Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of daylight simulation methods for reflected sunlight from curtain walls

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Curtain walls are more and more commonly used as building facades. They allow a better daylight availability and a direct connection to exterior environments. Meanwhile, due to the high specular reflections, they may also introduce negative impacts, such as glare and urban heat island effects, to the surround, especially in dense and urban environments. Therefore, it is important to effectively characterize the reflected sunlight from curtain walls. This study aimed to compare how different simulation methods can be used to characterize the reflected sunlight from curtain walls. It was found that the modeling of the sun and sky, ambient calculation, and the modeling of the building façade significantly affected the simulation results. A combination of forward and backward ray-tracing is recommended, with forward ray-tracing for identifying the curtain wall areas reflecting sunlight and backward ray-tracing for calculating illuminance due to reflected sunlight. A follow-up work is planned to investigate how different parameters will affect the simulation results and which method can produce similar results as field measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksamija A (2016). Design methods for sustainable, high-performance building facades. Advances in Building Energy Research, 10: 240–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baljit SSS, Chan HY, Sopian K (2016). Review of building integrated applications of photovoltaic and solar thermal systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137: 677–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer C, Wittkopf S (2016). Annual daylight simulations with EvalDRC — Assessing the performance of daylight redirection components. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, 3: 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BCA (2016). Regulation on daylight reflectance of materials used on exterior of buildings. Building and Construction Authority (BCA). Available at https://www.corenet.gov.sg/media/2013555/circular-on-regulation-on-daylight-reflectance-of-materials-used-on-exterior-of-buildings.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2019.

  • BD (2014). Guidelines on design and construction requirements for energy efficiency of residential buildings. Buildings Department (BD). Available at https://www.bd.gov.hk/doc/en/resources/codes-and-references/code-and-design-manuals/Guidelines_DCREERB2014e.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

  • Bourgeois D, Reinhart CF, Ward G (2008). Standard daylight coefficient model for dynamic daylighting simulations. Building Research & Information, 36: 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brembilla E, Mardaljevic J (2019). Climate-Based Daylight Modelling for compliance verification: Benchmarking multiple state-of-the-art methods. Building and Environment, 158: 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brembilla E, Chi DA, Hopfe CJ, Mardaljevic J (2019). Evaluation of climate-based daylighting techniques for complex fenestration and shading systems. Energy and Buildings, 203: 109454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brzezicki M (2012). The influence of reflected solar glare caused by the glass cladding of a building: application of caustic curve analysis. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 27: 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow T-t, Li C, Lin Z (2010). Innovative solar windows for cooling-demand climate. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 94: 212–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • City of Sydney Council (2012). Sydney development control plan 2012. Available at https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/shareddrupal-s3fs/master-test/fapub_pdf/SYDNEY/Sydney%20DCP%202012%20-%20as%20amended%206%20May%202016%20-%20Text.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2019.

  • Costanzo V, Yao R, Essah E, Shao L, Shahrestani M, et al. (2018). A method of strategic evaluation of energy performance of Building Integrated Photovoltaic in the urban context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184: 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danks R (2014). Application of large scale solar modelling in the built environment. In: Proceedings of the eSim 2014 Conference on Builing Simulation, Ottawa, Canada.

  • Danks R, Good J (2016). Urban scale simulations of solar reflections in the built environment: Methodology and validation. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design, London, UK.

  • Danks R, Good J, Sinclair R (2016). Assessing reflected sunlight from building facades: A literature review and proposed criteria. Building and Environment, 103: 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiLaura DL, Houser KW, Mistrick RG, Steffy GR (2011). The lighting handbook, 10th edn. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galasiu AD, Maref W, Saber HH (2015). High performance roofing and walls technologies: Task1, literature review on curtain walls. National Research Council Canada.

  • Garfield L (2016). The ‘death ray hotel’ burning Las Vegas visitors came up with a simple fix. Business Insider. Available at https://www.businessinsider.com/the-vdara-death-ray-hotel-is-still-burning-people-in-las-vegas-2016-6. Accessed 26 Feb 2019.

  • Glassner AS (1989). An Introduction to Ray Tracing. San Jose, CA, USA: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gobakis K, Kolokotsa D, Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki N, Perdikatsis V, Santamouris M (2015). Development and analysis of advanced inorganic coatings for buildings and urban structures. Energy and Buildings, 89: 196–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grobe LO, Noback A, Wittkopf S, Kazanasmaz T (2015). Comparison of measured and computed BSDF of a daylight redirecting component. In: Proceedings of International Conference CISBAT 2015, Lausanne, Switzerland.

  • Grobe LO (2019a). Photon mapping in image-based visual comfort assessments with BSDF models of high resolution. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 12: 745–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grobe LO (2019b). Photon-mapping in climate-based daylight modelling with high-resolution BSDFs. Energy and Buildings, 205: 109524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichinose M, Inoue T, Nagahama T (2017). Effect of retro-reflecting transparent window on anthropogenic urban heat balance. Energy and Buildings, 157: 157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakubiec JA, Reinhart CF (2014). Assessing disability glare potential of reflections from new construction: Case study analysis and recommendations for the future. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2449: 114–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee ES, Geisler-Moroder D, Ward G (2018). Modeling the direct sun component in buildings using matrix algebraic approaches: Methods and validation. Solar Energy, 160: 380–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardaljevic J (2000). Daylight simulation: Validation, sky models and daylight coefficients. PhD Thesis, De Montfort University, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardaljevic J (2015). Climate-based daylight modelling and its discontents. Paper presented at the Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (CIBSE) Technical Symposium 2015, London, UK.

  • McNeil A (2015). genBSDF tutorial. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL). Available at https://www.radiance-online.org/learning/tutorials/Tutorial-genBSDF_v1.0.1.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

  • Mitchell R, Kohler C, Klems JH, Rubin MD, Arasteh DK, et al. (2008). WINDOW 6.2/THERM 6.2 Research version user manual. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL). Available at https://escholarship.org/content/qt4rx784fq/qt4rx784fq.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

  • NREL (2007). Typical Meteorological Year 3 (TMY3). EnergyPlus. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Available at https://energyplus.net/weather. Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

  • Reinhart CF, Walkenhorst O (2001). Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds. Energy and Buildings, 33: 683–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santamouris M, Synnefa A, Karlessi T (2011). Using advanced cool materials in the urban built environment to mitigate heat islands and improve thermal comfort conditions. Solar Energy, 85: 3085–3102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena M, Ward G, Perry T, Heschong L, Higa R (2010). Dynamic Radiance-predicting annual daylighting with variable fenestration optics using BSDFs. Paper presented at the 4th National Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, New York, USA.

  • Schregle R (2015). Development and integration of the Radiance photon map extension v1.12. Technical Report, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Switzerland.

  • Schregle R, Grobe LO, Wittkopf S (2016). An out-of-core photon mapping approach to daylight coefficients. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 9: 620–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schregle R, Renken C, Wittkopf S (2018). Spatio-temporal visualisation of reflections from building integrated photovoltaics. Buildings, 8: 101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih NJ, Huang YS (2001). An analysis and simulation of curtain wall reflection glare. Building and Environment, 36: 619–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam S (2017). Daylighting simulations with Radiance using matrix-based methods. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL). Available at https://www.radiance-online.org/learning/tutorials/matrix-based-methods. Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

  • Suk JY (2007). Post-treatment analysis of the glare remediation of the Walt Disney Concert Hall. Master Thesis, University of Southern California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suk JY, Schiler M, Kensek K (2017). Reflectivity and specularity of building envelopes: how materiality in architecture affects human visual comfort. Architectural Science Review, 60: 256–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tregenza PR, Waters IM (1983). Daylight coefficients. Lighting Research & Technology, 15: 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tregenza PR (1987). Subdivision of the sky hemisphere for luminance measurements. Lighting Research & Technology, 19: 13–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker S (2012). Complex facades in sunny climates, microclimates, reflection caustics, Radiance workshop. Radiance Workshop 2012. Available at https://www.radiance-online.org/community/workshops/2012-copenhagen/Day3/Walker/Steve%20Walker%20-%20Radiance%20workshop%202012%20-%20Greg%20Ward.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2019.

  • Walker T (2013). Walkie Talkie architect ‘didn’t realise it was going to be so hot’. The Telegraph. Available at https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturenews/10292147/Walkie-Talkie-architect-blames-consultants-for-buildings-failures.html. Accessed 26 Feb 2019.

  • Wilcox S, Marion W (2018). Users manual for TMY3 data sets. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Available at https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy08osti/43156.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2020.

  • Yang XM, Grobe LO, Wittkopf S (2013). Simulation of reflected daylight from building envelopes. in: Proceedings of the 13th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Chambery, France.

  • Yuan J, Farnham C, Emura K (2015). Development of a retro-reflective material as building coating and evaluation on albedo of urban canyons and building heat loads. Energy and Buildings, 103: 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by Research Grant Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (PolyU 252029/16E).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China

    Jun Wang & Minchen Wei

  2. Wenzhou University, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China

    Xiukai Ruan

Authors
  1. Jun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Minchen Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiukai Ruan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Minchen Wei or Xiukai Ruan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Wei, M. & Ruan, X. Comparison of daylight simulation methods for reflected sunlight from curtain walls. Build. Simul. 14, 549–564 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0701-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0701-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation