Abstract
Date palm fruits are damaged by bird’s attack which reduce their commercial value and thereby cause significant economic losses. The objective of this study was to find out the suitable fruit bunch covering material for reducing birds attack, increase yield and improve fruit quality. An investigation was carried out for study the effect of different fruit bunch covering materials on bird’s damage, yield and quality of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Halawy at Date palm Research Center, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner during the year 2019–20. The fruit bunches were subjected to six covering materials i.e., iron wire gauge, non-woven material, agro-shed net, insect proof net, cloth bag and fertilizer bags with one unbagged treatment (control). The fruits bunches were covered at kimri or gandora stages of maturity. The applied treatments were arranged in a randomized block design with three replicates and in each replication three tree were used. Different fruit bunch covering materials significantly influenced the maturity period of date palm (doka stage). Fruit bunches covered with fertilizer bag were matured earlier (109.21 days) in compared to uncovered fruit bunches (116.30 days). The yield of fruits was significantly increased by different fruit bunch covers, and maximum yield (5.89 kg/bunch and 30.68 kg/palm) was recorded in insect proof net fruit cover. The quality attributes viz., fruit weight (7.18 g), fruit length (5.42 cm), fruit diameter (2.80 cm), fruit volume (7.25 cc) and pulp weight (5.44 g) were significantly increased in fruits covered by insect proof net covering materials. However, attributes viz., stone weight, length of bunches, percentage of fruits retained after covering of bunches were found non-significant under different covering materials. The maximum TSS (40.10%), phenol content (0.83 mg/100 g), ascorbic acid (8.06 mg/100 g), total sugar (34.46%) and reducing sugar (31.80%) were significantly influenced and recorded maximum in insect proof net. While, the acidity (0.14%) and soluble tannin (4.46 mg/g) were significantly decreased in insect proof net. Fruit bunch covers minimized the bird’s damage in fruits, and there were no infestations of birds in iron wire gauge cover (0.00%) while, fertilizer bag cover and agro-shed net cover showed minimum bird’s infestation i.e., 1.00% and 1.61%, respectively. The highest bird’s damage (14.64%) of date palm fruits was recorded in unbagged fruits (control).The highest benefit cost ratio (4.58) was obtained in fertilizer bag fruit cover while, the lowest benefit cost ratio (0.94) was recorded in iron wire gauge fruit cover.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A.O.A.C. 2007. Official Method of Analysis, vol. 2. Washington: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
Abdul Afiq, M.L., R. Abdul Rahman, Y.B. Che Man, H.A. Al-Kahtani, and T.S.T. Mansor. 2013. Date seed and date oil. International Food Research Journal 20 (5): 2035–2043.
Al-Bahrany, A.M., M.A. Suwwan, M. Faid, and M.A. Al-Amer. 1994. Effect of bunch cover on marketable yield and fruit spoilage in“Khalas” dates. Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Sciences 39 (3): 585–569.
Amarante, C., N.H. Banks, and S. Max. 2002. Effect of pre-harvest bagging on fruit quality and postharvest physiology of pears (Pyrus communis). New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 30 (2): 99–107.
Anonymous. 2013. Performance of ‘Repol’, a polypropylene based non-woven fabric as bunch sleeves on bunch characteristics and fruit quality in banana. National Research Center for banana (ICAR), Thogamalai Road, Thayanur post, Tiruchirappalli-620102 Tamil Nadu.
Awad, M.A. 2007. Increasing the rate of ripening of date palm fruit (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Helali by preharvest and postharvest treatments. Postharvest Biology and Technology 43 (1): 121–127.
Chillet, M., and M. Jannoyer. 1996. Choice of bagging for the optimization banana growth condition. Infomusa 5 (1): 25027.
Chonhenchob, V., D. Kamhangwong, J. Kruenate, K. Khongrat, N. Tangchantra, U. Wichai, and S.P. Singh. 2011. Pre-harvest bagging with wavelength-selective materials enhances development and quality of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. namdokmai. Journal of Science and Food Agriculture 91: 664–671. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4231.
Gao, W.S., D.G. Lv, C. Yu, S.J. Qin, G.D. Du, and D.Y. Zhao. 2007. Study on microorganism population structure in microenvironment of bagged apple fruit. Journal of Fruit Science 24 (6): 830–832.
Gopalan, C., Ramasastri, B.V., and Balasubramanium, S.C. 1985. Nutritive value of Indian foods. National Institute of Nutrition (ICMR), Hyderabad, pp 87.
Han, J.H., K.H. Hong, H.I. Jang, I.H. Cho, J.J. Choi, and H.J. Lee. 2002. Effect of characteristics of the bags and microclimate in the bags on russet of ‘Whangkeumbae’ pear fruit. Korean Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 20: 32–37.
Hu, G.B., D.C. Chen, P. Li, R. Ouyang, F.F. Gao, H.C. Wang, and J. Dong. 2001. Effects of bagging on fruit colration and phenylalaine ammonia lyase and polyphenol oxidase in ‘Feizixiao.’ Acta Horticulture 558: 273–278.
Jia, H.J., A. Araki, and G. Okamoto. 2005. Influence of fruit bagging on aroma volatiles and skin coloration of ‘Hakuho’ peach (Prunus persica Batsch). Postharvest Biology and Technology 35: 61–68.
Johnson, D.V., J.M. Al-Khayri, and S.M. Jain. 2013. Seedling date palms (Phoenix dactylifera L.) as genetic resources. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 25 (11): 809–830.
Karimipour Fard, H. 2001. Results of some investigational designs on date bunch fading disorder projects. “Nakhl”, specific magazine of date and tropical fruits research institute of Iran 78:23.
Kassem, A.A., M.R.M. Rabeh, and H.A. Kassem. 1994. The effect of bagging the spathes after pollination on yield and quality of Zaghloul and Samani dates. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research 21 (3B): 935–944.
Kim, D.K., D.S. Choi, E.S. Kim, K.H. Hur, K.H. Lim, K.S. Kim, and K.C. Lim. 2000a. Fruit quality of Yuzu (Citrus junos L.) as influenced by bagging time and materials of bagging treatment. Journal of Korean Society for Horticultural Science 41: 190–193.
Kim, Y.H., S.K. Kim, S.C. Lim, C.H. Lee, C.K. Youn, H.H. Kim, and K.S. Choi. 2000b. Effects of bagging material on coloration, maturity, and quality of peach fruits. Journal of Korean Society for Horticultural Science 41: 395–400.
Kim, Y.H., S.K. Kim, J.M. Park, S.C. Lim, C.K. Youn, B.A. Lee, T. Youn, and T.S. Kim. 2003. Effects of physical properties of bagging papers and changes of microclimate in the bags on coloration and quality of peach fruits. Journal of Korean Society for Horticultural Science 44: 483–488.
Li, E.M., D.C. Shi, Y.H. Xu, F. Chen, and H. Zhai. 2008. Changing characteristics of temperature and humidity in different type bags for bagging apple and their effects on fruit appearance quality. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 19: 208–212 (in Chinese with an English abstract).
Mohammadpour, A., and Pejman, H. 2001. Studies on influence of date bunch protection covers on reduce of damage of wasps and Carpophilus bittles on commercial date cultivars in Iran. Final report of investigational design. Agricultural research center of Hormozgan province, Iran. 32p
Niu, T.Q., H.R. Zhang, M.L. Li, and Y.Y. Hao. 2003. Influences on fruit quality under the microenvironment of bagging and analysis about its mechanism. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University 23: 255–259 (in Chinese with an English abstract).
Omar, A.E.D.K., A.M. Al-Saif, and M.A.E.A. Ahmed. 2014. Bagging of bunches with different materials influences yield and quality of Rothana date palm fruit. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 12 (2): 520–522.
Ranganna, S. 1979. Manual of analysis of fruit and vegetable products, 2nd ed., 634. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill, Publishing Company Limited.
Schanderl, S.H. 1970. Tannin measurement with Folin-Denis reagent. Method of Food Analysis, 709. New York: Academic Press.
Sharma, R.R., R.K. Pal, R. Asrey, V.R. Sagar, M.R. Dhiman, and M.R. Rana. 2013. Pre-harvest fruit bagging influences fruit color and quality of apple cv. Delicious. Agricultural Sciences 4 (9): 443–448.
Sheoran, O.P., Tonk, D.S., Kaushik, L.S., Hasija, R.C., and Pannu, R.S. 1998. Statistical software package foragricultural research workers. Department of Mathematics Statistics. CCS HAU, Hisar, pp. 139-143.
Singh, B.P., R.A. Singh, G. Singh, and B. Killadi. 2007. Response of bagging on maturity, ripening and storage behavior of winter guava. Acta Horticulture 735: 597–601.
Singleton, V.L., and J.A. Rossi. 1965. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. American journal of Enology and Viticulture 16 (3): 144–158.
Sivalingum, P.N., R. Bhargava, S.K. Sharma, and C.M. Muralidharan. 2014. Date palm. Current Science 107 (9): 1373–1374.
Somogyi, M. 1952. Estimation of sugar by colorimetric method. Journal of Biochemistry 200: 245.
Son, I.C., and C.H. Lee. 2008. The effects of bags with different light transmittance on the berry cracking of grape ‘Kyoho.’ Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology 49: 98–103.
Thorp, T.G., M.J. Clearwater, A.M. Barnett, P.J. Martin, P.J. Blattmann, and M.B. Currie. 2007. ‘Hort16A’ fruit beak end softening and shriveling in California. Acta Horticulture 753 (1): 389–396.
Wang, L., K. Xu, F. Bei, and F.S. Gao. 2007. Effects of bagging on the microenvironment, yield and quality of over-wintering tomato. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 18 (4): 837–842 ((in Chinese with an English abstract)).
Weerasinghe, S.S., and K.H. Ruwanpathirana. 2002. Influence of bagging material on development of banana (Musa spp.) under high density planting system. Annals of the Sri Lanka Department of Agriculture 4: 47–53.
Yang, W.H., X.C. Zhu, J.H. Bu, G.B. Hu, H.C. Wang, and X.M. Huang. 2009. Effects of bagging on fruit development and quality in cross-winter off-season longan. Scientia Horticulturae 120: 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.10.009.
Zhai, H., C. Ren, E.M. Li, D.C. Shi, G.Y. Lin, and X.Y. Liu. 2006. The effect of different bagging periods on the quality of red Fuji apple in Weibei dry land. Journal of Northwest University 20: 188–120.
Zohary, D., and M. Hopf. 2000. Domestication of Plants in the Old World: The origin and spread of cultivated plants in West Asia, Europe and the Nile Valley, 3rd ed., 316. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All the authors are involved in the plan and conceptualized the experiment and determined methodology and investigated the experimented and analyzed the data. All authors discussed the results and remarked on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Consent for Publication
The experiment was conduct at Date palm Research Center, Bikaner under the jurisdiction of Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner, and authors have consent to publish the results of the experiment.
Human and Animal Right Statement
The experiment does not involve any humans or animals, and thus, no such consent was taken. No commercial interest of any author or institutions is involved.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jangid, T.R., Rathore, R.S., Naqvi, A.R. et al. Study the Effect of Different Fruit Bunch Covering Materials on Bird’s Damage, Yield and Quality of Date Palm cv. Halawy in Western Rajasthan. Sugar Tech 23, 933–940 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-00963-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-00963-x