Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simulation and experiment research on integrated casting and forging process of automobile control arm

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Material Forming Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Integrated casting and forging process (ICFP) has broad application prospects, especially for products with complex shapes and high performance. Numerical simulation of the ICFP of A356 alloy automobile control arm was carried out on Thercast and Forge software. The numerical results showed that part without porosities was obtained at pouring temperature of 680 °C, mold temperature of 150 °C, forging start-up time of 1s, and forging stroke of 2 mm. The scaled automobile control arms were fabricated by ICFP platform. The experimental results confirmed the accuracy of the numerical simulation. Better mechanical properties involving tensile strength of 238.96 Mpa and elongation of 8.13% were obtained by ICFP than die-casting due to the fine microstructure without porosities. This research has resulted in a solution of the design and optimize of process parameters through simulation, which played an important role in promoting the applications of ICFP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors guarantee no restriction of availability of data, material, and code.

References

  1. Deng L, Wang XY, Jin JS, Xia JC (2018) Precision forging technology for aluminum alloy. Front Mech Eng 13(1):25–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-018-0477-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dedov S, Lehmann G, Kawalla R (2013) Application of combined casting-forging process for production of durable lightweight aluminum parts. Key Eng Mater 554–557: 264–273. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.264

  3. Lee K, Kwon YN, Lee S (2008) Effects of eutectic silicon particles on tensile properties and fracture toughness of A356 aluminum alloys fabricated by low-pressure-casting, casting-forging, and squeeze-casting processes. J Alloy Compd 461(1–2):532–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.07.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang JF, Wang Y, Li YF, Shan WW, Luo SJ (2012) Microstructure and mechanical properties of the motorcycle cylinder body of AM60B magnesium alloy formed by combining die casting and forging. Mater Des 37:202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jiang JF, Wang Y, Li YF, Qu JJ, Shan WW, Luo SJ (2012) A double control forming technology combining die casting and forging for the production of Mg alloy components with enhanced properties. J Mater Process Technol 212(5):1191–1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou HT, Xu SX, Li WD, Wang SC, Peng Y (2015) A study of automobile brake bracket formed by casting-forging integrated forming technology. Mater Des 67:285–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang JF, Wang Y, Chen G, Liu J, Li YF, Luo SJ (2012) Comparison of mechanical properties and microstructure of AZ91D alloy motorcycle wheels formed by die casting and double control forming. Mater Des 40:541–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang JF, Chen G, Wang Y, Du ZM, Shan WW, Li YF (2013) Microstructure and mechanical properties of thin-wall and high-rib parts of AM60B Mg alloy formed by double control forming and die casting under the optimal conditions. J Alloy Compd 552:44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Q, Cao M, Zhang S, Zhang DW, Zhao SD, Liu Q (2014) Integrated casting and forging process for aluminum alloy automobile wheel. Adv Mech Eng 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/870182

  10. Luo AA, Sachdev AK, Apelian D (2022) Alloy development and process innovations for light metals casting. J Mater Process Technol 306:117606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Afazov SM, Becker AA, Hyde TH (2012) Development of a finite element data exchange system for chain simulation of manufacturing processes. Adv Eng Softw 47(1):104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saby M, Bouchard PQ, Bernacki M (2015) Void closure criteria for hot metal forming: a review. J Manuf Process 19:239–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2014.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Q, Niu LQ, Liang ZL, Cao M, Zhou T (2020) A porosity closure model considering stress triaxiality ratio and Lode stress parameter. J Mater Process Technol 286:116824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Niu LQ, Cao M, Liang ZL, Han B, Zhang Q (2020) A modified Johnson-Cook model considering strain softening of A356 alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 789:139612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.139612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pequet C, Rappaz M, Gremaud M (2002) Modeling of microporosity, macroporosity, and pipe-shrinkage formation during the solidification of alloys using a mushy-zone refinement method: applications to aluminum alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 33(7):2095–2106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-002-0041-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Niyama E, Morikawa M, Saito S, Uchida T (1980) Predicting shrinkage in large steel castings. J Jan Foundry Soc 52(11):635. https://doi.org/10.11279/imono.52.11_635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li LF, Zhang RJ, Hu SJ, Zhang D, Yang SD, Wang CS, Jiang HT (2019) Prediction of mushy zone permeability of Al-4.5wt%Cu alloy during solidification by phase field model and CFD simulation. China Foundry 16(5):313–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41230-019-9039-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gao ZM, Jie WQ, Liu YQ, Zheng YJ, Luo HJ (2019) A model for coupling prediction of inverse segregation and porosity for up-vertical unidirectional solidification of Al–Cu alloys. J Alloy Compd 797:514–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liang ZL (2020) Research on material flow behavior and microstructure evolution of A356 aluminum alloy during integrated forming process of casting and forging (Ph.D. Thesis). Xi’an Jiaotong University

  20. Niu LQ, Zhang Q (2022) A void closure model based on hydrostatic integration and the Lode parameter for additive manufacturing AlSi10Mg. J Manuf Process 73:235–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.10.056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bazhenov VE, Petrova AV, Rizhsky AA, Tselovalnik YV, Sannikov AV, Belov VD (2021) Simulation and experimental validation of A356 and AZ91 alloy fluidity in a graphite mold. Int J Metal Cast 15(1):319–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-020-00468-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu J, Wang SC, Zheng KH, Zhou N, Song DF, Li JL (2016) Microstructure and mechanical properties of 2014 aluminum alloy prepared by casting-forging integrated technology at different forging-starting time (in Chinese). Special Cast Nonferrous Alloys 36(12):1253–1257. https://doi.org/10.15980/j.tzzz.2016.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang SC, Cai C, Qi WJ, Zheng KH (2014) Effects of forging deformation amount on microstructure and mechanical properties of A356 aluminum alloy manufactured by casting-forging integrated technology (in Chinese). J Plast Eng 21(1):58–64. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-2012.2014.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This paper was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51875441), and by the Gansu Province Science and Technology Funds for Youths (Grant No. 21JR7RA263).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Liqun Niu: Software, Data curation, Writing-original draft. Zhenglong Liang: Funding acquisition, Writing-Review & Editing. Tiantai Tian: Visualization, Validation. Hongtu Xu: Visualization, Methodology. Wenbin Zan: Methodology, Validation. Yao Wang: Investigation, Formal analysis. Bin Han: Supervision, Resources. Qi Zhang: Project administration, Conceptualization.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Liqun Niu or Qi Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

The publisher has the permission of the authors to publish the given article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niu, L., Liang, Z., Tian, T. et al. Simulation and experiment research on integrated casting and forging process of automobile control arm. Int J Mater Form 16, 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-022-01726-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-022-01726-z

Keywords

Navigation