Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hyperbaric Storage Effect on Enzyme Activity and Texture Characteristics of Raw Meat

  • Published:
Food Engineering Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hyperbaric storage (HS) is a new food preservation alternative or even improvement of cold storage processes. HS of raw pork meat in pieces (PP) and raw bovine minced meat (BM) was compared to conventional refrigeration at 60 MPa/10 °C and 75 MPa/25 °C (conditions at which a previous work reported good potential for shelf life extension), on proteolytic enzymes, texture after cooking, and SEM of raw meat microstructure. Regarding enzymatic activities in PP meat, an overall reduction on the activity of cathepsins B, L, and D and calpains were observed, which were more pronounced for cathepsin B and calpains, with a reduction of 77.5 and 95.3% for PP samples stored at 60 MPa/10 °C and 47.3 and 90.9% for samples stored at 75 MPa/25 °C, respectively, after 60 days of storage. A different scenario was observed for BM samples, where enzymatic activities remained practically unchanged for both HS conditions (except for calpains), when compared to refrigerated storage. Indeed, the reduction of calpain activity in BM at 60 MPa/10 °C was comparable to that of refrigerated storage, while at 75 MPa/25 °C, a significant (p > 0.05) reduction on calpain activity was observed compared either with refrigeration and 60 MPa/10 °C from the 30th day of storage experiments onwards. Additionally, cathepsin L activity decreased along refrigerated storage (approximately 44.4%), while both HS conditions allowed to keep the enzymatic activity unchanged along storage. Regarding texture after cooking, 60 MPa/10 °C revealed to be the preservation condition that better maintained meat textural characteristics during storage. Furthermore, analysis by SEM showed a more pronounced effect of 75 MPa/25 °C on meat microstructure, with muscular fibers showing a smother appearance and a less individualized organization. These results contribute to deepen the knowledge of the effect of HS on raw meat, after previous results have revealed a good possibility of extending the shelf-life of raw bovine and pork meats by HS, either in combination with mild (10 °C) or room-like (25 °C) temperatures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bermejo-Prada A, Colmant A, Otero L, Guignon B (2017) Industrial viability of the hyperbaric method to store perishable foods at room temperature. J Food Eng 193:76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.08.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Santos MD Fidalgo LG Pinto CA et al 2020 Hyperbaric storage at room like temperatures as a possible alternative to refrigeration: evolution and recent advances Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1–12 10.1080/10408398.2020.1770687

  3. Fidalgo LG, Santos MD, Queirós RP et al (2014) Hyperbaric storage at and above room temperature of a highly perishable food. Food Bioprocess Technol 7:2028–2037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-013-1201-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Queirós RP, Santos MD, Fidalgo LG et al (2014) Hyperbaric storage of melon juice at and above room temperature and comparison with storage at atmospheric pressure and refrigeration. Food Chem 147:209–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.09.124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Segovia-Bravo KA, Guignon B, Bermejo-Prada A et al (2012) Hyperbaric storage at room temperature for food preservation: A study in strawberry juice. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 15:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2012.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lemos ÁT, Ribeiro AC, Delgadillo I, Saraiva JA (2020) Preservation of raw watermelon juice up to one year by hyperbaric storage at room temperature. LWT 117:108695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108695

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Moreira SA, Fernandes PAR, Duarte R et al (2015) A first study comparing preservation of a ready-to-eat soup under pressure (hyperbaric storage) at 25°C and 30°C with refrigeration. Food Sci Nutr 3:467–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.212

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fidalgo LG, Lemos ÁT, Delgadillo I, Saraiva JA (2018) Microbial and physicochemical evolution during hyperbaric storage at room temperature of fresh Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 45:264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2017.11.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fidalgo LG, Simões MMQ, Casal S et al (2020) Physicochemical parameters, lipids stability, and volatiles profile of vacuum-packaged fresh Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) loins preserved by hyperbaric storage at 10 °C. Food Res Int 127:108740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernandes PA, Moreira SA, Santos MD et al (2019) Hyperbaric storage at variable room temperature – a new preservation methodology for minced meat compared to refrigeration. J Sci Food Agric 99:3276–3282. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Santos MD, Castro R, Delgadillo I, Saraiva JA (2020) Improvement of the refrigerated preservation technology by hyperbaric storage for raw fresh meat. J Sci Food Agric 100:969–977. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10083

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pinto C, Moreira SA, Fidalgo LG et al (2017) Impact of different hyperbaric storage conditions on microbial, physicochemical and enzymatic parameters of watermelon juice. Food Res Int 99:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.05.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pinto CA, Santos MD, Fidalgo LG et al (2018) Enhanced control of Bacillus subtilis endospores development by hyperbaric storage at variable/uncontrolled room temperature compared to refrigeration. Food Microbiol 74:125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2018.03.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pinto CA, Martins AP, Santos MD et al (2019) Growth inhibition and inactivation of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris endospores in apple juice by hyperbaric storage at ambient temperature. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 52:232–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2019.01.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chéret R, Delbarre-Ladrat C, de Lamballerie-Anton M, Verrez-Bagnis V (2007) Calpain and cathepsin activities in post mortem fish and meat muscles. Food Chem 101:1474–1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.04.023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lamare M, Taylor RG, Farout L et al (2002) Changes in proteasome activity during postmortem aging of bovine muscle. Meat Sci 61:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00187-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Quali A (1992) Proteolytic and physicocohemical mechanisms involved in meat texture development. Biochimie 74:251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9084(92)90124-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Turk V, Bode W (1991) The cystatins: protein inhibitors of cysteine proteinases. FEBS Lett 285:213–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(91)80804-C

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zamora F, Debiton E, Lepetit J et al (1996) Predicting variability of ageing and toughness in beef M. Longissimus lumborum et thoracis Meat Sci 43:321–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(96)00020-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Malinowska-Pańczyk E, Kołodziejska I (2018) Changes in enzymatic activity of fish and slaughter animals’ meat after high pressure treatment at subzero temperatures. Pol J Food Nutr Sci 68:125–131. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjfns-2017-0019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Campus M (2010) High pressure processing of meat, meat products and seafood. Food Eng Rev 2:256–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-010-9028-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lakshmanan R, Patterson MF, Piggott JR (2005) Effects of high-pressure processing on proteolytic enzymes and proteins in cold-smoked salmon during refrigerated storage. Food Chem 90:541–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.05.015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Homma N, Ikeuchi Y, Suzuki A (1994) Effects of high pressure treatment on the proteolytic enzymes in meat. Meat Sci 38:219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(94)90111-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Anson ML (1938) The estimation of pepsin, trypsin, papain, and cathepsin with hemoglobin. J Gen Physiol 22:79–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Teixeira B, Fidalgo L, Mendes R et al (2013) Changes of enzymes activity and protein profiles caused by high-pressure processing in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) fillets. J Agric Food Chem 61:2851–2860. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf3049643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Caine WR, Aalhus JL, Best DR et al (2003) Relationship of texture profile analysis and Warner-Bratzler shear force with sensory characteristics of beef rib steaks. Meat Sci 64:333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00110-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bourne MC, Kenny JF, Barnard J (1978) Computer-assisted readout of data from texture profile analysis curves. J Texture Stud 9:481–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.1978.tb01219.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Homma N, Ikeuchi Y, Suzuki A (1995) Levels of calpain and calpastatin in meat subjected to high pressure. Meat Sci 41:251–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(95)00005-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fidalgo LG, Delgadillo I, Saraiva JA (2020) Autolytic changes involving proteolytic enzymes on Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) preserved by hyperbaric storage. LWT 118:108755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Buckow R, Sikes A, Tume R (2013) Effect of high pressure on physicochemical properties of meat. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 53:770–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.560296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheng JH (2016) Lipid oxidation in meat J Nutr Food Sci 06 10.4172/2155-9600.1000494

  32. Bhat ZF, Morton JD, Mason SL, Bekhit AE-DA (2018) Role of calpain system in meat tenderness: a review. Food Sci Hum Wellness 7:196–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2018.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Elgasim EA, Kennick WH (1982) Effect of high hydrostatic pressure on meat microstructure. Food Struct 1:8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to the University of Aveiro and FCT/MCT for the financial support for the QOPNA and LAQV research Units (FCT UID/QUI/00062/2019 and UIDB/50006/2020, respectively) through national founds and, where applicable, co-financed by the FEDER, within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement. Mauro D. Santos and Carlos A. Pinto would like to thank also FCT/MCT for the PhD grant SFRH/BD/103145/2014 and SFRH/BD/137036/2018, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge A. Saraiva.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santos, M.D., Matos, G., Pinto, C.A. et al. Hyperbaric Storage Effect on Enzyme Activity and Texture Characteristics of Raw Meat. Food Eng Rev 13, 642–650 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-020-09261-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-020-09261-w

Keywords

Navigation