Skip to main content
Log in

The Transnational Key: Response to Judit Bokser Liwerant’s 2017 Sklare Lecture

  • Published:
Contemporary Jewry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Judit Liwerant’s exploration of the “binomial” of the national and the transnational takes up one of the most significant shifts in history and the social sciences of the last few decades. Her focus on Latin American Jewry and how it is transformed by a transnational approach is consistent with a parallel focus in the study of North American Jewry. Liwerant’s analysis of the constantly shifting processes experienced by the Jews of the Americas underlines the constant negotiations involved in historical memories, networks, migration flows and cultural bonds that were and are never contained by national boundaries. Her work is a timely and important contribution to transnational studies of Jews.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Both Kuhn (1962) and Langer (1942) have seen many editions. Kuhn’s work is far and away the more famous and influential. However, the tidal wave created by the interest in the symbolic in the social sciences and history for decades was deeply indebted to Langer.

  2. Transnationalism’s impact has been significant for at least two decades. It has come later to the study of American Jewish history, though there are many fine examples of this research.

  3. See Lederhendler (2017) and Krah (2017). On “entangled” histories see Baumgarten et al. (2016).

References

  • Baumgarten, Elisheva, Ruth Mazo Karras, and Katelyn Mesler. 2016. Entangled histories: Knowledge, authority and culture in the thirteenth century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallas, Elisabeth, Anton Hieke, David Junger, Ulrike Kleinecke, and Markus Krah. 2017. Introduction: Re-framing American Jewish history and thought—New transnational perspectives. American Jewish History 101(4): 517–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krah, Markus. 2017. Clinging to borders and boundaries? The (sorry) state of transnational American Jewish studies. American Jewish History 101(4): 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, Susanne. 1942. Philosophy in a new key: A study in the symbolism of reason, rite and art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederhendler, Eli. 2017. Modern historians and Jewish transnational perspectives. American Jewish History 101(4): 557–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riv-Ellen Prell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prell, RE. The Transnational Key: Response to Judit Bokser Liwerant’s 2017 Sklare Lecture. Cont Jewry 38, 221–225 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12397-018-9262-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12397-018-9262-9

Keywords

Navigation