Abstract
Background
Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and HER2 expression status in breast cancer function as prognostic and predictive factors that enable individualized treatment. Intrinsic subtype classification has also been performed based on these and other biological and prognostic characteristics. However, clinical analysis of such subtypes in a large number of Japanese breast cancer patients has not yet been reported.
Methods
Between January 2003 and December 2007, 4,266 patients with primary breast cancer were registered. Four subtypes based on immunohistochemically evaluated ER/PgR/HER2 status, clinicopathological features, and prognosis were analyzed retrospectively.
Results
The following subtype distribution was observed: luminal A type (ER+ and/or PgR+, HER2−), 3,046 cases (71%); luminal B type (ER+ and/or PgR+, HER2+), 321 cases (8%); HER2 type (ER−, PgR−, HER2+), 398 cases (9%); and triple negative (TN) type (ER−, PgR−, HER2−), 501 cases (12%). The HER2+ subtypes (luminal B and HER2 types) had a significantly higher incidence of lymph node metastasis and lymphatic permeation, while the hormone receptor negative subtypes (HER2 and TN types) showed a significantly higher nuclear grade. Overall, patients with HER2-type and TN-type disease had a significantly poorer prognosis than other subtypes.
Conclusion
Intrinsic breast cancer subtypes are associated with clinicopathological features and prognosis in Japanese women. Long-term clinical observation of the relationship between each subtype and therapies used should provide useful information for selecting appropriately tailored treatments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ER:
-
Estrogen receptor
- PgR:
-
Progesterone receptor
- HER2:
-
Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2
- TN:
-
Triple negative
- IDC:
-
Invasive ductal carcinoma
- DFS:
-
Disease-free survival
- mAb:
-
Monoclonal antibody
References
Japanese Breast Cancer Society. General rules for clinical and pathological recording of breast cancer. 15th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara-Shuppan Co.; 2004; p. 31–68.
National Registration Survey of Breast Cancer Patients (2005 annual cases). Japanese Breast Cancer Society Registration Committee. 2005;36:1–20 (in Japanese).
Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:10869–74.
Sotiriou C, Neo SY, McShane LM, Korn EL, Long PM, Jazaeri A, et al. Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:10393–8.
Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jefferey SS, Rees CA, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumors. Nature. 2000;406:747–52.
Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, Hastie T, Marron JS, Nobel A, et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.. 2003;100:8418–23.
Nielsen TO, Hsu FD, Jensen K, Cheang M, Karaca G, Hu Z, et al. Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:5367–74.
Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, Dressler LG, Cowan D, Conway K, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina breast cancer study. JAMA. 2006;295:2492–502.
Nakajima H, Fujiwara I, Mizuta N, Sakaguchi K, Hachimine Y, Nakatsukasa K, et al. Investigation of the prognosis of breast cancer from the view point of presentation of estrogen receptor and HER2 in immunohistochemical staining. Jpn Clin Surg. 2007;68:2171–77 (in Japanese with English abstract).
Nishimura R, Arima N. Is triple negative a prognostic factor in breast cancer? Breast Cancer. 2008;15:303–8.
Kurebayashi J, Moriya T, Ishida T, Hirakawa H, Kurosumi M, Akiyama F, et al. The prevalence of intrinsic subtypes and prognosis in breast cancer patients of different races. Breast. 2007;16:s72–7.
Kurebayashi J. Characteristics of breast cancers in Japanese patients according to the gene expression profiles. Clin Surg. 2008;63:1055–9 (in Japanese).
Ishihara A, Tsuda H, Kitagawa K, Yoneda M, Shiraishi T. Morphological characteristics of basal-like subtype of breast carcinoma with special reference to cytopathological features. Breast Cancer. 2009;16:179–85.
Okumura Y, Nishimura R, Osako T. Is chemotherapy necessary for young women with breast cancer? Jpn J Breast Cancer. 2009;24:23–9 (in Japanese with English abstract).
Foulkes WD, Brunet JS, Stefansson IM, Straume O, Chappuis PO, Begin LR, et al. The prognostic implication of the basal-like (cyclin E high/p27 low/p53+/glomeruloid-microvascular-proliferation+) phenotype of BRCA1-related breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2004;64:830–5.
Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, Andre F, Tordai A, Mejia JA, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1275–81.
Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Ellis IO. Basal-like breast cancer: a critical review. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2568–81.
Piccart GMJ, Procter M, Leyland JB, Goldhirsch A, Untch M, Smith I, et al. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1659–72.
Romond EH, Perez EA, Bryant JB, Suman VJ, Geyer CE, Davidson NE, et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1673–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Shibuta, K., Ueo, H., Furusawa, H. et al. The relevance of intrinsic subtype to clinicopathological features and prognosis in 4,266 Japanese women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer 18, 292–298 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-010-0209-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-010-0209-6