Skip to main content

Analysing user daylight preferences in heritage buildings using virtual reality

Abstract

Technology has always been creating effective ways to support human decisions. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) has emerged to engage users in a simulated world, and this has gained the interest of a wide variety of users in the heritage industry. A historical case study built in the early 19th century is considered for an adaptive reuse exhibition. The palace is located in Cairo, Egypt, and named after Prince Omar Tosson. The current palace state incorporates a smashed top-lit zone, which is being studied and analyzed for daylighting adequacy. Three simulated distinct optimum skylight configurations are suggested for the redesign where the selection should not be based solely on simulation data, but should consider real-user preferences. Most daylight design criteria are previously based on simulation data that do not necessarily indicate the users’ preferences. But utilizing user interactive tools such as IVR to test daylight redesign options, a whole new dimension is provided. In this study, the VR users’ survey data is statistically analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), where results revealed that the assessment attributes succeeded in reflecting the users’ preferences; which, motivated designers to consider potential users’ daylight preferences in reused spaces. The paper highlights the most significant emotional attributes that provide cost-effective and reliable information concerned with the performance of daylight in IVR before design implementation. This study compares and analyzes the effect of three skylight designs (Cases A, B & C) on the users’ perception before design implementation using (IVR) post-survey. Forty-eight participants have contributed to the study, providing their feedback on six attributes namely: Pleasant, Contrasting, Brightness, Uniform Distribution, Visual Comfort, and Satisfaction. Those attributes are evaluated for the three cases in space using five scale rating values to reveal that the “Pleasant” attribute is most reliable in the study to reflect the users’ preferences for design Case B.

References

  • Abboushi B, Elzeyadi I, Van Den Wymelenberg K, et al. (2018). Do visually interesting sunlight patterns impact occupants’ perceived glare? In: Proceedings of IES Research Symposium 2018, Atlanta, GA, USA.

  • Abdelmonem MG (2017). Managing cultural heritage in the digital age: Research policy document on the development of virtual heritage for Egypt and the Middle East. Virtual Heritage Cairo.

  • Amirkhani M, Garcia-Hansen V, Isoardi G, et al. (2018). Innovative window design strategy to reduce negative lighting interventions in office buildings. Energy and Buildings, 179: 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axarli K, Meresi A (2008). Objective and subjective criteria regarding the effect of sunlight and daylight in classrooms. In: Proceedings of 25th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Dublin, Ireland.

  • Chamilothori K, Chinazzo G, de Matos Rodrigues JP, et al. (2018). Perceived interest and heart rate response to façade and daylight patterns in Virtual Reality, In: Proceedings of Academy of Neuroscience for Architecture (ANFA2018), La Jolla, CA, USA.

  • Chamilothori K, Wienold J, Andersen M (2019). Adequacy of immersive virtual reality for the perception of daylit spaces: comparison of real and virtual environments. Leukos, 15: 203–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi DA, Moreno D, Navarro J (2019). Statistical methods applied to optimize perforated façade design for daylight availability. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 25: 04018034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi JH, Loftness V, Nou D, et al. (2019). Impacts of dynamic glazing on office workers’ environmental and psychological responses. In: Proceedings of ARCC Conference, Toronto, Canada.

  • Clevenger CM, Rogers Z (2017). Managing daylight in airports. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 23: 04017006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ElSharkawy M (2020). Enhancing daylight utilization in adaptive reuse of heritage buildings using building information modeling. PhD Thesis, Cairo University, Egypt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, et al. (2013). G* Power Version 3.1. 7. Uiversität Kiel, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Tone HC, Bustamante Escapa J, Bustamante Escapa P, et al. (2021). The drawing and perception of architectural spaces through immersive virtual reality. Sustainability, 13: 6223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegazy M, Yasufuku K, Abe H (2022). An interactive approach to investigate brightness perception of daylighting in Immersive Virtual Environments: Comparing subjective responses and quantitative metrics. Building Simulation, 15: 41–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heydarian A, Carneiro JP, Gerber D, et al. (2015). Immersive virtual environments versus physical built environments: a benchmarking study for building design and user-built environment explorations. Automation in Construction, 54: 116–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heydarian A, Pantazis E, Wang A, et al. (2017). Towards user centered building design: Identifying end-user lighting preferences via immersive virtual environments. Automation in Construction, 81: 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong X, Shi F, Wang S, et al. (2021). Multi-objective optimization of thermochromic glazing based on daylight and energy performance evaluation. Building Simulation, 14: 1685–1695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin S, Fan M, Kadir A (2021). Immersive spring morning in the Han palace: learning traditional Chinese art via virtual reality and multi-touch tabletop. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1930389.

  • Kajiya JT (1986). The rendering equation. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 20: 143–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandi VR, Castronovo F, Brittle P, et al. (2020). Assessing the impact of a construction virtual reality game on design review skills of construction students. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 26: 04020035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya SM, Afacan Y (2018). Effects of daylight design features on visitors’ satisfaction of museums. Indoor and Built Environment, 27: 1341–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keshavarzi M, Caldas L, Santos L (2019). RadVR: A 6DOF virtual reality daylighting analysis tool. arXiv: 1907.01652.

  • Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47: 583–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Yuan C (2016). An optimal design analysis of a novel parabolic trough lighting and thermal system. International Journal of Energy Research, 40: 1193–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marín-Morales J, Higuera-Trujillo JL, De-Juan-ripoll C, et al. (2019). Navigation comparison between a real and a virtual museum: time-dependent differences using a head mounted display. Interacting With Computers, 31: 208–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzouk M, Eissa A, ElSharkawy M (2020a). Influence of light redirecting control element on daylight performance: A case of Egyptian heritage palace skylight. Journal of Building Engineering, 31: 101309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzouk M, ElSharkawy M, Eissa A (2020b). Optimizing thermal and visual efficiency using parametric configuration of skylights in heritage buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 31: 101385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mat Roni S, Merga MK, Morris JE (2020). Analysis: Correlation. In: Conducting Quantitative Research in Education. Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newson R (2002). Parameters behind “nonparametric” statistics: Kendall’s tau, Somers’ D and median differences. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 2: 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omidfar A, Niermann M, Groat N (2015). The use of environmental aesthetics in subjective evaluation of daylight quality in office buildings. In Proceedings of IES Annual Conference.

  • Patnaik A, Kumar V, Saha P (2018). Importance of indoor environmental quality in green buildings. In: Singh V, Yadav S, Yadava R (eds), Environmental Pollution: Select Proceedings of ICWEES-2016. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quartier K, Vanrie J, Van Cleempoel K (2014). As real as it gets: What role does lighting have on consumer’s perception of atmosphere, emotions and behaviour? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 39: 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rea MS (2000). Daylighting. In: Lighting Handbook: Reference and Application, 9th edn, Chapter 8. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell JA (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39: 1161–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell JA, Ward LM, Pratt G (1981). Affective quality attributed to environments: A factor analytic study. Environment and Behavior, 13: 259–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer O, Chamilothori K (2019). Influence of subjective impressions of a space on brightness satisfaction: An experimental study in virtual reality. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design.

  • Stokkermans M, Vogels I, de Kort Y, et al. (2018). A comparison of methodologies to investigate the influence of light on the atmosphere of a space. Leukos, 14: 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veitch JA (2001). Psychological processes influencing lighting quality. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 30: 124–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Itzstein GS, Billinghurst M, Smith RT, et al. (2017). Augmented reality entertainment: Taking gaming out of the box. In: Lee N (ed), Encyclopedia of Computer Graphics and Games. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner WEIII (2019). Using IBM® SPSS® Statistics for Research Methods and Social Science Statistics, 7th edn. Los Angeles, CA, USA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang CH, Kuo N, Anthony K (2015). Impact of sunlight on pain interference-Natural energy and recovery. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Energy Equipment Science and Engineering (ICEESE).

  • Wang J, Wei M, Ruan X (2021). Comparison of daylight simulation methods for reflected sunlight from curtain walls. Building Simulation, 14: 549–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardono P, Wibisono A (2013). Sensory effect of daylight on contemplative perception of space. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 85: 191–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2020). The World Bank in Egypt. Available at https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/egypt/overview. Accessed 25 Nov 2019.

  • Xue P, Mak CM, Cheung HD (2014). The effects of daylighting and human behavior on luminous comfort in residential buildings: A questionnaire survey. Building and Environment, 81: 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin J, Yuan J, Arfaei N, et al. (2020). Effects of biophilic indoor environment on stress and anxiety recovery: A between-subjects experiment in virtual reality. Environment International, 136: 105427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by Egypt-UK Newton-Musharafa Fund: Institutional Links; STDF (the Science & Technology Development Fund), Egypt, Grant No. 26150.

Funding

Funding note: Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Marzouk.

Rights and permissions

Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marzouk, M., ElSharkawy, M. & Mahmoud, A. Analysing user daylight preferences in heritage buildings using virtual reality. Build. Simul. 15, 1561–1576 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0873-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0873-9

Keywords

  • daylight preferences
  • heritage buildings rehabilitation
  • immersive virtual reality
  • statistical analysis