Abstract
A 72 year-old man was referred to our hospital for a detailed examination of a recurrent rectal polyp. He had past histories of surgery and radiation therapy for prostate cancer at the age of 66 and endoscopic excision of a rectal polyp at the age of 70. Colonoscopy revealed a semi-pedunculated lesion surrounded by friable mucosa, which was positive under positron-emission tomography-computed tomography. Histopathological examination of the endoscopically excised polyp revealed proliferation of atypical cells, characterized by strong pleomorphic or spindle morphology, which was immunohistochemically compatible with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. We diagnosed this case as sarcoma presumably associated with radiation proctitis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Radiation therapy (RT) has become an integral part of cancer treatment [1, 2]. While RT is effective for treating cancer, it can also cause adverse events [3, 4], including radiation-induced sarcoma (RIS) in the late stage after RT [5]. RIS can occur at any irradiated site, and it requires resection or chemotherapy. To date, however, few cases of RIS in the gastrointestinal tract have been reported [5, 6]. We herein report a case of undifferentiated pleomorphic rectal sarcoma presumably associated with prior RT.
Case report
A 72 year-old man was referred to our hospital for recurrence of a rectal polyp that had been removed endoscopically. He had a history of surgery followed by RT (76 Gy, 38 fractions) for prostate cancer at the age of 66 years. He was subsequently diagnosed with radiation proctitis at the age of 68 years. At the age of 70 years, follow-up colonoscopy for radiation proctitis revealed a 10 mm, semi-pedunculated lesion in the rectum (Fig. 1), which was removed by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). The resected specimen contained spindle-shaped atypical cells with nuclear pleomorphism proliferating in a fascicular pattern, suggestive of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). The horizontal and vertical margins remained undetermined for tumor invasion (Fig. 2a, b). Immunohistochemically, the atypical cells were positive for vimentin but negative for AE1/AE3, desmin, smooth muscle actin (SMA), KIT, S100, and melan A (Fig. 2c–i). The staining for Ki-67 showed a scattered distribution with an index of 20% (Fig. 2j).
The previous resected specimen contained spindle-shaped atypical cells with nuclear pleomorphism proliferating in a fascicular pattern and the horizontal and vertical margins were undetermined (a, b). Immunohistochemistry showed that the specimen was positive for vimentin (c), while AE1/AE3 (d), desmin (e), SMA (f), KIT (g) S100 (h), and melan A (i) were negative. Ki-67 showed a scattered distribution, with an index of about 20% (j)
Follow-up colonoscopy 2 years after EMR revealed a flat, elevated lesion at the same site. Colonoscopy revealed the lesion to be an 8 mm, white, flat, elevated lesion with vascular dilation on the surface (Fig. 3a, b). Magnifying endoscopy showed vascular expansion without epithelial microstructure (Fig. 3c, d), suggesting a diagnosis of granulation tissue. On positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), an accumulation with a maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max) of 2.22 was found in the rectum (Fig. 4).
a, b When the patient was 72 years of age, colonoscopy identified a lesion that manifested as an 8 mm white, flat-elevated lesion with vascular dilation. c Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging showed dilated vessels. d Magnifying endoscopy with crystal violet staining showed that the superficial microstructure had disappeared
The endoscopic and PET–CT findings, as well as the location of the lesion at the site of radiation proctitis, suggested the lesion to be RIS. Because the lesion was small and had not metastasized to other organs, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was performed with the patient’s consent. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen revealed that the protruding lesion was composed of proliferating atypical cells of pleomorphic or spindle-shaped morphology, primarily within the proper mucosal layer and invading the submucosal layer (Fig. 5a). Immunohistochemically, the cells showed the identical patterns as seen in the previously resected specimen (Fig. 5b–h). Ki-67 showed a scattered distribution with an index of about 30% (Fig. 5i). Based on these findings, we diagnosed the lesion as high-grade, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS). The horizontal and vertical margins of the resected specimen were free of tumor cells. In the surrounding non-neoplastic mucosa, crypts and goblet cells were preserved, and inflammatory cell infiltration was observed in the proper mucosal layer. Based on these findings, a diagnosis of RIS was established.
Histopathological examination revealed atypical cell proliferation with strong pleomorphism or spindle-shaped morphology, mainly in the proper mucosal layer to the submucosal layer (a). Immunohistochemistry showed that the specimen was positive for vimentin (b), while AE1/AE3 (c), desmin (d), SMA (e), KIT (f), S100 (g), and melan A (h) were negative. Ki-67 showed a scattered distribution, with an index of about 30% (i)
Six months later, the patient underwent repeated PET–CT and colonoscopy, which revealed no recurrence or metastasis. He has been under observation with annual PET–CT and colonoscopy.
Discussion
In the past, RIS was reported to be a late adverse event after RT [3,4,5,6,7,8]. The diagnostic criteria for RIS are prior radiation exposure, subsequent development of sarcoma within the irradiated tissue, and histologic confirmation of sarcoma distinct from the original primary malignancy [7, 8]. Our patient had prior radiation exposure for prostate cancer and developed radiation-induced proctitis. Subsequently, an undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma was found at the site of rectal irradiation. The patient’s clinical course fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for RIS.
In our case, the resected specimen at the age of 70 years showed spindle-shaped atypical cells, which were suggestive of GIST. However, the immunohistochemical findings were not compatible with the diagnosis. In the second endoscopically resected specimen, the histological and immunohistochemical findings remained unchanged. Because the involvement of the resected margin in the first specimen remained obscure, we believe the second lesion to be a local recurrence.
In 2010, Gladdy et al. reported the clinicopathological features of 130 cases of RIS. They found that the median age at diagnosis of RIS was 59 years, with a range from 18 to 86 years, and the median interval from the start of RT to the diagnosis of RIS was 10 years, with a range from 1.3 to 74 years. In their cohort, 108 of 130 RISs (83%) were histologically compatible with high-grade sarcoma, and the predominant tumor site was the trunk (61.5%), as opposed to the extremities and the abdomen [9]. Furthermore, the most common histologic type of RIS was pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) (n = 34 [26%]), followed by angiosarcoma (n = 27 [21%]), leiomyosarcoma (n = 16 [12%]), fibrosarcoma (n = 16 [12%]), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) (n = 11 [9%]) and liposarcoma (n = 4 [3%]) [9]. Since MFH does not show clear histiocytic differentiation, the nomenclature “MFH” was subsequently revised to UPS [10]. UPS is now widely used as a generic term for many unclassifiable malignant soft tissue tumors that lack specific genetic characteristics or differentiation trends that can be demonstrated by genetic or histological examination [10]. More recently, Kim E, et al. attempted whole genome sequencing in 11 cases of RISs and compared the result with that found in spontaneous sarcoma genomes. As a consequence, the investigators found that the nonhomologous end joining pathway for DNA damage repair may be associated with the tumorigenesis of RIS [11]. Other genetic features of RIS need to be elucidated further.
RIS occurs predominantly in the deep soft tissues of the trunk, whereas gastrointestinal involvement is extremely rare. In fact, our online search of PubMed during the period from 2004 to 2024 identified only four cases of rectal RIS (Table 1) [12,13,14,15]. Among those cases, the primary cancers requiring RT were of gynecological or urological origin (cervical cancer in three cases and prostate cancer in one case). The median time from RT to diagnosis of RIS was 10.5 years, with a range from 8 to 32 years. All cases of RIS were resected surgically, and the histological type was found to be leiomyosarcoma in three cases and angiosarcoma in one case. We removed our patient’s rectal lesion by ESD based on its extremely small size and presumably less invasive involvement in the rectal wall. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of gastrointestinal RIS treated by endoscopic resection.
Descriptions of the endoscopic features of gastrointestinal RISs are sparse. The initial endoscopic findings of the tumor in our case were a semi-pedunculated and reddish polyp with obvious vasculature on the surface. Hypervascularity was also found at the time of recurrence. These observations suggested that mesenchymal tumor, lymphoma, melanoma and condyloma acuminatum were the candidate differential diagnoses for rectal RIS. In this regard, a reddish protrusion occurring in rectal mucosa damaged by prior irradiation may be specific to the endoscopic diagnosis of RIS.
It should be noted that the overall prognosis of RIS remains to be established. Cha et al. reported that the 5 year survival rate of RIS was 41%, with a median survival time of 48 months [16]. They also reported that histologically high-grade tumor, patient age > 60 years, and positive resection margins were predictors of poor prognosis [16]. In our case, histological examination of the resected specimen revealed high tumor cellularity, which seemed to be high-grade UPS, but the resected margin was free of tumor cells.
In conclusion, we report a case of rectal RIS that was histologically compatible with UPS. RIS should be considered for polypoid lesions occurring in the gastrointestinal tract damaged by prior RT.
References
Royce TJ, Qureshi MM, Truong MT. Radiotherapy utilization and fractionation patterns during the first course of cancer treatment in the United States from 2004 to 2014. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:1558–64.
Thariat J, Hannoun-Levi JM, Sun Myint A, et al. Past, present, and future of radiotherapy for the benefit of patients. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10:52–60.
Resnick MJ, Koyama T, Fan KH, et al. Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:436–45.
Holch P, Henry AM, Davidson S, et al. Acute and late adverse events associated with radical radiation therapy prostate cancer treatment: a systematic review of clinician and patient toxicity reporting in randomized controlled trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;97:495–510.
Patel SR. Radiation-induced sarcoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2000;1:258–61.
Murray EM, Werner D, Greeff EA, et al. Postradiation sarcomas: 20 cases and a literature review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45:951–61.
Cahan WG, Woodard HQ, Higinbotham NL, et al. Sarcoma arising in irradiated bone. Cancer. 1948;1:3–29.
Arlen M, Higginbotham NL, Huvos AG, et al. Radiation-induced sarcoma of bone. Cancer. 1971;28:1087–99.
Gladdy RA, Qin LX, Moraco N, et al. Do radiation-associated soft tissue sarcomas have the same prognosis as sporadic soft tissue sarcomas? J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2064–9.
Dei Tos AP, Mertens F, Pillay N (2020) Undifferentiated sarcoma. WHO classification of tumours. Soft tissue and bone tumours. 5th edn. p 318–320
Kim E, Han DJ, Kim BH, et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals mutational signatures related to radiation-induced sarcomas and DNA-damage-repair pathways. Mod Pathol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2022.100004.
Ahmad A, Jamieson T, Balsitis M, et al. Radiation-induced angiosarcoma of the rectum: a case report and review of literature. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10:847–8.
Jayakumar R, Basu PP, Huang T, et al. Postirradiation leiomyosarcoma of rectum presenting as a polyp: case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Pathol. 2016;24:163–9.
Garcia-Ortega DY, Reyes-Garcia N, Martinez-Said H, et al. Radiation-induced leiomyosarcoma of the rectum after cervical cancer treatment. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2018;83:465–7.
Makhmudov DE, Kolesnik OO, Lagoda NN, et al. Leiomyosarcoma of the rectum as a radiation-induced second malignancy after cervical cancer treatment: case report with review of the literature. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1610653.
Cha C, Antonescu CR, Quan ML, et al. Long-term results with resection of radiation-induced soft tissue sarcomas. Ann Surg. 2004;239:903–9.
Funding
The authors declare that they received no funding for this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EM and TY contributed to the writing of this manuscript. YS, OT, YS, KN, YN, and ST were involved in the patient’s treatment and pathological diagnosis. MT supervised the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the diagnosis, treatment and clinical management of the patient. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
As this paper is a single case report, it has not been approved by the Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images. Research complies with the guidelines for human studies and was conducted ethically in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent
We have obtained written informed consent from the patient for the publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Eizuka, M., Toya, Y., Yamada, S. et al. A case of undifferentiated pleomorphic rectal sarcoma occurring after radiation exposure. Clin J Gastroenterol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-024-02026-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-024-02026-6