Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Crop Diversification Options Involving Pulses and Sugarcane for Improving Crop Productivity, Nutritional Security and Sustainability in India

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pulses have very good opportunity to find place in different agro-ecosystems. Nowadays, soil organic carbon and crop productivity have become major concerns in sustainable agriculture. Since last six decades in our country, improvement in productivity of most of the field crops has been obtained but much success could not be achieved in increasing area and productivity of pulse crops. From 1980–1981 to 2013–2014, the total cropped area under pulses in India increased from 22.46 to 25.21 m ha with the peak of 26.40 m ha in 2010–2011. Due to stagnant production and an increase in population, the per capita availability of pulses has been declined in the range of 35.4 g to 47.2 g/capita/day during 2009–2014. Significant increment in area and productivity of pulse crops is possible by intercropping of these crops with sugarcane which is grown in more than 5.15 million ha area in India. Thus, in irrigated agro-ecosystem, there is a great scope of increasing area under pulse crops through crop diversification/intensification besides improving their productivity. Adoption of pulse crops with autumn (October)-planted cane in furrow-irrigated raised-bed system where sugarcane is planted in furrows and component crop is planted on raised beds also provides great scope for increasing crop productivity and optimizing input use efficiencies in the system. Crop residues recycling of pulses addresses the key issue of decreasing soil organic carbon created due to indiscriminate/imbalanced use of fertilizers and lower use/unavailability of organic manures. Mechanization of diversified cropping systems will certainly boost the adoption of recommended technologies by the farmers. Various tractor-drawn implements for planting of sugarcane and component pulse crops have been developed. Mechanical harvesters for pulse crops have already been developed and are being used by the farmers. Thus, cost of production could be reduced and profitability may be increased with introduction of these crops in irrigated agro-ecosystem besides improving soil fertility and sustainability for longer period. In present paper, authors presented the opportunities of agronomic interventions for pulse crops in sugarcane-based system to improve the crop productivity, profitability and sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, M., N.B. Singh, and Shiv Kumar. 2002. Crop diversification through pulses for nutritional security in new millennium. International symposium on food, nutrition and economic security through diversification in sugarcane production and processing systems, Feb. 16–18, 2002, Lucknow, Proceedings, pp. 117–123.

  • Andrews, D.J., and A.N. Kassam. 1976. The importance of multiple cropping in increasing world food supplies. In Multiple cropping, ed. R.K. Papendic, P.A. Sanche, and G.B. Triplett, 1–10. Madison: American Society of Agronomy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. 2005. Management of intercrops in sugarcane. Final Report of National Agricultural Technology Project, IISR, Lucknow.

  • Anonymous. 2015. Vision 2050. Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow. http://www.iisr.nic.in.

  • Cooperative Sugar. 2016. State wise area, production and productivity of sugarcane in India. Cooperative Sugar 47: 44–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAC. 2013–2014. 2nd Advance estimate on area and production of food crops. Online data available on website of Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers welfare, Department of Economics and Statistics, GOI, New Delhi.

  • Enyi, B.A.C. 1973. Effect of plant population on growth and yield of soybeans. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 18: 131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, C.A. 1989. Biological efficiencies in multiple cropping systems. Advances in Agronomy 42: 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garside, A.L. and M.J. Bell. 1999. The potential for legumes in sugarcane cropping system in Australia. Proceedings ISSCT, New Delhi, 23: 100–106.

  • Ghosh, A.K., R.K. Rai, Y.R. Saxena, and A.K. Shrivastava. 1990. Effect of sulphur application on the nutritional status, yield and quality of sugarcane. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science 38: 73–76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IISR. 1994–1995. Annual Report Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow.

  • IISR. 2007–2008. Final Report, NATP Project on Intercropping with sugarcane conducted at IISR, Lucknow.

  • Lakshmikantham, M. 1983. Technology of sugarcane growing. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menhi Lal, A.K. Singh, and H.N. Shahi. 2002. Proceedings of international symposium on food, nutrition and economic security through diversification in sugarcane production and processing systems. Feb 16–18, 2002, pp. 331–337.

  • Li, Z.X., J.W. Wang, W.T. Yang, Y.H. Shu, Q. Du, L.L. Liu, and L. Shu. 2011. Effects of reduced nitrogen application on the yield, quality, and economic benefit of sugarcane intercropped with soybean. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 22: 713–719. (Chinese).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menhi Lal, and A.K. Singh. 2004. Technology package for sugarcane based intercropping systems. Lucknow: IISR Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menhi Lal, A.K. Singh, M. Ali, R. Kumar. 2000. Agronomic evaluation of mung bean/urd bean genotypes intercropped with spring planted sugarcane. Extended Summaries: National Symposium on ‘Agronomy: Challenges and strategies for the New Millennium’, Nov 15–18, 2000, Junagarh, p. 380.

  • Misra, G.N. 1971. Response of sugarcane to green manuring under north Indian Conditions. Indian Sugar 20: 789–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motiwale, M.P., and A.B. Singh. 1973. Annual report. Lucknow: Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research. p21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, K. 1976. Weed control in multiple cropping. Paper presented in Symposium on cropping systems research and development for the Asian rice farmers. 21–23 Sept., IRRI, Los Banos, Loguna, Philippines.

  • NCA. 1976. Report of the National Commission on Agriculture, 1976: Agrarian reforms, India (Republic). National Commission on Agriculture Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation, 1976—Agriculture, https://books.google.co.in/…/Report_of_the_National_Commission_on_Agr.html?id.

  • Nazir, M.S., I.A. Faqeer, G. Ali, R. Ahmad, and T. Mahmood. 1988. Studies on planting geometry and intercropping in autumn sugarcane. Gomel University Journal of Research 8: 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, H. R., and G. Hunsigi. 1994. Effect of incorporation of intercropped legumes and nitrogen levels on yield of sugarcane. In: Proceedings. Seminar: emerging technologies for sustainable crop production, eds Shivashankar, K. and Singlachar, M.A., University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, pp. 44–45.

  • Rathi, K.S., and R.A. Singh. 1979. Companion cropping with autumn planted sugarcane. Indian Sugar Crop Journal 69: 76–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R.K., K.S. Bangar, S.R. Sharma, H.B. Grewal, and O.P. Rathore. 1992. Comparative performance of intercropping pulses in sugarcane under south western M.P. Indian Journal of Agronomy 37: 95–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, S.K., and M.B. Pandey. 1999. Feasibility of inclusion of mustard (Brassica juncea) genotypes in intercropping and sequential cropping sytems with sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 69: 247–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, S.K., S.K. Awasthi, R. Singh, M. Nigam, A. Gaur, and A.K. Singh. 2013. Integrated nutrient management in sugarcane-based production systems: A review. Current Advances Agricultural Sciences 5: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh,G.B. and D.V. Yadav. 1991. Soil resource mapping for crop planning. Lead paper presented at National Meet on Soil Resource Mapping of different states for sustainable Agricultural Production, NBSSLUP, Nagpur.

  • Singh, A.K., Menhi Lal, and A.K. Singh. 2006. Production potential and economic viability of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. Hybrids)—based crop diversification options in the North zone of sub-tropical India. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology 2: 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A.K., Menhi Lal, and M. Singh. 2005. Productivity and profitability of autumn-sugarcane based plant-ratoon system through lentil intercropping, nitrogen nutrition and biofertilizers. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology 20: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K.P., A. Suman, and P.N. Singh. 2007. Yield and soil nutrient balance of a sugarcane plant- ratoon system with conventional and organic nutrient management in subtropical India. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 79: 209–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N.P. 2015. Pulses in India: Current status and way forward. In: Proceedings of the regional consultation on the promotion of the pulses in Asia for multiple health benefits held at Bangkok, Thailand 29–30 June 2015, pp 67–72.

  • Srivastava, T.K., A.K. Singh, and I. Singh. 2015. Sugarcane. In Textbook of field crops production: Commercial crops, ed. R. Prasad, 441–468. New Delhi: ICAR Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundara, B. 1998. Sugarcane cultivation. New Delhi: Vikash Pub. House Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dillewijn, C. 1952. Botany of sugarcane, 409–438. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vision. 2050. Vision of ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow. www.iisr.res.in/download/publications/IISRVision2050.pdf.

  • Webster, C. C. and P.N. Wilson. 1966. Agriculture in tropics. London, Longman, U.K.

  • Walters, R.F. 1971. Shifting cultivation in Latin America. Food and Agricultural Organisation, Forest Development, paper 17, p 305, FAO, Rome.

  • Willey, R.W. 1979. Intercropping—its importance and its research needs. I Competition and yield advantage. Field Crops Abstracts 31: 1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, D.V. 1999. Current status of sugarcane response to fertilizers in different agro-climatic zones: experiences learnt from All India Coordinated Research Project on Sugarcane. Fertiliser News 44: 127–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R.L. 1991. Agronomy of sugarcane: Principles and practices. Lucknow: International Book Distributing Company, Ltd. p31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R.L. 1981. Intercropping pigeonpea to conserve fertilizer nitrogen in maize and produce residual effects on sugarcane. Experimental Agriculture 17: 311–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R.L., S.R. Prasad, and K. Singh. 1987. Fertilizer requirement and row arrangement of pulses in sugarcane based cropping systems. Indian Journal of Agronomy 32: 80–84.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. K. Shukla.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shukla, S.K., Singh, K.K., Pathak, A.D. et al. Crop Diversification Options Involving Pulses and Sugarcane for Improving Crop Productivity, Nutritional Security and Sustainability in India. Sugar Tech 19, 1–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-016-0478-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-016-0478-2

Keywords

Navigation