Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of force reduction within-field variability on peak tibial accelerations using wearable inertial measurement units

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within-field variability of surface characteristics has been found to impact athlete injuries, performance, and perceptions about a surface. Ankle-worn inertial measurement units allow for in-situ research exploring how within-field variability influences athlete biomechanics. This study investigated the effect of force reduction within-field variability on peak tibial accelerations of male collegiate rugby athletes. High and low force reduction areas were delineated within one natural turfgrass and synthetic turf field. Athletes were fitted with wearable inertial measurement units and executed three activities (drop landing, drop jump, and modified acceleration–deceleration) within each area. Peak tibial accelerations (m/s2) were compared between areas within field types for each activity using t tests (α = 0.05). Peak tibial accelerations were significantly higher (p < 0.05; d = 0.36 and d = 0.61 for natural turfgrass and synthetic turf, respectively) in low force reduction areas on both field types (natural turfgrass = 201.0 ± 7.1 m/s2 and synthetic turf = 248.0 ± 8.7 m/s2, mean ± SE) during the drop landing activity compared to the high force reduction areas (natural turfgrass = 182.3 ± 5.9 m/s2 and synthetic turf = 220.5 ± 6.4 m/s2). Peak tibial accelerations were significantly higher in low force reduction areas during the initial landing of the drop jump on natural turfgrass (178.9 ± 6.1 and 202.9 ± 6.1 m/s2 for high and low force reduction area, respectively; p < 0.01; d = 0.61), but not synthetic turf (p = 0.95; d = 0.01). No differences were detected between areas or field types with the second landing of the drop jump or modified acceleration–deceleration activities. These findings suggest that within-field variability affects biomechanics of athletes when performing certain athletic maneuvers, which has important implications on sports field management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available upon request.

References

  1. Stiles VH, James IT, Dixon SJ, Guisasola IN (2009) Natural turf surfaces: the case for continued research. Sports Med 39:65–84. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200939010-00005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jastifer JR, McNitt AS, Mack CD et al (2019) Synthetic turf: history, design, maintenance, and athlete safety. Sports Health 11:84–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738118793378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hales ME, Johnson JD 2nd (2019) The influence of sport-field properties on muscle-recruitment patterns and metabolic response. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 14:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2018-0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Potthast W (2010) Motion differences in goal kicking on natural and artificial soccer turf systems. Footwear Sci 2:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280903535447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Meyers MC (2010) Incidence, mechanisms, and severity of game-related college football injuries on FieldTurf versus natural grass: a 3-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med 38:687–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509352464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ammar A, Bailey SJ, Hammouda O et al (2019) Effects of playing surface on physical, physiological, and perceptual responses to a repeated-sprint ability test: natural grass versus artificial turf. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 14:1219–1226. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2018-0766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dickson KH, Straw CM, Thoms AW, et al (2021) Impact of third generation synthetic turf athletic field age on surface hardness and infill depth spatial variability. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sport Eng Technol https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371211002947

  8. Straw CM, Carrow RN, Bowling WJ et al (2018) Uniformity and spatial variability of soil moisture and irrigation distribution on natural turfgrass sports fields. J Soil Water Conserv 73:577–586. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.73.5.577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Straw CM, Grubbs RA, Henry GM (2020) Short-term spatiotemporal relationship between plant and soil properties on natural turfgrass sports fields. Agrosyst Geosci Environ 3:e20043. https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Forrester SE, Tsui F (2014) Spatial and temporal analysis of surface hardness across a third-generation artificial turf pitch over a year. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sport Eng Technol 228:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754337114523756

  11. Straw CM, Samson CO, Henry GM, Brown CN (2018) Does variability within natural turfgrass sports fields influence ground-derived injuries? Eur J Sport Sci 18:893–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2018.1457083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Straw CM, Principe FM, Kurtz EL, et al (2020) Within-field variability of turfgrass surface properties and athlete performance: modeling their relationship using GPS and GIS technologies. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sport Eng Technol 234:170–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754337119901090

  13. Straw CM, Henry GM, Shannon J, Thompson JJ (2019) Athletes perceptions of within-field variability on natural turfgrass sports fields. Precis Agric 20:118–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-018-9585-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mears AC, Osei-Owusu P, Harland AR et al (2018) Perceived links between playing surfaces and injury: a worldwide study of elite association football players. Sports Med Open 4:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0155-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferris DP, Liang K, Farley CT (1999) Runners adjust leg stiffness for their first step on a new running surface. J Biomech 32:787–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00078-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schrier NM, Wannop JW, Lewinson RT et al (2014) Shoe traction and surface compliance affect performance of soccer-related movements. Footwear Sci 6:69–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2014.886302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Qu H, Zhang S, Sorochan JC et al (2022) Effects of synthetic turf and shock pad on impact attenuation related biomechanics during drop landing. Sports Biomech 21:748–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2019.1690570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Camomilla V, Bergamini E, Fantozzi S, Vannozzi G (2018) Trends supporting the in-field use of wearable inertial sensors for sport performance evaluation: a systematic review. Sensors 18:873. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fleming P, Watts C, Gunn J, Forrester S (2020) Hardness safety testing of artificial turf. MDPI Proc 49:130. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020049130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. IRB (2020) IRB Artificial Rugby Turf Performance Specification: Technical Document

  21. Krivoruchko K, Gribov A (2019) Evaluation of empirical Bayesian kriging. Spat Stat 32:100368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2019.100368

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Getis A, Ord JK (2010) The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr Anal 24:189–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Armitage M, Beato M, McErlain-Naylor SA (2021) Inter-unit reliability of IMU Step metrics using IMeasureU Blue Trident inertial measurement units for running-based team sport tasks. J Sports Sci 39:1512–1518. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2021.1882726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Burland JP, Outerleys JB, Lattermann C, Davis IS (2021) Reliability of wearable sensors to assess impact metrics during sport-specific tasks. J Sports Sci 39:406–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1823131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lesinski M, Prieske O, Beurskens R et al (2018) Effects of drop-height and surface instability on jump performance and knee kinematics. Int J Sports Med 39:50–57. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-117610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Harper DJ, Morin J-B, Carling C, Kiely J (2020) Measuring maximal horizontal deceleration ability using radar technology: reliability and sensitivity of kinematic and kinetic variables. Sports Biomech. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2020.1792968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Prieske O, Muehlbauer T, Krueger T et al (2015) Sex-specific effects of surface instability on drop jump and landing biomechanics. Int J Sports Med 36:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1384549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE et al (2020) SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods 17:261–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vallejos R, Osorio F, Bevilacqua M (2020) Spatial relationships between two georeferenced variables: with applications in R. Nature Springer, New York, NY, USA

  30. Schloerke B, Cook D, Larmarange J, et al (2021) GGally: Extension to “ggplot2”

  31. R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

  32. Hope RM (2013) Rmisc: Ryan Miscellaneous

  33. Morey RD (2008) Confidence intervals from normalized data: a correction to Cousineau (2005) Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 4:61–64. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061

  34. Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Nature Springer, New York, NY

  35. Nunome H, Inoue K, Ball K et al (2020) High load stress-strain property of natural turf for professional use, various types of natural, hybrid and artificial turfs in football. MDPI Proc 49:142. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020049142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Caple M, James I, Bartlett M (2012) Mechanical behaviour of natural turf sports pitches across a season. Sports Eng 15:129–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-012-0096-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Binnie MJ, Dawson B, Pinnington H et al (2014) Sand training: a review of current research and practical applications. J Sports Sci 32:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2013.805239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Saunders N, Twomey D, Otago L (2011) Clegg hammer measures and human external landing forces: is there a relationship? Int J Sports Sci Eng 5:231–236

    Google Scholar 

  39. Matijevich ES, Branscombe LM, Scott LR, Zelik KE (2019) Ground reaction force metrics are not strongly correlated with tibial bone load when running across speeds and slopes: Implications for science, sport and wearable tech. PLoS One 14:e0210000. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hollville E, Nordez A, Guilhem G et al (2020) Surface properties affect the interplay between fascicles and tendinous tissues during landing. Eur J Appl Physiol 120:203–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-019-04265-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Arampatzis A, Stafilidis S, Morey-Klapsing G, Brüggemann G-P (2004) Interaction of the human body and surfaces of different stiffness during drop jumps. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:451–459. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000117166.87736.0a

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Brian Carey, CSFM, SSC Services for Education at Texas A&M University, and the Texas A&M University Club Rugby team for their assistance and participation in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA

    Conlan M. Burbrink

  2. Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA

    Chase M. Straw & Weston F. Floyd

  3. Aspetar Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, PO Box 29222, Doha, Qatar

    Athol Thomson

  4. Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA

    Steven E. Riechman

Authors
  1. Conlan M. Burbrink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chase M. Straw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Weston F. Floyd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Athol Thomson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Steven E. Riechman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Conlan M. Burbrink.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 66 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burbrink, C.M., Straw, C.M., Floyd, W.F. et al. Influence of force reduction within-field variability on peak tibial accelerations using wearable inertial measurement units. Sports Eng 26, 44 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-023-00435-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-023-00435-3

Search

Navigation