Abstract
In late 2003, the Singaporean government launched Biopolis, a life sciences technopole that brings key Singaporean biomedical research institutes together with global and local biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies and governance bodies. The government has allocated generous funding to a range of biomedical research at Biopolis and adjacent academic and clinical institutes. Its stated aim is to make Singapore the Biopolis of Asia, the premier life sciences hub in a region where several much more populous states, notably China, India, and South Korea, are rapidly scaling up public investment in regenerative medicine and genomics. This paper will tease out what is at stake in the creation of Biopolis for the Singaporean state and population and what it can tell us about South East Asian governmentality and its bioeconomic and biopolitical aspirations and anxieties. In particular the paper engages with the implicit utopian vision of a regenerative bioeconomy evident in the Biopolis project. Biopolis is a site which brings together local and imported scientific expertise with the biological productivity of the multi-ethnic Singaporean population, who are understood as surrogates for the SE Asian population more generally. The ultimate aim of Biopolis, I argue, is to recalibrate the relationships between the biological and political life of the Singaporean population, and secure the economic future of the city-state, through the advanced research and development of Asia-specific medical biotechnology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Thrift (2006) suggests that the bioscience buildings recently built on university campuses all over the world are exemplary of the ways that innovation capital is using space to increase the valorization of scientific knowledge. These buildings are performative in that they are designed to foster interdisciplinary and a certain notion of interactive knowledge (Thrift 2006: 293).
Halliday demonstrates the utopian qualities of botanical gardens, their early attempts to recreate an ideal Eden. See Halliday (2006) I am using the idea of Eden here in that register.
China recently launched a 15-year Plan for medium and long-term science and technology development (2006–2020) with the goals of increasing R&D investment from the current 1.4% of economic output to 2.0% by 2010 and 2.5% by 2020.
Between 2000 and 2007, it is estimated that the South Korean government has invested about 5.2 trillion South Korean Won ($4.4 billion) in the biomedical technology R&D field (Wong et al 2004).
A comment made at the October 2005 Keystone symposium on stem cells, senescence, and cancer, Singapore.
Aristotle, in a move typical of the gender politics that pervade The Politics, relegates the care for reproductive life to women and slaves and the space of the household, which is held to be quite separate from the proper social life of the Polis.
In 2006 Singapore’s Gross National Income per capita was $US 29,320, while Australia’s was $US 35,990 (World Bank Atlas http://web.worldbank.org/ accessed 7-Mar-08).
In a much more wide-ranging argument, Cooper (2008) argues that the whole project of Postfordist economies is the reanimation and revaluation of both organic and inorganic matter, by putting them into speculative play through the technical reconfigurations and market deregulation of the 1970s and 1980s.
Interview, stem cell scientist, Biopolis, Singapore, 8th October 2007.
Personal communication, Yao, Souchou.
Cytoplasmic hybrids—the term for the cloning of human genetic material using animal eggs.
The Singaporean stem cell bank will distribute the four good manufacturing practice (GMP) embryonic stem cell lines created by ES Cell International with Sydney IVF in 2006, clinically compliant lines that could be used in the future for human therapies. While the lines will be distributed worldwide to scientists without IP restrictions on preclinical research, their use for clinical applications will require license payments to ES Cell International. In other words, the Singaporean Stem Cell Bank will have a much closer relationship to business than the UK stem cell bank.
A term used by the government to designate the presumed socially conservative general population, the beneficiaries of rather than participants in the ‘new economy’ (Wong and Bunnel 2006).
Interview with STN life scientist.
Interview with stem cell scientist.
Interview with SCCS scientist.
So for example, current evidence suggests that guidelines related to body mass index (BMI) and central obesity measurements should vary for different populations. South Asians appear to be more susceptible to developing metabolic disease at lower BMI ratios than north Europeans.
Interview with SCCS scientist.
References
Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Aristotle (1981) The Politics. T. Saunders, Penguin Classics
Arnold, W. (2006). Singapore fills stem-cell void created by a U.S. ban. New York: The New York Times.
Bioethics Advisory Committee Singapore. (2008). Donation of human eggs for research. Singapore: Bioethics Advisory Committee Singapore.
BioMed-Singapore. (2007). "About Biomedical Science." Retrieved 1/9/2007, from http://www.biomed-singapore.com/bms/sg/en_uk/index/about_biomedical_sciences.html.
Chua, B.-H. (1995). Communitarian ideology and democracy in Singapore. London: Routledge.
Clarke, A. Shim, J. Mamo, L. et al. (2003). Biomedicalization: Technoscientific Transformations of Health, Illness, and U.S. Biomedicine. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 161–194.
Cooper, M. (2008). Life as surplus: Biotechnics and the transformations of Capital. Washington: Washington University Press.
Finegold, D. Wong, P.-K. & Cheah, T.-C. (2004). Adapting a foreign direct investment strategy to the knowledge economy: The case of Singapore's emerging biotechnology cluster. European Planning Studies, 12(7), 921–941.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality volume 1. New York: Vintage Books.
Gottweis, H. Salter, B. & Waldby, C. (2009). The global politics of human embryonic stem cell science: regenerative medicine in transition. Palgrave: Basingstoke.
Halliday, L. (2006). Bio-utopia to Doomsday and Back Again: Rethinking the role of seed banks for the conservation of agricultural biodiversity. The Australian Sociological Association (TASA) Annual Conference, University of Western Australia.
Hayden, C. (2007). Taking as giving: Bioscience, exchange, and the politics of benefit-sharing. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 729–758.
Heng, B. C. (2006). Alternative solutions to the current situation of oocyte donation in Singapore. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 12(3), 286–291.
Heng, G. & Devan, J. (1992). State fatherhood: The politics of nationalism, sexuality, and race in Singapore. In A. Parker, M. Russo, D. Sommer & P. Yaeger (Eds.), Nationalisms and sexualities (pp. 343–364). New York: Routledge.
Holden, K. & Demeritt, D. (2008). Democratising science? The politics of promoting biomedicine in Singapore's developmental state. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(1), 68–86.
Levitas, R. (1990). The concept of Utopia. New York: Syracuse University Press.
Lim, S. & Ho, C. (2003). The ethical position of Singapore on embryonic stem cell research. SMA News, 35(6), 14–23.
MTI. (2006). Sustaining innovation-driven growth: science and technology 2010 plan (Vol. 65). Singapore: Ministry of Trade and Industry.
Normile, D. (2007). Singapore firm abandons plans for stem cell therapies. Science, 317(5836), 305.
OECD. (2006). The bioeconomy to 2030 (pp. 1–12). Paris OECD: Designing a policy agenda.
Olds, K. (2007) "Global Assemblage: Singapore, Foreign Universities, and the Construction of a “Global Education Hub”." Wisconsin Center for the Advancement of Postsecondary Education (WISCAPE) working papers Volume, 1–44
Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press.
Ong, A. (2007). Scales of exception: Experiments with knowledge and sheer life in tropical Southeast Asia. Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, San Francisco
Oxford English Dictionary Online (2007) accessed 23/11/07.
Rabinow, P. (1999). French DNA: Trouble in purgatory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rajan, K. (2006). Biocapital: The constitution of postgenomic life. Durham: Durham Duke University Press.
Salter, B. (2007) "State strategies and speculative innovation in regenerative medicine: the global politics of uncertain futures." Global Biopolitics Research Group Working Paper No. 20 Volume, 1–29
Salter, B. Cooper, M. Dickins, A. et al. (2007). Stem cell science in India: Emerging economies and the politics of globalisation. Regenerative Medicine, 2(1), 75–89.
Singapore Consortium for Cohort Studies (2007). Study Protocol for the Singapore Consortium for Cohort Studies.
Thrift N. (2006). Re-inventing invention: new tendencies in capitalist commodification. Economy and Society, 35(2), 279–306.
Tsui-Auch, L. (2004). Bureaucratic rationality and nodal agency in a developmental state: The case of state-led biotechnology development in Singapore. International Sociology, 19(4), 451–477.
UK Stem Cell Initiative. (2005). Report and recommendations of the UK stem cell initiative. London: DH Publications. November.
Waldby, C. (1996). AIDS and the body politic: Biomedicine and sexual difference. London: Routledge.
Waldby, C. (2002). Stem cells, tissue cultures and the production of biovalue. Health: an Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 6(3), 305–323.
Walker, J. (2007). Economy of nature: A genealogy of the concepts 'growth and 'equilibrium' as artefacts of metaphorical exchange between the natural and the social sciences. Sydney, University of Technology Sydney. Ph. D: 326.
Wong, J. (2005). Re-making the developmental state in Taiwan: the challenges of biotechnology. International Political Science Review, 26(2), 169–191.
Wong, J. (2006). Technovation in Taiwan: Implications for industrial governance. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 19(4), 651–672.
Wong, K. W. & Bunnell, T. (2006). 'New economy' discourse and space in Singapore: a case study of one-north. Environment and Planning A, 38, 69–83.
Wong, M. Chia, K. Yam, W. et al. (2004). Willingness to donate blood samples for genetic research: A survey from a community in Singapore. Clinical Genetics, 65, 45–51.
Yao, S. (2007). Singapore: The state and the culture of excess. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Waldby, C. Singapore Biopolis: Bare Life in the City-State. East Asian Science 3, 367–383 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12280-009-9089-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12280-009-9089-2