Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of Errors in Clinical Laboratories

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laboratories have a major impact on patient safety as 80–90 % of all the diagnosis are made on the basis of laboratory tests. Laboratory errors have a reported frequency of 0.012–0.6 % of all test results. Patient safety is a managerial issue which can be enhanced by implementing active system to identify and monitor quality failures. This can be facilitated by reactive method which includes incident reporting followed by root cause analysis. This leads to identification and correction of weaknesses in policies and procedures in the system. Another way is proactive method like Failure Mode and Effect Analysis. In this focus is on entire examination process, anticipating major adverse events and pre-emptively prevent them from occurring. It is used for prospective risk analysis of high-risk processes to reduce the chance of errors in the laboratory and other patient care areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O’Kaine M. The reporting, classification and grading of quality failures in the medical laboratory. Clin Chem Acta. 2009;404:28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Choozza ML, Ponzetti C. FMEA: a model for reducing medical errors. Clin Chem Acta. 2009;404:75–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;7(324):377–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reason JT, Carthey J, de Leval MR. Diagnosing ‘vulnerable system syndromes’: an essential prerequisite to effective risk management. Qual Health Care. 2001;10 Suppl 2:ii21–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reason J. Safety in the operating theatre—part 2: human error and organisational failure. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:56–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reason J. Combating omission errors through task analysis and good reminders. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:40–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carthey J, de Leval MR, Reason JT. Institutional resilience in health care systems. Qual Health Care. 2001;10:29–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Howanitz PJ. Errors in laboratory medicine. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:1252–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Plebani M, Carraro P. Mistakes in a stat laboratory: types and frequency. Clin Chem. 1997;43:1348–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Witte DL, VanNess SA, Angstadt DS, Pannell BJ. Errors, mistakes, blunders, outliers or unacceptable results: how many? Clin Chem. 1997;43:1352–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldschmidt HMJ, Lent RW. Gross errors and work flow analysis in the clinical laboratory. Klin Biochem Metab. 1995;3:131–40.

    Google Scholar 

  12. O’Kane MJ, Lynch PLM, McGowan N. The development of a system for the reporting, classification and grading of quality failures in the clinical biochemistry laboratory. Ann Clin Biochem. 2008;45:129–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/PDTS 22367. Medical laboratories: reducing error through risk management and continual improvement: complementary element. Geneva: ISO; 2005.

  14. Woodhouse S, Burney B, Costie K. To err is human: improving patient safety through failure mode and effect analysis. Clin Leadersh Manag Rev. 2004;18:32–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Capunzo M, Cavallo P, Boccia G, Brunetti L, Pizzuti S. A FMEA clinical laboratory case study: how to make problems and improvements measurable. Clin Leadrersh Manag Rev. 2004;18:37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  16. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/PDTS 22367:2008. Medical laboratories—reduction of error through risk management and continual improvement. Geneva: ISO; 2008.

  17. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations. Performance improvement. 2002 Comprehensive accreditation manual for hospitals. Oakbrook Terrace: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations; 2001. p. 200–1.

  18. Cohen MR, Sanders J, Davis NM. Failure mode and effects analysis: a novel approach to avoiding dangerous medication errors and accidents. Hosp Pharm. 1994;29:319–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Joint Commission Resources. Failure mode and effects analysis in health care: proactive risk reduction. Oakbrook Terrace: Joint Commission Resources; 2002.

  20. Oldenhof MT, van Leeuwen JF, Nauta MJ, de Kaste D, et al. Consistency of FMEA used in the validation of analytical procedures. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2001;4(3):592–5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bonini P, Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Rubboli F. Errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem. 2002;48:691–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Southard PB, Kumar S, Southard CA. A modified Delphi methodology to conduct a failure modes effects analysis: a patient-centric effort in a clinical medical laboratories. Qual Manag Health Care. 2011;20(2):131–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachna Agarwal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agarwal, R. Measurement of Errors in Clinical Laboratories. Ind J Clin Biochem 28, 227–234 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-013-0314-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-013-0314-3

Keywords

Navigation