Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
A 72-year-old man, who had previously been diagnosed with mycosis fungoides (MF) and treated with mogamulizumab, presented for clinical follow-up and was found to have diffuse erythroderma associated with areas of poikiloderma (Fig. 1). A punch biopsy was performed to evaluate for recurrent MF.
Histologic sections of the biopsy showed a superficial dermal granulomatous reaction (Fig. 2a–c). Adjacent to the granulomatous reaction were atypical, small to intermediate-sized lymphocytes with irregular nuclei and angulated cytoplasmic borders. These cells were CD3-positive T cells (Fig. 2d) with co-expression of CD4 (Fig. 2e) and GATA3 (Fig. 2g) and no expression of CD7 (Fig. 2f), T-bet (Fig. 2h), or FOXP3 (Fig. 2i).
Mogamulizumab is a recently approved humanized anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody, which causes cytotoxic effects against cells that express CCR4 on their cell membrane, including MF cells and TH2/regulatory T cells. A recent study has shown that patients treated with mogamulizumab can develop a cutaneous granulomatous drug eruption (CGDE) and usually present with erythroderma [1]. Histologically, CGDE can mimic granulomatous MF.
Given the mechanism of this drug, immunohistochemical stains for T-bet, GATA-3, and FOXP3 become useful in discriminating granulomatous MF from mogamulizumab-associated CGDE. T-bet is a T-box transcription factor necessary for the development of TH1 cells. GATA-3 is expressed on TH2 cells, and this T cell type is seen in dermatoses and forms the predominant cell in late stage MF and in patients with erythrodermic MF and Sézary syndrome (SS) [2]. Accordingly, the neoplastic cells in tumor stage MF and SS are GATA-3-positive [3]. FOXP3 is strongly expressed by regulatory T cells and is positive in a significant majority of T cells in most dermatoses [3]. On the other hand, FOXP3-positive T cells comprised less than 10% of the total lymphocytes in the majority of MF biopsies examined in one study and did not exceed 25% in any of the specimens [4].
In the case presented, the atypical lymphoid infiltrate showed a CD3+/CD4+/CD7−/GATA3+/T-bet-/FOXP3-immunophenotype, which supported involvement by MF rather than a drug reaction or other cutaneous inflammatory T cell infiltrate.
References
Chen L, Carson KR, Staser KW, Mehta-Shah N, Schaffer A, Rosman IS, Musiek A (2019) Mogamulizumab-associated cutaneous granulomatous drug eruption mimicking mycosis fungoides but possibly indicating durable clinical response. JAMA Dermatol 155(8):968–971
Papadavid E, Economidou J, Psarra A, Kapsimali V, Mantzana V, Antoniou C, Limas K, Stratigos A, Stavrianeas N, Avgerinou G, Katsambas A (2003) The relevance of peripheral blood T-helper 1 and 2 cytokine pattern in the evaluation of patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Br J Dermatol 148(4):709–718
Hsi AC, Lee SJ, Rosman IS, Carson KR, Kelley A, Viele V, Pang X, Musiek A, Scaffer A (2015) Expression of helper T cell master regulators in inflammatory dermatoses and primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: diagnostic implications. J Am Acad Dermatol 72(1):159–167
Fried I, Cerroni L (2012) FOXP3 in sequential biopsies of progressive mycosis fungoides. Am J Dermatopathol 34(3):263–265
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martig, D.S., Bridges, A.G. & Macon, W.R. Assessing for disease: recurrent mycosis fungoides or cutaneous granulomatous drug eruption after mogamulizumab therapy. J Hematopathol 13, 287–288 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12308-020-00411-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12308-020-00411-x