Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Impact of Social Robotics on L2 Learners’ Anxiety and Attitude in English Vocabulary Acquisition

  • Published:
International Journal of Social Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effect of robot assisted language learning (RALL) on the anxiety level and attitude in English vocabulary acquisition amongst Iranian EFL junior high school students. Forty-six female students, who were beginners at the age of 12, participated in this study and were randomly assigned into two groups of RALL (30 students) and non-RALL (16 students). The textbook, the materials, as well as the teacher were the same in the two groups. However in the RALL group, the treatment was given by a teacher accompanied by a humanoid robot assistant. Two questionnaires of anxiety and attitude were utilized to measure the students’ anxiety and attitude (Horwitz et al. 1986; Alemi and Alipour 2012). The results of descriptive and t tests indicated that there was lower anxiety and a more positive attitude towards English vocabulary acquisition in the RALL group compared with those in the non-RALL group. The study showed that the students in the RALL group had great fun in the learning process; they also believed they were learning more effectively, which helped them boost their motivation in the long run. The present study provides new insights into the use of technology in the language classroom, suggesting that teachers and material developers should integrate technology into the language learning process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Graph 1
Graph 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rahimi M, Hosseini KSF (2011) The impact of computer-based activities on Iranian high-school students’ attitudes towards computer-assisted language learning. Procedia Comput Sci 3:183–190. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.031

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Han J (2012) Emerging technologies: robot assisted language learning. Lang Learn Technol 16:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yang SC, Chen YJ (2007) Technology-enhanced language learning: a case study. Comput Hum Behav 23:860–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang CW, Lee JH, Chao PY, Wang CY, Chen GD (2010) Exploring the possibility of using humanoid robots as instructional tools for teaching a second language in primary school. Educ Technol Soc 13:13–24

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hegarty M (2004) Dynamic visualizations and learning: getting to difficult questions. Learn Instruct 14:343–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xie L, Antle AN, Motamedi N (2008) Are tangibles more fun? Comparing children’s enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces. In: Conference on tangible and embedded interaction. http://sr-hercules05.iat.sfu.ca/TangibleSpatialGames/Paper/p191-xie.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2013

  7. Meghdari A, Alemi M, Ghazisaedy M, Taheri AR, Karimian A, Zandvakili MZ (2013) Applying robots as teaching assistant in EFL classes at Iranian middle-schools. In: International conference on education and modern educational technologies, Venice, Italy. http://www.europement.com/library/2013/venice/bypaper/EMET/EMET-09.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2013

  8. Barani G (2011) The relationship between computer assisted language learning (CALL) and listening skill of Iranian EFL learners. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.414

  9. Rahimi M, Yadollahi S (2011) Foreign language learning attitude as a predictor of attitudes towards computer-assisted language learning. World Conf Inf Technol. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.029

  10. Marzban A (2011) Improvement of reading comprehension through computer-assisted language learning in Iranian intermediate EFL students. Procedia Comput Sci 3:3–10. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Miles S, Kwon CJ (2008) Benefits of using CALL vocabulary programs to provide systematic word recycling. English Teach. http://praxised.com/research/miles-kwon.pdf. Accessed 20 January 2014

  12. Andrade M, Williams K (2009) Foreign language learning anxiety in Japanese EFL university classes: physical, emotional, expressive, and verbal reactions. Sophia Jr College Fac J 29:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng YS, Horwitz EK, Schallert DL (1999) Language anxiety: differentiating writing and speaking components. Lang learn 49:417–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee S, Noh H, Lee J, Lee K, Lee GG, Sagong S, Kim M (2011) On the effectiveness of robot-assisted language learning. ReCALL 23:25–58. doi:10.1017/S0958344010000273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Horwitz EK, Horwitz MB, Cope J (1986) Foreign language classroom anxiety. Mod Lang J 70:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Arnold N (2007) Reducing foreign language communication apprehension with computer-mediated communication: a preliminary study. Systems 35:469–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Richardson JC, Swan K (2003) Examing social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. JALN 7:68–88. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/18713/RichardsonSwan%20JALN7%281%29.pdf?sequence=2. Accessed 3 January 2013

  18. Matsuda S, Gobel P (2004) Anxiety and predictors of performance in the foreign language classroom. Systems 32:21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sparks RL, Patton J, Ganschow L, Humbach N (2009) Long-term relationships among early first language skills, second language aptitude, second language affect, and later second language proficiency. Appl Psycholinguist 30:725–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alemi M, Alipour M (2012) The effect of CALL on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. In: 10th International TELLSI Conference, Tehran, Iran

  21. Hwang Y, Huang NP (2010) A study of EFL college students’ language anxiety in multimedia environments. Int J Humanit 8: 367–378

    Google Scholar 

  22. Poza MIC (2005) The effects of asynchronous computer voice conferencing on learners’ anxiety when speaking a foreign language. Doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University

  23. Yang SH (2012) Exploring college students’ attitudes and self-efficacy of mobile learning. Turk Online J Educ Technol 11:148–154. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ989264.pdf. Accessed 11 November 2013

  24. Lu M (2008) Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. J Comput Assist Learn 24:515–525. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lan YJ, Sung YT, Chang KE (2007) A mobile-device-supported peer-assisted learning system for collaborative early EFL reading. Lang Learn Technol 11:130–151

  26. Kanda T, Hirano T, Eaton D, Ishiguro H (2004) Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: a field trial. Hum-Comput Interact 19:61–84

  27. Han J, Jo M, Park S, Kim S (2005) The educational use of home robots for children. Robot Human Interact Commun. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2005.1513808

  28. You ZJ, Shen CY, Chang CW, Liu BJ, Chen GD (2006) A robot as a teaching assistant in an English class. Adv Learn Technol. doi:10.1109/ICALT.2006.1652373

  29. Nomura T, Kanda T, Suzuki T, Kato K (2004) Psychology in human-robot communication: an attempt through investigation of negative attitudes and anxiety toward robots. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interaction communication. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2004.1374726

  30. Kanda T, Sato R, Saiwaki N, Ishiguro H (2007) A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human-robot interaction. Robotics 23:962–971. doi:10.1109/TRO.2007.904904

    Google Scholar 

  31. Park SJ, Han JH, Kang BH, Shin KC (2011) Teaching assistant robot, ROBOSEM, in English class and practical issues for its diffusion. Adv Robot Soc Impacts (ARSO). doi:10.1109/ARSO.2011.6301971

  32. Alemi M, Meghdari A, Ghazisaedy M (2014) Employing humanoid robots for teaching english language in Iranian junior high schools. Int J Humanoid Robot. doi:10.1142/S0219843614500224

  33. Vandewaetere M, Desmet P (2009) Introducing psychometrical validation of questionnaire in CALL research: the case of measuring attitude towards CALL. Comput Assist Lang Learn 22:349–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vetter EB (1983) TPR-Plus. In: Conference of the California association of teachers of English to speakers of other languages

  35. Swain M (1985) Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. Input Second Lang Acquis 15:165–179

    Google Scholar 

  36. Alemi M, Meghdari A, Ghanbarzadeh A, Moghaddam LJ, (2014) Impact of a social humanoid robot as a therapy assistant in children cancer treatment. In: Proceedings of the \(6^{\rm th}\) international conference on social robotics (ICSR), (Best Paper Award), Sydney, Australia

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the National Elites Foundation of Iran (http://www.bmn.ir) for their moral and financial support throughout this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Tehran West Branch, Tehran, Iran

    M. Alemi

  2. Social Robotics Laboratory, Center of Excellence in Design, Robotics, and Automation, Tehran, Iran

    M. Alemi & A. Meghdari

  3. Languages and Linguistics Center, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    M. Ghazisaedy

Authors
  1. M. Alemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Meghdari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Ghazisaedy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Meghdari.

Appendices

Appendices

1.1 Appendix 1

See the appendix Table 6.

Table 6 Foreign language classroom anxiety scale (modified version)
Full size table

1.2 Appendix 2

See the appendix Table 7.

Table 7 Vandewaetere and desmet’s attitude questionnaire (modified version)
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alemi, M., Meghdari, A. & Ghazisaedy, M. The Impact of Social Robotics on L2 Learners’ Anxiety and Attitude in English Vocabulary Acquisition. Int J of Soc Robotics 7, 523–535 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0286-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0286-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation