Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
A 69-year-old man presented with enlarged left iliac lymph node which on PET-CT showed FDG-avidity with a standardized uptake value (SUV) max of 14.8. Needle core biopsy showed involvement by a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. By immunohistochemistry, the neoplasm showed a germinal center B-cell phenotype with expression of CD10, CD20, BCL2, BCL6, and PAX5. Fluorescence in situ hybridization studies were negative for MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 gene rearrangements. He underwent 6 cycles of chemotherapy with R-CHOP (Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Hydroxydaunomycin (doxorubicin), Oncovin (Vincristine), Prednisolone).
Towards the completion of chemotherapy (5 months since diagnosis), imaging studies revealed residual PET-avidity of the left iliac lymph node with a SUV max of 10.2, highly suspicious for residual lymphoma. An excisional biopsy was subsequently performed which showed diffuse involvement by a histiocytic infiltrate with bland nuclei, inconspicuous nucleoli, and abundant foamy cytoplasm (Fig. 1A, Hematoxylin and eosin stain). Immunohistochemistry revealed positive staining for CD163 (Fig. 1B) and absence of B-cell markers including CD20 and PAX5 (Fig. 1C). Flow cytometry immunophenotyping did not demonstrate an abnormal B-cell or an aberrant T-cell population. There was no morphologic or immunophenotypic evidence of lymphoma. Possible differential diagnosis included histiocytic neoplasms arising in the setting of transdifferentiation. Evaluation for ALK-positive histiocytosis, Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), and Rosai-Dorfman disease were ruled out by the absence of immunostaining for ALK, S100, Factor 13a (Fig. 1D), Cyclin D1 and BRAF V600E, respectively[1]. Furthermore, clinical and radiologic findings were not compatible with ECD[1]. The overall findings in the setting of post-chemotherapy were in keeping with the diagnosis of histiocyte-rich pseudotumor.
Histiocyte-rich pseudotumor, although a rare benign entity, often mimics residual lymphoma as demonstrated by increased FDG-avidity on imaging studies post-chemotherapy [2, 3]. It is essential to keep this entity as a potential differential diagnosis while evaluating residual PET-avid lesions in post-chemotherapy lymphoma patients to avoid unnecessary treatment. Follow-up imaging studies usually show a gradual decrease in FDG-avidity in such cases further attesting that they represent a benign/reactive process[2]. In this patient, follow-up imaging studies at 3 months from diagnosis of histiocytic-rich pseudotumor showed complete resolution of FDG-avidity.
References
Goyal G, Young JR, Koster MJ et al (2019) Mayo Clin Proc 94:2054–2071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.02.023
Fang H, Chuang HH, Strati P et al (2021) Am J Surg Pathol 45:160–168. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001547
Chandra P, Wen YH, Tuli S et al (2009) Am J Clin Pathol 132:342–8. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPC67QOGJXCEZB
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ravindran, A., Macon, W.R. & Rech, K.L. Histiocyte-rich pseudotumor — a post-chemotherapy radiologic dilemma. J Hematopathol 15, 45–46 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12308-022-00482-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12308-022-00482-y