Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of string bed pattern on ball spin generation from a tennis racket

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Topspin has become a vital component of modern day tennis. Ball-to-string bed and inter-string friction coefficients can affect topspin generation from a racket. The aim of this research was to determine the effect of string bed pattern on topspin generation. Tennis balls were projected onto nine head-clamped rackets with different string bed patterns. The balls were fired at 24 m/s, at an angle of 26° to the string bed normal with a backspin rate of 218 rad/s and outbound velocity, spin and angle were measured. Outbound velocity was shown to be independent of string bed pattern. Outbound angle increased with the number of cross strings, while outbound topspin decreased. In the most extreme case, decreasing the number of cross strings from 19 to 13 increased rebound topspin from 117 to 170 rad/s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choppin SB, Goodwill SR, Haake SJ (2011) Impact characteristics of the ball and racket during play at the Wimbledon qualifying tournament. Sports Eng 13:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goodwill S, Capel-Davies J, Haake S, Miller S (2007) Ball spin generation of elite players during match play. Tennis Sci Technol 3(1):349–356 International Tennis Federation, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kelley J, Goodwill S, Capel-Davies J, Haake S (2008) Ball spin generation at the 2007 Wimbledon qualifying tournament. Eng Sport 7(1):571–578 Springer, France

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goodwill SR, Chin SB, Haake SJ (2004) Wind tunnel testing of spinning and non-spinning tennis balls. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 92:935–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mehta R, Pallis J (2001) The aerodynamics of a tennis ball. Sports Eng 4:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Allen T, Haake SJ, Goodwill SR (2011) Effect of tennis racket parameters on a simulated groundstroke. J Sports Sci 29:311–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goodwill SR, Haake SJ (2002) Why were ‘spaghetti string’ rackets banned in the game of tennis? In: Ujihashi S, Haake S (eds) 4th International conference on sports engineering. Blackwell Science, Kyoto, pp 231–237

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goodwill SR, Haake SJ (2004) Ball spin generation for oblique impacts with a tennis racket. Soc Exp Mech 44:195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cross R (2000) Effects of friction between the ball and strings in tennis. Sports Eng 3:85–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Allen TB, Haake SJ, Goodwill SR (2010) Effect of friction on tennis ball impacts. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sports Eng Technol 224:229–236

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haake SJ, Allen TB, Jones A, Spurr J, Goodwill S (2012) Effect of inter-string friction on tennis ball rebound. Proc Inst Mech Eng J J Eng Tribol 226:626–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kawazoe Y, Okimoto K (2008) Tennis top spin comparison between new, used and lubricated used strings by high speed video analysis with impact simulation. Theor Appl Mech Jpn 57:511–522

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lindsey C (2011) Spin and string pattern. The tennis warehouse. http://twu.tennis-warehouse.com/learning_center/stringpattern.php. Accessed 18 Jan 2013

  14. Cross R, Lindsey C (2013) Spin and string patterns old, new, and illegal. The tennis warehouse. http://twu.tennis-warehouse.com/learning_center/spinpatterns.php. Accessed 18 Jan 2013

  15. Fischer W (1977) Tennis racket. US Pat 4(273):331

    Google Scholar 

  16. ITF Technical Department. International Tennis Federation. www.itftennis.com/technical. Accessed 02 Oct 2012

  17. Groppel JL, Shin IS, Spotts J, Hill B (1987) Effects of different string tension patterns and racket motion on tennis racket-ball impact. Int J Sport Biomech 3:142–158

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brody H (1987) Models of tennis racket impacts (Modeles d’impacts sur raquette de tennis). Int J Sport Biomech 3:293–296

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cross R (1998) The sweet spots of a tennis racket. Sports Eng 1:63–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kawazoe Y (1997) Experimental identification of a hand-held tennis racket and prediction of rebound ball velocity in an impact. Theoret Appl Mech 46:177–188

    Google Scholar 

  21. Allen T, Goodwill SR, Haake SJ (2009) Comparison of a finite element model of a tennis racket to experimental data. Sports Eng 12:87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cross R, Lindsey C (2005) Racquets, strings, balls, courts, spin and bounce. Technical tennis. Racquet Tech Publishing, California

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mr Terry Senior for designing and developing the test rig and Prince Sports for providing equipment for testing. The authors also like to thank Dr Simon Choppin and Dr Heather Driscoll for proof reading the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Allen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nicolaides, A., Elliott, N., Kelley, J. et al. Effect of string bed pattern on ball spin generation from a tennis racket. Sports Eng 16, 181–188 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-013-0118-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-013-0118-y

Keywords

Navigation