Prevalence, Treatment, and Control of Hypercholesterolemia in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients: Evidences from a Systematic Literature Review in Spain



Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) represent a major Public Health burden. High serum cholesterol levels have been linked to major CV risk. The objectives of this study were to review the epidemiology of hypercholesterolemia in high risk CV patients from Spain, by assessing its prevalence, the proportion of diagnosed patients undergoing pharmacological treatment and the degree of attained lipid control.


A systematic literature review was carried out using Medline and two Spanish databases. Manuscripts containing information on hypercholesterolemia in several high CV risk groups [diabetes mellitus (DM), Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) risk >5, or documented CVD], published between January 2010 and October 2014, were included.


Of the 1947 published references initially retrieved, a full-text review was done on 264 manuscripts and 120 were finally included. Prevalence of hypercholesterolemia ranged from 50 to 84% in diabetics, 30–60% in patients with DM or elevated SCORE risk, 64–74% with coronary heart disease, 40–70% in stroke patients, and 60–80% in those with peripheral artery disease. Despite the finding that most of them were on pharmacological treatment, acceptable control of serum lipids was very variable, ranging from 15% to 65%. Among those with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, 95–100% received treatment but less than 50% achieved their therapeutic goals.


An elevated prevalence of hypercholesterolemia can be found in targeted groups at high CV risk. Although most patients are receiving pharmacological treatment, rates of lipid control continue to be low, both in primary and secondary prevention.


The overall prevalence of hypercholesterolemia in the Spanish adult population has been estimated between 34% and 50% in recent studies [13]. The importance of this high prevalence is due to the association of high levels of serum cholesterol with cardiovascular disease (CVD), which has been well established [4, 5]. For instance, the occurrence of CV events in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia has been highlighted, with a prevalence of premature CVD (before 55 years of age in men and before 65 years of age in women) of 10%, in contrast to less than 3% in relatives without familial hypercholesterolemia [6].

The therapeutic arsenal available for hypercholesterolemia includes the standard treatment based on lifestyle and dietary modification strategies, and lipid-lowering medications, mainly statins [7]. Other existing treatments for controlling low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) levels are ezetimibe (added to statins in primary hypercholesterolemia and homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or as a monotherapy in cases of statin intolerance or if they are contraindicated), fibrates and bile-acid sequestrants. In addition, newly developed lipid-lowering drugs (monoclonal antibodies proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor) have been recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency. Lipid-lowering treatments (LLT) are efficacious in reducing LDLc levels and reducing the burden of major CV events as well as CV mortality, even among populations without known CVD [8, 9]. Consequently, recent European Clinical Practice Guidelines have established LDLc targets accordingly to individual’s CV risk [7]: LDLc levels <100 mg/dl for patients without CVD, but with diabetes mellitus (DM) or with high CV risk based on a Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) risk assessment >5 (Primary prevention hereinafter), and <70 mg/dl for patients with overt CVD, i.e., those who have suffered a previous CV event (Secondary prevention). However, according to the results published in a multinational study conducted between 2006 and 2007, despite the use of LLT, a significant proportion of patients did not attain target levels of LDLc [10], which means they still have a significant CV residual risk. Understanding the contemporary magnitude of this condition is of importance to plan additional interventions to reach LDLc targets and to reduce the burden of the related CV events and deaths. Thus, the objectives of the present research were to review the published evidence addressing the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia, the usual clinical management of lipid profile, and the attained control of LDLc levels in patients with high CV risk from Spain.


A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the accepted standards [11] and with a research question defined with reference to Patients, Interventions, Comparisons, Outcomes, and Study design (PICOS) (please see Table S1 in the supplementary material for details). The search was run on the second week of October 2014 (from 6th to 10th) in Medline and two Spanish electronic databases: Biblioteca Virtual de la Salud (BVS) and Medes. The search strategies included both controlled and free terms in both English and Spanish languages. The search strategies executed in each electronic public-access libraries are presented in Table S2 in the supplementary material.

The information gathered was manually cross-checked using the relevant references given in the publications included. To select the studies, titles and abstracts were first examined. After this, full text of selected manuscripts was reviewed. The selection criteria for publications were as follows:

Inclusion Criteria

Studies carried out in Spain and focused on lipid levels of patients belonging to one of the following groups: (a) heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH); (b) overt CVD including acute coronary syndrome (ACS), chronic coronary heart disease (CHD), ischemic stroke (IS) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD); (c) DM; or (d) high CV risk. ACS was defined as acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina in the last 12 months. Chronic CHD refers to patients with ACS occurred longer than 12 months, or with stable angina or revascularization. Regarding CV risk, a SCORE risk assessment >5 (tables for countries with low CV risk) or equivalent was considered. Furthermore, according to the objectives described before, the studies had to include information on one of the following results: (a) prevalence of hypercholesterolemia; (b) rates of pharmacological treatment or (c) control of LDLc levels.

Exclusion Criteria

Manuscripts were discarded if any of the following conditions applied: (a) carried out outside Spain; (b) studies that did not include original patient data (i.e., reviews, editorials or letters); (c) studies that did not include human data; (d) studies with pediatric populations or (e) case reports.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

This article is based on previously conducted studies, and does not involve any new studies of human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.


A total of 1362 publications were retrieved from PubMed, 537 from the BVS and 560 from Medes (512 were duplicates so an initial pool of 1947 original manuscripts were identified for title and abstract review). Following the selection process, the full text of 264 manuscripts was reviewed, of which a total of 120 original papers were finally considered (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Flow diagram showing the selection process of the included articles. BVS Biblioteca Virtual de la Salud


In the study using data from the electronic database of the Spanish Familial Hypercholesterolemia Longitudinal Cohort Study (SAFEHEART) [12], 84% of the HeFH patients were receiving LLT at the time of inclusion (97% index cases and 78% HeFH relatives). 95% of treated patients received statins, 58% as monotherapy and 31% in combination, mostly with ezetimibe. Meanwhile, in another observational study [13] which included 241 patients with HeFH and 286 with combined familial hypercholesterolemia, 100% received LLT during a monitoring period of 1 year. Patients took an average of 1.5 lipid-lowering drugs (94% statins and 33% ezetimibe).

Despite the high proportion of patients undergoing a LLT in both studies [12, 13], between 72% and 96%, approximately, did not reach a target LDLc below 100 mg/dl and only 45% reduced LDLc levels by >50% (Table 1).

Table 1 Lipid-lowering treatments and LDL cholesterol targets in Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Hypercholesterolemia in Secondary Prevention


In studies carried out among patients with ACS the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia was highly variable ranging from 45% to 80% [1531]. The proportion of ACS patients undergoing LLT ranged between 33% and 90%, but control levels were poor with only 14% of patients with LDLc levels <70 mg/dl and 56% meeting the target of LDLc <100 mg/dl [26] (Table 2; Fig. 2).

Table 2 Lipid-lowering treatments and LDL cholesterol targets in secondary prevention
Fig. 2

Control in secondary prevention. LDLc low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, DM diabetes mellitus, BMI body mass index


The prevalence of hypercholesterolemia in patients with chronic CHD was more uniform than that found in patients with ACS, according to the information collected, ranging from 64% to 74% [3238, 4446]. More than 80% of patients were receiving LLT, statins accounting for 95% of them [37]. Again, despite the high proportion of treatment, only between 26% and 55% of patients had LDLc levels <100 mg/dl (Table 2).


The prevalence of hypercholesterolemia in patients with IS ranged from 40% to 70% [3941, 4760]. The proportion of treated patients was lower than that found in ACS or CHD patients. Upon discharge from hospital following an IS episode, between 38% and 76% of patients were receiving LLT [39, 40, 49]. In addition, one observational study with 203 patients admitted for medium- to long-term stays in one hospital between 2009 and 2010 found that only 20% of the total number of post-event patients received the dosage recommended by current guidelines [54].

With regards to attained cholesterol levels, 3 studies were found [3941], reporting figures on LDLc control of <100 mg/dl between 25% and 33%. In two additional studies [54, 61] in which targets were set at Total Cholesterol (TC) < 175 mg/dl, control rates were between 43% and 77% (Table 2; Fig. 2).


A very limited number of studies were identified for this particular subgroup [42, 6264]. In these studies, the clinical diagnosis of PAD was based on an ankle-brachial index <0.9. A prevalence of hypercholesterolemia between 60% and 80% was reported. With regard to treatment applied and results achieved, between 46% and 79% of patients received LLT. However, only 30% of them achieved a target LDLc <100 mg/dl (Table 2; Fig. 2).

Hypercholesterolemia in Primary Prevention


In accordance with a previous diagnosis or the use of LLT, data indicated that between 50% and 84% of DM patients would present with hypercholesterolemia [44, 57, 6568].

Regarding the rates of LLT usage (Table 3; Fig. 3), between 45% and 90% of DM patients were using a LLT [26, 69, 70]. With respect to the lipid control achieved in this population, rates ranged from 40% to 50% in DM patients with no CVD history (LDLc goal <100 mg/dl), to only 15% in DM patients with a history of CVD (LDLc goal <70 mg/dl).

Table 3 Lipid-lowering treatments and LDL cholesterol targets in primary prevention: diabetes mellitus
Fig. 3

Control in primary prevention: diabetes mellitus. LDLc low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, DM diabetes mellitus

Patients with High CV Risk

Within this group of special interest in the prevention of CVD, between 30% and 60% had a specific diagnosis of hypercholesterolemia, based on a TC >200 mg/dl or previous treatment [1, 3, 7678].

LLT was used in 50% to 60% of these patients [1], while control rates ranged from 35% to 65%, considering a LDLc target of <100 mg/dl [1, 72, 73]. Table 4 and Fig. 4 summarize these data.

Table 4 Lipid-lowering treatments and LDL cholesterol targets in primary prevention: high cardiovascular risk patients
Fig. 4

Control in primary prevention: high or very high risk patients. LDLc low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, DM diabetes mellitus, CVD cardiovascular disease


It has been shown that hypercholesterolemia is significantly present among patients with an increased vascular risk and those who have already suffered a CV event: 50–84% of patients with DM [44, 57, 67, 68, 74], 30–50% of high risk patient [1, 3, 7678], and between 35% and above 80% in those with overt CVD, depending on the type of event [1541, 4460]. The association of this condition with the risk of CV events [9, 83] makes it all the more necessary to endorse the interventions aimed at managing the modifiable risk factors (diet and exercise), to prescribe a LLT accordingly to individual’s CV risk [7], and also to plan an adequate monitoring of the pharmacological therapies implemented to maximize their benefit. There are many examples of this relationship in our country: hypercholesterolemia doubled the risk of an ischemic disease [84, 85], and would be the cause of 22% of all coronary events. The risk increased significantly among patients who did not have their lipid values controlled, while among those diagnosed with controlled hypercholesterolemia and, who are undergoing a lipid-lowering treatment, the increased risk of ischemic heart disease was not statistically significant [84].

Due, in large part, to the information above, the use of lipid-lowering drugs in Spain has increased from 18.9 defined daily doses (DDD) per 1000 inhabitants per day (DDD/1000 inhabitants/day) in the year 2000 to 102.6 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day in the year 2012, an increase of 442% [86]. Statins are the most commonly used drugs (91.7 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day in 2012) representing 89.3% of all LLT, but also fibrates, bile-acid sequestrants, ezetimibe, and omega 3 fatty acids contributed during 2012 to LLT use [86]. The increase in the use of LLT can be justified by their ability to reduce the risk of CV events, and the associated burden of disease.

Although treatments available have led to an improvement in the clinical situation and prognosis of these cases, it is clear that there is a lot of effort still to be made until LDLc targets defined by current European guidelines [7] can be reached by most of patients. In all of the groups analyzed, an important number could still be found with total cholesterol and LDLc levels above the acceptable threshold. For example, among diabetics, only between 15% (in case of those with previous CVD) and 40–50% (in those without CVD) attained recommended levels of lipids in the blood [26, 6971], and the situation is not better in secondary prevention or among patients with HeFH. This picture, which is similar to other western countries [8789], highlights the need to continue maximizing the control of lipids in the blood and to minimize therapeutic inertia. Regarding this, in one recent study with CHD patients, therapeutic inertia was estimated to be as high as 73% [33].

It should be noted, as the main limitation of the present work, how difficult it is to make a more exact approximation of the estimations presented in this manuscript. This is due in great part to the sheer heterogeneity of the criteria used in the various studies in defining hypercholesterolemia, CV risk, ACS or CHD. In addition, one other relevant aspect to consider is the nature of the studies included. They are mainly cross-sectional investigations and with a wide range of different sampling procedures and sample sizes. Even more, many studies are based on the analysis of individuals coming from the same national databases or registries. Considering these important constraints, a more analytic approach as meta-analysis might be applied at least with those studies following comparable clinical criteria to have a more accurate estimation of disease prevalence and control in each of the groups of interest, and to highlight the significance of the heterogeneity found between studies. Despite this, an important strength of the present manuscript is that all the relevant studies carried out in Spain and published in peer review journals have been systematically identify and reviewed to facilitate a global but comprehensive report of this condition in our country.


There is an elevated prevalence of hypercholesterolemia in Spain among those selected groups with a high CV risk. Although LLT is present in an elevated proportion, controls rates of lipid levels need to be improved both in primary and secondary prevention.


  1. 1.

    Baena-Díez JM, Félix FJ, Grau M, Cabrera De León A, Sanz H, Leal M, et al. Tratamiento y control de los factores de riesgo según el riesgo coronario en la población española del estudio DARIOS. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011;64:766–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Grau M, Elosua R, Cabrera De León A, Guembe MJ, Baena-Díez JM, Vega Alonso T, et al. Factores de riesgo cardiovascular en España en la primera década del siglo XXI: análisis agrupado con datos individuales de 11 estudios de base poblacional, estudio DARIOS. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011;64:295–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Guallar-Castillón P, Gil-Montero M, León-Muñoz LM, Graciani A, Bayán-Bravo A, Taboada JM, et al. Magnitud y manejo de la hipercolesterolemia en la población adulta de España, 2008–2010: el estudio ENRICA. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2012;65:551–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Alzamora MT, Fores R, Baena-Diez JM, Pera G, Toran P, Sorribes M, et al. The peripheral arterial disease study (PERART/ARTPER): prevalence and risk factors in the general population. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:38.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ramos R, Balló E, Marrugat J, Elosua R, Sala J, Grau M, et al. Validez del Sistema de Información para el Desarrollo de la Investigación en Atención Primaria (SIDIAP) en el estudio de enfermedades vasculares: estudio EMMA. Validity for use in research on vascular diseases of the SIDIAP (Information System for the Development of Research in Primary Care): the EMMA study. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2012;65(1):29–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Alonso R, Andres E, Mata N, Fuentes-Jimenez F, Badimon L, Lopez-Miranda J, et al. Lipoprotein(a) levels in familial hypercholesterolemia: an important predictor of cardiovascular disease independent of the type of LDL receptor mutation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(19):1982–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, Graham I, Reiner Z, Verschuren M, et al. European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J. 2012;33(13):1635–701.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, Holland LE, Reith C, Bhala N, et al. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376(9753):1670–81.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mihaylova B, Emberson J, Blackwell L, Keech A, Simes J, Barnes EH, et al. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. Lancet. 2012;380(9841):581–90.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Waters DD, Brotons C, Chiang CW, Ferrieres J, Foody J, Jukema JW, et al. Lipid treatment assessment project 2: a multinational survey to evaluate the proportion of patients achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. Circulation. 2009;120(1):28–34.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Perestelo-Pérez L. Standards on how to develop and report systematic reviews in Psychology and Health. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2013;13:49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mata N, Alonso R, Badimon L, Padro T, Fuentes F, Muniz O, et al. Clinical characteristics and evaluation of LDL-cholesterol treatment of the Spanish Familial Hypercholesterolemia Longitudinal Cohort Study (SAFEHEART). Lipids Health Dis. 2011;10:94.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lahoz C, Mostaza JM, Pinto X, de la Cruz JJ, Banegas JR, Pedro-Botet J. LDL-cholesterol control in patients with genetic dyslipidemia followed up by Lipid and Vascular Risk Units of the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis. Clin Investig Arterioscler. 2015;27(1):1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Suades R, Padro T, Alonso R, Lopez-Miranda J, Mata P, Badimon L. Circulating CD45+/CD3+ lymphocyte-derived microparticles map lipid-rich atherosclerotic plaques in familial hypercholesterolaemia patients. Thromb Haemost. 2014;111(1):111–21.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Aros F, Heras M, Vila J, Sanz H, Ferreira-Gonzalez I, Permanyer-Miralda G, et al. Reduction in 28 days and 6 months of acute myocardial infarction mortality from 1995 to 2005. Data from PRIAMHO I, II and MASCARA Registries. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2011;64(11):972–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cordero A, Moreno-Arribas J, Bertomeu-González V, Agudo P, Miralles B, Masiá M, et al. Las concentraciones bajas de colesterol unido a las lipoproteínas de alta densidad se asocian de manera independiente a enfermedad coronaria aguda en pacientes que ingresan por dolor torácico. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2012;65:319–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Cordero A, Lopez-Palop R, Bertomeu-González V, Carrillo P, Moreno-Arribas J, Bertomeu-Martínez V. Perfil clínico y pronóstico de los pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo y colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de baja densidad <70 mg/dl. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2013;66:588–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cordero A, Lopez-Palop R, Carrillo P, Miralles B, Masiá M, Bertomeu-Martínez V. Valor pronóstico de la escala INTERHEART-colesterol para pacientes que ingresan por dolor torácico. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2014;67:578–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cubedo J, Padro T, Alonso R, Cinca J, Mata P, Badimon L. Differential proteomic distribution of TTR (pre-albumin) forms in serum and HDL of patients with high cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis. 2012;222(1):263–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Garcia-Moll X, Fácila L, Conthe P, Zapata A, Artigas R, Bertomeu V, et al. ¿Cómo se usan los bloqueadores beta en España? Análisis de las limitaciones para su uso en medicina interna y cardiología: estudio CARACTER-BETA. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011;64:883–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Jover A, Corbella E, Muñoz A, Millán J, Pintó X, Mangas A, et al. Prevalencia del síndrome metabólico y de sus componentes en pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011;64:579–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Machon M, Basterretxea M, Martinez-Camblor P, Aldasoro E, Vicente JM, Larranaga N. Sex differences in relative survival and prognostic factors in patients with a first acute myocardial infarction in guipuzcoa, Spain. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2010;63(6):649–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Martinez-Quintana E, Rodriguez-Gonzalez F, Nieto-Lago V, Novoa FJ, Lopez-Rios L, Riano-Ruiz M. Serum glucose and lipid levels in adult congenital heart disease patients. Metabolism. 2010;59(11):1642–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Millán J, Pedro-Botet J, Muñoz A, Corbella E, Mangas A, Zúñiga M, et al. Perfil lipídico residual en la cardiopatía isquémica recurrente. Med Clin (Barc). 2012;138:238–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Olivencia PL, Bueno CA, Soto Blanco JM, Yuste Ossorio ME, Barranco RF. Acute coronary syndrome in women. Gender differences. Med Clin (Barc). 2011;137(14):623–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Pérez De Isla L, Saltijeral Cerezo A, Vitale G, González Timón B, Torres Do Rego A, Álvarez-Sala Walther LA. Prevalencia de colesterol LDL inadecuado en pacientes con enfermedad coronaria y/o diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (Prevalence of inappropriate LDL cholesterol levels in patients with coronary disease and/or type 2 diabetes). Rev Clin Esp. 2012;212(10):475–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Pineda J, Marin F, Marco P, Roldan V, Valencia J, Ruiz-Nodar JM, et al. The prognostic value of biomarkers after a premature myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2010;143(3):249–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Rodríguez-Roca GC, Rodríguez-Padial L, Alonso-Moreno FJ, Romero-Gutiérrez A, Akerström F, Segura-Fragoso A, et al. Perfil lipídico en pacientes ingresados por síndrome coronario agudo en España: datos del área sanitaria de Toledo entre los años 2005 y 2008. Semergen. 2013;39:298–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ruiz-Bailén M, Romero-Bermejo FJ, Expósito-Ruiz M, Zamora-Zamora F, Martínez-Ramírez MJ, Castillo-Rivera AM, et al. Tratamiento precoz con estatinas en el infarto agudo de miocardio. Med Intensiv. 2014;38:11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sanfelix-Gimeno G, Peiro S, Ferreros I, Perez-Vicente R, Librero J, Catala-Lopez F, et al. Adherence to evidence-based therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective population-based cohort study linking hospital, outpatient, and pharmacy health information systems in Valencia, Spain. J Manag Care Pharm. 2013;19(3):247–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Sicras-Mainar A, Fernández De Bobadilla J, Navarro-Artieda R, Martín I, Varela-Moreno C. Morbimortalidad y consumo de recursos asociados tras síndrome coronario agudo en una población española. Rev Clin Esp. 2011;211:560–71.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lahoz C, Mostaza J, Mantilla M, Taboada M, Tranche S, López-Rodríguez I, et al. Prevalencia de síndrome metabólico en pacientes con enfermedad coronaria estable: objetivos terapéuticos y utilización de fármacos cardiovasculares. Rev Clin Esp. 2011;211:1–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lázaro P, Murga N, Aguilar D, Hernández-Presa MA. Inercia terapéutica en el manejo extrahospitalario de la dislipemia en pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica. Estudio Inercia. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2010;63:1428–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Otero-Raviña F, Mazon-Ramos P, Grigorian-Shamagian L, Nores-Lorenzo A, Zugaza-Gurruchaga L, Seoane-Blanco R, et al. Effect of diabetes on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. The CIBAR study. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2010;63(11):1371–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lahoz C, Mostaza JM, Tranche S, Martin-Jadraque R, Mantilla MT, Lopez-Rodriguez I, et al. Atherogenic dyslipidemia in patients with established coronary artery disease. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2012;22(2):103–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Barrios V, Escobar C, Murga N, Quijano JJ. Clinical profile and management of patients with chronic ischemic heart disease according to age in the population daily attended by cardiologists in Spain: the ELDERCIC study. Eur J Intern Med. 2010;21(3):180–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    González-Juanatey JR, Cordero A, Vitale GC, González-Timón B, Mazón P, Bertomeu V. Magnitud y características del riesgo residual lipídico en pacientes con antecedentes de revascularización coronaria: estudio ICP-Bypass. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011;64:862–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Barrios V, Escobar C, Calderon A. Clinical profile and management of patients with hypertension and chronic ischemic heart disease according to BMI. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010;18(10):2017–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Vidal-Pérez R, Otero-Raviña F, Domínguez-López J, Fabeiro-Romero D, Gómez-Vázquez JL, de Blas-Abad P, et al. Características clínicas y pronóstico de pacientes con enfermedad cerebrovascular crónica (estudio ICBAR). Rev Neurol. 2011;53:449–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Abellán Alemán J, Ruilope Urioste LM, Leal Hernández M, Armario García P, Tiberio López G, Martell Claros N. Control de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con ictus atendidos en Atención Primaria en España. Estudio ICTUSCARE. Med Clin (Barc). 2011;136:329–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Rubio Gil E, Martínez Pastor A, López-Picazo Ferrer J, Leal Hernández M, Morales Ortiz A, Martinez Navarro A, et al. Calidad del registro en OMI-AP de los pacientes con ictus seguidos en atención primaria quality of records in OMI-AP of the patients with stroke followed in primary care. Rev Calid Asist. 2010;25(6):341–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Mostaza JM, Puras E, Blasco M, Lahoz C, Samaniego ML. Utilización de tratamientos cardiovasculares preventivos y consecución de objetivos terapéuticos en pacientes con enfermedad arterial periférica. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2012;65:713–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Félix-Redondo FJ, Fernández-Berges D, Grau M, Baena-Diez JM, Mostaza JM, Vila J. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of peripheral arterial disease in the study population Hermex. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2012;65(8):726–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Dalli E, Colomer E, Tormos MC, Cosin-Sales J, Milara J, Esteban E, et al. Crataegus laevigata decreases neutrophil elastase and has hypolipidemic effect: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Phytomedicine. 2011;18(8–9):769–75.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Piulats-Egea N, Albaigès-Ràfols MC, Solé-Sancho J, Benito-Badorrey MB, Casas-Rodríguez J, Sendra-Pons M. Cardiopatía isquémica en población inmigrante. Hipertens Riesgo Vasc. 2014;31:40–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ruescas-Escolano E, Orozco-Beltran D, Gaubert-Tortosa M, Navarro-Palazón A, Cordero-Fort A, Navarro-Pérez J, et al. El estudio PROPRESE: resultados de un nuevo modelo organizativo en atención primaria para pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica crónica basado en una intervención multifactorial. Aten Primaria. 2014;46:10–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Arrospide A, Mar J, Vivancos-Mora J, Rejas-Gutierrez J, Caro J. Cost-effectiveness analysis of using high doses of atorvastatin for the secondary stroke prevention in Spain. Rev Neurol. 2010;51(1):1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Brea D, Roquer J, Serena J, Segura T, Castillo J. Oxidative stress markers are associated to vascular recurrence in non-cardioembolic stroke patients non-treated with statins. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:65.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Clua-Espuny JL, Piñol-Moreso JL, Gil-Guillén VF, Orozco-Beltrán D, Panisello-Tafalla A, Lucas-Noll J, et al. Resultados de prevención cardiovascular primaria y secundaria en pacientes con ictus: riesgo de recurrencia y supervivencia asociada (estudio Ebrictus). Rev Neurol. 2012;54:81–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Jiménez-Caballero PE, López-Espuela F, Portilla-Cuenca JC, Jiménez-Gracia MA, Casado-Naranjo I. Detección de factores de riesgo vascular y fibrilación auricular no conocida en pacientes ingresados en la unidad de ictus. Rev Neurol. 2013;56:464–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    López-Farre AJ, Zamorano-León JJ, Segura A, Mateos-Caceres PJ, Modrego J, Rodriguez-Sierra P, et al. Plasma desmoplakin I biomarker of vascular recurrence after ischemic stroke. J Neurochem. 2012;121(2):314–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Martinez-Sanchez P, Fuentes B, Fernandez-Dominguez J, Ortega-Casarrubios ML, Aguilar-Amar MJ, Abenza-Abildua MJ, et al. Young women have poorer outcomes than men after stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;31(5):455–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Merida-Rodrigo L, Poveda-Gomez F, Camafort-Babkowski M, Rivas-Ruiz F, Martin-Escalante MD, Quiros-Lopez R, et al. Long-term survival of ischemic stroke. Rev Clin Esp. 2012;212(5):223–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Pardo-Cabello AJ, Bermudo-Conde S, Manzano-Gamero V, Gómez-Jiménez FJ, Torres-Puchol JdlH. Implementación de las guías de práctica clínica sobre ictus isquémico agudo en atención especializada. Implementation of clinical practice guidelines for acute ischaemic stroke in specialist. Neurologia. 2013;28(3):137–44.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Purroy F, Montserrat J, Begue R, Gil MI, Quilez A, Sanahuja J, et al. Higher carotid intima media thickness predicts extracranial vascular events and not stroke recurrence among transient ischemic attack patients. Int J Stroke. 2012;7(2):125–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Rodriguez-Sanz A, Fuentes B, Martinez-Sanchez P, Prefasi D, Martinez-Martinez M, Correas E, et al. High-density lipoprotein: a novel marker for risk of in-hospital infection in acute ischemic stroke patients? Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(3):291–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Roquer J, Rodriguez-Campello A, Cuadrado-Godia E, Giralt-Steinhauer E, Jimenez-Conde J, Degano IR, et al. Ischemic stroke in prediabetic patients. J Neurol. 2014;261:1866–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Rubio Gil E, Martínez Pastor A, López-Picazo Ferrer J, Leal Hernández M, Martínez Navarro A, Abellán Alemán J. Estudio de los registros de seguimiento y control de los factores de riesgo en pacientes con ictus seguidos en atención primaria por historia clínica informatizada (OMI-AP). Estudio ictus-OMI. Aten Primaria. 2011;43:209–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Ruiz-Ares G, Fuentes B, Martinez-Sanchez P, Martinez-Martinez M, Diez-Tejedor E. Utility of the assessment of echogenicity in the identification of symptomatic carotid artery atheroma plaques in ischemic stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;32(6):535–41.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Serrano-Villar S, Fresco G, Ruiz-Artacho P, Bravo A, Valencia C, Fuentes-Ferrer M, et al. Stroke in the very old: myths and realities. Med Clin (Barc). 2013;140(2):53–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Polo-Romero F, Santisteban-López Y, Ramírez-Relinque L, Rodríguez-Martín B. Estrategias para mejorar el control lipídico: aumentar dosis de estatinas o asociar ezetimiba? Rev Clin Esp. 2010;210:425–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Estirado E, Lahoz C, Laguna F, Garcia-Iglesias F, Gonzalez-Alegre MT, Mostaza JM. Metabolic syndrome in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Rev Clin Esp. 2014;214:437–44.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Ferreras-Amez JM, Sanjuán-Domingo R, Visiedo-Sánchez S, Sarrat-Torres MA, Vicente-Molinero A, Abadía-Gallego V, et al. Análisis del control de factores de riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con enfermedad arterial periférica. Semergen. 2013;39:63–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Félix-Redondo FJ, Fernández-Bergés D, Palomo-Cobos L, Buitrago-Ramírez F, Pérez-Castán JF, Lozano-Mera L. Prevalencia de consumo de alcohol y factores de riesgo cardiovascular en un área sanitaria de Extremadura. Estudio Hermex. Aten Primaria. 2012;44:201–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Martínez-Hervás J, Priego A, Lorente R, Molina M, Navarro-Hidalgo MI, Real JT, et al. Arteriosclerosis carotídea subclínica en pacientes con hiperlipidemia familiar combinada. Evolución tras dos años de tratamiento con dosis altas de atorvastatina. Med Clin (Barc). 2012;138:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Mazon-Ramos P, Cordero A, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Bertomeu MV, Delgado E, Vitale G, et al. Control of cardiovascular risk factors in revascularized patients with diabetes: a subanalysis of the ICP-Bypass Study. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2015;68:115–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Pérez A, González-Blanco C, Hernández-Presa MÁ, Chaves J. Estrategia de tratamiento de la dislipemia y consecución de objetivos en la población española con diabetes tipo 2 sin enfermedad cardiovascular. Endocrinol Nutr. 2011;58:283–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Roca-Rodríguez MM, Carral-San Laureano F, Baena-Nieto G, Aguilar-Diosdado M. Evaluación del grado de consecución de objetivos de control metabólico en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Endocrinol Nutr. 2010;57:434–439.

  69. 69.

    López-Simarro F, Brotons C, Moral I, Cols-Sagarra C, Selva A, Aguado-Jodar A, et al. Inercia y cumplimiento terapéutico en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en atención primaria. Med Clin (Barc). 2012;138:377–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Pérez De Isla L, Saltijeral Cerezo A, Vitale G, González-Timón B, Torres Do Rego A, Álvarez-Sala Walther LA. Cifras de colesterol adecuadas en pacientes coronarios y diabéticos. Análisis según especialidades médicas y comunidades autónomas. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2013;66:748–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Millan J, Alegría E, Guijarro C, Lozano JV, Vitale GC, González-Timón B, et al. Dislipemia en población diabética tratada con estatinas. Resultados del estudio DYSIS en España. Med Clin (Barc). 2013;141:430–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Pedro-Botet J, Mostaza JM, Pinto X, Banegas JR. Consecución del objetivo terapéutico del colesterol de las lipoproteínas de baja densidad en las unidades de lípidos y riesgo vascular de la Sociedad Española de Arteriosclerosis. Clin Investig Arterioscler. 2013;25:155–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    González-Juanatey JR, Millán J, Alegría E, Guijarro C, Lozano JV, Vitale GC. Prevalencia y características de la dislipemia en pacientes en prevención primaria y secundaria tratados con estatinas en España. Estudio DYSIS-España. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011;64:286–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Martinez-Hervas S, Carmena R, Ascaso J, Real J, Masana L, Catala M, et al. Prevalence of plasma lipid abnormalities and its association with glucose metabolism in Spain: the study. Clin Investig Arterioscler. 2014;26(3):107–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    De la Peña A, Roca-Cusachs À, Suarez C, Bonet S. Riesgo vascular en las consultas de Medicina Interna. Estudio MICARE. Med Clin (Barc). 2013;140:246–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Divisón-Garrote JA, Massó-Orozco J, Carrión-Valero L, López-Abril J, Carbayo-Herencia JA, Artigao-Rodenas LM, et al. Evolución de la prevalencia de factores de riesgo y del riesgo cardiovascular global en población mayor de 18 años de la provincia de Albacete (1992–94 a 2004–06). Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2011;85:277–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Brotons C, Moral I, Soriano N, Cuixart L, Osorio D, Bottaro D, et al. Impacto de la utilización de las diferentes tablas SCORE en el cálculo del riesgo cardiovascular. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2014;67:94–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Félix-Redondo FJ, Fernández-Bergés D, Fernando-Pérez J, Zaro MJ, García A, Lozano L, et al. Prevalencia, detección, tratamiento y grado de control de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular en la población de Extremadura (España). Estudio HERMEX. Aten Primaria. 2011;43:426–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Zamora A, de Fernandez BF, Carrion C, Vazquez G, Paluzie G, Elosua R, et al. Pilot study to validate a computer-based clinical decision support system for dyslipidemia treatment (HTE-DLP). Atherosclerosis. 2013;231(2):401–4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Suades R, Padro T, Alonso R, Mata P, Badimon L. Lipid-lowering therapy with statins reduces microparticle shedding from endothelium, platelets and inflammatory cells. Thromb Haemost. 2013;110(2):366–77.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Antón-García F, Correcher-Salvador E, Rodríguez-Lagos FA, González-Caminero S. Evaluación durante 6 años de la dislipidemia en un centro de salud. Importancia de las acciones de mejora. Semergen. 2014;40:241–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Díaz-Díaz J, Suárez-Tembra M, Díaz-Peromingo J, Pena-Seijo M, Martínez-Ramonde T, Pose-Reino A. Eficacia y seguridad de ezetimiba en unidades de riesgo vascular. Rev Clin Esp. 2011;211:283–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Taylor F, Huffman MD, Macedo AF, Moore TH, Burke M, Davey SG, et al. Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;1:CD004816.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Huerta JM, Tormo MJ, Gavrila D, Navarro C. Cardiovascular risk estimated after 13 years of follow-up in a low-incidence Mediterranean region with high-prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:640.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Marin A, Medrano MJ, Gonzalez J, Pintado H, Compaired V, Barcena M, et al. Risk of ischaemic heart disease and acute myocardial infarction in a Spanish population: observational prospective study in a primary-care setting. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:38.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Ministerio de Sanidad Servicios Sociales e Igualdad, Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios. Utilización de medicamentos hipolipemiantes en España durante el periodo 2000–2012. Madrid: MSSSI; 2014. Informe de utilización de medicamentos: U/HLP/V1/17012014.

  87. 87.

    Mindell J, Aresu M, Zaninotto P, Falaschetti E, Poulter N. Improving lipid profiles and increasing use of lipid-lowering therapy in England: results from a national cross-sectional survey—2006. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011;75(5):621–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Omboni S, Carabelli G, Ghirardi E, Carugo S. Awareness, treatment, and control of major cardiovascular risk factors in a small-scale Italian community: results of a screening campaign. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013;9:177–85.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Verhave JC, Troyanov S, Mongeau F, Fradette L, Bouchard J, Awadalla P, et al. Prevalence, awareness, and management of CKD and cardiovascular risk factors in publicly funded health care. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(4):713–9.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Sponsorship, article processing charges, and the open access charge for this study were funded by Sanofi Iberia. All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given final approval to the version to be published.


Marta Rubio works at the Health Economics and Outcomes Research department of Sanofi Iberia. Rudi Subirà works at the Health Economics and Outcomes Research department of Sanofi Iberia. Alex de la Sierra has served as a scientific advisor to Sanofi and declares honoraria for participation in advisory board/scientific meetings funded by Abbott, Daiichi-Sankyo, Lacer, Menarini, Merck, Sharp and Dohme, Pfizer, and Sanofi. Xavier Pintó has served as a scientific advisor to Sanofi. Carlos Guijarro has served as a scientific advisor to Sanofi and declares honoraria as a speaker or consultant from Sanofi, MSD, Astra Zeneca. José López Miranda has served as a scientific advisor to Sanofi and declares fees for participation in advisory board/scientific meetings from Sanofi. Daniel Callejo has served as a scientific advisor to Sanofi. Jesús Cuervo has served as a scientific advisor to Sanofi.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

This article is based on previously conducted studies, and does not involve any new studies of human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex de la Sierra.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 293 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de la Sierra, A., Pintó, X., Guijarro, C. et al. Prevalence, Treatment, and Control of Hypercholesterolemia in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients: Evidences from a Systematic Literature Review in Spain. Adv Ther 32, 944–961 (2015).

Download citation


  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Control
  • Drug
  • Dyslipidemia
  • Hypercholesterolemia
  • Prevalence