Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are Olfactory Receptors Really Olfactive?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biosemiotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Any living organism interacts with and responds specifically to environmental molecules by expressing specific olfactory receptors. In this paper, this specificity will be first examined in causal terms with particular emphasis on the mechanisms controlling olfactory gene expression, cell-to-cell interactions and odor-decoding processes. However, this type of explanation does not entirely justify the role olfactory receptors have played during evolution, since they are also expressed ectopically in different organs and/or tissues. Homologous olfactory genes have in fact been found in such diverse cells and/or organs as spermatozoa, testis and kidney where they are assumed to act as chemotactic sensors or renin modulators. To justify their functional diversity, homologous olfactory receptors are assumed to share the same basic role: that of conferring a self-identity to cells or tissues under varying environmental conditions. By adopting this standpoint, the functional attribution as olfactory or chemotactic sensors to these receptors should not be seen either as a cause conditioning receptor gene expression, or as a final effect resulting from genetically predetermined programs, but as a direct consequence of the environmental conditions olfactory receptor genes have explored during evolution. The association of odorant patterns with specific environmental or contextual situations makes their relationship semiotically triadic, due to the emergence of an interpretant capable of perceiving odorants as meaningful signs out of a noisy background. This perspective highlights the importance of odorant-receptor relationships as respect to the properties of the interacting partners. It is our contention that only when taken together can these different explanatory strategies provide a realistic account of how olfactory receptor genes have been structurally and functionally modified during evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abaffy, T., Malhotra, A., & Luetje, C. W. (2007). The molecular basis for ligand specificity in a mouse olfactory receptor. A network of functionally important residues. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 282, 1216–1224.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aldinhas Ferreira, M. I. (2010). On meaning: A biosemiotic approach. Biosemiotics, 3, 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athanasiadou, A. & Dirven, R. (1997). Conditionality, hypotheticality, counterfactuality. In: Angeliki, A. & Dirven, R. (eds.) On Conditionals Again. John Benjamins Publishing Company

  • Atmanspacher, H. (2007). Semiotic approach to complex systems. In A. Mehler & R. Kohler (Eds.), Aspects of Automatic Text Analysis (pp. 79–94). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome, B. M., Jayaraman, V., & Laurent, G. (2006). Encoding and decoding of overlapping odor sequences. Neuron, 51, 467–482.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, L.E. (2003). A sign-theoretic approach to Biotechnology. PhD Dissertation. Institute of Molecular Biology. University of Copenhagen.

  • Bruni, L. E. (2007). Cellular semiotics and signal transduction. In M. Barbieri (Ed.), Introduction to Biosemiotics: The New Biological Synthesis (pp. 365–408). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, L. E. (2008). Hierarchical categorical perception in sensing and cognitive processes. Biosemiotics, 1, 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, L.E. (2010). Heterarchical semantic congruence. 10th Gathering in Biosemiotics – Braga, Portugal.

  • Buck, L., & Axel, R. (1991). A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell, 65, 175–187.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D. J. (2002). Function and Design Revisited. In A. Ariew, R. Cummins, & M. Perlman (Eds.), Functions (pp. 222–243). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cariani, P. A. (2001). Specialist and generalist strategies in sensory evolution. Artificial Life, 7, 211–214.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. R., & Shepherd, G. M. (2005). The olfactory glomerulus: A cortical module with specific functions. Journal of Neurocytology, 34, 353–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, S., & Downes, J. J. (2000). Odour-evoked autobiographical memories: Psychological investigations of proustian phenomena. Chemical Senses, 25, 111–116.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Derby, C. D., & Steullet, P. (2001). Why do animals have so many receptors? The role of multiple chemosensors in animal perception. Biological Bulletin, 200, 211–215.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer, W.J. (1998). The area code hypothesis revisited: Olfactory receptors and other related transmembrane receptors may function as the last digits in a cell surface code for assembling embryos. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 95, 9072–9077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, A. E., & Dionne, V. E. (1994). Action potentials and chemosensitive conductances in the dendrites of olfactory neurons suggest new features for odor transduction. The Journal of General Physiology, 103, 181–201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dulai, K. S., von Dornum, M., Mollon, J. D., & Hunt, D. M. (2010). The evolution of trichromatic color vision by opsin gene duplication in new world and old world primates. Genome Research, 9, 629–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, C. (2000). Closure, function, emergence, semiosis and life: The same idea? Reflections on the concrete and the abstract in theoretical biology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 901, 187–197.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feldmesser, E., Olender, T., Khen, M., Yanai, I., Ophir, R., & Lancet, D. (2006). Widespread ectopic expression of olfactory receptor genes. BMC Genomics, 7, 121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Firestein, S., Zufall, F., & Shepherd, G. M. (1991). Single odor-sensitive channels in olfactory receptor neurons are also gated by cyclic nucleotides. The Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 3565–3572.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer, J., Breer, H., & Strotmann, J. (2009). Mammalian olfactory receptors. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 3, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fordyce, J. A. (2006). The evolutionary consequences of ecological interactions mediated through phenotypic plasticity. Journal of Experimental Biology, 209, 2377–2383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda, N., Yomogida, K., Okabe, M., & Touhara, K. (2004). Functional characterization of a mouse testicular olfactory receptor and its role in chemosensing and in regulation of sperm motility. Journal of Cell Sciences, 117, 5835–5845.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuss, S. H., & Ray, A. (2009). Mechanisms of odorant receptor gene choice in Drosophila and vertebrates. Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, 41, 101–112.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galizia, C. G., & Menzel, R. (2000). Probing the olfactory code. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 853–854.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galizia, C. G., Sachse, S., Rappert, A., & Menzel, R. (1999). The glomerular code for odor representation is species specific in the honeybee Apis mellifera. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 473–478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilad, Y., Bustamante, C. D., Lancet, D., & Paabo, S. (2003). Natural selection on the olfactory receptor gene family in humans and chimpanzees. American Journal of Human Genetics, 73, 489–501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, A. (2008). What the nose knows. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, F., Bruni, L. E., & Maggio, R. (2010). Receptor oligomerization as a process modulating cellular semiotics. Biosemiotics, 3, 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudge, T. A. (1958). Causal explanation in natural history. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 35, 194–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goto, T., Salpekar, A., & Monk, M. (2001). Expression of a testis-specific member of the olfactory receptor gene family in human primordial germ cells. Molecular Human Reproduction, 7, 553–558.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, P. E. (1993). Functional analysis and proper functions. Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44, 409–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hague, C., Uberti, M.A., Chen, Z., Bush, C.F., Jones, S.V., Ressler, K.J., Hall, R.A. & Minneman, K.P. (2004). Olfactory receptor surface expression is driven by association with the beta2-adrenergic receptor. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101, 13672–13676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harries-Jones, P. (2002). Where bonds become binds: The necessity for Bateson's interactive perspective in biosemiotics. Sign Systems Studies, 30, 163–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M. A., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2005). The binding problem in presence research. Presence, 14, 616–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herz, R. S. (2007). The Scent of Desire: Discovering Our Enigmatic Sense of Smell. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, R. S., & Engen, T. (1996). Odor memory: review and analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 300–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand, J.G. (1995). Analysis of chemical signals by nervous systems. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 92, 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoare, D. J., McCrohan, C. R., & Cobb, M. (2008). Precise and fuzzy coding by olfactory sensory neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 9710–9722.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, J. (1996). Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, P., Vaidehi, N., Floriano, W. B., Hall, S. E., & Goddard, W. A. (2005). Test of the binding threshold hypothesis for olfactory receptors: explanation of the differential binding of ketones to the mouse and human orthologs of olfactory receptor 912–93. Protein Science, 14, 703–710.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, J. L., & Beynon, R. J. (2010). Making progress in genetic kin recognition among vertebrates. Journal of Biology, 9, 13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, Y., Zhang, Z., & Hu, Y. (2009). The repertoire of G-protein-coupled receptors in Xenopus tropicalis. BMC Genomics, 10, 263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keverne, E. B. (2002). Pheromones, vomeronasal function, and gender-specific behavior. Cell, 108, 735–738.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kull, K. (1998). Organism as a self-reading text: anticipation and semiosis. International Journal of Computing Anticipatory Systems, 1, 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, K., Deacon, T., Emmeche, C., Hoffmeyer, J., & Stjernfelt, F. (2009). Theses on biosemiotics: prolegomena to a theoretical biology. Biological Theory, 4, 167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, P. C., Bahl, G., Gremigni, M., Matarazzo, V., Clot-Faybesse, O., Ronin, C., et al. (2008). Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics, 9, 29–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W., Margolskee, R., Donnert, G., Hell, S.W. & Restrepo, D. (2007). Olfactory neurons expressing transient receptor potential channel M5 (TRPM5) are involved in sensing semiochemicals. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104, 2471–2476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomvardas, S., Barnea, G., Pisapia, D. J., Mendelsohn, M., Kirkland, J., & Axel, R. (2006). Interchromosomal interactions and olfactory receptor choice. Cell, 126, 403–413.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malnic, B., Hirono, J., Sato, T., & Buck, L. B. (1999). Combinatorial receptor codes for odors. Cell, 96, 713–723.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maritan, M., Monaco, G., Zamparo, I., Zaccolo, M., Pozzan, T. & Lodovichi, C. (2009). Odorant receptors at the growth cone are coupled to localized cAMP and Ca2+ increases. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 3537–3542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Marcos, A. (2009). On the organization of olfactory and vomeronasal cortices. Progress in Neurobiology, 87, 21–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzocchi, F. (2008). Complexity in biology. EMBO Reports, 9, 10–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menashe, I., Aloni, R., & Lancet, D. (2006). A probabilistic classifier for olfactory receptor pseudogenes. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, M.M., Linster, C., Escanilla, O., Sacquet, J., Didier, A. & Mandairon, N. (2009). Olfactory perceptual learning requires adult neurogenesis. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 17980–17985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1977). Teleology revisited: goal-directed processes in biology. Journal of Philosophy, 74, 261–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niimura, Y. & Nei, M. (2001). Evolution of olfactory receptor genes in the human genome. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 100, 12235–12240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niimura, Y., & Nei, M. (2006). Evolutionary dynamics of olfactory and other chemosensory receptor genes in vertebrates. Journal of Human Genetics, 51, 505–517.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. (1931). The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge-MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Peterlin, Z., Li, Y., Sun, G., Shah, R., Firestein, S., & Ryan, K. (2008). The importance of odorant conformation to the binding and activation of a representative olfactory receptor. Chemistry & Biology, 15, 1317–1327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzari, T., & Birkhead, T. R. (2002). The sexually-selected sperm hypothesis: sex-biased inheritance and sexual antagonism. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 77, 183–209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pluznick, J.L., Zou, D.J., Zhang, X., Yan, Q., Rodriguez-Gil, D.J., Eisner, C., Wells, E., Greer, C.A., Wang, T., Firestein, S., Schnermann, J. & Caplan, M.J. (2009). Functional expression of the olfactory signaling system in the kidney. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 2059–2064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, A., Naters, W. G., & Carlson, J. R. (2008). A regulatory code for neuron-specific odor receptor expression. PLoS Biology, 6, 1069–1082.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riffell, J. A., Lei, H., Christensen, T. A., & Hildebrand, J. G. (2009). Characterization and Coding of Behaviorally Significant Odor Mixtures. Current Biology, 19, 335–340.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rouquier, S., & Giorgi, D. (2007). Olfactory receptor gene repertoires in mammals. Mutation Research, 616, 95–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, P., & Zhang, J. (2009). Extraordinary diversity of chemosensory receptor gene repertoires among vertebrates. Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation, 47, 1–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shykind, B. M., Rohani, S. C., O'Donnell, S., Nemes, A., Mendelsohn, M., Sun, Y., et al. (2004). Gene switching and the stability of odorant receptor gene choice. Cell, 117, 801–815.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soyer O.S. & Bonhoeffer, S. (2006). Evolution of complexity in signaling pathways. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 103, 16337–16342

    Google Scholar 

  • Spehr, M., Gisselmann, G., Poplawski, A., Riffell, J. A., Wetzel, C. H., Zimmer, R. K., et al. (2003). Identification of a testicular odorant receptor mediating human sperm chemotaxis. Science, 299, 2054–2058.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stensmyr, M. C., Giordano, E., Balloi, A., Angioy, A. M., & Hansson, B. S. (2003). Novel natural ligands for Drosophila olfactory receptor neurones. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 206, 715–724.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, R. M., & Wilson, D. A. (2003). Molecular biology of early olfactory memory. Learning & Memory, 10, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaney, W. T., & Keverne, E. B. (2009). The evolution of pheromonal communication. Behavioural Brain Research, 200, 239–247.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szidonya, L., Cserzo, M., & Hunyady, L. (2008). Dimerization and oligomerization of G-protein-coupled receptors: debated structures with established and emerging functions. The Journal of Endocrinology, 196, 435–453.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Touhara, K., Sengoku, S., Inaki, K., Tsuboi, A., Hirono, J., Sato, T., Sakano, H., & Haga, T. (1999) Functional identification and reconstitution of an odorant receptor in single olfactory neurons. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 96, 4040–4045.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubbs, C., & Thomas, P. (2009). Progestin signaling through an olfactory G protein and membrane progestin receptor-α in Atlantic croaker sperm: Potential role in induction of sperm hypermotility. Endocrinology, 150, 473–484.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turchin, A., & Kohane, I. S. (2002). Gene homology resources on the world wide web. Physiological Genomics, 11, 165–177.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Toller, S., & Kendal-Reed, M. (1995). A possible protocognitive role for odor in human infant development. Brain and Cognition, 29, 275–293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vassar, R., Ngai, J., & Axel, R. (1993). Spatial segregation of odorant receptor expression in the mammalian olfactory epithelium. Cell, 74, 309–318.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. A., & Leon, M. (1988). Spatial patterns of olfactory bulb single-unit responses to learned olfactory cues in young rats. Journal of Neurophysiology, 59, 1770–1782.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yanai, I., Graur, D., & Ophir, R. (2004). Incongruent expression profiles between human and mouse orthologous genes suggest widespread neutral evolution of transcription control. Omics: A Journal of Integrative Biology, 8, 15–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, T.-F. (2010). Smell with new neurons. Cell and Tissue Research, 340, 211–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A., Dohr, G., & Uchanska-Ziegler, B. (2002). Possible Roles for Products of Polymorphic MHC and Linked Olfactory Receptor Genes during Selection Processes in Reproduction. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 48, 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuroscience, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    Franco Giorgi

  2. Department of Experimental Medicine, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy

    Roberto Maggio

  3. Department of Architecture, Design and Media Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

    Luis Emilio Bruni

Authors
  1. Franco Giorgi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roberto Maggio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luis Emilio Bruni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franco Giorgi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giorgi, F., Maggio, R. & Bruni, L.E. Are Olfactory Receptors Really Olfactive?. Biosemiotics 4, 331–347 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-011-9113-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-011-9113-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation