Introduction

Geosites provide a useful and very important contribution to the understanding of the geological history of a given area and have exceptional importance as regards scientific, cultural, and recreational aspects. These represent the geodiversity, understood as the set of distinctive geological, geomorphological, pedological, hydrological, sedimentological, and palaeontological characteristics of an area. In the last decades, geotourism is becoming increasingly popular as initiatives within geoparks suggest. This “cultural tourism” has the main purpose of promoting the history, culture, and traditions of a territory, contributing to the well-being of local communities (Dowling 2011).

As concerns geosciences, palaeontology is probably one of the most easily suitable disciplines to be divulged to the general public and can provide the starting point for initiatives aimed at the protection and divulgation of the geological heritage of a determinate territory. The palaeontological heritage is the whole of body fossils or ichnofossils (e.g., tracks ad trackways) that have been reported in the geological record and which have been assigned a scientific and educational value. The enhancement of geo-palaeontological heritage aims to promote protection and preservation, disclosing scientific data for use and enjoyment of the whole society, bringing this discipline to the general public (Henriques and Pena dos Reis 2015; Berrocal-Casero et al. 2018; Meléndez 2018). For these reasons, governments should protect and valorize the geo-palaeontological sites as it occurs to other tourist attractions (Melinte-Dobrinescu et al. 2017; Audije-Gil et al. 2018; Cobos and Alcalá 2018; Cobos et al. 2020; Vasconcelos et al. 2020). Probably, the most suitable and relatively common type of geo-palaeontological sites used as tourist attractions is the ichnosites. Indeed, numerous spectacular palaeontological sites with dinosaurs or other vertebrate tracks and trackways are currently used for this purpose in a great number of localities around the world (Arzarello et al. 2000; Berrocal-Casero et al. 2018; Cobos et al. 2020; Francischini et al. 2020).

In the last decades, the palaeontology of vertebrates of Sardinia has had a significant development that has led to a better knowledge of endemic mammals and evolution in insular ecosystems during Neogene (e.g., Abbazzi et al. 2008; Zoboli and Pillola 2017a; Mennecart et al. 2017, 2019) and Quaternary (e.g., Abbazzi et al. 2004; Palombo et al. 2006; Palombo 2009; Zoboli et al. 2016, 2019; Zoboli and Caddeo 2016; Zoboli and Pillola 2016, 2017b; Angelone et al. 2018). Besides, a series of research concerning tetrapod ichnology of Sardinia have been published (Fanelli et al. 2007; Marchetti et al. 2018, 2020; Pillola et al. 2020). In particular, these latest works highlighted how Pleistocene ichnosites are relatively numerous along the western coast of Sardinia and providing useful data for palaeoenvironmental reconstructions.

Among the numerous ichnosites reported in the Pleistocene of Sardinia, the geosite of Funtana Morimenta (Fig. 1) has recently provided a series of useful and interesting data that allowed recognition of new ichnotaxa in the ichnofossil record of Sardinia and reconstruction of the palaeoenvironment during the Ice Age (Pillola and Zoboli 2017; Zoboli and Pillola 2018; Pillola et al. 2020). As highlighted by recent investigations, the Funtana Morimenta ichnosite has shown important deterioration because of its susceptibility to weathering. This work aims to indicate a series of efficient requalification actions to protect the area and the ichnofossils, and to offer a great opportunity to promote interest in geosciences and improve awareness of the Italian geo-palaeontological heritage.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Geographical location of Funtana Morimenta (Gonnesa, SW Sardinia, Italy). a Location of Sardinia and the Sulcis-Iglesiente sub-region (the red rectangle indicates the Gonnesa area). b General geographical context. c Detailed geographical context

Geological and Palaeontological Settings

The Funtana Morimenta geosite is located in the Sulcis-Iglesiente sub-region (southwestern Sardinia, Italy) about 0.5 km S-W of the small village of Gonnesa (39° 15′ 25.85″ N–8° 27′ 32.30″ E), and it is comprised in the Geopark of Sardinia (Parco Geominerario Storico e Ambientale della Sardegna) (Figs. 1 and 2). The site consists of a natural cliff of late Middle Pleistocene aeolian sandstone, with an outcrop of about 10 m high and 150 m long, where large-scale cross and low-angle planer stratifications are well-exposed. Megacerine deer and mammoth footprints with clear deformations of the underlying laminae are visible in cross-sections along with the natural exposures and concave epireliefs or convex hyporeliefs in large collapsed aeolian sandstone blocks at the base of the cliff (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Geological sketch map of the Gonnesa area: 1 undifferentiated Variscan metamorphic basement (Cambrian–Ordovician), 2 fluvial sandstones and volcaniclastic deposits (Guardia Pisano Fm., Permian), 3 marine and transitional carbonates (Miliolitico Fm., early Ypresian), 4 fluvial conglomerates and sandstones (Cixerri Fm., middle Lutetian–Oligocene), 5 aeolian sandstones and sands (Funtana Morimenta Fm., Middle Pleistocene), 5 alluvial deposits (Holocene), 6 main faults

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Natural cliff of late Middle Pleistocene aeolian sandstone of Funtana Morimenta. b Aeolian cross-stratification. c Sandstone cross-sections showing a mammoth footprint and relative deformation of the underlying strata

Generally, the aeolian deposits cropping out in the western Sardinia were assigned to the Middle to Late Pleistocene age based on the relationships with the interglacial marine deposits of the MIS 5e (Tyrrhenian Stage in the Italian Mediterranean Marine Stages). The geological settings of different aeolian (s.l.) successions in the western coasts of Sardinia show that deposits occur both below and above the marine Tyrrhenian deposits (Pecorini 1954; Lecca and Carboni 2007; Coltorti et al. 2010). The absence of Tyrrhenian marine sediments interposed in the aeolian outcrops of the internal areas represents a problem for a precise chronological context of the continental deposits (Pillola et al. 2020). Concerning the Sulcis-Iglesiente area where the Funtana Morimenta site and other several ichnosites have been identified (Fanelli et al. 2007; Zoboli and Pillola 2018), at least two generations of aeolian deposits are recognized (Orrù and Ulzega 1986). In particular, the oldest of them (Funtana Morimenta Formation) has been attributed to the late Middle Pleistocene based on the relationships with the observed Tyrrhenian marine marker in the near shoreline. The younger aeolian deposits present in several localities of the Sulcis-Iglesiente area have been attributed to an indefinite Late Pleistocene (Orrù and Ulzega 1986).

The Funtana Morimenta site has been mentioned since the beginning of the nineteenth century by Lamarmora (1857) who reported the first description of the Quaternary aeolian deposits (Fig. 4a, b). However, at the end of the same century, the site became relevant as regards the palaeontology of vertebrates due to the discovery of an incomplete skeleton of a small proboscidean (Figs. 4c, d and 5) (Acconci 1881). The fossil remains, currently regarded as the holotype of Mammuthus lamarmorai (Major 1883), have been found during the construction of a railway and are now housed in different European museums (Fig. 4d) (Major 1883; Comaschi Caria 1965; Zoboli et al. 2018). Comaschi Caria (1965) provided additional data about the proboscidean of Funtana Morimenta and reported that the excavations in the site have been continued for several decades after the first report by Acconci (1881), as confirmed by the dates (1881, 1903, and 1923) reported in the labels associated with the mammoth fossils housed at the Naturhistorisches Museum of Basel (Switzerland). Palombo et al. (2012) revised the location of the mammoth fossil site, demonstrating that the disused railway cited by Acconci (1881) runs at the top of Guardia Pisano hill, a toponym very close to Funtana Morimenta. Accordingly, the authors proposed that the M. lamarmorai remains have been collected in the aeolian deposit still visible on the slope of Guardia Pisano hill, instead than from the deposits cropping out at Funtana Morimenta, as previously believed.

Fig. 4
figure 4

a Alberto Lamarmora (1789–1863) who first reported the Quaternary aeolian succession of Funtana Morimenta. b The Funtana Morimenta section in the stratigraphical sketch by Lamarmora (1857). c Charles Immanuel Forsyth Major (1843–1923) who described the dwarf mammoth fossils collected in the Funtana Morimenta area. d Part of the remains of the Sardinian dwarf mammoth Mammuthus lamarmorai, Major’s Collection (Naturhistorisches Museum Basel, Switzerland)

Fig. 5
figure 5

a Plaster cast of the partial skeleton of Mammuthus lamarmorai collected at the Museo dei Palaeoambienti Sulcitani – E. A. Martel of Carbonia (Sardinia). b Estimated size of M. lamarmorai, scale bar corresponds to 1 m

Recently, a series of studies have highlighted the presence of tracks and trackways left by large mammals. To date, the ichnotaxa reported on the site are Proboscipeda panfamilia McNeil et al. 2007 and Bifidipes isp., respectively left by mammoths and deer (Zoboli and Pillola 2018). Considering shape and size, the proboscidean footprints of Funtana Morimenta have been related to the Sardinian dwarf mammoth M. lamarmorai. It is worth highlighting that these proboscidean footprints represent the first record of mammoth tracks of Italy and potentially the first attributable to a dwarf mammoth in the western Mediterranean Basin (Pillola and Zoboli 2017).

Potential Valorization Actions

The aeolianites cropping out on the N-NE side of the Guardia Pisano hill, where the remains of the type material of Mammuthus lamarmorai (Major 1883) were found (Palombo et al. 2012), have never been subject to any intervention of protection or enhancement. The site is currently hardly visible from the road crossing between the SS126 and the SP108 roads as it is almost completely covered by shrubs and herbaceous vegetation. There are no traces of the old railway line except for a small bridge over which the railway passed and which now delimits access to private property. In our opinion, this site does not lend itself to an enhancement because of its location.

On the other hand, the Funtana Morimenta aeolianites have been subject to attention due to the presence of an important water source (in the local idiom “Su laccu de s’acqua de sa canna”), a large parking area, and commercial activities. However, the geo-palaeontological site is currently experiencing decay. The vegetation covers part of the aeolian cliff which is almost invisible from the facing parking area (Fig. 6). The deposits also show strong erosional processes with large sandstone blocks collapsed from the cliff or about to detach. Even the dwarf mammoth and megacerine deer tracks, still visible in cross-section, are subject to erosional processes and are irreparably destined to disappear (Fig. 7a, b). Recent surveys have highlighted the state of abandonment of the Funtana Morimenta area and the almost absence of suitable information or any info-point about the geo-palaeontological heritage. The only displayed information is a panel (Fig. 8) placed by private citizens which reports scarce information written in Italian: “In questa località sede dell’antica laveria ‘Gonnesa Mining Company of London’ fu ritrovato un esemplare di elefante nano” (“In this locality, headquarters of the old mine-washery ‘Gonnesa Mining Company of London’, a dwarf elephant was found”).

Fig. 6
figure 6

The Funtana Morimenta aeolian cliff viewed from the parking area and totally hidden by spontaneous vegetation

Fig. 7
figure 7

Current state of preservation of large mammal tracks in cross-section. a Single dwarf mammoth footprint. b Couple of megacerine deer footprints

Fig. 8
figure 8

The only panel on the site of Funtana Morimenta that indicates the presence of a geoheritage

As previously highlighted, the ichnosite of Funtana Morimenta lends itself easily to a redevelopment action aimed at its enhancement and fruition (Fig. 9(a–d)). The interventions proposed here are relatively inexpensive and consist of elementary but essential improvements to (a) protect the unique geo-palaeontological heritage, (b) protect the entire area and the potential users, (c) make the geosite more visible from the SS126 road and therefore attract tourists or local people, (d) redevelop the area making it more attractive and functional, and (e) promote interest in geosciences.

Fig. 9
figure 9

The Funtana Morimenta area and simulations of the main improvement interventions herein proposed: (a) low dry stone walls and wooden fences at the base of the cliff, (b) panels, (c) life-size silhouettes of the Sardinian dwarf mammoth in the roundabout on the SS126 road, and (d) panel on SS126 to indicate the site

The first and fundamental intervention must be finalized to protect the ichnofossils in situ. The natural erosion process on the poorly cemented lithotypes can be arrested using specific consolidating and protective products as acrylic polymers (Sanciu and Zoboli 2018). In addition, a laser-scanning or photogrammetry could be useful to preserve the scientific information and to realize replicas of the more vulnerable tracks that are irreparably destined to disappear.

One of the main problems highlighted during a 2019 inspection is the very poor visibility of the aeolian cliff due to the uncontrolled growth of spontaneous vegetation represented principally by reeds and brambles. The site is not visible both from the SS126 road and from the parking area of the water source. Therefore, one of the first measures should be the reduction or total eradication of the spontaneous surrounding vegetation.

To consent the protection of the geo-palaeontological heritage and the tourist’s safety, another fundamental intervention is to delimit the aeolian cliff (Fig. 9(a)). In order to guarantee a low visual impact, it would be necessary the use of local lithotypes to build low dry stone walls and/or equip the area with wooden fences. Recently, similar solutions have already been chosen in some geosites located in central Sardinia where local administrations have invested in culture and geotourism enhancing their geo-palaeontological heritage (e.g., the geosite “Cava Duidduru” near Genoni in the Sarcidano sub-region and the mega-pillow “Su Corongiu de Fanari” near Masullas in the Marmilla sub-region).

Panels represent the most direct and relatively inexpensive way to disclose information, thorough explanations, artworks, and photographs. For this reason, one of the fundamental objectives of the project will be the installation of appropriate panels giving the visitor scientific and didactic support. Therefore, we suggest a series of panels aimed to explain the history of the geosite and its peculiar geo-palaeontological heritage through drawings and especially palaeoenvironmental reconstructions of the area during the late Middle Pleistocene (Fig. 9(b)). Considering the peculiar fossil biota found in the site, we suggest a series of life-size silhouettes of the dwarf Sardinian mammoth to be placed in proximity of the site and the SS126 roundabout between Funtana Morimenta and the village of Gonnesa (Fig. 9(c, d)). These silhouettes, achievable using weathering steel, would have the double function to show the real size of the small proboscidate and to indicate the proximity of the geo-palaeontological site. Furthermore, it is essential to allocate resources for the maintenance of the geosite and its facilities.

The Relevance of Funtana Morimenta Ichnosite as Palaeontological Heritage

The geo-palaeontological heritage is an educational resource that can generate aptitudes and attitudes concerning the vulnerability of the Earth systems through the geology, palaeontology, and other branches of geoscience. In recent years, numerous dissemination and promotional initiatives around the world have been developed to increase public heritage interest. In addition, geotourist localities are often used as a relevant socio-economic resource.

The territory of Gonnesa, like much of the Sulcis-Iglesiente sub-region of Sardinia, has a potential value beyond the seaside tourism. The Sulcis-Iglesiente sub-region is very rich in potential geosites distributed in various areas both inland and along the coast which should be protected and enhanced. The area is known for sites of visual beauty, archeological interest, reach mining heritage history that can be properly exploited adding value to the entire territory, and the whole community.

The restoring and dissemination actions here proposed offer a great opportunity to promote interest in geosciences and improve awareness on the importance of geoheritage. The objectives of this work are to spread the knowledge about the late Middle Pleistocene ichnosite of Funtana Morimenta, to emphasize the importance of the educational values of this site, and to expose the need to protect this example of national geo-palaeontological heritage. All actions proposed here would be made possible with a modest investment and could represent a model for similar initiatives in other areas of Sardinia. Therefore, in addition to its outstanding scientific importance, this ichnosite represents a significant geo-palaeontological resource that can be developed for geoeducational benefit.

The plan to develop Funtana Morimenta as an educational and geotourist site relies on its survival. However, if no adequate protection is provided, the fossil tracks will quickly deteriorate. Therefore, it is necessary to take urgent measures to protect this geosite. Moreover, the surrounding area offers an outstanding cultural heritage and it would be interesting to publicize this tracksite as well as using this publicity to promote its protection.

Conclusions

The Sardinian ichnosite herein discussed has great relevance and importance for the geological and palaeontological heritage of Italy and represents an exceptional source of information about the late Middle Pleistocene continental palaeoecosystem of Sardinia. One of the most significant features of the sites is the presence of unique ichnofossils as tracks and trackways left by large mammals of the Ice Age. Among others, this is particularly the case for the still visible proboscidean footprints left by the Sardinian dwarf mammoth Mammuthus lamarmorai (Major 1883), the first attributable to a dwarf mammoth in the western Mediterranean Basin.

It is worth specifying that the site is technically a part of the Geopark of Sardinia; therefore, a rapid intervention by the competent authorities is solicited so that the entire area and the palaeontological content are protected.

We conclude that the described site, following the proposed low-cost management and restoring actions, can be exposed to public visitation. This would serve the purpose of conservation of geo-palaeontological heritage of Sardinia, assuring the continuation of the scientific research and cultural practices, finally improving the life quality of the local population increasing the geotourism in this Italian region.