Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Precise assessment of myocardial perfusion and blood flow is critical in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), paving the way to identify subjects that will most likely benefit from coronary intervention.1 Various imaging modalities have been proposed to provide guidance in regards to those patients that would benefit from cardiac catheterization.2,3 For instance, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has been established for this purpose, and recent developments such as cardiocentric acquisitions, or cadmium-zinc-telluride detectors, have provided an even more reliable read-out of the status of myocardial perfusion.3,4
Furthermore, given its tremendous success in oncology with more and more devices installed,5,6,7 an increasing number of facilities are using positron emission tomography (PET) for cardiac imaging.8 In this regard, [82]Rubidium ([82]Rb) PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has been widely utilized for decades9 due to availability from on-site production using a cyclotron.3,10 Further advantages relative to conventional SPECT MPI, include, but are not limited to, low radiation exposure, measurement of myocardial blood flow (coronary flow reserve) or convenient rest-stress protocols within 30 minutes.10
Given the increased use of [82]Rb10 or other radiotracers used in nuclear cardiology,11 it is important to ensure that any potential impact of prescribed drugs on myocardial uptake is understood. For instance, cardiac nerve integrity assessments using [123I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine can be substantially altered by concomitant drug intake,12 increasing the risk of false-positive or false-negative findings when such scans are interpreted. Given the high rate of [82]Rb PET scans conducted in the clinic, Bentsen et al aimed to determine whether drugs used to treat CAD may affect the [82]Rb distribution in the myocardium.13 Such studies in humans would be desirable, but a well-designed trial cannot be rigorously executed,12 as individuals with CAD will most likely not tolerate withdrawal of their life-saving medication(s).1
Therefore, the authors of the present study conducted a thorough investigation in rats, which were treated by a sophisticated protocol, including various drugs also prescribed in the clinic (e.g., amiodarone, acetylsalicylic acid, or metoprolol succinate).1 All animals were imaged on day 1 and day 7 and rats were compared to treatment-naïve controls by analyzing standardized uptake values (SUV). Of note, no relevant impact on cardiac uptake by any of the investigated drugs was noted, except for amiodarone significantly reducing SUV ratio from baseline to follow-up.13 In a clinical setting, these findings are relevant, as the investigated drugs are also endorsed by current guidelines.1
In principle, the nuclear cardiologist or molecular imaging expert interpreting [82]Rb MPI scans can be certain that the concomitant intake of medication at the date of scan will most likely not alter the derived imaging results. However, one may speculate whether [82]Rb kinetic parameters assessing absolute myocardial blood flow in patients treated with amiodarone could be substantially affected. Therefore, despite its difficulties to perform a human trial, further investigations in patients under amiodarone are warranted. As an antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) used for life-threatening ventricular tachycardia, amiodarone has an inhibitory effect on the Na+/K+-ATPase pump,14 which provides a possible explanation for an inhibition of [82]Rb uptake in the heart as this radiotracer enters cardiomyocytes through exactly the same target mechanism.15 Amiodarone has been suggested as the most potent AAD to restore rhythm (SR) in atrial fibrillation (AF), but dofetilide is also used for this purpose.16 Not surprisingly, both drugs are prescribed for SR restoration in AF with an ejection fraction of ≤ 35%.17,18 As such, dofetilide should also be investigated in the setting described by Bentsen et al.
Nonetheless, the effect of amiodarone on [82]Rb uptake is of importance, as this drug is the most commonly prescribed medication for AF.17 Despite the numerous advantages of [82]Rb,10 [18F]flurpiridaz PET for MPI has been subject to research in recent years, as its longer half-life of 110 minutes may allow for more flexibility in imaging protocols, in particular in a busy nuclear cardiology practice.19,20,21 Therefore, such studies as the one presented by Bentsen et al should also be repeated by using [18F]flurpiridaz,13 preferably with a coronary occlusion model compared to treated vs. treatment-naïve controls.
References
Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2020;41:407-77.
Nagel E, Berry C. Magnetic resonance perfusion or fractional flow reserve in coronary disease. Reply. N Engl J Med 2019;381:2277-8.
Werner RA, Thackeray JT, Diekmann J, Weiberg D, Bauersachs J, Bengel FM. The changing face of nuclear cardiology: Guiding cardiovascular care toward molecular medicine. J Nucl Med 2020;61:951-61.
Bengel FM. Issue “noninvasive molecular imaging and theranostic probes”: New concepts in myocardial imaging. Methods 2017;130:72-78.
Rowe SP, Drzezga A, Neumaier B, Dietlein M, Gorin MA, Zalutsky MR et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted radiohalogenated PET and therapeutic agents for prostate cancer. J Nucl Med 2016;57:90S-S96.
de Vries EGE, Kist de Ruijter L, Lub-de Hooge MN, Dierckx RA, Elias SG, Oosting SF. Integrating molecular nuclear imaging in clinical research to improve anticancer therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2019;16:241-55.
Wahl RL, Chareonthaitawee P, Clarke B, Drzezga A, Lindenberg L, Rahmim A et al. Mars shot for nuclear medicine, molecular imaging, and molecularly targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy. J Nucl Med 2021;62:6-14.
Gould KL, Johnson NP, Bateman TM, Beanlands RS, Bengel FM, Bober R et al. Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease. Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1639-53.
Selwyn AP, Allan RM, L’Abbate A, Horlock P, Camici P, Clark J et al. Relation between regional myocardial uptake of rubidium-82 and perfusion: Absolute reduction of cation uptake in ischemia. Am J Cardiol 1982;50:112-21.
Calnon DA. Will (18)F flurpiridaz replace (82)rubidium as the most commonly used perfusion tracer for PET myocardial perfusion imaging? J Nucl Cardiol 2019;26:2031-3.
Jacobson AF, Travin MI. Impact of medications on mIBG uptake, with specific attention to the heart: Comprehensive review of the literature. J Nucl Cardiol 2015;22:980-93.
Werner RA, Kobayashi R, Javadi MS, Kock Z, Wakabayashi H, Unterecker S et al. Impact of novel antidepressants on cardiac (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine uptake: Experimental studies on SK-N-SH cells and healthy rabbits. J Nucl Med 2018;59:1099-103.
Bentsen S, Bang LE, Hasbak P, Kjaer A, Ripa RS. Amiodarone attenuates cardiac Rubidium-82 in consecutive PET/CT scans in a rodent model. J Nucl Cardiol 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02785-6.
Haworth RA, Goknur AB, Berkoff HA. Inhibition of ATP-sensitive potassium channels of adult rat heart cells by antiarrhythmic drugs. Circ Res 1989;65:1157-60.
Ghotbi AA, Kjaer A, Hasbak P. Review: Comparison of PET rubidium-82 with conventional SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2014;34:163-70.
Bianconi L, Castro A, Dinelli M, Alboni P, Pappalardo A, Richiardi E et al. Comparison of intravenously administered dofetilide versus amiodarone in the acute termination of atrial fibrillation and flutter. A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur Heart J 2000;21:1265-73.
Zimetbaum P. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2012;125:381-9.
Atti V, Turagam M, Lakkireddy DR. Safety of rapid switching from amiodarone to dofetilide in patients with AF with an ICD. https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2020/01/06/07/55/safety-of-rapid-switching-from-amiodarone-to-dofetilide-in-patients-with-af-with-an-icd. Last accessed 8 Aug 2021.
Werner RA, Koshino K, Arimitsu K, Lapa C, Javadi MS, Rowe SP et al. Stability of distribution of F18 flurpiridaz after transient coronary occlusion in pigs. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:2269-71.
Werner RA, Chen X, Rowe SP, Lapa C, Javadi MS, Higuchi T. Moving into the next era of PET myocardial perfusion imaging: Introduction of novel (18)F-labeled tracers. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;35:569-77.
Maddahi J, Lazewatsky J, Udelson JE, Berman DS, Beanlands RSB, Heller GV et al. Phase-III clinical trial of fluorine-18 flurpiridaz positron emission tomography for evaluation of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:391-401.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
See related article, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02785-6.
Funding
TH received funding through the Okayama University “RECTOR” Program and a KAKENHI grant (JP15K21774) has been provided for TH from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Werner, R.A., Rowe, S.P. & Higuchi, T. No major impact of prescribed CAD drugs on myocardial perfusion uptake derived by [82]rubidium PET. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 29, 2863–2865 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02786-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02786-5