Abstract
The choice of females to accept or reject male courtship is a critical decision for animal reproduction. Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) has been found to regulate sexual behavior in many species, but it is unclear how 5-HT and its receptors function to regulate different aspects of sexual behavior. Here we used Drosophila melanogaster as the model animal to investigate how 5-HT and its receptors modulate female sexual receptivity. We found that knockout of tryptophan hydroxylase (Trh), which is involved in the biosynthesis of 5-HT, severely reduced virgin female receptivity without affecting post-mating behaviors. We identified a subset of sexually dimorphic Trh neurons that co-expressed fruitless (fru), in which the activity was correlated with sexual receptivity in females. We also found that 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 receptors regulate virgin female receptivity. Our findings demonstrate how 5-HT functions in sexually dimorphic neurons to promote virgin female receptivity through two of its receptors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Sexual behavior in Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent model in which to investigate the neuronal basis underlying social behavior because they are innate and robust [1,2,3]. Wild-type male and female flies can achieve copulation without social learning experiences during adulthood [4, 5]. Drosophila sexual behaviors include stereotypic male courtship rituals such as orienting to a female, extending an ipsilateral wing to produce courtship songs, tapping and licking the female, attempting copulation, and finally copulation [6, 7]. The neural circuit involved in male courtship behavior has been dissected in recent years owing to advances in genetic technology [8,9,10,11]. However, studies on female sexual behavior are far fewer than those on males.
Much progress has been made in recent years on how female flies perceive the presence of males and their courtship, and integrate auditory, olfactory, and mechanosensory cues, to decide whether to be receptive or not [12,13,14,15]. Such a decision is also dependent on the maturity and mating status of the female. Sexually immature females exhibit rejection behaviors by running away, flicking wings, or kicking the courting male [16, 17]. After sexual maturity, virgin females make the decision to copulate with courting males and exhibit sexual receptivity, which is a proxy metric to evaluate the willingness of females to mate [18,19,20]. Recently-mated females display post-mating behaviors by reducing receptivity and increasing egg-laying [8, 21, 22]. Female post-mating behaviors are triggered by the male seminal fluid peptide (sex-peptide, SP) and regulated by SP-responsive neurons which express fruitless (fru), doublesex (dsx), and pickpocket (ppk) [23,24,25,26]. Despite this progress in the sensory and integrative circuits for female sexual behavior [26,27,28,29], very little is known about how internal factors modulate virgin female receptivity.
Internal factors that modulate the function of neuronal circuits often use neurochemical systems including neuropeptides and neurotransmitters [30]. Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT), which is one of the highly-conserved neurotransmitters across species, is involved in a range of behaviors including cognition, reward, learning, and memory, as well as male and female sexual behavior [31,32,33,34,35]. Although 5-HT is known to be involved in mammal sexual behavior, its exact function in regulating sexual behavior is unclear. In Drosophila, 5-HT has also been shown to regulate a variety of complex behaviors including aggression, sleep, and feeding [36,37,38], but whether and how it regulates female sexual receptivity is unknown. Thus, it is of particular importance to investigate the function of 5-HT in female sexual receptivity using the Drosophila model.
Sexual behaviors in Drosophila are largely controlled by two pivotal regulatory genes, fru and dsx, that control most aspects of sexual development and behavior [10, 39, 40]. Sex-specific dsx transcripts are translated in both sexes to produce the sex-specific proteins DsxM or DsxF, which control male and female differentiation, respectively [15, 41,42,43]. In contrast, fru proteins (FruM) control male courtship and are male-specific [1, 5, 44, 45]. Although FruM proteins are not produced in females, neurons expressing the fru transcript (fru+) are crucial for female sexual receptivity, as silencing these fru+ neurons impairs female receptivity [44, 46]. Recent studies have also revealed the importance of dsx+ neurons in controlling virgin female receptivity and post-mating behaviors in mated females [24, 27, 47, 48].
In this study, we showed that 5-HT signaling modulates female sexual receptivity at both the molecular and the neural circuit levels. Knockout and knockdown of tryptophan hydroxylase (Trh), which is involved in the biosynthesis of 5-HT, decreased virgin female receptivity. Activation of the entire population of Trh+ neurons enhanced sexual receptivity in virgin females but had no effect on sexual receptivity in mated females. We identified a group of sexually dimorphic Trh+fru+ neurons in the posterior lateral protocerebrum (PLP) to be a crucial 5-HT-releasing site in the regulation of female sexual receptivity. Analysis of Ca2+ activity in 5-HT-PLP neurons revealed stronger activity in virgin flies than in mated flies. Furthermore, we found two 5-HT receptors, 5-HT1A and 5-HT7, that might be crucial for female sexual receptivity.
Materials and Methods
Fly Culture and Strains
All D. melanogaster strains were reared on standard medium at 25°C and 60% humidity in a 12-h light/dark photoperiod unless otherwise described. All the knockout lines in this study for screening have been published [49]. The following strains were obtained from Dr. Yi Rao’s lab (Peking University, Beijing, China): isoCS (wild-type), Trh-GAL4, elav-GAL4;UAS-dicer2, elav-GAL4, and UAS-5-HT1A. The UAS-stingerGFP and UAS-Redstinger lines were gifts from Dr. Yufeng Pan’s lab (Southeast University, Nanjing, China). UAS-PACα was a gift from Dr. Yan Zhu’s lab (Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences). The following strains were from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center: UAS-Kir2.1 (BL#6596), TRIC (BL#61679), UAS-mCD8-GFP (BL#5137), UAS-shits (BL#44222), and UAS-Trh-RNAi (BL#33612).
Behavioral Assays
Female receptivity assays were conducted as previously described [15]. In brief, individual virgin females (8–10 days old) were paired with a naïve wild-type male courter (isoCS) (8–10 days old). Before they were paired, females and males were separately introduced into a two-layer courtship chamber (10 mm diameter × 3 mm height per layer), which was divided by a removable transparent strip. The assay was recorded with a resolution of 1280 pixels × 720 pixels (1.78:1) at 30 frames/s for 30 min using cameras (VIXIA HF R500, Canon, Tokyo, Japan). The number of receptive females and the time of receptivity for individual females were analyzed manually.
In the egg-laying assay, 3–4 virgin or mated females (~8 days old) were transferred to a vial with fresh medium left for 48 h at 25°C and 60% humidity under a 12-h light/dark cycle, and the number of eggs laid per female during 48 h was counted manually. To collect mated females, individual females were aspirated into the courtship chamber to allow copulation with a wild-type male before the egg-laying tests.
In the re-mating assay, we obtained mated females by pairing virgin females with wild-type males (both ~8 days old). The mated females were collected as above, transferred to food vials, and left for 48 h before re-mating tests with a new wild-type male of the same age for 1 h. The percentage of re-mating females was analyzed manually.
The locomotion assay was applied at 25°C and 60% humidity. Individual virgin females were transferred to the courtship chambers without males and recorded for 10 min. The locomotor speed was analyzed using MatLab software (MathWorks Inc., MA, USA) as described previously [50].
All behavioral assays were run from 11:00 to 15:00. The food medium was replaced every 2–3 days to ensure freshness.
Light-induced Experiments
In PACα (photoactivated adenylyl cyclase α) experiments, flies were crossed on standard medium, and the vials were wrapped in aluminum foil to avoid light. Female progeny (<8 h) were isolated in darkness for 8–10 days. Prior to behavioral tests, PACα-expression was activated by blue light (420 nm, 1200 mW/cm2, 5 s; Denjoy, DY-400-4, Changsha, China).
In CsChrimson experiments, flies were crossed on 0.2 mmol/L retinal-containing medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) in darkness. Virgin females were immediately transferred to 0.4 mmol/L retinal-containing medium and isolated in darkness for 8–10 days. Female receptivity tests were performed in darkness (control) or with red light activation (620 nm, 0.03 mW/mm2; Kemai Vision Technology, Dongguan, China) during a 30-min observation period. The assay was recorded by an industrial camera (Stingray F080B ASG, Allied Vision Technologies, Stadtroda, Germany) equipped with an infrared light source (860-nm IR LED, Kemai Vision Technology) for illumination.
Temperature-induction Experiments
In TrpA1 and UAS-shits experiments, virgin females were maintained at 22°C for 8–10 days. Before the behavioral assay, the flies were concurrently introduced into chambers at 30°C or 21°C for 20 min. 30°C was the activation temperature in TrpA1 activation experiments but a restrictive temperature in UAS-shits inactivation experiment.
Generation of UAS-5-HT7
pJFRC28-5XUAS-IVS-GFP-p10 (# 12073; Fungene Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) was used for the generation of the pJFRC28-UAS-5-HT7 (UAS-5-HT7) construct. pJFRC28-5XUAS-IVS-GFP-p10 plasmid digested within NotI and XbaI was used to excise the coding sequence of GFP. Using the Gibson Assembly, the complementary DNA (cDNA) of 5-HT7 was cloned in the described plasmid. The right upstream of ATG codon added the Kozak sequence, and the UAS-5-HT7 construct was injected into the attP40 site using phiC31 integrase-mediated transgenesis. The construct was confirmed using DNA sequencing and PCR. The primers used for cloning 5-HT7 cDNA were as follows:
-
UAS-5-HT7-forward:
TCTTATCCTTTACTTCAGGCGGCCGCCACCATGGCTTTATCTGGACAGGACTG
-
UAS-5-HT7-reverse:
GTTATTTTAAAAACGATTCATTCTAGATTAAGAGAAAGCTCTCCCTCGC
Confirmation of Transgenic Flies
Genomic DNA was extracted from the whole body of adult flies. Individual flies were crushed with a pestle in 50 µL DNA extraction reagent. After incubation at 95°C for 10 min, the samples were centrifuged at 12,000 r/min for 10 min at room temperature. The supernatant of DNA was collected and added to the mixing system to conduct PCR, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The mix contained 25 µL 2× MightyAmp buffer, 1 µL MightyAmp DNA polymerase, and 5 µL 10× Additive for high specificity, and was adjusted to 50 µL. Primers used in regions 1–3 (Fig. 1B) were as follows:
-
Region 1 forward: GGCTACGGTGGATATTCCAAG
-
Region 1 reverse: CATTCAGGCTGTTGTGGAGC
-
Region 2 forward: GAGAGGTGGCCTCTGTGAAC
-
Region 2 reverse: CGGTGCCCCTTTGAACG
-
Region 3 forward: AGGGAACAGATTCTCGGGAC
-
Region 3 reverse: ACTTCTTGGTGCAGTGCCTC
Immunostaining
Flies were dissected in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and then the brains were fixed in 2% (weight/volume) paraformaldehyde (PFA) (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hangzhou, China) for 55 min at room temperature. Then, the samples were washed five times in PBS with 0.3% Triton (PBST) for 15 min and incubated in blocking solution [5% (volume/volume) goat serum (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted in 0.3% PBST] for 1 h at room temperature. The brains were then incubated with the primary antibody (diluted in blocking solution) for >24 h at 4°C, and washed five times in 0.3% PBST for 15 min before incubation with the secondary antibody (1:500, diluted in blocking solution) overnight at 4°C. The samples were washed five times in 0.3% PBST for 15 min and fixed in 4% PFA for >4 h at room temperature. The brains were washed five times with 0.3% PBST for 15 min at room temperature and were placed on a poly-L-lysine-coated coverslip in 0.3% PBST. The brains were then immersed in 30%, 50%, 75%, 95%, and 100% ethanol. The brains were immersed three times in xylene for 5 min and mounted on glass slides using dibutylphthalate polystyrene xylene (DPX) (Sigma-Aldrich) for imaging. Images were generated on a Zeiss 710 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and were processed using Fiji software (https://imagej.net/Fiji).
The antibodies used were mouse anti-nc82 (1:50; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, USA), chicken anti-GFP (1:1000; Life technologies, Carlsbad, USA), rabbit anti-RFP (1:500; Invitrogen, Waltham, USA), and rabbit anti-5-HT (1:500; Life technologies). The secondary antibodies were Alexa Fluor goat anti-chicken 488 (1:500; Life technologies), Alexa Fluor goat anti-rabbit 488 (1:500; Life technologies), Alexa Fluor goat anti-mouse 546 (1:500; Life technologies), and Alexa Fluor goat anti-rabbit 633 (1:500; Invitrogen).
Drug Treatment in Rescue Experiments
The procedure in the 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP; Sigma-Aldrich) feeding experiment is shown in Fig. 2A. Virgin females were reared on normal food for 8 days after eclosion. Two days before behavioral tests and immunostaining analysis, the flies were divided into two treatment groups. In the control group (5-HTP−), females were put on control mock food containing 2% agar and 10% sucrose; in the 5-HTP feeding group (5-HTP+), the flies were reared on drug-containing food in which 2 mg/mL 5-HTP was dissolved in the mock food.
Transcriptional Reporter of Intracellular Ca2+ (TRIC) Assay
Virgin females with the genotype 10XUAS-mCD8::RFP/13XLexAop2-mCD8::GFP;nSyb-MKII::nlsLexADBDo;UAS-p65AD::CaM/Trh-GAL4 were collected within 8 h after eclosion until TRIC assay. For mated females, 8-days-old virgin females of given genotypes were transferred to courtship chambers and paired with wild-type male flies. The females that copulated successfully within 30 min were collected for further TRIC analysis. Adult female brains from these two groups (virgin and mated) were dissected, and the whole brain was perfused with a saline solution containing (in mmol/L) 103 NaCl, 3 KCl, 4 MgCl2, 1.5 CaCl2, 26 NaHCO3, 1 NaH2PO4, 5 N-tri-(hydroxymethyl)-methyl-2-aminoethane-sulfonic acid, 20 glucose, 17 sucrose, and 5 trehalose, adjusted to pH 7.3.
Images were acquired using a confocal microscope (Nikon A1R+, Nikon, Toyko, Japan) with a 40× water immersion objective. The Ca2+ signal was indicated by the fluorescence intensity. 488-nm and 546-nm light was used to excite GFP and RFP, respectively. The regions of interest (ROIs) were manually defined in the PLP cluster area and were analyzed using NIS-Elements D (Nikon; https://www.microscope.healthcare.nikon.com/en_EU/products/software). The relative TRIC signal of selected ROIs (GFP signal/RFP signal) was used to compare neural activity in virgin and mated females.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis and graphics were applied with the R system 4.0.2 (https://www.r-project.org/), MatLab software (MathWorks Inc., MA, USA), and GraphPad Prism 7 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA). The χ2 test was used to compare the copulation rate of different groups at various time points. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied for two-group comparisons. Kruskal-Wallis with the post hoc Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the differences between multiple groups. All data are shown as the mean ± SEM. Sample sizes are indicated in the figures. Statistical significance was set at P <0.01.
Results
5-HT Modulates Virgin Female Receptivity
In Drosophila, it has been found that virgin female receptivity is associated with the release of dopamine (DA), drosulfakinin (DSK), and SIFamide (SIFa) [51,52,53,54]. To identify the role of other neurochemicals involved in regulating virgin female receptivity, we screened 108 chemoconnectome (CCT) knockout lines generated by the CRISPR-Cas9 system [49].
Preliminary screening (unpublished data) showed that virgin female receptivity might be regulated by the Trh gene that encodes an enzyme catalyzing the first and rate-limiting step of 5-HT biosynthesis (Fig. 1A) [55, 56]. We confirmed the Trh knockout line by using PCR analysis at the Trh locus in genomic DNA samples (Fig. 1B, C) and by detecting the immunoreactivity of 5-HT in the central brain (Fig. 1D). 5-HT immunoreactivity was found in the brain of wild-type and heterozygous flies (Figs. 1D), but was absent in homozygous Trh-knockout flies (Fig. 1D). We found that knockout of Trh reduced the virgin female copulation rate and prolonged the copulation latency compared to heterozygous and wild-type control females (Fig. 1E, F). In contrast, we found that Trh-knockout females showed locomotor activity comparable to control females (Fig. 1G). Furthermore, knocking down Trh expression pan-neuronally using the elav-GAL4 driver reduced the copulation rate and increased the copulation latency in virgin females (Fig. 1H, I). Given that Trh heterozygous and wild-type females displayed similar phenotypes, we mainly used wild-type females as control flies in later experiments.
To determine whether restoration of the 5-HT expression level could rescue the sexual receptivity of Trh-knockout females, we performed pharmacological rescue experiments by feeding them with 5-HTP (Fig. 2A). After feeding with 2 mg/mL 5-HTP, 5-HT immunofluorescence was restored in the brain of Trh mutant females (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, both copulation rate and copulation latency were rescued to normal levels in Trh mutant females (Fig. 2C, D). In contrast, 5-HT immunofluorescence and female sexual receptivity were not significantly affected in wild-type females by feeding with 5-HTP (Fig. 2E–G). These results indicate that 5-HT is crucial for virgin female receptivity in Drosophila.
To determine whether 5-HT specifically regulates virgin female receptivity, or affects sexual behavior in both virgin and mated females, we next tested egg-laying and re-mating behaviors in Trh-knockout or -knockdown females. We found that Trh-knockout virgin females did not show increased egg-laying (Fig. S1A), or any re-mating behavior after mating, like wild-type controls (Fig. S1B). We also observed similar phenotypes in Trh RNAi-knockdown females (Fig. S1C, D). Thus, 5-HT specifically regulates virgin female receptivity but not post-mating behaviors.
Trh + Neurons Regulate Virgin Female Receptivity
We used a UAS-mCD8GFP reporter to visualize the expression pattern of the newly-generated Trh-GAL4 [36] (Fig. 3A). The Trh-GAL4 labeled 5-HT clusters in the brain similar to those reported by previous studies [57, 58]. We mapped the distribution of Trh+ neurons in the central brain including the anterior dorsomedial protocerebrum (ADMP), anterior lateral protocerebrum (ALP), anterior medial protocerebrum (AMP), lateral subesophageal ganglion (SEL), lateral protocerebrum (LP), medial subesophageal ganglion (SEM), posterior medial protocerebrum, dorsal (PMPD), medial (PMPM), and ventral (PMPV) posterior medial protocerebrum, and posterior lateral protocerebrum (PLP) (Fig. 3B).
We then analyzed whether Trh+ neurons are involved in the modulation of female sexual receptivity. We activated all Trh-expressing neurons by using PACα [59], which specifically enhances intracellular cAMP levels after blue light stimulation, and also has a more moderate activation effect than CsChrimson [60] or dTrpA1 [61], since the Trh-GAL4 labels a large number of neurons and strong activation of these neurons may have side-effects. We found that activation of Trh-GAL4 neurons increased copulation rate and decreased copulation latency in UAS-PACα/Trh-GAL4 virgin females (Fig. 3C, D). In contrast, there was no significant change in copulation rate and copulation latency after blue light stimulation in UAS-PACα/+ or Trh-GAL4/+ control females (Fig. 3E–H).
To further confirm whether Trh+ neurons are necessary for virgin female receptivity, we silenced these neurons by expressing the inwardly-rectifying K+ channel (Kir2.1) [62]. UAS-Kir2.1/Trh-GAL4 virgin females exhibited a dramatic reduction in copulation rate and a prolonged copulation latency compared to control females (Fig. 3I, J). We also found that blocking neurotransmission from Trh+ neurons expressing the temperature-sensitive shibirets (shits) [63] significantly reduced virgin female receptivity (Fig. S2). Furthermore, neither activation nor inactivation of Trh+ neurons affected sexual receptivity in mated females (Tables S1, S2). Taken together, our findings indicate that the activity of Trh+ neurons positively regulates sexual receptivity in virgin, but not mated females.
Trh + fru +neurons Mediate Virgin Female Receptivity
We next set out to narrow down the serotonergic neurons that promote virgin female receptivity. As previous studies revealed crucial roles of fru or dsx neurons in regulating female receptivity [15, 41, 46], we tried to specifically label and manipulate Trh+∩fru+ or Trh+∩dsx+ neurons. We first applied the FLP/FRT intersectional strategy [64] to restrict expression in overlapping Trh+ and fru+ neurons (Fig. 4A). UAS>stop>CsChrimson; fruLexA LexAop2-FlpL/Trh-GAL4 virgin females, in which the overlapping Trh+ and fru+ neurons (referred to as Trh+fru+ neurons hereafter) express the optogenetic effector CsChrimson [60], displayed a much higher copulation rate and decreased copulation latency with red light stimulation (Fig. 4B, C). In contrast, control UAS>stop>CsChrimson; fruLexA LexAop2-FlpL/+, or Trh-GAL4/+ virgin females did not exhibit red light-induced changes in receptivity (Fig. 4D–G). We also used the thermogenetic effector TrpA1 [61] to activate the Trh+fru+ neurons, and found that heat-induced activation of Trh+fru+ neurons slightly but significantly enhanced virgin female receptivity (Fig. S3). These results indicate that activation of Trh+fru+ neurons is able to promote virgin female receptivity.
We next tried to silence the Trh+fru+ neurons using the same intersectional strategy to express the inwardly-rectifying K+ channel Kir2.1 [62]. Silencing the Trh+fru+ neurons dramatically reduced copulation rate and increased copulation latency in virgin females compared with control females (Fig. 4H, I). The reduction of receptivity in these females was not due to locomotor activity as they displayed a walking speed comparable with control females (Fig. 4J). We also used the same intersectional strategy to silence the overlapping Trh+ and dsx+ neurons, but did not find any significant change in virgin female receptivity (Fig. S4A, B). Thus, these findings indicate that Trh+fru+ neurons are crucial for virgin female receptivity.
Sexually Dimorphic Trh + fru + PLP Neurons Promote Virgin Female Receptivity
The above results demonstrated a crucial role of Trh+fru+ neurons in regulating virgin female receptivity. To visualize the Trh+fru+ neurons, we first applied double-labeling in Trh-GAL4/UAS-stingerGFP; fruLexA/LexAop-Redstinger flies, and found that a subset of PLP neurons was co-labeled by Trh+ and fru+ in the brain of females (Fig. 5A, B). In addition, we applied the FLP/FRT intersectional strategy to express GFP in both sexes of UAS>stop>mCD8-GFP; fruLexA LexAop2-FlpL/Trh-GAL4 flies. We observed GFP expression in ~3 pairs of PLP neurons (Fig. 5C) and a few neurons in the ventral nerve cord (VNC) in females (Fig. 5C); in contrast, we observed 1–2 pairs of PLP neurons as well as a few other neurons in the brain (Fig. 5C) and VNC in males (Fig. 5C). Thus, there might be female-specific Trh+fru+ PLP neurons that regulate virgin female receptivity. We also used the same strategy to visualize Trh+dsx+ neurons, and observed sparse expression in the brain and VNC (Fig. S4C). Nevertheless, these Trh+dsx+ neurons were not involved in virgin female receptivity (Fig. S4A, B). In addition, we used the above strategy to express nsyb-GFP and Dscam-GFP and localized presynaptic and postsynaptic sites of the Trh+fru+ PLP neurons in females (Fig. S5).
To further test the role of Trh+fru+ PLP neurons in female receptivity, we monitored the neural activity of PLP neurons by expressing TRIC [65] in virgin and mated females. The TRIC signal in PLP neurons was significantly stronger in virgins than that in mated females (Fig. 5D). Thus, the spontaneous activity of Trh+fru+ PLP neurons is higher in virgin females, which might reflect an internal state of female receptivity. Together, these results demonstrate that a subset of sexually dimorphic Trh+fru+ PLP neurons promotes sexual receptivity in virgin females.
5-HT1A and 5-HT7 Receptors Regulate Virgin Female Receptivity
There are five types of 5-HT G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs): 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT7 [36, 66,67,68]. These receptors, which are mammalian orthologs of the 5-HT receptor family, are expressed widely in the central nervous system [69] (Fig. S6), and regulate complex behaviors [37, 70,71,72]. To identify which 5-HT receptors are involved in virgin female receptivity, we used knockout lines of each 5-HT receptor and found that the copulation latency of 5-HT1A- and 5-HT7-knockout females was significantly longer than in the wild-type control females (Fig. 6A). In addition, knockout of 5-HT1A and 5-HT7, but not 5-HT1B, 5-HT2A, or 5-HT2B, significantly reduced the copulation rate in virgin females (Fig. 6B–F).
Given that female sexual receptivity was reduced in the 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 mutants, we analyzed whether overexpressing 5-HT1A or 5-HT7 in 5-HT1A or 5-HT7 mutants could restore female receptivity. We used elav-GAL4 to drive the expression of UAS-5-HT1A or UAS-5-HT7 in 5-HT1A or 5-HT7 mutant flies, respectively. We found that the copulation rate was increased, and copulation latency was reduced in 5-HT1A mutant females with elav-GAL4-driven expression of 5-HT1A (Fig. 6G, H). Meanwhile, the copulation rate and the copulation latency of 5-HT7 knockout females were also restored to normal levels with elav-GAL4-driven expression of 5-HT7 (Fig. 6I, J). These results suggest that 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 receptors are involved in virgin female receptivity.
Discussion
In animals, males often initiate courtship, and females decide whether to accept or reject copulation. Acceptance by females is a prerequisite for reproductive success, which is determined not only by external factors but also by internal sexual motivation. Monoamine neurotransmitters and neuropeptides have been found to regulate female receptivity, such as dopamine [51, 53], octopamine [27], DSK [54], and SIFa [52]. Here, we showed that 5-HT signaling plays a critical role in virgin female receptivity. Both the knockout and RNAi knockdown of Trh reduced the receptivity. 5-HT may regulate virgin female receptivity through two of the 5-HT receptors, 5-HT1A and 5-HT7. Furthermore, we identified ~3 pairs of sexually dimorphic Trh+fru+ PLP neurons in the female brain that promote sexual receptivity in virgin females.
5-HT is a well-known conserved molecule, which participates in regulating sexual behavior in a wide range of species [73]. In mammals, a fraction of 5-HT is produced in the central nervous system to regulate male sexual behavior, such as ejaculation and orgasm [74,75,76,77]. Moreover, 5-HT is required for male sexual preference: male mice lacking 5-HT prefer to court males rather than females [78]. Although the role of 5-HT has been unraveled in the modulation of male sexual behavior, little is known about its role in female sexual behavior. We found that Trh knockout females showed a dramatic reduction in receptivity, which was rescued by acutely feeding 5-HTP before the receptivity assay. Loss of 5-HT specifically impaired virgin female receptivity but not post-mating behaviors. Furthermore, the spontaneous activity of a subset of 5-HT-releasing neurons was stronger in receptive virgin females. We speculate that 5-HT is required to maintain proper activity in sex-promoting neurons, and thus serves as a positive regulator for sexual motivation in virgin females.
All 5-HT receptors, 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT7, play coordinated roles in serotonin signaling to modulate diverse complex behaviors including aggression, locomotion, and sleep [36, 79, 80]. Notably, knockout of either Trh or individual 5-HT receptors did not result in any evident developmental deficit in flies, which suggests that the role of 5-HT signaling in a variety of behaviors is not due to a developmental deficit. We found that the 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 receptors, but not the 5-HT1B, 5-HT2A, or 5-HT2B receptors, are involved in virgin female receptivity. Knockout of 5-HT1A or 5-HT7 reduced the receptivity, although not as severely as knockout of Trh, suggesting that 5-HT receptors might have parallel and redundant roles in virgin female receptivity. We also noted that knockout of 5-HT2B induced a slight increase in the female copulation rate. It has been reported that 5-HT2B regulates the amount of sleep and sleep homeostasis [36, 81], while sleep significantly influences female mating behaviors. Whether 5-HT2B functions to coordinate female sleep and sexual behavior awaits further investigation.
Approximately 90 serotonergic neurons are present in the central brain and are divided into several clusters into distinct brain regions [57, 58]. Distinct clusters of serotonergic neurons modulate various behaviors, such as walking, long-term memory, and feeding [38, 69]. Previous reports have indicated that female sexual receptivity is regulated by fru+ neurons [23, 46, 82], which encouraged us to subdivide the serotonergic neurons involved in sexual receptivity by intersecting with fru+ neurons. We identified Trh+fru+ neurons in the PLP cluster to be crucial for virgin female receptivity. Interestingly, there were more Trh+fru+ PLP neurons in females than in males, suggesting the involvement of female-specific Trh+fru+ PLP neurons in female receptivity. Such dimorphism of Trh+fru+ PLP neurons might be regulated by the presence/absence of FruM protein in males and females, respectively, as found in other sexually dimorphic fru+ neurons [83,84,85]. We also found that 5-HT functions in sexually dimorphic neurons to mediate male courtship behavior (unpublished data). Thus, 5-HT signaling regulates both male and female sexual behavior through sexually dimorphic neural circuits. Future studies may reveal how 5-HT functions in each sex to mediate different aspects of sexual behavior, possibly through distinct 5-HT receptors.
References
Dickson BJ. Wired for sex: the neurobiology of Drosophila mating decisions. Science 2008, 322: 904–909.
Billeter JC, Levine JD. Who is he and what is he to you? Recognition in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2013, 23: 17–23.
Pavlou HJ, Goodwin SF. Courtship behavior in Drosophila melanogaster: Towards a ‘courtship connectome.’ Curr Opin Neurobiol 2013, 23: 76–83.
Ito H, Fujitani K, Usui K, Shimizu-Nishikawa K, Tanaka S, Yamamoto D Sexual orientation in Drosophila is altered by the satori mutation in the sex-determination gene fruitless that encodes a zinc finger protein with a BTB domain Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996, 93: 9687–9692.
Peng Q, Chen J, Pan Y. From fruitless to sex: On the generation and diversification of an innate behavior. Genes Brain Behav 2021, 20: e12772.
Greenspan RJ. Understanding the genetic construction of behavior. Sci Am 1995, 272: 72–78.
Sturtevant AH. Experiments on sex recognition and the problem of sexual selection in Drosoophilia. J Animal Behav 1915, 5: 351–366.
Greenspan RJ, Ferveur JF. Courtship in Drosophila. Ann Rev Genet 2000, 34: 205–232.
Pan Y, Baker BS. Genetic identification and separation of innate and experience-dependent courtship behaviors in Drosophila. Cell 2014, 156: 236–248.
Villella A, Hall JC. Neurogenetics of courtship and mating in Drosophila. Adv Genet 2008, 62: 67–184.
Gao C, Guo C, Peng Q, Cao J, Shohat-Ophir G, Liu D. Sex and death: Identification of feedback neuromodulation balancing reproduction and survival. Neurosci Bull 2020, 36: 1429–1440.
Datta SR, Vasconcelos ML, Ruta V, Luo S, Wong A, Demir E, et al. The Drosophila pheromone cVA activates a sexually dimorphic neural circuit. Nature 2008, 452: 473–477.
Deutsch D, Clemens J, Thiberge SY, Guan G, Murthy M. Shared song detector neurons in Drosophila male and female brains drive sex-specific behaviors. Curr Biol 2019, 29: 3200-3215.e5.
Liu C, Zhang B, Zhang L, Yang T, Zhang Z, Gao Z, et al. A neural circuit encoding mating states tunes defensive behavior in Drosophila. Nat Commun 2020, 11: 3962.
Zhou C, Pan Y, Robinett CC, Meissner GW, Baker BS. Central brain neurons expressing doublesex regulate female receptivity in Drosophila. Neuron 2014, 83: 149–163.
Aranha MM, Vasconcelos ML. Deciphering Drosophila female innate behaviors. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2018, 52: 139–148.
Cook R, Connolly K. Rejection responses by female Drosophila melanogaster: Their ontogeny, causality and effects upon the behaviour of the courting male. Behaviour 1973, 44: 142–165.
Ferveur JF. Drosophila female courtship and mating behaviors: Sensory signals, genes, neural structures and evolution. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2010, 20: 764–769.
Spieth HT. Courtship behavior in Drosophila. Ann Rev Entomol 1974, 19: 385–405.
Manning A. The control of sexual receptivity in female Drosophila. Animal Behav 1967, 15: 239–250.
Kubli E. Sex-peptides: Seminal peptides of the Drosophila male. Cell Mol Life Sci 2003, 60: 1689–1704.
Wolfner MF. Tokens of love: Functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 1997, 27: 179–192.
Häsemeyer M, Yapici N, Heberlein U, Dickson BJ. Sensory neurons in the Drosophila genital tract regulate female reproductive behavior. Neuron 2009, 61: 511–518.
Rezával C, Pavlou HJ, Dornan AJ, Chan YB, Kravitz EA, Goodwin SF. Neural circuitry underlying Drosophila female postmating behavioral responses. Curr Biol 2012, 22: 1155–1165.
Yang CH, Rumpf S, Xiang Y, Gordon MD, Song W, Jan LY, et al. Control of the postmating behavioral switch in Drosophila females by internal sensory neurons. Neuron 2009, 61: 519–526.
Haussmann IU, Hemani Y, Wijesekera T, Dauwalder B, Soller M. Multiple pathways mediate the sex-peptide-regulated switch in female Drosophila reproductive behaviours. Proc Biol Sci 2013, 280: 20131938.
Rezával C, Nojima T, Neville MC, Lin AC, Goodwin SF. Sexually dimorphic octopaminergic neurons modulate female postmating behaviors in Drosophila. Curr Biol 2014, 24: 725–730.
Ding Z, Haussmann I, Ottiger M, Kubli E. Sex-peptides bind to two molecularly different targets in Drosophila melanogaster females. J Neurobiol 2003, 55: 372–384.
Yapici N, Kim YJ, Ribeiro C, Dickson BJ. A receptor that mediates the post-mating switch in Drosophila reproductive behaviour. Nature 2008, 451: 33–37.
Luo L. Principles of neurobiology, 2nd edn. Garland Science, New York, 2020, pp 80–87.
Ferguson J, Henriksen S, Cohen H, Mitchell G, Barchas J, Dement W. “Hypersexuality” and behavioral changes in cats caused by administration of p-chlorophenylalanine. Science 1970, 168: 499–501.
Obara Y, Fukano Y, Watanabe K, Ozawa G, Sasaki K. Serotonin-induced mate rejection in the female cabbage butterfly Pieris rapae crucivora. Naturwissenschaften 2011, 98: 989–993.
Soares MC, Paula JR, Bshary R. Serotonin blockade delays learning performance in a cooperative fish. Animal Cogn 2016, 19: 1027–1030.
Ma Q. Beneficial effects of moderate voluntary physical exercise and its biological mechanisms on brain health. Neurosci Bull 2008, 24: 265–270.
Zhu Y, Wu X, Zhou R, Sie O, Niu Z, Wang F, et al. Hypothalamic-pituitary-end-organ axes: Hormone function in female patients with major depressive disorder. Neurosc. Bull 2021, 37: 1176–1187.
Qian Y, Cao Y, Deng B, Yang G, Li J, Xu R, et al. Sleep homeostasis regulated by 5HT2b receptor in a small subset of neurons in the dorsal fan-shaped body of Drosophila. Elife 2017, 6: e26519.
Alekseyenko OV, Chan YB, Fernandez MP, Bülow T, Pankratz MJ, Kravitz EA. Single serotonergic neurons that modulate aggression in Drosophila. Curr Biol 2014, 24: 2700–2707.
Albin SD, Kaun KR, Knapp JM, Chung P, Heberlein U, Simpson JH. A subset of serotonergic neurons evokes hunger in adult Drosophila. Curr Biol 2015, 25: 2435–2440.
Yamamoto D. The neural and genetic substrates of sexual behavior in Drosophila. Adv Genet 2007, 59: 39–66.
Lee G, Hall JC, Park JH. Doublesex gene expression in the central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurogenet 2002, 16: 229–248.
Rideout EJ, Dornan AJ, Neville MC, Eadie S, Goodwin SF. Control of sexual differentiation and behavior by the doublesex gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Neurosci 2010, 13: 458–466.
Waterbury JA, Jackson LL, Schedl P. Analysis of the doublesex female protein in Drosophila melanogaster: Role on sexual differentiation and behavior and dependence on intersex. Genetics 1999, 152: 1653–1667.
Williams TM, Selegue JE, Werner T, Gompel N, Kopp A, Carroll SB. The regulation and evolution of a genetic switch controlling sexually dimorphic traits in Drosophila. Cell 2008, 134: 610–623.
Stockinger P, Kvitsiani D, Rotkopf S, Tirián L, Dickson BJ. Neural circuitry that governs Drosophila male courtship behavior. Cell 2005, 121: 795–807.
Yamamoto D, Koganezawa M. Genes and circuits of courtship behaviour in Drosophila males. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013, 14: 681–692.
Kvitsiani D, Dickson BJ. Shared neural circuitry for female and male sexual behaviours in Drosophila. Curr Biol 2006, 16: R355–R356.
Wang K, Wang F, Forknall N, Yang T, Patrick C, Parekh R, et al. Neural circuit mechanisms of sexual receptivity in Drosophila females. Nature 2021, 589: 577–581.
Wang F, Wang K, Forknall N, Parekh R, Dickson BJ. Circuit and behavioral mechanisms of sexual rejection by Drosophila females. Curr Biol 2020, 30: 3749-3760.e3.
Deng B, Li Q, Liu X, Cao Y, Li B, Qian Y, et al. Chemoconnectomics: mapping chemical transmission in Drosophila. Neuron 2019, 101: 876-893.e4.
Wu F, Deng B, Xiao N, Wang T, Li Y, Wang R, et al. A neuropeptide regulates fighting behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Elife 2020, 9: e54229.
Ishimoto H, Kamikouchi A. A feedforward circuit regulates action selection of pre-mating courtship behavior in female Drosophila. Curr Biol 2020, 30: 396-407.e4.
Terhzaz S, Rosay P, Goodwin SF, Veenstra JA. The neuropeptide SIFamide modulates sexual behavior in Drosophila. Biochem. Biophys. Res Commun 2007, 352: 305–310.
Neckameyer WS. Dopamine modulates female sexual receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurogenet 1998, 12: 101–114.
Wu S, Guo C, Zhao H, Sun M, Chen J, Han C, et al. Drosulfakinin signaling in fruitless circuitry antagonizes P1 neurons to regulate sexual arousal in Drosophila. Nat Commun 2019, 10: 4770.
Kuhn DM, Rosenberg RC, Lovenberg W. Determination of some molecular parameters of tryptophan hydroxylase from rat midbrain and murine mast cell. J Neurochem 1979, 33: 15–21.
Neckameyer WS, White K. A single locus encodes both phenylalanine hydroxylase and tryptophan hydroxylase activities in Drosophila. J Biol Chem 1992, 267: 4199–4206.
Alekseyenko OV, Lee C, Kravitz EA. Targeted manipulation of serotonergic neurotransmission affects the escalation of aggression in adult male Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One 2010, 5: e10806.
Pooryasin A, Fiala A. Identified serotonin-releasing neurons induce behavioral quiescence and suppress mating in Drosophila. J Neurosci 2015, 35: 12792–12812.
Schröder-Lang S, Schwärzel M, Seifert R, Strünker T, Kateriya S, Looser J, et al. Fast manipulation of cellular cAMP level by light in vivo. Nat Methods 2007, 4: 39–42.
Klapoetke NC, Murata Y, Kim SS, Pulver SR, Birdsey-Benson A, Cho YK, et al. Independent optical excitation of distinct neural populations. Nat Methods 2014, 11: 338–346.
Hamada FN, Rosenzweig M, Kang K, Pulver SR, Ghezzi A, Jegla TJ, et al. An internal thermal sensor controlling temperature preference in Drosophila. Nature 2008, 454: 217–220.
Baines RA, Uhler JP, Thompson A, Sweeney ST, Bate M. Altered electrical properties in Drosophila neurons developing without synaptic transmission. J Neurosci 2001, 21: 1523–1531.
Kitamoto T. Conditional disruption of synaptic transmission induces male-male courtship behavior in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99: 13232–13237.
Bohm RA, Welch WP, Goodnight LK, Cox LW, Henry LG, Gunter TC, et al. A genetic mosaic approach for neural circuit mapping in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107: 16378–16383.
Gao XJ, Riabinina O, Li J, Potter CJ, Clandinin TR, Luo L. A transcriptional reporter of intracellular Ca2+ in Drosophila. Nat Neurosci 2015, 18: 917–925.
Colas JF, Launay JM, Kellermann O, Rosay P, Maroteaux L. Drosophila 5-HT2 serotonin receptor: Coexpression with fushi-tarazu during segmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995, 92: 5441–5445.
Witz P, Amlaiky N, Plassat JL, Maroteaux L, Borrelli E, Hen R. Cloning and characterization of a Drosophila serotonin receptor that activates adenylate cyclase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990, 87: 8940–8944.
Saudou F, Hen R. 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor subtypes in vertebrates and invertebrates. Neurochem Int 1994, 25: 503–532.
Howard CE, Chen CL, Tabachnik T, Hormigo R, Ramdya P, Mann RS. Serotonergic modulation of walking in Drosophila. Curr Biol 2019, 29: 4218–4230.e8.
Ganguly A, Qi C, Bajaj J, Lee D. Serotonin receptor 5-HT7 in Drosophila mushroom body neurons mediates larval appetitive olfactory learning. Sci Rep 2020, 10: 21267.
Gasque G, Conway S, Huang J, Rao Y, Vosshall LB. Small molecule drug screening in Drosophila identifies the 5HT2A receptor as a feeding modulation target. Sci Rep 2013, 3: 2120.
Siddiqui A, Niazi A, Shaharyar S, Wilson CA. The 5HT7 receptor subtype is involved in the regulation of female sexual behaviour in the rat. Pharmacol. Biochem Behav 2007, 87: 386–392.
Berger M, Gray JA, Roth BL. The expanded biology of serotonin. Annu Rev Med 2009, 60: 355–366.
Dominguez JM, Hull EM. Serotonin impairs copulation and attenuates ejaculation-induced glutamate activity in the medial preoptic area. Behav Neurosci 2010, 124: 554–557.
Giuliano F. 5-hydroxytryptamine in premature ejaculation: Opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Trends Neurosci 2007, 30: 79–84.
Gradwell PB, Everitt BJ, Herbert J. 5-hydroxytryptamine in the central nervous system and sexual receptivity of female rhesus monkeys. Brain Res 1975, 88: 281–293.
Uphouse L. Pharmacology of serotonin and female sexual behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2014, 121: 31–42.
Liu Y, Jiang Y, Si Y, Kim JY, Chen ZF, Rao Y. Molecular regulation of sexual preference revealed by genetic studies of 5-HT in the brains of male mice. Nature 2011, 472: 95–99.
Yuan Q, Joiner WJ, Sehgal A. A sleep-promoting role for the Drosophila serotonin receptor 1A. Curr Biol 2006, 16: 1051–1062.
Alekseyenko OV, Chan YB, Okaty BW, Chang Y, Dymecki SM, Kravitz EA. Serotonergic modulation of aggression in Drosophila involves GABAergic and cholinergic opposing pathways. Curr Biol 2019, 29: 2145-2156.e5.
Xia M, Li Z, Li S, Liang S, Li X, Chen B, et al. Sleep deprivation selectively down-regulates astrocytic 5-HT2B receptors and triggers depressive-like behaviors via stimulating P2X7 receptors in mice. Neurosci Bull 2020, 36: 1259–1270.
Sakurai A, Koganezawa M, Yasunaga K, Emoto K, Yamamoto D. Select interneuron clusters determine female sexual receptivity in Drosophila. Nat Commun 1825, 2013: 4.
Kimura KI, Ote M, Tazawa T, Yamamoto D. Fruitless specifies sexually dimorphic neural circuitry in the Drosophila brain. Nature 2005, 438: 229–233.
Yamamoto D, Sato K, Koganezawa M. Neuroethology of male courtship in Drosophila: From the gene to behavior. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens Neural Behav Physiol 2014, 200: 251–264.
Kimura KI, Hachiya T, Koganezawa M, Tazawa T, Yamamoto D. Fruitless and doublesex coordinate to generate male-specific neurons that can initiate courtship. Neuron 2008, 59: 759–769.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Yi Rao (Peking University), Dr. Yufeng Pan (Southeast University), Dr. Jue Xie (Chinese Institute for Brain Research), Dr. Pengxiang Wu (Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Dr. Yan Zhu (Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences), and Dr. Yu Mu (Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for valuable comments on this manuscript. We also thank Shaowei Hu and Yantong Yang for technical guidance and for providing fly stocks, and Bingcai Wang and Na Xiao for editing software. We also thank the members of Chuan Zhou’s Laboratory for their comments and discussions. We thank the Bloomington Stock Center for fly stocks. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Y711181133 and Y711241133) and the State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents at the Institute of Zoology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y652751E03).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors claim that there is no conflict of interest.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, B., Wang, R., Liu, Y. et al. Serotonin Signaling Modulates Sexual Receptivity of Virgin Female Drosophila. Neurosci. Bull. 38, 1277–1291 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-022-00908-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-022-00908-8