Skip to main content
Log in

Kinematic analyses of seated throwing activities with and without an assistive pole

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Paralympic seated throwing events, the athlete can throw with and without an assistive pole. This study aimed to identify and compare performance-related kinematic variables associated with both seated throwing techniques. Twenty-nine non-disabled males (21.9 ± 2.6 years) performed 12 maximal throws using a 1-kg ball in two conditions (no-pole and pole). Automatic 3D-kinematic tracking (150 Hz) and temporal data were acquired. There was no significant difference between ball speeds at the point of release between conditions (no-pole = 12.8 ± 1.6 m/s vs. pole = 12.9 ± 1.5 m/s). There were four kinematic variables that were strongly correlated with ball speed when throwing with or without an assistive pole. These variables were elbow flexion at the start phase (pole r = .39 and no-pole r = .41), maximum shoulder external rotation angular velocity during the arm cocking phase (pole r = .42), maximum shoulder internal rotation angular velocity during the arm acceleration phase (pole r = .47), and should internal rotation angular velocity at the instant of ball release (pole r = .40). The pole clearly influenced the throwing technique with all four strongly correlated variables identified in this condition, compared to only one during the no-pole condition. When using the pole, participants produced significantly higher shoulder internal rotation angular velocities during the arm acceleration phase (pole = 367 ± 183°/s vs. no-pole = 275 ± 178°/s, p < .05) and at the instant of ball release (pole = 355 ± 115°/s vs. no-pole = 264 ± 120°/s, p < .05), compared to throwing without the pole. These findings have implications for the development of evidence-based classification systems in Paralympic seated throwing, and facilitate research that investigates the impact of impairment on seated throwing performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. DePauw K, Gavron S (1995) Disability in sport. Human Kinetics, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  2. IPC Athletics (2010) IPC athletics rules and regulations. International Paralympic Committee, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  3. IPC Athletics (2014) IPC athletics classification rules and regulations. International Paralympic Committee, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tweedy SM, Connick MJ, Burkett BJ, Sayers M, Meyer C, Vanlandewijck Y (2012) What throwing frame configuration should be used to investigate the impact of different impairment types on Paralympic seated throwing? Sports Technol 5(1–2):56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tweedy SM, Vanlandewijck YC (2009) International paralympic committee position stand-background and scientific rationale for classification in paralympic sport. Br J Sports Med 10:1136–1186

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tweedy SM, Beckman EM, Connick MJ (2014) Paralympic classification: conceptual basis, current methods, and research update. PM R 6(8 Suppl):S11–S17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. International Paralympic Committee (2007) IPC classification code and international standards. International Paralympic Committee, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beckman EM, Newcombe P, Vanlandewijck Y, Connick MJ, Tweedy SM (2014) Novel strength test battery to permit evidence-based paralympic classification. Medicine (Baltimore) 93(4):e31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Beckman EM, Tweedy SM (2009) Towards evidence-based classification in Paralympic athletics: evaluating the validity of activity limitation tests for use in classification of Paralympic running events. Br J Sports Med 43(13):1067–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tweedy SM, Mann D, Vanlandewijck YC (2016) Research needs for the development of evidence-based classification for physical, vision, and intellectual impairments. In: Valandewijck YC, Thompson WR (eds) Training and coaching the paralympic athlete, 1st edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 122–149

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Stodden DF, Fleisig GS, McLean SP, Andrews JR (2005) Relationship of biomechanical factors to baseball pitching velocity: within pitcher variation. J Appl Biomech 21(1):44–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Best RJ, Bartlett RM, Morriss CJ (1993) A three-dimensional analysis of javelin throwing technique. J Sports Sci 11(4):315–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Morriss C, Bartlett R (1996) Biomechanical factors critical for performance in the men’s javelin throw. Sports Med 21(6):438–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu H, Leigh S, Yu B (2010) Sequences of upper and lower extremity motions in javelin throwing. J Sports Sci 28(13):1459–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Werner SL, Suri M, Guido JA Jr, Meister K, Jones DG (2008) Relationships between ball velocity and throwing mechanics in collegiate baseball pitchers. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(6):905–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stodden DF, Fleisig GS, McLean SP, Lyman SL, Andrews JR (2001) Relationship of pelvis and upper torso kinematics to pitched baseball velocity. J Appl Biomech 17(2):164–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsuo T, Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW, Andrews JR (2001) Comparison of kinematic and temporal parameters between different pitch velocity groups. J Appl Biomech 17(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Escamilla R, Fleisig G, Barrentine S, Andrews J, Moorman C 3rd (2002) Kinematic and kinetic comparisons between American and Korean professional baseball pitchers. Sports Biomech 1(2):213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW, Zheng N, Escamilla RF, Andrews JR (1999) Kinematic and kinetic comparison of baseball pitching among various levels of development. J Biomech 32(12):1371–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Frossard L (2012) Performance dispersion for evidence-based classification of stationary throwers. Prosthet Orthot Int 36(3):348–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Frossard L, O’Riordan A, Goodman S (2010) Throwing frame and performance of elite male shot-putters. Sports Technol 3(2):88–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Frossard L, Smeathers J, O’Riordan A, Goodman S (2007) Shot trajectory parameters in gold medal stationary shot-putters during world-class competition. Adapt Phys Activ Q 24(4):317–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Frossard LA, O’Riordan A, Smeathers J (2013) Performance of elite seated discus throwers in F30 s classes: part I: does whole body positioning matter? Prosthet Orthot Int 37(3):183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Frossard LA, O’Riordan A, Smeathers J (2013) Performance of elite seated discus throwers in F30 s classes: part II: does feet positioning matter? Prosthet Orthot Int 37(3):192–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chow JW, Chae WS, Crawford MJ (2000) Kinematic analysis of shot-putting performed by wheelchair athletes of different medical classes. J Sports Sci 18(5):321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chow JW, Mindock LA (1999) Discus throwing performances and medical classification of wheelchair athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31(9):1272–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Abdel-Aziz YI, Karara HM (1971) Direct linear transformation into object space coordinates in close-range photogrammetry. In: Proceedings of the symposium on close-range photogrammetry. Urbana: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, pp 1–18

  28. Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, Zheng N, Barrentine SW, Andrews JR (2001) Kinematic comparisons of 1996 Olympic baseball pitchers. J Sports Sci 19(9):665–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW, Zheng NQ, Andrews JR (1998) Kinematic comparisons of throwing different types of baseball pitches. J Appl Biomech 14(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW, Escamilla RF, Andrews JR (1996) Biomechanics of overhand throwing with implications for injuries. Sports Med 21(6):421–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Australian Research Council (LP0882187). Mark Connick and Sean Tweedy are members of the IPC Classification Research and Development Centre (Physical Impairments), which is supported by the International Paralympic Committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luke Hogarth.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burkett, B., Connick, M., Sayers, M. et al. Kinematic analyses of seated throwing activities with and without an assistive pole. Sports Eng 20, 163–170 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-016-0221-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-016-0221-y

Keywords

Navigation