Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The classification of complex 4-part humeral fractures revisited: the missing fifth fragment and indications for surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe a new classification of complex 4-part proximal humeral fractures (PHF). Its novelty lies in the involvement of fractures of the calcar area (i.e., the missing fifth fragment) in relation to fragments of the head, tuberosities and shaft. The classification consists of 6 groups (divided into 15 subgroups) of calcar fracture patterns. We hypothesized that this classification could aid surgical decision making in terms of osteosynthesis versus prothesis. To test this hypothesis, two shoulder surgeons, trained in the classification, re-examined the X-rays and CT scans of 100 cases of 4-part PHF to codify each calcar fracture pattern. CT scans proved to be essential for this process. We then theoretically assigned the most appropriate treatment to each subgroup. Subsequent verification of clinical records confirmed our hypothesis that this classification could help the surgeon to decide the best approach to complex 4-part PHF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murray IR, Amin AK, White TO, Robinson CM (2011) Proximal humeral fractures: current concepts in classification, treatment and outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(1):1–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Codman EA (1934) Fractures in relation to the subacromial bursa. In: Codman EA (ed) The shoulder: rupture of the supraspinatus tendon and other lesions in or about the subacromial bursa. Thomas Todd, Boston, MA, pp 313–333

    Google Scholar 

  3. Neer CS 2nd (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures: I. classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:1077–1089

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Neer CS 2nd (2002) Four-segment classification of proximal humeral fractures: purpose and reliable use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:389–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J (1990) The comprehensive classification of fractures in long bones. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Hertel R (2005) Fractures of the proximal humerus in osteoporotic bone. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S65–S72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, Leunig M (2004) Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:427–433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Majed A, Macleod I, Bull AM, Zyto K, Resch H, Hertel R, Reilly P, Emery RJ (2011) Proximal humeral fracture classification systems revisited. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(7):1125–1132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tamai K, Ishige N, Kuroda S, Ohno W, Itoh H, Hashiguchi H, Iizawa N, Mikasa M (2009) Four-segment classification of proximal humeral fractures revisited: a multicenter study on 509 cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:845–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mauro CS (2011) Proximal humeral fractures. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 4(4):214–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mora Guix JM, Pedrós JS, Serrano AC (2009) Updated classification system for proximal humeral fractures. Clin Med Res 7(1–2):32–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Robinson BC, Athwal GS, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Rispoli DM (2008) Classification and imaging of proximal humerus fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 39(4):393–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Russo R, Visconti V, Lombardi LV, Ciccarelli M, Giudice G (2008) The block-bridge system: a new concept and surgical technique to reconstruct articular surfaces and tuberosities in complex proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(1):29–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Russo R, Visconti V, Lombardi LV, Ciccarelli M, Cautiero F (2010) Da Vinci system: clinical experience with complex proximal humerus fractures. Musculoskelet Surg 94(Suppl 1):S57–S64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Charalambous CP, Siddique I, Valluripalli K, Kovacevic M, Panose P, Srinivasan M, Marynissen H (2007) Proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(3):205–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gardner MJ, Weil Y, Barker JU, Kelly BT, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2007) The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 21(3):185–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Egol KA, Ong CC, Walsh M, Jazrawi LM, Tejwani NC, Zuckerman JD (2008) Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma 22(3):159–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee CW, Shin SJ (2009) Prognostic factors for unstable proximal humeral fractures treated with locking-plate fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(1):83–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fankhauser F, Boldin C, Schippinger G, Haunschmid C, Szyszkowitz R (2005) A new locking plate for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 430:176–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brunner F, Sommer C, Bahrs C, Heuwinkel R, Hafner C, Rillmann P, Kohut G, Ekelund A, Muller M, Audigé L, Babst R (2009) Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate: a prospective multicenter analysis. J Orthop Trauma 23(3):163–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mora Guix JM, Gonzalez AS, Brugalla JV, Carril EC, Baños FG (2006) Proposed protocol for reading images of humeral head fractures. Clin Orthop Relat 448:225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Russo R, Vernaglia Lombardi L, Cautiero F, Giudice G, Ciccarelli M (2008) Medial reconstruction technique in the treatment of complex fractures of humeral proximal epiphysis with SMR prosthetic modular system. Chir Organi Mov 91(2):117–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Greiner S, Kääb MJ, Haas NP, Bail HJ (2009) Humeral head necrosis rate at mid-term follow-up after open reduction and angular stable plate fixation for proximal humeral fractures. Injury 40(2):186–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Jean Ann Gilder (Scientific Communication srl) for editing the text.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raffaele Russo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russo, R., Cautiero, F. & Della Rotonda, G. The classification of complex 4-part humeral fractures revisited: the missing fifth fragment and indications for surgery. Musculoskelet Surg 96 (Suppl 1), 13–19 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-012-0195-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-012-0195-2

Keywords

Navigation