Eltoum IA, Alston EA, Roberson J. Trends in pancreatic pathology practice before and after implementation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012;136:447–53.
Tempero MA, Arnoletti JP, Wolff RA, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8:972–1017.
Liberman M, Sampalis J, Duranceau A, Thiffault V, Hadjeres R, Ferraro P. Endosonographic mediastinal lymph node staging of lung cancer. Chest 2014; Online first.
Silvestri GA, Gonzalez AV, Detterbeck FC, et al. Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence based-clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143(5 Suppl):e211S–50S.
Stavropoulos SN, Im GY, Grendell JH, et al. High yield of same-session EUS-guided liver biopsy by 19-gauge FNA needle in patients undergoing EUS to exclude biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:310–8.
Diehl DL, Johal AS, Aslanian HR et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a multicenter experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77 (Suppl 5); AB375.
Bang JY, Ramesh J, Trevino J, Eloubeidi MA, Varadarajulu S. Objective assessment of an algorithmic approach to EUS-guided FNA and interventions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:739–44.
Camellini L, Carlinfante G, Sassatelli R, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing 22G and 25G needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid lesions. Endoscopy. 2011;43:709–15.
Fabbri C, Polifemo AM, Luigiano C et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with 22- and 25-gauge needles in solid pancreatic masses: a prospective comparative 2011; 43: 647–52.
Siddiqui UD, Rossi F, Rosenthal LS, Padda MS, Murali-Dharan V, Aslanian HR. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, randomized trial com- paring 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:1093–7.
Song TJ, Kim JH, Kim MH, et al. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1739–45.
Ramesh J, Bang JY, Varadarajulu S et al. Multi-center randomized trial comparing the 19G and 25G needles for EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77 (Suppl 5): AB179–80.
Vilmann P, Săftoiu A, Streba CT, et al. Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in solid masses. Scand J Gastroentero. 2013;48:877–83.
Lee JK, Lee KT, Lee KH, et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48:752–7.
Madhoun MF, Wani SB, Maple JT, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2013;45:86–92.
Affolter KE, Schmidt RL, Matynia AP, Adler DG, Factor RE. Needle size has only a limited effect on outcomes in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:1026–34.
Larghi A, Verna EC, Costamagna G, et al. EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using a 19-gauge needle in a selected patient population: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:504–10.
Levy MJ. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided Trucut biopsy of the pancreas: prospects and problems. Pancreatology. 2007;7:163–6.
Larghi A, Verna EC, Stavropoulos SN, Rotterdam H, Lightdale CJ, Stevens PD. EUS-guided trucut needle biopsies in patients with solid pancreatic masses: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:185–90.
Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Dominguez-Muñoz JE, et al. Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1189–96.
Larghi A, Iglesias-Garcia J, Giovannini M, et al. Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2957–9.
Iwashita T, Nakai Y, Chang KJ, et al. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:909–15.
Hucl T, Wee E, Lakhtakia S, et al. Feasibility and efficiency of a new 22G core needle: a prospective comparison study. Endoscopy. 2013;45:792–8.
Polkowski M, Larghi A, Dumonceau JM, et al. Learning, techniques, and complications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) technical guideline. Endoscopy. 2012;44:190–206.
Wyse JM, Paquin SC, Joseph L, Sahai A. EUS-FNA without the stylet: the yield is comparable to that with the stylet and sampling of multiple sites during the same pass may improve sample quality and yield. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: AB330.
Bang JY, Hébert-Magee S, Ramesh J, Trevino JM, Varadarajulu S. Randomized trial comparing fanning with standard technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Endoscopy. 2013;45:445–50.
Wallace MB, Kennedy T, Hoffman BJ, et al. Randomized controlled trial of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration techniques for the detection of malignant lymphadenopathy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:441–7.
Lee JK, Choi JH, Jang KT, et al. A prospective, comparative trial to optimize sampling techniques in EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(5):745–51.
Puri R, Vilmann P, Gorunescu F, et al. Randomized controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle sampling with or without suction for better cytological diagnosis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:499–504.
Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Hébert-Magee S. Assessment of the technical performance of the flexible 19-gauge EUS-FNA needle. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:336–43.
Attam, R, Arain M, Bloechi SJ et al. Wet suction FNA technique: a novel technique for EUS-FNA. Results of a prospective randomized and blinded study. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;79:AB110.
Nakai Y, Isayama H, Koike K et al. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses. Dig Dis Sci 2014 [Epub ahead of print].
Sahai AV, Paquin SC, Gariépy G. A prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration results obtained in the same lesion, with and without the needle stylet. Endoscopy. 2010;42:900–3.
Rastogi A, Wani S, Olyaee M, et al. A prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of EUS-guided FNA with and without a stylet. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:58–64.
Wani S, Gupta N, Rastogi A, et al. A comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration with and without a stylet. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:2409–14.
Schmidt RL, Walker BS, Howard K, Layfield LJ, Adler DG. Rapid on-site evaluation reduces needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: a risk-benefit analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:3280–6.
LeBlanc JK, Ciaccia D, Collins E, et al. Optimal number of EUS-guided fine needle passes needed to obtain a correct diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:475–81.
Erickson RA, Sayage-Rabie L, Beissner RS. Factors predicting the number of EUS-guided fine-needle passes for diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:184–90.
Jhala NC, Jhala D, Eloubeidi MA, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a powerful tool to obtain samples from small lesions. Cancer. 2004;102:239–46.
Early DS, Acosta RD, Cash BD, et al. ASGE guidelines: adverse events associated with EUS and EUS with FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:839–43.
Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM. Frequency of major complications after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:622–9.
Anderson MA, Ben-Menachem T, Dominitz JA, et al. Management of antithrombotic agents for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:1060–70.
Wang KX, Ben QW, Li ZS, et al. Assessment of morbidity and mortality associated with EUS-guided FNA: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:283–90.
Varadarajulu S, Ginnetti L, Hawes R et al. Meta-analysis comparing rates of complications between the standard 19G and 22G/25G needles for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77 (Suppl 5): AB405.
Wani S, Coté GA, Early D, et al. Learning curves for EUS by using cumulative sum analysis: implications for American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommendations for training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:558–65.
Eisen GM, Dominitz JA, Erickson RA, et al. Guidelines for credentialing and granting privileges for endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:811–4.
Meenan J, Harris K, Norton S, et al. Service provision and training for endoscopic ultrasound in the UK. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2011;2:188–94.
Mertz H, Gautam S. The learning curve for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:33–7.
Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a learning curve with 300 consecutive procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:700–8.
Hébert-Magee S. Basic technique for solid lesions: cytology, core, or both? Endosc Ultrasound. 2014;3:28–34.
Hébert-Magee S, Bae S, Eltoum IA, et al. The presence of a cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Cytopathology. 2013;24:159–71.
Al-Abbadi MA, Bloom LI, Austin MR, et al. Adequate reimbursement is crucial to support cost-effective rapid on-site cytopathology evaluations. Cytojournal. 2010;7:22.
Schmidt RL, Will BL, Matynia AP, Barraza G, Layfield LJ, Adler DG. Rapid on-site evaluation increases endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration adequacy for pancreatic lesions. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:872–82.
Jhala N, Jhala D. Definitions in tissue acquisition. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014;24:19–27.
Hikichi T, Irisawa A, Obara K, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses with rapid on-site cytological evaluation by endosonographers without attendance of cytopathologists. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:322–8.
Hayashi T, Ishiwatari H, Kato J, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation by endosonographer during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid masses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:656–63.
Nguyen YP, Maple JT, Azar RR, et al. Reliability of gross visual assessment of specimen adequacy during EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1264–70.
Crapanzano JP, Heymann JJ, Monaco S, Nassar A, Saqi A. The state of cell block variation and satisfaction in the era of molecular diagnostics and personalized medicine. Cytojournal. 2014;11:7.