 ± 0.12) (Fig. 4B–D), indicating a possible link between organophosphate pesticides and DNA breaks in follicular cells. To further assess this possible connection, we considered cholinesterase (ChE) depression in blood samples. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity measured in red blood cells and plasma butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) activity did not correlate (Spearman r = − 0.10; P = 0.51; Fig. 4E). Median AChE activity was 17% lower in children with wristband organophosphate pesticide compared to children without organophosphate pesticide detection, but this difference was not significant (Suppl. Fig. S4). BChE activity was not different in children with vs without organophosphate pesticide detection in their wristbands. AChE activity was significantly lower in FW than in NFW children whereas BChE activity was not different between the two groups (Fig. 4F). Considering seasonality, AChE activity was lowest in April-June, whereas BChE activity was lowest in October–November (Fig. 4G). AChE was significantly anti-correlated with follicular DSB levels (Spearman r = − 0.31; P = 0.039), whereas BChE and follicular DSB were not associated (Spearman r = 0.025; P = 0.87) (Fig. 4H). For some participants, there was a time gap between blood and hair collection. Only considering participants with both collection within a month (N = 33), the association between AChE and DSB levels was higher than for the PACE5 participants as a whole (Spearman r = − 0.39; P = 0.023).
DNA Damage Induction by Chlorpyrifos
Chlorpyrifos was by far the most frequently detected organophosphate pesticide in our cohort. We therefore tested whether CPF induces DSBs in epithelial cells in vitro. Breast epithelial cells exposed to CPF had significantly more DSB damage foci compared to cells treated with vehicle (Fig. 5A–B). Next, we exposed hair follicles plucked from an adult volunteer to CPF (0.1 and 1 µg/ml) and measured a significant increase in DSB levels for both CPF concentrations compared to vehicle (Fig. 5C).
Discussion
We implemented a minimally invasive combination approach to quantify DNA damage and pesticide exposures in children. All participants in this community-based participatory research study identified as Latinx, were between 10 and 12 years of age, had comparable (modest) socio-economic status, and lived in North Carolina, either in rural or urban areas. Acceptance to provide hair follicle samples was high (83%); all participants who provided hair follicle samples wore the wristband samplers. Hair collection is a simple procedure that can be done in virtually any setting, including outdoors (Suppl. Fig. S5).
Follicular DNA double-strand breaks were more frequent in children from farmworker families compared to children from non-farmworker families, in agreement with previous studies (Bernardi et al. 2015; Castaneda-Yslas et al. 2016; Kapka-Skrzypczak et al. 2019). Sun exposure is unlikely to have influenced DSB measurements. Outdoor play frequency was not different between FW and NFW children and was not associated with different DNA damage levels. Besides, hair shafts provide a relative UV protection and UV damage causes primarily pyrimidine dimers, not DSBs. The small (non-significant) difference in follicular DSBs between girls and boys may reflect gender-specific differences in genome sensitivities and/or sexual dimorphisms in DNA damage response pathways (Cardano et al. 2022). Gender differences in DNA damage may also reflect the over-representation of boys in the farmworker group, different levels of hair coverage of the scalp (and hence skin protection from pollutants), and differences in behaviors. BMI of FW and NFW children were similar. Obesity therefore cannot explain the rural–urban differences in follicular DNA damage. Yet, our data indicate a possible contribution of obesity to DSB damage in follicular cells, which deserves future attention.
Seasonality of DNA damage levels in children from farmworker families may be due to different pesticide use or different activities (indoor/outdoor play, school/vacation, etc.) at different periods of the year. Our questionnaire on sun exposure was too rudimentary to address the latter possibility. Some organophosphate insecticides, including phorate, acephate, and chlorpyrifos (before its ban in the US in 2021) are used in spring and early summer on immature plants. Paradoxically, pesticide detections (including organophosphates) in wristbands were lower in spring than in fall (Arcury et al. 2023), yet AChE depression was highest in April-June (Fig. 4G). Seasonal effects on AChE activity (as well as the different seasonality of AChE and BChE) corroborate our previous measurements in adult Latinx farmworkers (Quandt et al. 2010, 2015). AChE and BChE activities did not correlate in this study. A previous study by Strelitz et al. (2014) also found no positive correlation between AChE and BChE but rather a weak negative correlation. The absence of positive correlation may (at least partly) be explained by the fact that different organophosphate pesticides have distinct inhibitory potency for AChE and BChE (Cadez et al. 2021) and the persistence of the inhibition by organophosphate pesticides is different for the two enzymes, with shorter inhibition of BChE compared to AChE (Kamel and Hoppin 2004).
The higher organophosphate exposure of FW compared to NFW children reported here based on wristband samplers and cholinesterase depression mirrors the measurements from the entire PACE5 cohort (Arcury et al. 2021), and other environmental and pesticide urinary metabolite measurements from previous studies (Quiros-Alcala et al. 2011; Quandt et al. 2015; Arcury et al. 2016, 2018; Tamaro et al. 2018). Among all the classes of pesticides detected by the wristband samplers, only organophosphates were associated with a modest increase in DNA damage. The association between DNA damage and AChE depression was much stronger, indicating that assessment of internal exposures may better predict biological outcomes than monitoring of external exposures. Wristband sampler measurements correspond to the bioavailable exposure rather than dose, which depends on absorption and metabolism, potentially different between participants.
Although we cannot conclude causality between organophosphate pesticide exposures and follicular DNA damage with our study design, all of our measurements point in this direction and the multiple associations are compelling. Our results are consistent with recent findings of the ORGANIKO study that documented correlations between oxidative DNA damage and chlorpyrifos metabolite detections in the urine of children in Cyprus (Makris et al. 2022). CPF induces reactive oxygen species, oxidative DNA damage and DNA strand breaks (Bagchi et al. 1995; Rahman et al. 2002; Li et al. 2015; Kopjar et al. 2018). It was by far the most frequently detected organophosphate pesticide in our cohort. We measured significantly higher DSB levels in follicular cells exposed in vitro to CPF compared to unexposed cells. In these experiments, CPF doses were more than ten times lower than the highest concentrations detected in plasma from mothers and newborn children from the CHAMACOS cohort (Huen et al. 2012). Mechanistically, oxidative DNA lesions caused by organophosphates may degenerate into DNA double-strand breaks, especially in actively dividing cells, such as those at the tip of hair follicles. This mechanism may, however, not fully explain the connection between organophosphate pesticides and DNA double-strand breaks since other classes of pesticides (such as organochlorines) also induce reactive oxygen species and single-strand breaks in vitro and in vivo (e.g., Bagchi et al. 1995). DNA adducts and strand cross-links formation from direct DNA interactions of organophosphates and their metabolites, and indirect effects on gene expression which may affect the DNA repair potential may also contribute to DNA double-strand break accumulation upon organophosphate exposure (Prathiksha et al. 2023).
This study had limitations. The number of participants was relatively small, with missing data for some participants. The latter will be remediated in future studies by increasing the number of hairs collected. The timing of the wristband and hair collections could not be matched perfectly for all participants. For some participants (11/45), ≥ 30 days elapsed between the two collections, which may have affected the analyses. We do not exclude the possibility that additional factors such as personal care and cosmetic products may influence DSB levels in hair follicles. We are also aware that the detected levels of DSBs depend on both the rates of DNA damage and repair. Inter-individual variability in DNA repair capacity likely contributed to the differences in 53BP1 foci densities between participants. Finally, not all organophosphate pesticides were measured in the wristbands and cholinesterase depletion cannot be attributed to a specific chemical compound, which may in part explain the lack of significant association between the two measures.
In conclusion, our study points to rural disparities in pesticide exposures and follicular DNA damage in Latinx children. Future studies combining monitoring of pesticide exposures and (follicular) DNA damage are needed to (1) assess the contribution of individual pesticides (or pesticide mixtures) to genotoxicity, (2) determine if the findings reported here apply to other child populations, and (3) evaluate the impact of socio-economic status on pesticide exposures and their DNA damaging effects.
Data Availability
The data generated during this study are included in this article. Imaging datasets from this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Anderson KA, Seck D, Hobbie KA, Traore AN, McCartney MA, Ndaye A, Forsberg ND, Haigh TA, Sower GJ (2014) Passive sampling devices enable capacity building and characterization of bioavailable pesticide along the Niger, Senegal and Bani Rivers of Africa. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 369(1639):20130110
Anderson KA, Points GL 3rd, Donald CE, Dixon HM, Scott RP, Wilson G, Tidwell LG, Hoffman PD, Herbstman JB, O’Connell SG (2017) Preparation and performance features of wristband samplers and considerations for chemical exposure assessment. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 27(6):551–559
Anguiano-Vega GA, Cazares-Ramirez LH, Rendon-Von Osten J, Santillan-Sidon AP, Vazquez-Boucard CG (2020) Risk of genotoxic damage in schoolchildren exposed to organochloride pesticides. Sci Rep 10(1):17584
Arcury TA, Grzywacz JG, Barr DB, Tapia J, Chen H, Quandt SA (2007) Pesticide urinary metabolite levels of children in eastern North Carolina farmworker households. Environ Health Perspect 115(8):1254–1260
Arcury TA, Laurienti PJ, Chen H, Howard TD, Barr DB, Mora DC, Summers P, Quandt SA (2016) Organophosphate Pesticide Urinary Metabolites Among Latino Immigrants: North Carolina Farmworkers and Non-farmworkers Compared. J Occup Environ Med 58(11):1079–1086
Arcury TA, Laurienti PJ, Talton JW, Chen H, Howard TD, Barr DB, Mora DC, Quandt SA (2018) Pesticide Urinary Metabolites Among Latina Farmworkers and Nonfarmworkers in North Carolina. J Occup Environ Med 60(1):e63–e71
Arcury TA, Chen H, Quandt SA, Talton JW, Anderson KA, Scott RP, Jensen A, Laurienti PJ (2021) Pesticide exposure among Latinx children: Comparison of children in rural, farmworker and urban, non-farmworker communities. Sci Total Environ 763:144233
Arcury TA, Chen H, Quandt SA, Talton JW, Anderson KA, Scott RP, Summers P, Laurienti PJ (2023) Pesticide Exposure among Latinx Children in Rural Farmworker and Urban Non-Farmworker Communities: Associations with Locality and Season. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20:9
Bagchi D, Bagchi M, Hassoun EA, Stohs SJ (1995) In vitro and in vivo generation of reactive oxygen species, DNA damage and lactate dehydrogenase leakage by selected pesticides. Toxicology 104(1–3):129–140
Bahrami M, Simpson SL, Burdette JH, Lyday RG, Quandt SA, Chen H, Arcury TA, Laurienti PJ (2022) Altered default mode network associated with pesticide exposure in Latinx children from rural farmworker families. Neuroimage 256:119179
Bekker-Jensen S, Lukas C, Melander F, Bartek J, Lukas J (2005) Dynamic assembly and sustained retention of 53BP1 at the sites of DNA damage are controlled by Mdc1/NFBD1. J Cell Biol 170(2):201–211
Bernardi N, Gentile N, Manas F, Mendez A, Gorla N, Aiassa D (2015) Assessment of the level of damage to the genetic material of children exposed to pesticides in the province of Cordoba. Arch Argent Pediatr 113(2):126–131
Bouchard MF, Chevrier J, Harley KG, Kogut K, Vedar M, Calderon N, Trujillo C, Johnson C, Bradman A, Barr DB, Eskenazi B (2011) Prenatal exposure to organophosphate pesticides and IQ in 7-year-old children. Environ Health Perspect 119(8):1189–1195
Cadez T, Kolic D, Sinko G, Kovarik Z (2021) Assessment of four organophosphorus pesticides as inhibitors of human acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase. Sci Rep 11(1):21486
Camidge DR, Randall KR, Foster JR, Sadler CJ, Wright JA, Soames AR, Laud PJ, Smith PD, Hughes AM (2005) Plucked human hair as a tissue in which to assess pharmacodynamic end points during drug development studies. Br J Cancer 92(10):1837–1841
Cardano M, Buscemi G, Zannini L (2022) "Sex disparities in DNA damage response pathways: Novel determinants in cancer formation and therapy. iScience 25(3):103875
Castaneda-Yslas IJ, Arellano-Garcia ME, Garcia-Zarate MA, Ruiz-Ruiz B, Zavala-Cerna MG, Torres-Bugarin O (2016) Biomonitoring with Micronuclei Test in Buccal Cells of Female Farmers and Children Exposed to Pesticides of Maneadero Agricultural Valley, Baja California, Mexico. J Toxicol 2016:7934257
Cha ES, Hwang SS, Lee WJ (2014) Childhood leukemia mortality and farming exposure in South Korea: A national population-based birth cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol 38(4):401–407
Chen M, Chang CH, Tao L, Lu C (2015) Residential Exposure to Pesticide During Childhood and Childhood Cancers: A Meta-Analysis. Pediatrics 136(4):719–729
Chevrier C, Beranger R (2018) Pesticides and Child’s Health in France. Curr Environ Health Rep 5(4):522–530
Ciccia A, Elledge SJ (2010) The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell 40(2):179–204
Cotsarelis G (2006) Gene expression profiling gets to the root of human hair follicle stem cells. J Clin Invest 116(1):19–22
Dobbins DL, Chen H, Cepeda MJ, Berenson L, Talton JW, Anderson KA, Burdette JH, Quandt SA, Arcury TA, Laurienti PJ (2022) Comparing impact of pesticide exposure on cognitive abilities of Latinx children from rural farmworker and urban non-farmworker families in North Carolina. Neurotoxicol Teratol 92:107106
Donald CE, Scott RP, Blaustein KL, Halbleib ML, Sarr M, Jepson PC, Anderson KA (2016) Silicone wristbands detect individuals’ pesticide exposures in West Africa. Royal Soc Open Sci 3:8
Engel SM, Wetmur J, Chen J, Zhu C, Barr DB, Canfield RL, Wolff MS (2011) Prenatal exposure to organophosphates, paraoxonase 1, and cognitive development in childhood. Environ Health Perspect 119(8):1182–1188
Engel SM, Bradman A, Wolff MS, Rauh VA, Harley KG, Yang JH, Hoepner LA, Barr DB, Yolton K, Vedar MG, Xu Y, Hornung RW, Wetmur JG, Chen J, Holland NT, Perera FP, Whyatt RM, Lanphear BP, Eskenazi B (2016) Prenatal Organophosphorus Pesticide Exposure and Child Neurodevelopment at 24 Months: An Analysis of Four Birth Cohorts. Environ Health Perspect 124(6):822–830
Fishel ML, Vasko MR, Kelley MR (2007) DNA repair in neurons: so if they don’t divide what’s to repair? Mutat Res 614(1–2):24–36
Fong PC, Boss DS, Yap TA, Tutt A, Wu P, Mergui-Roelvink M, Mortimer P, Swaisland H, Lau A, O’Connor MJ, Ashworth A, Carmichael J, Kaye SB, Schellens JH, de Bono JS (2009) Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N Engl J Med 361(2):123–134
Gho CG, Braun JE, Tilli CM, Neumann HA, Ramaekers FC (2004) Human follicular stem cells: their presence in plucked hair and follicular cell culture. Br J Dermatol 150(5):860–868
Grandjean P, Landrigan PJ (2006) Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals. Lancet 368(9553):2167–2178
Harley KG, Parra KL, Camacho J, Bradman A, Nolan JES, Lessard C, Anderson KA, Poutasse CM, Scott RP, Lazaro G, Cardoso E, Gallardo D, Gunier RB (2019) Determinants of pesticide concentrations in silicone wristbands worn by Latina adolescent girls in a California farmworker community: The COSECHA youth participatory action study. Sci Total Environ 652:1022–1029
Hernandez M, Hernandez-Valero MA, Garcia-Prieto C, Patterson DG, Hajek RA, Recinos I, Lopez DS, Li Y, Jones LA, Hawk E (2019) A Pilot Study Evaluating Organochlorine and Organophosphate Pesticide Exposure in Children and Adolescents of Mexican Descent Residing in Hidalgo County, Texas. J Immigr Minor Health 21(4):751–760
How V, Hashim Z, Ismail P, Md Said S, Omar D, S. Bahri Mohd Tamrin, (2014) Exploring cancer development in adulthood: cholinesterase depression and genotoxic effect from chronic exposure to organophosphate pesticides among rural farm children. J Agromedicine 19(1):35–43
Huen K, Bradman A, Harley K, Yousefi P, Boyd Barr D, Eskenazi B, Holland N (2012) Organophosphate pesticide levels in blood and urine of women and newborns living in an agricultural community. Environ Res 117:8–16
Iglesias-Gonzalez A, Hardy EM, Appenzeller BMR (2020) Cumulative exposure to organic pollutants of French children assessed by hair analysis. Environ Int 134:105332
Iglesias-Gonzalez A, Schweitzer M, Palazzi P, Peng F, Haan S, Letellier E, Appenzeller BMR (2022) Investigating children’s chemical exposome - Description and possible determinants of exposure in the region of Luxembourg based on hair analysis. Environ Int 165:107342
Johnson CD, Russell RL (1975) A rapid, simple radiometric assay for cholinesterase, suitable for multiple determinations. Anal Biochem 64(1):229–238
Kamel F, Hoppin JA (2004) Association of pesticide exposure with neurologic dysfunction and disease. Environ Health Perspect 112(9):950–958
Kapka-Skrzypczak L, Czajka M, Sawicki K, Matysiak-Kucharek M, Gabelova A, Sramkova M, Bartyzel-Lechforowicz H, Kruszewski M (2019) Assessment of DNA damage in Polish children environmentally exposed to pesticides. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 843:52–56
Kile ML, Scott RP, O’Connell SG, Lipscomb S, MacDonald M, McClelland M, Anderson KA (2016) Using silicone wristbands to evaluate preschool children’s exposure to flame retardants. Environ Res 147:365–372
Kopjar N, Zunec S, Mendas G, Micek V, Kasuba V, Mikolic A, Lovakovic BT, Milic M, Pavicic I, Cermak AMM, Pizent A, Lucic Vrdoljak A, Zeljezic D (2018) Evaluation of chlorpyrifos toxicity through a 28-day study: Cholinesterase activity, oxidative stress responses, parent compound/metabolite levels, and primary DNA damage in blood and brain tissue of adult male Wistar rats. Chem Biol Interact 279:51–63
Kudlova N, Slavik H, Duskova P, Furst T, Srovnal J, Bartek J, Mistrik M, Hajduch M (2021) An efficient, non-invasive approach for in-vivo sampling of hair follicles: design and applications in monitoring DNA damage and aging. Aging (albany NY) 13(23):25004–25024
Kulkarni A, Wilson DM (2008) The involvement of DNA-damage and -repair defects in neurological dysfunction. Am J Hum Genet 82(3):539–566
Li D, Huang Q, Lu M, Zhang L, Yang Z, Zong M, Tao L (2015) The organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos confers its genotoxic effects by inducing DNA damage and cell apoptosis. Chemosphere 135:387–393
Ma X, Buffler PA, Gunier RB, Dahl G, Smith MT, Reinier K, Reynolds P (2002) Critical windows of exposure to household pesticides and risk of childhood leukemia. Environ Health Perspect 110(9):955–960
Makris KC, Efthymiou N, Konstantinou C, Anastasi E, Schoeters G, Kolossa-Gehring M, Katsonouri A (2022) Oxidative stress of glyphosate, AMPA and metabolites of pyrethroids and chlorpyrifos pesticides among primary school children in Cyprus. Environ Res 212(Pt B):113316
Mirajkar N, Pope CN (2008) In vitro sensitivity of cholinesterases and [3H]oxotremorine-M binding in heart and brain of adult and aging rats to organophosphorus anticholinesterases. Biochem Pharmacol 76(8):1047–1058
Neri M, Bonassi S, Knudsen LE, Sram RJ, Holland N, Ugolini D, Merlo DF (2006) Children’s exposure to environmental pollutants and biomarkers of genetic damage. I. Overview and critical issues. Mutat Res 612(1):1–13
Perez-Maldonado IN, Athanasiadou M, Yanez L, Gonzalez-Amaro R, Bergman A, Diaz-Barriga F (2006) DDE-induced apoptosis in children exposed to the DDT metabolite. Sci Total Environ 370(2–3):343–351
Prathiksha J, Narasimhamurthy RK, Dsouza HS, Mumbrekar KD (2023) Organophosphate pesticide-induced toxicity through DNA damage and DNA repair mechanisms. Mol Biol Rep 50(6):5465–5479
Quandt SA, Arcury TA, Rao P, Snively BM, Camann DE, Doran AM, Yau AY, Hoppin JA, Jackson DS (2004) Agricultural and residential pesticides in wipe samples from farmworker family residences in North Carolina and Virginia. Environ Health Perspect 112(3):382–387
Quandt SA, Chen H, Grzywacz JG, Vallejos QM, Galvan L, Arcury TA (2010) Cholinesterase depression and its association with pesticide exposure across the agricultural season among Latino farmworkers in North Carolina. Environ Health Perspect 118(5):635–639
Quandt SA, Pope CN, Chen H, Summers P, Arcury TA (2015) Longitudinal Assessment of Blood Cholinesterase Activities Over 2 Consecutive Years Among Latino Nonfarmworkers and Pesticide-Exposed Farmworkers in North Carolina. J Occup Environ Med 57(8):851–857
Quandt SA, Mora DC, Seering TL, Chen H, Arcury TA, Laurienti PJ (2020) Using Life History Calendars to Estimate in Utero and Early Life Pesticide Exposure of Latinx Children in Farmworker Families. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:10
Quiros-Alcala L, Bradman A, Nishioka M, Harnly ME, Hubbard A, McKone TE, Ferber J, Eskenazi B (2011) Pesticides in house dust from urban and farmworker households in California: an observational measurement study. Environ Health 10:19
Rahman MF, Mahboob M, Danadevi K, Saleha Banu B, Grover P (2002) Assessment of genotoxic effects of chloropyriphos and acephate by the comet assay in mice leucocytes. Mutat Res 516(1–2):139–147
Rauh V, Arunajadai S, Horton M, Perera F, Hoepner L, Barr DB, Whyatt R (2011) Seven-year neurodevelopmental scores and prenatal exposure to chlorpyrifos, a common agricultural pesticide. Environ Health Perspect 119(8):1196–1201
Rauh VA, Perera FP, Horton MK, Whyatt RM, Bansal R, Hao X, Liu J, Barr DB, Slotkin TA, Peterson BS (2012) Brain anomalies in children exposed prenatally to a common organophosphate pesticide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(20):7871–7876
Redon CE, Nakamura AJ, Zhang YW, Ji JJ, Bonner WM, Kinders RJ, Parchment RE, Doroshow JH, Pommier Y (2010) Histone gammaH2AX and poly(ADP-ribose) as clinical pharmacodynamic biomarkers. Clin Cancer Res 16(18):4532–4542
Ruiz-Guzman JA, Gomez-Corrales P, Cruz-Esquivel A, Marrugo-Negrete JL (2017) Cytogenetic damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes of children exposed to pesticides in agricultural areas of the department of Cordoba, Colombia. Mutat Res 824:25–31
Schultz LB, Chehab NH, Malikzay A, Halazonetis TD (2000) p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) is an early participant in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks. J Cell Biol 151(7):1381–1390
Shiwaku H, Okazawa H (2015) Impaired DNA damage repair as a common feature of neurodegenerative diseases and psychiatric disorders. Curr Mol Med 15(2):119–128
Strelitz J, Engel LS, Keifer MC (2014) Blood acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase as biomarkers of cholinesterase depression among pesticide handlers. Occup Environ Med 71(12):842–847
Sutris JM, How V, Sumeri SA, Muhammad M, Sardi D, Mohd Mokhtar MT, Muhammad H, Ghazi HF, Isa ZM (2016) Genotoxicity following Organophosphate Pesticides Exposure among Orang Asli Children Living in an Agricultural Island in Kuala Langat, Selangor, Malaysia. Int J Occup Environ Med 7(1):42–51
Tamaro CM, Smith MN, Workman T, Griffith WC, Thompson B, Faustman EM (2018) Characterization of organophosphate pesticides in urine and home environment dust in an agricultural community. Biomarkers 23(2):174–187
Tepe Cam S, Seyhan N (2013) DNA damage in hair root cells as a biomarker for gamma ray exposure. Mutat Res 756(1–2):201–205
Van Maele-Fabry G, Hoet P, Lison D (2013) Parental occupational exposure to pesticides as risk factor for brain tumors in children and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Int 56:19–31
Vidi PA, Bissell MJ, Lelievre SA (2013) Three-dimensional culture of human breast epithelial cells: the how and the why. Methods Mol Biol 945:193–219
Vidi PA, Anderson KA, Chen H, Anderson R, Salvador-Moreno N, Mora DC, Poutasse C, Laurienti PJ, Daniel SS, Arcury TA (2017) Personal samplers of bioavailable pesticides integrated with a hair follicle assay of DNA damage to assess environmental exposures and their associated risks in children. Mutat Res 822:27–33
Acknowledgements
We thank our community partners, the North Carolina Farmworkers Project and Student Action with Farmworkers, and our community field interviewers for carrying out participant recruitment and data collection. We are grateful to the children and parents who participated in this study. We also thank Della King (NC State Extension) who shared information on pesticide use in NC, Dr. T. de Lange (the Rockefeller University) for providing the mCherry-53BP1ct DNA construct, and Dr. Marie Robert (Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest) for helpful comments on the manuscript. We acknowledge funding from the NIEHS, the Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Wake Forest University.
Funding
This work was funded by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01 ES08739), the Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Support Grant (P30CA012197, through AHWFBCCC’s Office for Community Outreach and Engagement), and by the Wake Forest Center for Molecular Signaling (CMS) via its imaging facility.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CL: investigation; MG: investigation; KZ: formal analysis; HC: formal analysis; JH: investigation; PS: data curation; project administration; KA.A: supervision; methodology; validation; RP.S: investigation; CNP: supervision; methodology; KHe: investigation; PJ.L: supervision; writing—review and editing; SA.Q: supervision; writing—review and editing; TA.A: conceptualization; funding acquisition; supervision; methodology; writing—review and editing; P-AV: conceptualization; formal analysis; investigation; supervision; writing—original draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
K.A.A. has a financial interest in MyExposome, Inc., which is marketing technology related to the research being reported. The terms of this arrangement have been approved by Oregon State University in accordance with its policy on research conflicts of interest. All other authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics Approval
This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Wake Forest School of Medicine (protocol No IRB00043066, 12/16/2020).
Consent to Participate
Written informed consent was obtained from the parents to all of the participants included in the study. Ascent was obtained and documented for all participants.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lepetit, C., Gaber, M., Zhou, K. et al. Follicular DNA Damage and Pesticide Exposure Among Latinx Children in Rural and Urban Communities. Expo Health (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-023-00609-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-023-00609-1