Eltoum IA, Alston EA, Roberson J. Trends in pancreatic pathology practice before and after implementation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012;136:447–53.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Tempero MA, Arnoletti JP, Wolff RA, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8:972–1017.
CAS
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Liberman M, Sampalis J, Duranceau A, Thiffault V, Hadjeres R, Ferraro P. Endosonographic mediastinal lymph node staging of lung cancer. Chest 2014; Online first.
Silvestri GA, Gonzalez AV, Detterbeck FC, et al. Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence based-clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143(5 Suppl):e211S–50S.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Stavropoulos SN, Im GY, Grendell JH, et al. High yield of same-session EUS-guided liver biopsy by 19-gauge FNA needle in patients undergoing EUS to exclude biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:310–8.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Diehl DL, Johal AS, Aslanian HR et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a multicenter experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77 (Suppl 5); AB375.
Bang JY, Ramesh J, Trevino J, Eloubeidi MA, Varadarajulu S. Objective assessment of an algorithmic approach to EUS-guided FNA and interventions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:739–44.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Camellini L, Carlinfante G, Sassatelli R, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing 22G and 25G needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid lesions. Endoscopy. 2011;43:709–15.
CAS
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Fabbri C, Polifemo AM, Luigiano C et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with 22- and 25-gauge needles in solid pancreatic masses: a prospective comparative 2011; 43: 647–52.
Siddiqui UD, Rossi F, Rosenthal LS, Padda MS, Murali-Dharan V, Aslanian HR. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, randomized trial com- paring 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:1093–7.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Song TJ, Kim JH, Kim MH, et al. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1739–45.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Ramesh J, Bang JY, Varadarajulu S et al. Multi-center randomized trial comparing the 19G and 25G needles for EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77 (Suppl 5): AB179–80.
Vilmann P, Săftoiu A, Streba CT, et al. Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in solid masses. Scand J Gastroentero. 2013;48:877–83.
Article
Google Scholar
Lee JK, Lee KT, Lee KH, et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48:752–7.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Madhoun MF, Wani SB, Maple JT, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2013;45:86–92.
CAS
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Affolter KE, Schmidt RL, Matynia AP, Adler DG, Factor RE. Needle size has only a limited effect on outcomes in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:1026–34.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Larghi A, Verna EC, Costamagna G, et al. EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using a 19-gauge needle in a selected patient population: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:504–10.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Levy MJ. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided Trucut biopsy of the pancreas: prospects and problems. Pancreatology. 2007;7:163–6.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Larghi A, Verna EC, Stavropoulos SN, Rotterdam H, Lightdale CJ, Stevens PD. EUS-guided trucut needle biopsies in patients with solid pancreatic masses: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:185–90.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Dominguez-Muñoz JE, et al. Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1189–96.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Larghi A, Iglesias-Garcia J, Giovannini M, et al. Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2957–9.
Google Scholar
Iwashita T, Nakai Y, Chang KJ, et al. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:909–15.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Hucl T, Wee E, Lakhtakia S, et al. Feasibility and efficiency of a new 22G core needle: a prospective comparison study. Endoscopy. 2013;45:792–8.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Polkowski M, Larghi A, Dumonceau JM, et al. Learning, techniques, and complications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) technical guideline. Endoscopy. 2012;44:190–206.
CAS
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Wyse JM, Paquin SC, Joseph L, Sahai A. EUS-FNA without the stylet: the yield is comparable to that with the stylet and sampling of multiple sites during the same pass may improve sample quality and yield. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: AB330.
Bang JY, Hébert-Magee S, Ramesh J, Trevino JM, Varadarajulu S. Randomized trial comparing fanning with standard technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Endoscopy. 2013;45:445–50.
CAS
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Wallace MB, Kennedy T, Hoffman BJ, et al. Randomized controlled trial of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration techniques for the detection of malignant lymphadenopathy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:441–7.
CAS
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Lee JK, Choi JH, Jang KT, et al. A prospective, comparative trial to optimize sampling techniques in EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(5):745–51.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Puri R, Vilmann P, Gorunescu F, et al. Randomized controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle sampling with or without suction for better cytological diagnosis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:499–504.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Hébert-Magee S. Assessment of the technical performance of the flexible 19-gauge EUS-FNA needle. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:336–43.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Attam, R, Arain M, Bloechi SJ et al. Wet suction FNA technique: a novel technique for EUS-FNA. Results of a prospective randomized and blinded study. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;79:AB110.
Nakai Y, Isayama H, Koike K et al. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses. Dig Dis Sci 2014 [Epub ahead of print].
Sahai AV, Paquin SC, Gariépy G. A prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration results obtained in the same lesion, with and without the needle stylet. Endoscopy. 2010;42:900–3.
CAS
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Rastogi A, Wani S, Olyaee M, et al. A prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of EUS-guided FNA with and without a stylet. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:58–64.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Wani S, Gupta N, Rastogi A, et al. A comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration with and without a stylet. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:2409–14.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Schmidt RL, Walker BS, Howard K, Layfield LJ, Adler DG. Rapid on-site evaluation reduces needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: a risk-benefit analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:3280–6.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
LeBlanc JK, Ciaccia D, Collins E, et al. Optimal number of EUS-guided fine needle passes needed to obtain a correct diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:475–81.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Erickson RA, Sayage-Rabie L, Beissner RS. Factors predicting the number of EUS-guided fine-needle passes for diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:184–90.
CAS
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Jhala NC, Jhala D, Eloubeidi MA, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a powerful tool to obtain samples from small lesions. Cancer. 2004;102:239–46.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Early DS, Acosta RD, Cash BD, et al. ASGE guidelines: adverse events associated with EUS and EUS with FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:839–43.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM. Frequency of major complications after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:622–9.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Anderson MA, Ben-Menachem T, Dominitz JA, et al. Management of antithrombotic agents for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:1060–70.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Wang KX, Ben QW, Li ZS, et al. Assessment of morbidity and mortality associated with EUS-guided FNA: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:283–90.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Varadarajulu S, Ginnetti L, Hawes R et al. Meta-analysis comparing rates of complications between the standard 19G and 22G/25G needles for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77 (Suppl 5): AB405.
Wani S, Coté GA, Early D, et al. Learning curves for EUS by using cumulative sum analysis: implications for American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommendations for training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:558–65.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Eisen GM, Dominitz JA, Erickson RA, et al. Guidelines for credentialing and granting privileges for endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:811–4.
CAS
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Meenan J, Harris K, Norton S, et al. Service provision and training for endoscopic ultrasound in the UK. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2011;2:188–94.
Article
Google Scholar
Mertz H, Gautam S. The learning curve for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:33–7.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a learning curve with 300 consecutive procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:700–8.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Hébert-Magee S. Basic technique for solid lesions: cytology, core, or both? Endosc Ultrasound. 2014;3:28–34.
PubMed Central
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Hébert-Magee S, Bae S, Eltoum IA, et al. The presence of a cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Cytopathology. 2013;24:159–71.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Al-Abbadi MA, Bloom LI, Austin MR, et al. Adequate reimbursement is crucial to support cost-effective rapid on-site cytopathology evaluations. Cytojournal. 2010;7:22.
PubMed Central
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Schmidt RL, Will BL, Matynia AP, Barraza G, Layfield LJ, Adler DG. Rapid on-site evaluation increases endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration adequacy for pancreatic lesions. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:872–82.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Jhala N, Jhala D. Definitions in tissue acquisition. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014;24:19–27.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Hikichi T, Irisawa A, Obara K, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses with rapid on-site cytological evaluation by endosonographers without attendance of cytopathologists. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:322–8.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Hayashi T, Ishiwatari H, Kato J, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation by endosonographer during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid masses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:656–63.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Nguyen YP, Maple JT, Azar RR, et al. Reliability of gross visual assessment of specimen adequacy during EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1264–70.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Crapanzano JP, Heymann JJ, Monaco S, Nassar A, Saqi A. The state of cell block variation and satisfaction in the era of molecular diagnostics and personalized medicine. Cytojournal. 2014;11:7.
PubMed Central
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar