Skip to main content
Log in

Elite tennis player sensitivity to changes in string tension and the effect on resulting ball dynamics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eighteen elite male tennis players were tested to determine their ability to identify string tension differences between rackets strung from 210 N (47 lb) to 285 N (64 lb). Each player impacted four tennis balls projected from a ball machine before changing rackets and repeating the test. Eleven participants (61%) could not correctly detect a 75 N (17 lb) difference between rackets. Only two participants (11%) could correctly detect a 25 N (6 lb) difference. To establish whether varying string tensions affected ball rebound dynamics, the ball’s rebound speed and landing position were analysed. The mean rebound ball speed was 117 km h−1, with only the trials from the 210 N racket producing significantly lower (P < 0.05) rebound speeds than the 235 N and 260 N rackets. This is contrary to previous laboratory-based tests where higher rebound speeds are typically associated with low-string tensions. The anomaly may be attributable to lower swing speeds from participants as they were not familiar with such a low string tension. Ball placement did not appear related to string tension, with the exception of more long errors for the 235 N racket and fewer long errors for the 285 N racket. It was concluded that elite male tennis players display limited ability to detect changes in string tension, impact the ball approximately 6% faster than advanced recreational tennis players during a typical rallying stroke, and that ball placement is predominantly unrelated to string tension for elite performers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bower R, Cross R (2003) Player sensitivity to changes in string tension in a tennis racket. J Sci Med Sport 6(1):120–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bower R, Cross R (2005) String tension effects on tennis ball rebound speed and accuracy during playing conditions. J Sports Sci 23(7):765–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bower R, Sinclair P (1999) Tennis racquet stiffness and string tension effects on rebound velocity and angle for an oblique impact. J Hum Mov Stud 37(6):271–286

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brody H (1979) Physics of the tennis racquet. A J Phys 47(6):482–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cross R, Bower R (2001) Measurements of string tension in a tennis racket. Sports Eng 4:165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Elliott B (1982) The influence of tennis racquet flexibility and string tension on rebound velocity following a dynamic impact. Res Q Exerc Sport 53(4):277–281

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elliott B, Marsh A, Overheu P (1987) The mechanics of the Lendl and conventional tennis forehands: a coach’s perspective. Sports Coach 11(2):4–9

    Google Scholar 

  8. Elliott B, Marsh A, Overheu P (1989) The topspin backhand drive in tennis: a biomechanical analysis. J Hum Mov Stud 16(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haake S, Carre M, Goodwill S (2003) The dynamic impact characteristics of tennis balls will tennis rackets. J Sports Sci 21:839–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hatze H (1993) The relationship between the coefficient of restitution and energy losses in tennis rackets. J Appl Biomech 9:124–142

    Google Scholar 

  11. Groppel J, Shin I, Thomas J, Welk G (1987) The effects of string type and tension on impact in midsized and oversized tennis racquets. Int J Sports Biomech 3:40–46

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rob Bower.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bower, R., Cross, R. Elite tennis player sensitivity to changes in string tension and the effect on resulting ball dynamics. Sports Eng 11, 31–36 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-008-0006-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-008-0006-z

Keywords

Navigation