Skip to main content
Log in

Solvency II, asset liability management, and the European bond market – theory and empirical evidence

  • Abhandlung
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft

Abstract

It is already foreseeable that Solvency II will tie capital requirements to a very comprehensive risk definition including underwriting and market risks. The new regulatory framework will demand more sophisticated tools to detect interest rate risks on both sides of the balance sheet in an integrated approach. Efforts by life insurers to level these risks could lead to an increased demand for long term fixed income securities. At this point the question arises if this industry wide change in asset demand will have or already has had an impact on prices of long-term bonds and the yield curve in the Euro-Zone?

Zusammenfassung

Unter Solvency II werden die Kapitalanforderungen direkt durch den Umfang der eingegangenen Risiken, insbesondere Marktrisiken, bestimmt. Deswegen wird der neue regulatorische Rahmen höhere Anforderungen an das Risikomanagement stellen. Die Nivellierung der Marktrisiken wird im Bereich der Lebensversicherung zu einer steigenden Nachfrage nach langlaufenden Bonds führen. Damit verbindet sich die Frage, ob diese Verschiebung der Nachfrage einen Einfluss auf die Preise langfristiger Rententitel und die Zinsstrukturkurve in der Eurozone haben wird bzw. bereits hatte?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Notes

  1. Brenner and Galai summarize some early tests of the Fisher Hypothesis. See Brenner and Galai (1978), pp. 29–32. More recent tests have, for example, been performed by Berument and Jelassi (2002), pp. 1647–1654 and Granville and Mallick (2004), pp. 88–89.

  2. See, for example, Fung and Chappel (1994), pp. 38–39; Cortes (2006), p. 50. However, it should be stressed that the preferred habitat theory is not new at all. See, for example, Lang and Rasche (1977), p. 16.

  3. This analysis leaves out QIS 3 and 4 as the space of time after execution of QIS 3 was insufficient to derive significant results and QIS 4 has not taken place by the time this research was carried out.

References

  • Andrews, D.W.K.: Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica 61, 821–856 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basse, T.: An Austrian version of the Lucas critique. Q. J. Austrian Econ. 9, 15–26 (2006a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basse, T.: Floating exchange rates and inflation in Germany: Are external shocks really irrelevant? Econ. Lett. 93, 393–397 (2006b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basse, T., Friedrich, M., Krampen, B., Krummaker, S.: Strategisches Asset-Liability Management in der Versicherungswirtschaft – Ein Ansatz zur integrierten Bilanzstrukturoptimierung. ZVersWiss. 96, 617–648 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berument, H., Jelassi, M.M.: The Fisher hypothesis: a multi-country analysis. Appl. Econ. 34, 1645–1655 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonser-Neal, C., Morley, T.R.: Does the yield spread predict real economic activity? A multicountry analysis. In: Rabin, J., Stevens, G.L. (eds.) Handbook of Monetary Policy, pp. 189–202. Marcel Dekker, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, M.D.: The gold standard, Bretton Wood and other monetary regimes: A historical appraisal. Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev 75, 123–191 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, M., Galai, D.: The empirical relationship between inflation and financial assets' returns in an inflation-intensive capital market. In: Sarnat, M. (ed.) Inflation and capital markets, pp. 3–32. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, J.B.: Learning, rational expectations and policy: A summary of recent research. Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev 73, 50–60 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.Y., Shiller, R.J.: Yield spreads and interest rate movements: A bird's eye view. Rev. Econ. Stud. 58, 495–514 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEIOPS: EU Solvency II project – the first quantitative impact study, Solvency II – Guidelines for QIS 1, CEIOPS-FS-12/05. Comitee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supvisors (2005)

  • CEIOPS: Quantitative impact study 2 cover note, CEIOPS-FS-06/06. Comitee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supvisors (2006)

  • Chow, G.C.: Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28, 591–605 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clostermann, J., Seitz, F.: Überbewertung der Rentenmärkte: Fakt oder Vision? Kreditwesen 60, 127–131 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortes, F.: Understanding the term structure of swap spreads. Bank England Q. Bull. 46, 45–56 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Grauwe, P., Polan, M.: Is inflation always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon? Scand. J. Econ. 107, 239–259 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimson, E., Marsh, P., Staunton, M.: Global evidence on the equity risk premium. J. Appl. Corp. Financ. 15, 8–19 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dusenberry, J.S.: Worldwide inflation, a fiscalist view. In: Meiselmann, D.I., Laffer, A.B. (eds.) The phenomenon of worldwide inflation, pp. 114–123. American Enterprise Institute, Washington (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission: Solvency II – Reflections on the general outline of a framework directive and mandates for further technical work, MARKT/2539/03-EN (2003)

  • Filc, W.: Theorie und Empirie des Kapitalmarktzinses, 2. Aufl. Deutscher Sparkassen Verlag, Stuttgart (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, C.: Duration Gap: Aktives Risiko der Versicherung. VersWirt. 1, 82 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A., Chappel, B.: The yield curve as an indicator of monetary conditions. Reserve Bank New Zealand Bull. 57, 35–45 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • GDV: Solvency II bringt einen Paradigmenwechsel in der Versicherungswirtschaft, S. 1–2. http://www.gdv.de/Downloads/Pressemeldungen_2007/PD53_2007.RTF. Letzter Zugriff 4.11.2008 (2007a)

  • GDV: Impact assessment – Results of the industry survey on the impact of Solvency II. http://www.gdv.de/Downloads/Pressemeldungen_2007/PD36_Branchenumfrage.pdf. Letzter Zugriff 4.11.2008 (2007b)

  • GDV: Statistisches Taschenbuch der Versicherungswirtschaft. Verlag Versicherungswirtschaft, Karlsruhe (2007c)

    Google Scholar 

  • Golob, J.E.: Does inflation uncertainty increase with inflation? Fed. Reserve Bank Kansas City Econ. Rev. 79, 27–38 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Granville, B., Mallick, S.: Fisher hypothesis: UK evidence over a century. Appl. Econ. Lett. 11, 87–90 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B.E.: Approximate asymptotic p values for structural-change tests. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 15, 60–67 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova, D., Lahiri, K., Seitz, F.: Interest rate spreads as predictors of German inflation and business cycles. Int. J. Forecasting 16, 39–58 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S.: Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica 59, 1551–1580 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, R.G., Kurmann, A.: Expectations and the term structure of interest rates: Evidence and implications. Fed. Reserve Bank Richmond Econ.  Q. 88, 49–95 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinge, U.: Mit unternehmensspezifischen Daten zum Best Estimate. VersWirt. 62, 1145–1147 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, R.W., Rasche, R.W.: Debt-management policy and the own price elasticity of demand for U.S. government notes and bonds. Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev. 59, 8–22 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitermann, U.: Bedeutung von Solvency II für das Kapitalanlagemanagement. In: Gründl, H., Perlet, H. (Hrsg.) Solvency II und Risikomanagement, S. 299–316. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.: Portfolio Selection. J Financ 7(1) (1952)

  • McClure, J.H., Willett, T.D.: The inflation tax. In: Willett, T.D. (ed.) Political business cycles, pp. 177–185. Duke University Press, Durham and London (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiselman, D.I.: Worldwide inflation: A monetarist view. In: Meiselmann, D.I., Laffer, A.B. (eds.) The phenomenon of worldwide inflation, pp. 69–112. American Enterprise Institute, Washington (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, W.: Understanding the term structure of interest rates. Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev. 87, 589–595 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Resler, D.H.: The formation of inflation expectations. Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev. 62, 2–12 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudebusch, G.D., Swanson, E.T., Wu, T.: The bond yield “conundrum” from a macro-finance perspective. Bank Japan Monetary Econ. Stud. 42, 83–109 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S.: Understanding the term structure of interest rates: The expectations theory. Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev. 74, 36–50 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schotman, P.C.: Small sample properties of the regression test of the expectations model of the term structure. Econ. Lett. 57, 129–134 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, T., Grießmann, G.: Solvency II – Die EU treibt die zweite Phase des Projekts voran. VersWirt. 59, 470–472 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, A.J.: Aftermath of the monetarist clash with the Federal Reserve before and during the Volcker era. Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev. 87, 349–352 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J.J.: The shrinking equity premium. J. Portfolio Manage. 26, 10–17 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R.J.: The term structure of interest rates In: Friedman, B.M., Hahn, F.H. (eds.) Handbook of monetary economics, vol. 1, pp. 627–722. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirvani, H., Wilbratte, B.: Money and inflation: International evidence based on cointegration theory. Int. Econ. J. 8, 11–21 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithin, J.: The theory of interest rates. In: Arestis, P., Sawyer, M. (eds.) A handbook of alternative monetary economics, pp. 273–290. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, A.C.: Zunehmende Nachfrage nach Langläufern. VersWirt. 61, 193–196 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.B.: The International implications of october 1979: Toward a long boom on a global scale. Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev. 87, 269–276 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, D.L.: Testing the expectations hypothesis: Some new evidence for Japan. Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev. 86, 21–39 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A.A.: Asymmetric interest rate policy in Europe: Causes and consequences. In: Deutsche Bundesbank (ed.) The monetary transmission process, pp. 131–158. Palgrave, London (2000)

  • Willett, T.D.: A new monetary constitution. In: Dorn, J.A., Schwartz, A.J. (eds.) The search for stable money, pp. 145–160. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London (1988)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meik Friedrich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basse, T., Friedrich, M. Solvency II, asset liability management, and the European bond market – theory and empirical evidence. ZVersWiss 97 (Suppl 1), 155–171 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-008-0041-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-008-0041-7

Keywords

Navigation